Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives Edit

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletionEdit

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletionEdit

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the userEdit

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

DiscussionsEdit

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussionsEdit

Stanley and MartinEdit

Stanley and Martin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not Notable or Hoax A6 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 10:27, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete Possible hoax, no sources either way, and couldn't find any info online after a quick search. Hockeycatcat (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete per nom and HCC. SHB2000 (talk) 14:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Hoax. Nothing about this show on Google. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mayengbam Mohendra Kumar SinghaEdit

Mayengbam Mohendra Kumar Singha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person. Google search of this guy only gives me simple.wikipedia and a couple of Linkedin pages. Poorly sourced, and no Wikidata or English Wikipedia article. SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep There's no poor source. Having no wikidata item and en wiki article is completely irrelevant to this RFD. Besides, I have upgraded the article. Haoreima (talk) 08:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Weakly sourced, achievements show no evidence for notability. Proposer doesn't understand the concept of notability, I think. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    Don't worry, I have upgraded the article in a better way. Haoreima (talk) 14:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete i can't say the subject is not notable nor Notable Enough, but to put it in simple terms: Too Soon to have an article on wikipedia, the subject can always return to wikipedia once they passed General Notability thank you.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 13:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    Sakura emad Don't worry, I have upgraded the article in a better way. Haoreima (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mutua BahadurEdit

Mutua Bahadur (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This person does not appear to be notable (founders of museums don't make people notable). Almost all the sources are unreliable with almost all of them being a book found on Google Books. There is no English Wikipedia article, nor is there a Wikidata item. SHB2000 (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Keep Notability depends on the person's contributions! Please read the article first. Wikipedia guidelines recommend links from Google Books, JSTOR, BBC, etc. I put almost most of them from Google Books. Having no wikidata item or en wiki equivalent article isn't a problem. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 08:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Birmal Hembram(Blogger ) (2nd nomination)Edit

Birmal Hembram(Blogger ) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Bodhisattwa has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not a notable person to have an encyclopedic entry. Bodhisattwa (talk) 07:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Comment The first nomination is still being discussed, so please go here to vote. Dingothegorg 14:13, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:28, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Fireflies (movie)Edit

Fireflies (movie) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be a notable film, and has no English Wikipedia article as well. Almost all of the references are from imdb, with the other couple of sources also not significant. SHB2000 (talk) 07:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep The article is notable to others while it's not notable to you. It's notable as per the wiki rules because of all the references provided. Besides, never use "no en wiki equivalent" as a reason for RFD. The very reference (which you are mentioning) is applied only to the info box section and the plot. Better see other references clearly. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 07:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • The "no English Wikipedia counterpart" is not a policy, but a guide to whether it's notable or not. The sources mentioned (imdb and some others) aren't NPOV. Other sources mentioned: [1] and [2] aren't reliable sources. SHB2000 (talk) 07:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    According to WP:MOVIE, the article is too much notable to have an existence in Wikipedia. It has awards and nominations from multiple international film festivals. It has sufficient multiple media coverage. IMDb is not for notability but it's for giving information. These are all mentioned in the guidelines. Cheers! Haoreima (talk) 09:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    If it were notable, it'd have a Wikidata item for sure. SHB2000 (talk) 09:48, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    SHB2000 Are you sure? If it has a wikidata item, then will you get satisfied for notability? Other than this (reliable or unreliable reasons), I don't think you have anything to say more! Haoreima (talk) 10:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    One cannot assume that I've got nothing else to say. In that, I'm too tired to explain anything now so maybe tomorrow (which is 3 hours from now). SHB2000 (talk) 11:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep The Awards section makes it notable enough for me. Sources need to be better though. 💠Ely - Talk💠 10:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep Sources like https://www.deccanchronicle.com/nation/in-other-news/040118/women-torchbearers-of-change-in-manipur.html show notability. Also, there is an enwiki page: Fireflies (film). We use movie in articles instead of film here. Ferien (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep I went in and formatted some of the sources. H did cite IMDB a lot, but there are also good news articles, for example the Deccan Chronicle. This article needs a little work is all. Darkfrog24 (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


