Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives Edit

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletionEdit

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletionEdit

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the userEdit

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

DiscussionsEdit

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussionsEdit

Cinderella boy 3rd movie (2020)Edit

Cinderella boy 3rd movie (2020) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: does not appear to pass WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 17:03, 15 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


MergersCorpEdit

MergersCorp (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: does not appear to pass WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 15:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 15:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Gary HawkerEdit

Gary Hawker (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: May not be notable, I can't find any mentions of him online Lights and freedom (talk) 03:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 03:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Andrew Brown Jr.Edit

Andrew Brown Jr. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Leo12350 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails notability, per WP:ONEEVENT as this article is only about Andrew Brown's death. -Leo💬📜 17:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep Now that the article is about the killing, I think it's notable, because a lot of important people have been talking about it. Lights and freedom (talk) 21:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep in the current form. A clearly notable topic.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Edwin Symonowicz (2nd nomination)Edit

Edwin Symonowicz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Polish person, that seems to have been victim of an identrity theft. Originally, this is a disputed quick-deletion (A4-notability). The subject may well be notable, but our article lacks any references; th person may be quite a hight-profile case, but our article lacks references; so I leave this for the community to decide. For me, sounds interesting, but without sources, justifying a keep will be hard. Given this is quite a high-profile case, there will have been media reports. Anyway, keep or delete? Eptalon (talk) 16:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

Weak   Keep (as of now). No BBC, CNN or other major news' companies writing about him. Few particularly reliable sources do exist. Also, he is definitely notable as the singer, but the current version of the page has a very awful style and should be rewritten. --62.12.115.34 (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Proxy checker rates this IP as a likely proxy. Darubrub (Let me know) 17:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  Comment If you look at my IP and see previous edits, ignore them. This February, I allowed my 5-year-old son to have computer and he vandalized Wikipedia, sorry for that. --62.12.115.34 (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  Keep Edwin Symonowicz is an owner of next awards (cite): Order of Polonia Restituta (2015), Honorary badge "Meritorious for Polish Culture" (2013), Medal of St. Wojciech (2011), Medal of the President of Slovak Republic (2015). --31.168.162.21 (talk) 17:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Please provide sources if this is true. PotsdamLamb (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
IPQualityScore rates this IP as a suspected proxy. Darubrub (Let me know) 17:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  Comment Already deleted. I can't find claims of notability since it is gone. Darubrub (Let me know) 17:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
@Darubrub: I fixed the link to the article. PotsdamLamb (talk) 17:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, I did not say my son did this. I said that if you come to my IP contribution list and see bunch of vandalism from this February, this was done by my son. --62.12.114.142 (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Either way, you are responsible for what happens, not your son. Also, IP addresses do not have much say in whether an article is a keep or delete unless you can provide sources that show this person meets our notibility guidelines, especially since it is a biography of a living person. PotsdamLamb (talk) 17:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Dear IP user, the closing admin will also take your statement into account; note however, that while many admins value the contributions of ipusers, this is not a vote, where the highest count wins. It is about assesing consensus, not about counting votes. --Eptalon (talk) 23:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Can't find significant coverage. Darubrub (Let me know) 17:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC) Changing vote to   Quick Delete per G4. Darubrub (Let me know) 17:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete Neither Mortenensen nor Symonowicz has any sign of being notable. Identity theft happens all the time, and it doesn't mean that a person is important. Lights and freedom (talk) 21:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  • delete A mildly interesting case, however not notable. No significant coverage.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sasha MilivoyevEdit

Sasha Milivoyev (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Martin Urbanec has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cross-wiki vanity spam by large active sockfarm; users Sandra.serbia, Milivojevsasa, Diana-agnel, Vanesa.Barby, Maha-uae, Ana-africana, ... Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Comment On May 6, 2021 at 1626U time, IP address 105.192.86.211 removed the RFD template [1]. IP may be part of sock farm. PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:49, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete I see a red flag in the page's history. Cross-wiki spam. Also, can't find significant coverage. Darubrub (Let me know) 17:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete I cannot see any reason to keep this. A google search has exactly 7 links in it. Five of them link to something in this article (i.e. wikidata, picture, etc.). The other two are his WordPress site and a Russian website. [Google Results] PotsdamLamb (talk) 06:18, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Male rappersEdit

