Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Policy shortcuts:
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives Edit

Shortcut

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletionEdit

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletionEdit

See also: Category:Deletion requests

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the userEdit

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

DiscussionsEdit

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussionsEdit

I kissed a girlEdit

I kissed a girl (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Arthurfan828 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Very short and doesn’t show indication of notability. I decided not to QD it because I think QD doesn’t include poems. Arthurfan828 - CHAT 12:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Comment To whom it may concern: I kissed a girl is a song by Katy Perry not a poem. --Examknowtalk 13:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


User:Kedarbehra2001Edit

User:Kedarbehra2001 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Camouflaged Mirage has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: NOTWEBHOST. And promotional in some sense. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:17, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 10:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Coleen TrinidadEdit

Coleen Trinidad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Social media personality with no independent and significant, in-depth coverage. All but one source seems to be a self reference. Followers != notability Operator873talkconnect 02:19, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 02:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Angie (movie)Edit

Angie (movie) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Arthurfan828 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Fails WP:NOTABLE. Arthurfan828 - CHAT 20:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 20:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kirill DmitrievEdit

Kirill Dmitriev (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Russian entrepreneur, at the head of aRussian company. Has presumably wone some awards that might make him notable. Article has two problems thoufgh: There are no sources, and the article reads like a CV. Note: Being at the head of a large comany is no source of notability; neither is doing a PhD. So: delete? Eptalon (talk) 13:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 13:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Author of the article: Added sources, updated information. Please do not delete the article, as Kirill Dmitriev is a popular financier and businessman, the head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund


BankerpediaEdit

Bankerpedia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Vermont has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline. It may in the future, but at the moment I don't see enough coverage. Vermont (talk) 21:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Article/Website to show that Bhanu Srivastav (also up for deletion) is notable. In that context, I'd suggest we delete this as well...--Eptalon (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delete as unnotable and unremarkable. I do not find the subject suitable for a page at present. Hiàn (talk) 14:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Hacker 404 Happiness not foundEdit

Hacker 404 Happiness not found (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doubtful notability. Novel written by a patently unnotable author. Every one of the references listed in the article appear to be a copy paste of each other (or something, I just skimmed through the sources). Hiàn (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 21:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bhanu SrivastavEdit

Bhanu Srivastav (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hiàn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. A quick search reveals no substantive coverage of the subject by reliable, third-party sources (though very humourously a source claims he's "Google proof"). Very weak claim for notability. Hiàn (talk) 21:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 21:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dhiraj MishraEdit

Dhiraj Mishra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hacker, who may be borderline notable, if I believe the references. Rather than doing a Quick dleetion I propose this as a regular RfD request; to allow time for cleanup, and to let thew community express themselves. Eptalon (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Thanks Eptalon, for not doing a speedy deletion and providing the opportunity for cleanup, This was my first article so please find below justification.

1. I've changed the occupation from Hacker to Information Security which fits more better. Would request if you can move this article to main space. Aside the article has a proper references with citation. Please let me know if any further clarification is required.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugasur (talk • contribs)
2. I've added few more citations and correct details about his company and occupation & some minor tweaks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugasur (talk • contribs)
3. Thanks Eptalon, I've made more changes in it added proper references and corrected few grammatical mistakes. I would request if you can review this, post your review if you can shift this to main space that would be awesome. Aside I'll keep on updating the article. Thanks once again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugasur (talk • contribs)
4. Just to add the final note, I've made the necessary changes from my side, would request Eptalon to have a look. I'll keep making minor tweaks in future. Aside as mentioned earlier the article is borderline notable so hope this is moved to main space.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugasur (talk • contribs)
5. Thanks Operator873 and Hiàn for your review and comments, but I feel the article is borderline notable. I understand there is no in depth individual article but subject has received awards multiple time which is one of the criteria of notable. Having said that I respect whatsoever decision is taken by Administrative. If this is moved to main space I'll continue working on this. Thanks once again.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugasur (talk • contribs)
6. Thanks for your feedback Arthurfan828, aside please have a look on this URL if in-case you have missed - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hackers. They all are hackers and they are notable to :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugasur (talk • contribs)

  • Delete per Eptalon. There isn't substantial in-depth coverage here. Operator873talkconnect 14:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delete. While I acknowledge there is a rather large amount of references linked, I don't see what is particularly groundbreaking or notable about the subject's work. Hiàn (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delete. I have never heard of any hackers that are notable, and this one doesn’t appear to be notable as it does not clearly explain what that person is notable for. Arthurfan828 - CHAT 16:58, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.



Recently closed deletion discussionsEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Chenzw  Talk  02:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC).