J.W. DantEdit

J.W. Dant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: i recently put QD (G1) on the page however after searching on the google found out it is not complete nonsense so i am not sure whether it should be quickly deleted or not. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 02:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sungai PetaniEdit

Sungai Petani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SoyokoAnis has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Apologies, but I believe this article has WAY too many errors. It's even listed in hoax articles category. Please disable this RFD if you believe this discussion is irrelevant. SoyokoAnis - talk 16:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep Notable, It just needs grammatical correction. Dingothegorg 19:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep it's notable the problem is fixing some grammatical errors which is waste to delete it like that.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 02:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep per above. SHB2000 (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep We can repair every problems. Haoreima (talk) 08:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Notable, just needs a cleanup. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dalai LamaEdit

Dalai Lama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Elytrian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Is pasted from en-wiki, went unnoticed as it was old. 💠Ely - Talk💠 15:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep Just needs simplifying. Dingothegorg 14:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment: i think Reducing the Article to minimum; that meets simple wiki's standards is better than deleting it, the subject is notable anyway it will be wasted|🌸 Sakura emad 💖--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 15:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  • I agree with Sakura emad. I'll try simplifying the article. This definitely isn't something for requests for deletion. --Ferien (talk) 15:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Subject is notable. Article just needs a cleanup. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep It could use some simplifying, but it's not bad enough to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep all it needs is simplifying. SHB2000 (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep Let's keep it, by simplifying. Ely! Haoreima (talk) 08:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Birmal Hembram(Blogger )Edit

Birmal Hembram(Blogger ) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: too soon to have an article subject does not meets the general notability 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 13:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Quick Delete : Per QD G4. See Birmal Hembram for previous deletion logs. MathXplore (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    This article was not deleted at requests for deletion before, so it is not eligible for G4 deletion. Ferien (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment: true, but the page was deleted independently by three very experienced editors, and that is relevant. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete I think the person meets general nobility, but it's a little too soon. Dingothegorg 15:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    In general, if the person is under 20 years old, he/she most likely hasn’t received enough attention to merit an article on Wikipedia. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 18:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete per G4. SHB2000 (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Not notable, another influencer wanting to spread fame. Hockeycatcat (talk) 14:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


LIV Swiss WatchesEdit

LIV Swiss Watches (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Watch-making company, making "Swiss-made" watches, but with company headquaters i the US. Article reads like an extended press-release/product catalog, and is not encyclopedic, in my view. Note that companies that make "Swiss watches" are usually located in Switzerland. Much like "French cheese", which is not from France. In short: I don't think this company has reached encyclopedic notability yet. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Speedy keep It meets encyclopedic notability, but the tone of the article can be corrected. I just worked from the French version and some other stuff found online, which mostly seem to draw too heavily from press releases, and I didn't really like the way it was written either. The main thing is that it's clearly notable regardless of whether they're really American or Swiss, and the watches are on the list of highest-funded crowdfunding projects. Basically it's definitely noteworthy enough in the world of Swiss watches, and not some garage shop. Now I think we can get back to removing whatever press release content might be in there. Cheers! Jlockerocks2 (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep i think it is Notable as @Jlockerocks2: said it can be corrected if the article has some errors.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Please note that what we have is pretty close to being a translation of the French wikipedia article. Note: Anyone can set up crowdfunding, and being successful at raising money is the prerequisite for starting a company. In the Fintech sector, people talk about Bitcoin and Ethereum, which have both been used as cryptocurrencies. Possibly, in the watchmaking industry, crowdfunding wasn't used beforehand. It may be a lot like the case of being notable, because of a large following in social media channels. Or a person being notable, because he or she was nominated for an award (but later, someone else got the award)...--Eptalon (talk) 12:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


CrumblEdit

Crumbl (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem like a good redirect. Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:30, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Comment: Please explain it why you think like it doesn't seem good, Please explain it based on Simple Policies Thank you :) . --Sakura emad (talk) 09:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Sakura emad Redirect isn't helpful, probably will catch some false positives and it isn't even a redirect anyway... Ely - Talk 09:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete The redirect isn't useful and may affect SEO. SHB2000 (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:30, 21 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DELETE