Category:Male rappers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:640:4000:3170:2862:C2DF:2851:A6F9 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have seen things that say Simple English Wikipedia is not categorizing by gender. Besides, most rappers are male, so if category is kept, it should include most of the rappers that have articles. Maybe also delete Category:Female rappers, but the thing is, there are less female rappers than male rappers. 2601:640:4000:3170:2862:C2DF:2851:A6F9 (talk) 20:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • We do lump actors and actresses into one category, so it would make sense to follow suit here. So we should Delete both this category and it's female counterpart, and move all articles into Category:Rap musicians--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:48, 12 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Adil QadriEdit

Adil Qadri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

PotsdamLamb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Under A4 - Person is non-notable; appears to be written by the person himself or someone close to him. Not a whole lot of reliable sources for him that I can see. I did a QD but it was challenged, so converting to RFD. PotsdamLamb (talk) 18:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete Absolutely not notable and does not claim to be. If everyone who had their own website had an article then we would have a lot lot lot lot more articles... --Ferien (talk) 19:25, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete - Per reasons expressed in the nomination. I can't find any sources either. Seems to me a clear case of A4. Hulgedtalk⟩ 05:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 18:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


FBG DuckEdit

FBG Duck (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable rapper. Only coverage appears to be about his death, falling under WP:ONEEVENT.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Keep The article was vandalized so I've restored it. Perhaps next time check the article's history and see if its current image is due to vandalism and revert it instead of deleting it altogether. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 09:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
    Right, but I didn't nominate it because the page was vandalized. (I did miss that though, so my bad.) I nominated it because I don't think the subject meets our notability guidelines. Doesnt appear to have made significant notable contributions to the field. Cult following is questionable. Relationship with 21 savage, or any other person, doesn't make a person notable themselves. The only story here seems to be his death, which falls under WP:ONEEVENT.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 14:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete because now the article has a little more detail, but tends to lack notability. Not even English Wikipedia has an article on him. Also, the main event is just his death, really, per WP:ONEEVENT. -Leo (let's talk) (my help) 14:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
    A note, just because en Wikipedia doesn't have an article doesn't mean we shouldn't have that article. We can make our own editorial decisions separate from what en decides to do.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Per above, also apologies for removing the template. SoyokoAnis - talk 14:57, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  • There is no way FBG Duck's page should be getting deleted. He has way more contribution/legacy beyond "slide" and his death. He is perhaps the most well known opposition figure to O'Block, including superstars such as Lil Durk and King Von. Although I myself am not an expert on FBG Duck's history, I do believe there is much more of a story to be told and public information out there about him that should be added to his Wiki.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.21.67.152 (talkcontribs) 03:10, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


SteezEdit

Steez (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:444:201:9E70:3C69:4033:53A6:F60B has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Maybe real but not sure 2601:444:201:9E70:3C69:4033:53A6:F60B (talk) 20:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Adding discussion to RfD, changing close date as no-one has seen it. --Ferien (talk) 11:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep the reason isn't clear why this article should be deleted. -Leo (let's talk) (my help) 14:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  • The reason for deletion is not good. However, the subject of the article is not notable for an article and does not claim to be. Also, see the amount of declines on the draft w:Draft:Steez.   Delete as not notable, not "per nom" though... --Ferien (talk) 06:08, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete A slightly odd case, as there is another rapper with a similar name who is probably notable. This subject however, is not.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC) 12:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Raúl AllainEdit

