Wikipedia:Deletion review

If you think a review of a deletion discussion is needed, please list it here and say why. Users can then comment to reach an agreement on whether the community thinks the discussion was closed correctly, or the decision should be overturned. Each user can say if they want to endorse the closure, or overturn the closure, with a brief comment, and sign with ~~~~.

A page should stay listed here for at least 5 to 7 days. After that time, an administrator will decide if there is a consensus (agreement) about what to do, and take appropriate steps. If the consensus was that the discussion was closed correctly, the discussion should be closed with a note saying this.


Current requestsEdit

สมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัวมหาวชิราลงกรณ บดินทรเทพยวรางกูร and วชิราลงกรณEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Both of these redirects were deleted for being “Not in English” although they don’t fit any deletion criteria. I don’t see any problem redirecting Thai words to a Thai King. -Deppiyy (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

@Deppiyy Only the nomination gave the reason of them not being in English. The other people commenting referred to the discussion at Simple talk, which could be taken to mean that no new redirects of this type should be created until that discussion is over (and these were created after the discussion started). Also keep in mind that there are no defined "deletion criteria" for RFD discussions so it doesn't make sense to say that they don't fit any deletion criteria. -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:10, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
I think what they are trying to say is the deletion didn't match policy/guidelines which is true. The deletion and delete votes didn't follow the current guidelines for redirects, they were valid redirects. -Djsasso (talk) 13:23, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: I support deletion on both RFDs. The deletion criteria is used for speedy deletion. For articles that do not fit the criteria, the community decides whether they should be deleted, as they did. Support continued deletion. Griff (talk) 07:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Restore per Djsasso. A few people supported the deletion pretty much saying "look at ST" where about 50% of the comments are essentially "I don't like it and I don't want to explain why". --Ferien (talk) 16:42, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Continued deletion - the redirect is not needed.--Simple wiki can not solve all sorts of imagined problems.--I am not saying that the redirects are related to a troll factory - however my "out-of-whack detector", is giving interesting signals. 89.8.168.158 (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Continued deletion -- Redirect doesn't exist on Enwiki and really there isn't any point at all whatsoever for it. Something that is unused has no place on any encyclopedia. Many projects have been deleted on this Wikipedia for lack of activity and I think we shouldn't keep something that has no place here. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 03:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
    @MrMeAndMrMe: I'm not saying we should restore these, but keep in mind that the issues with redirects are different from the issues with articles (or projects, for that matter). Redirects aren't expected to necessarily be used; they exist in case somebody uses them at some point in time. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Josephs Quartzy (actor)Edit

The mentioned article was currently nominated to speedy deletion because the article with the same content (and name actually) was once deleted because it did not provide enough references to stand. I suggested it to be reviewed before all and gave a reason that, it had all the requirements for an article but I was never replied and the discussion was a seen a waste lastly, it was deleted. Could you please reconsider and review it?..Though the requirements for an article may vary among wikipedias of different languages. I think notability stands as a pie for all. The entity has got several articles on different wikipedias. NHWX (talk) 16:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Having reviewed the original article that was at RFD, as well as this article, I'm not seeing any one thing that is stated in the article that makes Mr. Quartzy notable. Can you tell me, in short and direct statements, why Josephs Quartzy is notable enough for a Wikipedia article? Griff (talk) 18:24, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
I did not happen to see the original article at RFD though I think it was written poorly, but Mr. Josephs Quartzy is an actor having worked with big names in several notable movies&Tv prog (you can check at his Fimography or prove them at search engines, news, articles and movie data bases). Also he his an author with a notable book nominated in several accordance. He is a performer too. We could keep on improving if article was still alive. NHWX (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
I checked IMDB and none of the credited roles he was in were *not* in notable movies as defined by our guideline on movie notability, nor did I see any indication he met the notability guideline for actors and performers. It is the responsibility of the user requesting a deletion review to show why the reasons the article was deleted were not valid, and you have not provided sources or evidence that it was. At this time, I support continued deletion. Griff (talk) 06:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Support continued deletion - After reviewing the links below:
  • The Los Angeles Times article does not mention Josephs at all. He is not covered by that article.
  • The casts section of the Netflix page does not indicate that Josephs played an important role.
  • No indication that he played an important role in Madagascar 2.
No indication of importance, fails NACTOR. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 11:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  Comment: the editor who started the deletion review has now been blocked as a sockpupppet... --Ferien (talk) 11:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
notability.

Per my research I can testify against 'his credits not to meet our guideline on movie notability'.

I could find a large number of his credits on english and other languages wikipedias too. I thought they might meet requirements.

For notability guideline for actors and performers he's got a huge following in his social medias. He is featured in few articles are referenced on the deleted article, He is featured in other wikipedias like fr and esp also he is well established in search engines like Google and Yahoo NHWX (talk) 07:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

EFEMEdit

Hello hope your doing well , I need you to check this article https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFEM it can be restored in this case the article was deleted with 9 ref one time and again with 24 references. I outlined that the artist name does not pop up on google evrytime due to similar companies with the same name, which is why the name does not show up when you search on google some times this is google id https://g.co/kgs/nV68eZ please undelete the article all

They have all been verified sources, yet I disagree. I've also tagged administrators to investigate this case, because you can't just delete just like that with 24 references. I think administrators should investigate some adminis here because those who abuse thair privileges should be taken178.197.197.173 (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

It has Albanian Wikipedia And it has also wikidata so and it is also on Musicbrainz Discogs Genius I can provide all links is well-known in the Balkans. Albania, Kosovo Nord Macedonian Montenegro and Albanian Diaspora if you search him on google ( EFEM shake it ) there it pops up article as well to178.197.197.173 (talk) 01:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello Againi hope your doing well User:Auntof6 User:ImprovedWikiImprovment User:Operator873 User:BRPever User:Peterdownunder

please keep an eye on some people here they are abusing their privileges they even don't take time to look on google carefully he nominated for deletion for second time efem article was deleted with 24, references i explained already There is a company with the same name that they make google ads each time that make it harder to show a certain time the artist I suggest to keep this article with 24 References thank you in advance.178.197.196.135 (talk) 12:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)178.197.239.86 (talk) 14:44, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Keep this article it meets the criteria 24 references are quiet enough for notability178.197.239.86 (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

(talk)  This article has criteria if some people  do not like Albanians there is not my problem  

This singer is well known in albania kosovo nord macedonien montengro I already provided news links check those founding excuses is easy, but you should undelete the article you can edit the article if you wish the text thats why i taget many administrators 24 references if you think are like nothing there is one big issue here are the press and they have all been verified on wikipedia where this singer was posted and all this sources are reliable

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTV21  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klan_Kosova 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazeta_Express https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegrafi178.197.196.135 (talk) 17:43, 20 May 2022 (UTC)