Maura SchindlerEdit

Maura Schindler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TDKR Chicago 101 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hard time seeing notability (unsourced and a quick google search results in nothing) TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 03:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Unrelated to Emilie and Oskar Schindler, the people the movie Schindler's List is based on. As she's born after the war (1949), she might have been a child of Oskar & Emilile; but their children are named Schlegel. So: likely not notable, delete--Eptalon (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Only source in this article is a website which I can’t access online since it was taken down. After googling him, I couldn’t find any more sources about him. Also, he is not on the English Wikipedia. So, we might as well delete this article. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete as non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 08:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chitra RinEdit

Chitra Rin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable. I can't find reliable coverage of the subject, and the sources there are seem to be either local or unreliable. Fixing26 (talk) 13:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Covered by a few magizines seems notable to me but needs to be expanded. SoyokoAnis - talk 16:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Not notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    Comment: dear @SkeletalDome$ the subjects meets notability in some ways Please review the sources and the subject, Sakura emad (talk) 17:59, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    I reviewed them and they seem to be reliable. However, we need some more sources to show that this person is indeed notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 19:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. I am from the Khmer (Cambodian) Wikipedia because an article with the same topic is created there. Most of the sources provided appears to be written by the same author. I think this person is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article, and there are no local papers talking about this person. (I may be out of the loop, but as things stand this person is not notable.) The author of this article also wrote about this person (who is not notable) as their first global contribution, which might suggest the author probably knows this person and therefore this article is not written from a neutral POV.
I have also done some research about Aisaki Media, a business owned by the person as claimed in the article. It appears that Aisaki Media is not legally a ‘company’ and has no own website. I can only find a Facebook page, Aisaki Media, which is selling verified Facebook profiles. I do not know if this business practice is violating Facebook’s term of use, but I think a person who owns this business should not be written about in Wikipedia. The article claiming Aisaki Media is a ‘company’ is also a hoax. Here is Aisaki Media Facebook page that I have found: https://www.facebook.com/aisakimediaofficial. I do not use Facebook, but this might be a scam because their own Facebook page is not verified, and they are claiming to sell verified Facebook pages. Users that they have claimed to have used their service are actually celebrities that have more Facebook followers than them. --Trezoo (talk) 03:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 04:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak support: the subject seems notable in some ways although it is not notable enough but i think it will be waste to be deleted like that. --Sakura emad (talk) 17:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   I withdraw my support It's not notable at all. SoyokoAnis - talk 16:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Stankevicius GroupEdit

Stankevicius Group (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Elytrian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Clearly promotional, not notable. EN wiki doesn't have a page. (I made this now even though the Rfd was made a while back) Ely - Talk 07:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Can an admin decide quickly? RfD remover is kinda edit warring.Ely - Talk 08:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
    Elytrian, there's no need to rush requests for deletion. There is not really much of a decision to make if the page has been at requests for deletion for an hour and no-one else has commented. If this page keeps on getting removed from requests from deletion, please let an admin know. --Ferien (talk) 16:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Changing end of discussion date to 16:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC), as it was not transcluded on the requests for deletion page. --Ferien (talk) 16:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


Kachin StateEdit

Kachin State (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

90.224.197.111 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources, no categories, does not seem to claim any notability. 90.224.197.111 (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Deny recognition to that IP 90.224.197.111, on basis of a previous edit:
    See that IP's edit of 07:39, 31 August 2021. 89.8.93.163 (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep – A state of Myanmar where the tallest mountain of the country is. Also, there are sources and I have added a category to the article. Deletion is not cleanup. --Ferien (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep Notable MagicalNight97 (talk) 02:32, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • I don't see why we should not have this page, except there are some long, complex sentences. Fixable, I'd say. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep. It is a state in a country, so it is definitely notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep it is a state and widely recognizable by its citizens and as a part of Myanmar country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakura emad (talkcontribs) 20:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep are you serious? SHB2000 (talk) 08:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep It's better to save things by upgrading rather than deleting. Regards! Haoreima (talk) 08:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Changing closure to 16:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC), as this page wasn't transcluded onto the requests for deletions page. --Ferien (talk) 16:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