Raúl Allain (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't believe this subject to be notable. No widespread coverage from reliable sources. Gordonrox24 | Talk 17:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • The cited sources are reliable because they have been used in Wikipedia pages in English in general, as well as in the Spanish language. In addition, the subject is cited in the new Wikipedia project Racism in Peru, which will also have coverage in the English language. This is relevant. There is coverage on the subject in agencies that are major and worldwide. We can unfailingly appreciate the sources cited in English Wikipedia pages and this is indisputable. Even the theme is laureate. Greetings! Literaturemostly (talk) 17:48, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
A source being used elsewhere doesn't always make it a reliable source. Coverage in a Wikiproject is not a reliable source. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 21:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
The Racism in Peru page is a national and global project that will be extended to Wikipedia in its various languages. It is of a state and institutional nature, and professionals and experts established in the current intellectual scene are cited. Sincerely! Literaturemostly (talk) 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, however Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for Wikipedia.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Well. As you mentioned earlier, it could be a reliable source. In fact, it can be thought that it is a reference when the names are shaded and in this way Wikiprojects have arisen. Literaturemostly (talk) 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  • The person may be notable, but the article lacks all biographical information (which must be sourced). It does suggest (by the titles) what kind of work he does, and it is hard to say whether he is significantly better than others. What's needed is critical assessment of his work. It's good to win awards, and he has had some success there. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
    The awards themselves seem questionable. The first award mentioned comes from "Hispanomundial Union of Writers". Outside of a facebook page, I'm not even sure this actually exists as a real organization. The 2nd award, "International Eagle World Award for Sociological Excellence" doesn't have an organization noted in the article. Searching for one doesn't turn anything up that I can see. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 21:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
    I have just added as references, three critical evaluations about your work. They: "Raúl Allain y la reserva moral", in addition to "La visión maldita de Raúl Allain" by the historian, poet and journalist Humberto Pinedo. And the article by the member María Alejandra Gámez of the Association of Victims of Organized Harassment and Electronic Torture (VIACTEC), a recent institution cited in Wikipedia in Japanese on page Voice to Skull (ボイス・トゥ・スカル) where the character's article "Reforma científica del derecho humano público" taken by the Colombian newspaper La Libertad (source: Ssociólogos) is also a reference. An attentive greeting. Literaturemostly (talk) 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Yes, so I think that adds up as   Delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, I guess. -Leo💬📜 17:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Both laurels are from the Unión Hispanomundial de Escritores (UHE), cited in this English Wikipedia, for example on the page of Magie Faure-Vidot in section Honors, awards, certifications, training, and memberships. However, the page can be edited. Best regards! Literaturemostly (talk) 7 May 2021 (UTC)
    Again, just because a source is used on another Wikipedia article doesn't necessarily make the source reliable. When attempting to research the Unión Hispanomundial de Escritores, the first result coming up as Facebook doesn't bode well for the reliability of this organization as a source. Nothing I'm seeing makes me believe it is a suitable reliable source.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
    You can also see that the President is Carlos Hugo Garrido Chalén, a multi-awarded and distinguished writer and lawyer. In addition to the fact that Garrido Chalén is the current member of the historic North Group where the universal poet César Vallejo was a member. Consideration! Literaturemostly (talk) 7 May 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 17:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Death of Kelsey-Smith BriggsEdit

Death of Kelsey-Smith Briggs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Two-year old that died as a rsult of abuse, in Oklahoma. What we do have is the blurb of the EnWP article. According to that article, the state of Oklahome changed some of its procedures to better be able to hanlde cases such as this one. Biological mother and stepfather seem to have been sentenced to 27 and 30 years in prison respectively. Originally, this was proposed as an 'A4- questionable notability'. Give a quick search I found some sources, so I propose we do a regular RfD on this article. Depending on how you look at the case it might be notable, and worth keeping. On the other hand: the case looks extrodinary because state authorities placed her in the fster care of her biological mother & stephather, without knowing who the abuser was. Anyway: how many simliar cases of child abuse are there every year? - So, for the community to decide if this one is notable enough for keeping. Eptalon (talk) 15:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Death of Kelsey Smith-Briggs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Adding the duplicate page to the request. --Ferien (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

2601:640:4000:3170:91FB:8806:3F15:895B (talk) 16:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

  • We can delete this one straight away because it as an incorrect title! On the correct version I would argue that the story of her death is notable, but we can discuss that later. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
  • It might actually make more sense to Keep this page, and delete the other copy. At least this one has some references to start with.--Gordonrox24 | Talk
  •   Comment If kept, needs to be moved to the correct name; also keep in mind that there is en:Murder of Kelsey Smith, a case which probably attracted more media attention (18-year old teenager kidnapped, raped murdered, the killer is currently serving life in prison); at some point we may also have an article on that case, we currently don't.--Eptalon (talk) 06:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
    @Eptalon I agree, moving the page seems like a better option than fully deleting the page. SoyokoAnis - talk 16:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment The page has been deleted by Macdonald-ross. --Ferien (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
    • I merely deleted the version which was wrongly titled! Anything we need for the remaining version can be got from En wiki. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep seems notable enough. --Ferien (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:52, 8 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Özge KaraogluEdit