Intellectual Dark WebEdit

Intellectual Dark Web (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:OR and non-neutral POV Gotanda (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

There are now links to sources of information within the page such that the critique that it lacks sources no longer holds sway. 198.200.115.29 (talk) 22:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC). I just checked the improved version of the page on the Intellectual Dark Web and I think I did something horribly wrong when adding the links because each one is listed as if it were a separate category within the content of the article. My fault. Mea culpa. Does anyone know how to fix that? ̃

  •   Keep There is a page on the English Wikipedia on the Intellectual Dark Web. A number of its members such as Dave Rubin have actually embraced the term. A number of notable publications including The Atlantic, Quillette, the Huffington Post, The National Review, The Nation and the New York Times have commented on the Intellectual Dark Web using that term to laud it, criticize it, or to dispute the existence of an Intellectual Dark Web. The phrase has become a common enough term vis-à-vis today’s parlance as it regards political discourse that it is relevant to provide its definition. Especially considering that most of the so-called Dark Web intellectuals such as Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager and Jordan Peterson are notable and have their own pages on Wikipedia including the Simple English Wikipedia and as such I support the continued inclusion of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.200.115.29 (talk • contribs) --Eptalon (talk) 16:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
  • This article makes many claims, but does not provide anything that we could see as a reliable source. So: ad sources, to alavage the article. --Eptalon (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delete No reliable sources --Examknowtalk 16:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Keep but use proper citations, not a long list of sources at the end. Most of the recently added sources look good, but see Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to cite each claim to a specific source. DougHill (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:37, 4 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Chenzw  Talk  02:28, 5 April 2020 (UTC).

Khaoula SlimaniEdit

Khaoula Slimani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, most of the sources are not reliable or do not establish notability and there isn't any claim that would make them notable in the content. I did a quick search on them to see if there are any reliable sources but couldn't find anything. The pages on other wikis are created by new users and I think it's another creation of paid editing circle. Thanks BRP ever 21:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. I concur with the notability and paid editing arguments. Hiàn (talk) 22:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delete - It is not notable because it does not have reliable sources. This article really needs more reliable sources. Arthurfan828 - CHAT 00:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
    • @Arthurfan828: The current state of sourcing of an article is not a valid reason for/against deletion. Please ensure that you are familiar with the relevant policy. Chenzw  Talk  00:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Claims are made under four categories, but I don't think she is notable under any of them. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
  •   Keep. As notable, artist well known in tunisia. She became a producer. attached a source

https://www.realites.com.tn/2020/03/le-budget-alloue-a-la-production-de-galb-edhib-depasse-le-milliard-de-dinars/ --Chdondon1990 (talk) 11:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 17:06, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

CMV MusicEdit

CMV Music (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Operator873 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Corresponding page on enwiki was deleted and I find the same reasons apply here. This agency doesn't meet notability requirements and fails the significant, in-depth coverage requirement. Operator873talkconnect 16:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 16:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. QDd as not notable per A4 BRP ever 22:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC).

VardhanBoyaEdit

VardhanBoya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Arthurfan828 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable Arthurfan828 - CHAT 08:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Badly written self article Naleksuh (talk) 07:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
  •   Delete - this is almost a textbook example for what A4 ought to be used for. Hiàn (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete why is this at rfd? It's a clear cut example of a4. Praxidicae (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:35, 9 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. This article was largely a copyright violation and a hoax. I deleted the article as such and am closing this RfD. Operator873talkconnect 02:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC).

KonkanilandEdit

Konkaniland (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hoax article by a chronic LTA. Zaxxon0 (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit


This request is due to close on 20:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Operator873talkconnect 02:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC).

My Little Pony (2021 film)Edit

My Little Pony (2021 film) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Case of WP:CRYSTAL here as this could easily be canned with it over a year away. DJSasso (talk) 01:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 01:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep.--Eptalon (talk) 12:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Magneto (comics)Edit

Magneto (comics) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zaxxon0 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:OR Zaxxon0 (talk) 20:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

There are several comic book characters who have Wikipedia pages including on the Simple English Wikipedia. You and I have both worked on a number of them. Magneto has a page on the English Wikipedia. I’m perfectly fine with altering the page to incorporate more information vis-à-vis his relevance but I don’t believe it should be deleted. Of course, it is entirely possible for me to be wrong but if I am I would greatly appreciate an explanation of your reasons for disagreement. Thank you 198.200.115.29 (talk) 01:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC) Also I don’t believe that there is any original research in this article 198.200.115.29 (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

  Keep I added refs to the article and removed the content without ref. He is an important character, present in dozens of interwikis. He is also considered as one of the greatest villains of American HQs. ✍️A.WagnerC (talk) 03:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

  Keep As I said in the discussion earlier without casting a vote there is no original research within the page. 198.200.115.29 (talk) 15:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep There is nothing on the page that looks like OR to me. And he is very clearly a notable character in fiction. -DJSasso (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Related pagesEdit

Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion&oldid=6891849"