Royal titles across the worldEdit

Royal titles across the world (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Short version: Sounds made up. Long version: My cursory search for sources DID show webpages about this sort of thing, but I am not sure how many of them are RS. I checked two of them, and they didn't show the distinctions made in the article. I think it could be possible to scrub this into an article worth having, but it isn't in such condition now. Darkfrog24 (talk) 20:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC) Darkfrog24 (talk) 20:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Made-up list which is not suitable for an encyclopedia. We do already have a page on royalty. Anyway, in this form the article should be deleted. As a list, it's just silly.
There are very few countries where the nominal "royalty" have political power. Their role is almost always purely constitutional. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment: if we have an article for Royalty Don't you think we should merge the page instead of deleting the informations? thanks Sakura emad (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete as a list that is unsourced and meaningless. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    Comment: dear @SkeletalDome$ i don't know what makes it nonsensical to you, but it provides the info for the Royalty Titles, as @Macdonald-ross mentioned if we have an article for Royalty we should merge it and save the Details instead of deleting it. Sakura emad (talk) 21:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    It isn’t nonsensical but it still doesn’t meet the criteria for inclusion. There is a page on royalty on this wiki but it just has links to other articles about royalty. However, one of the articles that page links to is Royal family. Since this article lists some terms relating to royal families, I think it would make sense to merge it with that page. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Merge instead of removing the article Please Move Useful informations to Related Pages you can check for Royalty thank you. --Sakura emad (talk) 21:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
As I said above, the list is made-up and not suitable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
@User:Macdonald-ross: Yes, but that doesn’t mean it should be deleted. As Sakura emad said we might be able to merge the content of this article with another related article. I found a related page that we can merge the content with, Royal family. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sukh Mhanje Nakki Kay Asta!Edit

Sukh Mhanje Nakki Kay Asta! (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A number of tables, one or two infoboxes, listings of characters, and a few references. I assume this is a TV series, with 316 episodes. Sorry, but I would have at least expected a few sentences of prose text. Not really adequate for a list type article, so I would propose deletion, as we are almost totally lacking context. Other views? Eptalon (talk) 15:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete as no prose content = little or no meaning. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I've added some prose content, based on the article on the English Wikipedia. I think it'd be reasonable to   Keep now. --Ferien (talk) 14:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
    @Ferien same i think we shouldn't delete it. Sakura emad (talk) 21:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete as there is no information about the plot, making the article meaningless. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:42, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    Comment: Dear @SkeletalDome$ we can always add Plot soon or late. Sakura emad (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    SkeletalDome$, a plot section is not required. And as Sakura emad says, we can always expand articles, so we shouldn't delete articles if there is some useful content, as long as they are notable. --Ferien (talk) 06:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
    I agree, but the article would be more useful if it had a plot summary. Most TV show and movie articles, at least those on the English Wikipedia, have a section describing the plot. More content is always better. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 17:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Sakura emad (talk) 21:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep Haoreima (talk) 05:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete SHB2000 (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:36, 18 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