Özge Karaoglu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not sure this teacher is notable. Main claim to notability is winning an award in 2011, but I'm unsure how notable this award is itself. It appears the subject won the first annual edition, but I'm not seeing anything to show that the award existed after the first year. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Being an author (2 books) and teacher does not qualify someone as notable. No real coverage in news sources and does not yet seem to meet WP:AUTHOR. Desertborn (talk) 15:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Iqbal AvenueEdit

Iqbal Avenue (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

つがる has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to have much significance, most of the references seem to be real estate listings/sites. Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Delete. No claim or evidence for notability, and notability is not self-evident here. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 00:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


M.ZaidEdit

M.Zaid (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Peterdownunder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Listed as a QD, but challenged by the author who claims notability, and that several of the sources are valid and reliable. Further input requested. Peterdownunder (talk) 07:50, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

Comments from the talk page copied to here for the discussion. Peterdownunder (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

  • This page should not be speedily deleted because... it is a genuine page that I personally created. I researched the content, it is certainly accurate and sufficiently referenced. I don't understand the "speedy deletion" tag. It's certainly not blasphematory or anything. Thank you for removing this hideous tag on the page that I spent time creating. Thank you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zayne Hijazi (talkcontribs) 22:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  • A quick deletion tag is not hideous, it gives the reason for why a page has been tagged for deletion. RPBG 💬 🖊 22:53, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Plus, I can see that there is not an explanation to prove that the page is notable. RPBG 💬 🖊 22:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Sorry if i am rude and about the notability this article have references from one of the biggest pakistani new source and Article source Zayne Hijazi (talk) 04:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. This is an advertisement for a 13-year old which shows no genuine claim for, and no evidence for, notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete per my QD nomination. "Fame on social media" does not mean that M.Zaid can automatically get a Wikipedia article and he does not claim notability anywhere else in the article. --Ferien (talk) 15:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete per Ferien. (Redacted) Darubrub (Let me know) 15:39, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Per Ferien SoyokoAnis - talk 23:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 07:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Guangdong Independence MovementEdit

Guangdong Independence Movement (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Bishibitsu has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is incomprehensible by both basic and regular English standards. The user who created this article was also globally blocked for sockpuppetry. Bishibitsu (talk) 08:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Merge and redirect into Separatist movements of China - Re-word it a bit and add the content over there. Fixing26 (talk) 20:26, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  • There are two issues: the language and the merger. Merger implies that the various struggles are essentially the same, else it would be better to link those separate pages under a category. I would judge they are not so similar.
The second is the language, which is not simple, and is also far too long for what it has to say. It needs completely re-writing. It could be in essence deleted, and a simple account put in. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 08:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Khalil MolanaeiEdit

Khalil Molanaei (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not seem to be notable. All the sources I can find are mostly self published. Lights and freedom (talk) 05:26, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Comment. Musical artist, released one Album this year per MusicBrainz. Otherwise just seems to be a YouTuber. Probably not yet meeting WP:CREATIVE at this time. So I lean delete but will think some more. It could be there are news sources, just not in English. Desertborn (talk) 15:26, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ali Mahmoud OgluEdit

Ali Mahmoud Oglu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Styyx has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable "translator". All of the sources are PR pieces or interviews. His Turkish page was protected from creation (now re-created under a new name) because of repeated creation and after it was found out that this guy is a scammer. The creator of the English page (also deleted) is blocked.

This person is making non-credible Turkish websites publish news about him to show that he is an important translator and it seems like he has links to Wikipedia as well. I have a sources analysis here (sadly in Turkish), that visualizes the problem: no reliable sources, all PR pieces and interviews. ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 15:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Delete; deleted before on Ali Suleiman and Ali Al Suleiman. This user is Long term abuser, and his account locked globally --Alaa :)..! 06:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete No reliable sources on the article and long-term spam. --Ferien (talk) 18:47, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment If this was deleted before, then it should have been a QD - A4 PotsdamLamb (talk) 22:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Josh fightEdit