S. Manikchand SinghEdit

S. Manikchand Singh (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Elytrian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem notable to me, and doesn't have an enwiki counterpart. Any objections? Ely - Talk 07:14, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep Keep the article. You will find no rules in Wikipedia that an article with no en wiki equivalent should be deleted. 90 percent of the articles I had created, here, don't have en wiki equivalents, what about those? Besides, notability also depends on the references provided. You should decide whether the references are reliable or not. Haoreima (talk) 11:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC).
    The en-wiki counterpart is not a rule, but usually just how we know if a article that doesn't seem notable with some doubt on it is really notable. Ely - Talk 14:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. The person is not notable. The issue is whether the sources represent significant coverage and are reliable and independent of the subject. The sources produce a single paragraph which to me is not convincing. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
    The source is too much reliable on its own. It gives good brief information on the person, no matter whether it's a single paragraph or multiple. Besides, it's from the Google Books, one of the most highly respected websites, not a personal blog. Haoreima (talk) 14:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
It's good to see there are still innocent people. Google's only objective is to make money. Anything they advertise makes money for them if it sells. The only evidence worth noting is evidence from qualified and disinterested parties. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:09, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
BTW, I have already upgraded the article's sources after your first comment. Don't worry, it's now goodly sourced. Besides, there's no forms of advertising in the sources. Besides, Wikipedia guidelines also recommends sources from Google Books, JSTOR, etc. Haoreima (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 04:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
    Notability about a person depends on his or her good contributions towards a particular field and a good reliable source link to prove it. Not just by saying "notable" or "not notable". Haoreima (talk) 06:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
    Comment: to be honest dear @SHB2000 i think @Haoreima is right, Notability depends on someone's work, we like to know why this person should be here and have an article about, we ask what is his service to the community?. Sakura emad (talk) 21:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    Dear @SHB2000 Please look at WP:ATA thank you. Sakura emad (talk) 21:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    English Wikipedia policies don't apply here. And, they're non notable, and they don't get an article here. SHB2000 (talk) 23:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    SHB2000 I think what @Sakura emad: has told you is right! If you think the article is not notable, then can you give any good reason that the article isn't notable? Haoreima (talk) 04:45, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    As I said, they're non notable and do NOT get their own article on Wikipedia. Please don't question me on this again. SHB2000 (talk) 04:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    SHB2000 Just saying "non notable" isn't also notable, if no proper reason is given. I mean your statement is meaningless, in the absence of proper reason. Because people don't count the number of "keep" or "delete" statements, everything is based on guidelines and rules. Not quantity but quality. Haoreima (talk) 06:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    I'm not responding to this anymore. I've told you numerous times that they aren't notable. Now any many times will you go questioning me on this. SHB2000 (talk) 07:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    Just read WP:GNG. *sigh* Ely - Talk 07:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
    @SHB2000, Elytrian, Haoreima: No, simply saying "not notable" is not an appropriate comment to make in a deletion discussion, comments should be more detailed, especially if questioned about it. --Ferien (talk) 15:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    English Wikipedia policies do apply here, as guidelines, for when there's not a page here. See WP:FOLLOW. --Ferien (talk) 17:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep Dear Ely this discussion should not be taken due to your reasons let me explain: i believe having this article on other wikis has nothing to do with Deletion Discussion Policy, we delete pages based on Rules such as -> if the article is Meaningless or copied from another Place (Copyright issue), or if the subject does not claim notable, and if not written in english && An obvious Hoax, Therefore we should not delete any articles if we thought that the article should not be here or if we simply do not like the article, sorry if my explanation sound rude to you i do not mean it 😊 thank you again. --Sakura emad (talk) 22:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Muhammad Ali MirzaEdit

Muhammad Ali Mirza (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Pakistani working as an engineer for the Pakistani government. As far as I can see, he donesn't have an (advanced) education in Islamic theology, but holds a degree in engineering. Only thing that I can see is that he is active on social media; except for English, we also get pages in (Western) Punjabi, Urdu, and Pashto (IIRC: All of those are spoken in Pakistan). So, I do not really see what makes this person notable? - does anyone else? Eptalon (talk) 00:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep as i checked the subject's sources and their status, i think they meet general Notability which makes the subject Notable Thank you.--Sakura emad (talk) 20:57, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Yet another biog which totally ignores the issue of notability: notability needs evidence, not just a c.v. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete per MR. SHB2000 (talk) 08:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep The article has reliable sources. Besides, it has en wiki equivalent article, where, I think no one has any problem with it there too. Thanks, please don't mind with my words! I just want to save things, that's only it. Haoreima (talk) 08:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

All right! I think so now, then make it deletion. Xpërt100 (talk) 07:51, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


Wikipedia:Tertiary sourcesEdit

Wikipedia:Tertiary sources (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Etoza has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nonsense, but I'm not sure if this fulfills the QD criteria. I cannot understand the point/meaning of this article. Etoza (?) 18:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 18:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mulgi Jhali HoEdit

Mulgi Jhali Ho (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject does not appear to be notable for Wikipedia. SHB2000 (talk) 12:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Just a bunch of lists and no claim to notability. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 18:08, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Comment: hello dear !Voters as i checked and Double checked; it is an Indian Romance Drama with the number of 268 Episodes, According to Google the Drama is recognizable by People and its fans, which meets Notability in some ways. while voting in here Please consider that the drama is still ongoing Thank you --Sakura emad (talk) 22:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

  •   Delete. Fails to address the issue of notability at all. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussionsEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Article has been deleted..--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 14:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Sok Kimsa (2003)Edit

Sok Kimsa (2003) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem notable. Hockeycatcat (talk) 09:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Comment I think the 2nd and the 3rd references are too much reliable. The only problem is that these 2 reliable sources are not in English but still we can easily read the sources through Google Translate (so, no problem). But, I don't know if Wikipedia guidelines permit non English sources for English article. That's only it. If there's permission, then the article should be kept. Haoreima (talk) 09:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete non notable. SHB2000 (talk) 09:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Quickly deleted Ferien (talk) 15:44, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Matru Pal (2nd nomination)Edit

Matru Pal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person. No English Wikipedia article and most all of the sources are either primary sources or unreliable. SHB2000 (talk) 07:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

Actually forget that, this is eligible for speedy deletion (G4) as this is a recreation of a deleted page SHB2000 (talk) 07:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  Comment I think the first reference is totally reliable but seems to be a mirror site of some wiki, not of WMF! Haoreima (talk) 08:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  Delete I remember this page, and it's just blatant advertising. Hockeycatcat (talk) 08:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Quickly deleted Ferien (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Mahammad IsgandarovEdit

Mahammad Isgandarov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Morneo06 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be a hoax, the references do not cite the information given and some of the sources don't even deal with him Morneo06 (talk) 14:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete WP:Too soon to have an article the subject does not passes the general notability. --Sakura emad (talk) 18:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

  •   Delete per Sakura. SHB2000 (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Pandawa BeachEdit

Pandawa Beach (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Morneo06 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fits more to wikivoyage, not an encyclopedic entry Morneo06 (talk) 17:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete per nominator's reason. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak support i think if we could make the article better it can stay in both Projects as a stub in simple and as a Guide in Voyage.--Sakura emad (talk) 21:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
    Comment: also the reason why i chose weak keep because the creator does not provided any sources. Sakura emad (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete admin on Wikivoyage commenting here, but if this were ever imported to voy, I'd speedy it as individual beaches don't get their own article on Wikivoyage per wiaa. SHB2000 (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. No other information found, probable hoax. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

LaobEdit

Laob (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Morneo06 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I couldn't find any sources stating the information given, possible hoax. Morneo06 (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Appears to be a hoax, since I couldn't find anything about this one online. Should be QD'd under criteria A6. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Weak support we should ask its creator to provide some sources if we could not find it, since we can't find everything on Google especially Historical Records it is not easy to find it.--Sakura emad (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Deleted as hoax. Peterdownunder (talk) 11:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

The FunklesEdit

The Funkles (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A Google search for "The Funkles" showed only a music band. This show does not have an IMDB entry. I think this could be a prank. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Found nothing after googling this show online. I think it’s a hoax. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete, complete hoax. --Ferien (talk) 16:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete can't find reliable sources. --Sakura emad (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Not notable, so quick deleted under criteria A4. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Brij Kishore SharmaEdit

Brij Kishore Sharma (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Derpdart56 (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Not notable; promotion. Dingothegorg 16:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sources 1, 2, and 3 are not real. They are fake notices that were not published in those newspapers, and they were uploaded to archive.org by Brij Kishore Sharma himself. --Bonadea (talk) 16:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
OH. That's not good. Anyway,   Delete. --Derpdart56 (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep He is Notable now after researching about him I got this link click here you will go to the official website of en:Ministry of Home Affairs (India) but after clicking it you have to create account in that website but it is official website of India by which you will not hack and after creating account you have to reclick the link which I give you and you see his name and profilr in the website which means he is notable and it is the website of Government of India which means 100% reliable and notable and for making easy I am also giving you archived link because it is difficult to create account for you click here which is in pdf format and it is not fake sources it is the photo of enewspaper and in India to save data storage it will deleted and you are saying that it was uploaded by the subject yes you are right it was uploaded by subject but for sharing to his freinds and I want to say one more thing only 3 sources is not reliable but the source which I give and some more sources there are 9 sources in which three is secondary source two is reliable and notable source and you can see more sources— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:3000:4110:40be:cc5a:5570:e22d (talkcontribs) 18:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
@Derpdart56:   Cleaned (One Vote per account) Sakura emad (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Not notable, fake sources. Ely - Talk 04:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