Josh fight (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Per en:WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE and en:WP:NOTNEWS. Nothing significant or notable about this meme for an encyclopedia, despite the sporadic covereage. --IWI (talk) 01:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Keep I created the article. If Storm Area 51 gets an article, so should this one. While the bar for Internet meme coverage is very high on Wikipedia, this one has strong significance for Internet culture; Internet culture has become increasingly impactful. Swiz | Ping!
    Please see en:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --IWI (talk) 12:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete I believe the storm area 51 event to be on a completely different level than this. Storm area 51 had prolonged coverage leading up to and after the event. In the case of the Josh fight, I don't think we're going to see any more coverage after today. If we start to see this become an annual event with increasing relevance, with copycat events and the like, then we can consider keeping it. But for now, it's a one day story in a rapid news cycle.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete and   Comment Doesn't meet notability guidelines. This page is under contestation in other Wikipedias too, with the English Wikipedia considering it for deletion, the Ukrainian Wikipedia doing the same, the French Wikipedia raising several concerns about the article, with the 3 all having the same issue at the centre, notability. The other Wikipedias with the article seemingly have just translated it from the English version. Fixing26 (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Shouldn't we wait a fair while to see if notability is established, then have this discussion? JoshFight (talk) 10:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
The short answer to this is no. It is a requirement that page topics must be notable, and support this with reliable referenced sources. This is our procedure. We decide on what we see. Nothing stops editors reapplying if it turns out that new evidence of notability occurs. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 01:19, 3 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.



Recently closed deletion discussionsEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 08:06, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Wakame KonbuEdit

Wakame Konbu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Definitely not my area of expertise, however I don't believe this subject meets our notability guidelines. Doing some digging, I see a lot of stuff from Fandom, and blurbs written by the artist on publisher's pages. But I'm not seeing much in terms of 3rd party reliable sources. Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:37, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep I have created this page. This page was missing a source. Therefore, I have added the sources to this page. Wakame Konbu 00:31, 26 April 2021(UTC)‎. --Mochi Mikan (talk) 00:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete No reliable sources, so fails WP:GNG. @Mochi Mikan: are any of the sources you have added reliable? --Ferien (talk) 06:15, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
  • All of the sources I have provided are from publishers and news websites. All of them are Japanese sites, but they are reliable. All of them are not sources originated by the author, but are secondary sources.--Mochi Mikan (talk) 07:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
    Ok, can you give some examples as I couldn't find any. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 07:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
    COMIC NATALIE is a Japanese news website; KADOKAWA CORPORATION, SQUARE ENIX and HOUBUNSHA are Japanese publishers. I have used these sources.--Mochi Mikan (talk) 07:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

I think we need a Japanese speaker for this. I can't make a definitive decision on the reliability of the sources. Gotanda, would you mind having a look at the sources and commenting on them if you get time? Thanks, --IWI (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

  •   Delete - I do not see any notability, regardless of language, as the sources are not reliable and if we could list every single animator, then this should be animator.wikipedia.org PotsdamLamb (talk) 22:43, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Ferien (talk) 22:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

User:Leo12350/Discuss stuff with me about robloxEdit

User:Leo12350/Discuss stuff with me about roblox (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

つがる has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I am nominating this for RFD due to En:WP:NOTWEBHOST, and per the guidelines at WP:UP, I am not sure if this type of page is allowed, so I am asking for everyone's thoughts. Thanks. Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 00:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Delete This is not what userpages are for. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete No area on Wikipedia can be a forum, even userpages. --Ferien (talk) 16:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete There's a Roblox devforums. Darubrub (Let me know) 16:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete per nom. -Leo💬📜 17:25, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
    @Leo12350: btw if you want this to be deleted then you can request it for deletion yourself with {{qd|u1}} Best regards, --Ferien (talk) 17:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Was deleted quickly for another reason.... --Ferien (talk) 06:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

DanTDMEdit

DanTDM (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:444:201:9E70:8D9F:3498:83C4:8C6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Waiting to be checked for Vandalism 2601:444:201:9E70:8D9F:3498:83C4:8C6 (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 19:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Quickly deleted by User:ImprovedWikiImprovement. Darubrub (Let me know) 14:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC).

Alexandrian RepublicEdit

Alexandrian Republic (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darubrub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I was originally requesting a QD for A1, but an IP consists on removing the tag. I am concerned that this is a possible hoax. Darubrub (Let me know) 13:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 13:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. valid archive of simple talk and nominated by new user — Preceding unsigned comment added by PotsdamLamb (talkcontribs) 18:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Simple talkEdit

Wikipedia talk:Simple talk (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SoyokoAnis has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: What is the need for this page? I am also requesting full protection so no more edits happen here. SoyokoAnis - talk 17:25, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • I have removed the RFD from the page as it is an archive of simple talk and needs to remain. If you want protection on the page, this is not the place for it. PotsdamLamb (talk) 20:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:25, 11 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pagesEdit