*  Keep Now the creator of the page has removed all wrong sources and added notable, reliable and independent sources you see the wikipedia page for one more time. All wrong and unreliable sources has been removed and notable sources has been added 49.36.41.101 (talk) 08:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC) *  Keep Editors who want that the page has to be deleted and the users who already added for deletion I want to say that please recheck the page which you want to be deleted because now the page has been reconstructed and all wrong references has been removed and more good sources has been added. Mr. Hindi (talk) 09:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC) *  Keep As currrent sources the subject is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:3000:4110:e148:1ae3:975a:e1a7 (talkcontribs) 10:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

*  Keep Notable because as forth reference he was nominated for the forth highest civilian award in India - Padma Shri and the third source is reliable because it is the official webiste of scholar.google.com 2405:201:3000:4110:4D98:F2E6:6AAB:F98D (talk) 13:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Struck votes of clearly single user voting as though they were multiple people. -Djsasso (talk) 13:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: i am not sure if they are same or not, But Please see en:Brij_Kishore_Sharma that've been created on English wikipedia. --🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 05:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

@Sakura emad: They seem to be different people. 💠Ely - Talk💠 07:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
@Ely-san   You are right. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 07:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment (Copied from the talk page of Mr. Hindi) I want to say only one thing for this page Brij Kishore Sharma a user want to delete this page because of he is not notable so I want to say that Padma Shri is the forth highest award in India you can see this english wikipedia page Category:Recipients of the Padma Shri in literature & education you will see that all person who got this award like this person has a wikipedia page you can see in references there is only links which describes that he got Padma Shri which means they all person get his name in wikipedia for only one subject WP:1E so this person is also notable for only one event so please close deletion request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr. Hindi (talk • contribs) 07:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:18, 21 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   DeleteFerien (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Darya SindhuEdit

Darya Sindhu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

つがる has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: does not seem notable, this just seems to be an information page about a ship, and does not contain encyclopedic content, Perhaps if the ship does become notable in the future, an article could be added, thoughts?... Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 02:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete as not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Per つがる. Just a ship, no info on why it is notable, just its whereabouts.Ely - Talk 12:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Article doesn't show that this ship is notable. This could have been QD'd. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
    There's usually not very much harm in sending to requests for deletion if you're unsure whether it meets QD A4. --Ferien (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. too soon or Does not claim notability.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 06:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Matru PalEdit

Matru Pal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable. --Ferien (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Actor was born in 2004, so realistically we are looking at possibly 1-2 roles that he played.I also don't really see independent coverage, thats why I quick deleted (as A4- not notable) earlier today. --Eptalon (talk) 16:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  • delete immediately: QD of multiple editors removed, obviously an ad and not notable. Ely - Talk 16:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete as A4: clearly not notable –Morneo06 (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete PR MagicalNight97 (talk) 02:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. All sources are just trivial mentions. Clearly not notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:30, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete WP:TOOSOON too soon to have an article. --Sakura emad (talk) 20:51, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete A4: Not notable. Dingothegorg 14:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
  • remove deletion templatewhats the problem with you all editors why you all to delete this why it is notable once search him on google he is a musical artist ckeck photos, article s, social profiles and his soundtracks on Spotify and apple Music etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:30c3:2705:0:50:e10e:3a01 (talkcontribs) 18:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
    we think it is too soon for him to have an article, remember once he Passed General Notability you can always come back and create a new article for him, Thank you. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
    Notability is shown by reliable sources, not services like Spotify that pretty much anyone can use. --Ferien (talk) 06:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 13:16, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Rahul Rits (2nd nomination)Edit

Rahul Rits (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: to have an article subject does not meets general Notability 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 12:07, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 12:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Per Previous Nomination.--🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Bikram Malati (2nd nomination)Edit

Bikram Malati (2nd nomination) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sakura emad has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: too soon have an article, the subject does not passes General Notability 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 09:44, 23 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   DeleteFerien (talk) 21:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Lalu Singh SodhaEdit

Lalu Singh Sodha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Yahya has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails general notability guideline. Sources are trivial mention. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 21:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Clear case: has not shown notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Not notable. Sources only have passing mentions of this person. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 16:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete WP:Too soon too soon to have an article, the subject not notable enoug.--Sakura emad (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pagesEdit