Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFD)
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives Edit

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletionEdit

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletionEdit

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the userEdit

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

DiscussionsEdit

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussionsEdit

Joe RinaldiEdit

Joe Rinaldi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Couldn't find anything except the IMDb and a Fandom pages in my search for sources to improve the page. Likely not notable. BRP ever 13:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • I found that this article has a jawiki version, but no reliable sources were given as well as here. MathXplore (talk) 14:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
    There is a french version of this article. DMK-C5 (talk) 14:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:Nelson, New ZealandEdit

Template:Nelson, New Zealand (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Navigational box template with no blue links in the body. The purpose of a navbox is to provide links between related articles, and a navbox can't do that if there aren't appropriate blue links. Auntof6 (talk) 08:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 08:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


12 Inch RecordsEdit

12 Inch Records (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to be completely non-notable. Gordonrox24 | Talk 16:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

Delete per nom. No notability asserted. Kansan (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


André MarinhoEdit

André Marinho (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. The one reference doesn't show notability in my opinion, and the only things I can find online are social networks and EverybodyWiki - a wiki often used for articles that have been deleted from Wikipedia. --Ferien (talk) 09:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 09:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Battl Victory RecordsEdit

Battl Victory Records (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from enwiki but not complex, so not an A3. This appears to fail WP:GNG, I can only find primary sources - and that is why the draft for this topic on enwiki has been declined so many times. --Ferien (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • It has not been copied. After creating the Simple English Wikipedia, I expanded the English Wiki. A label has the obligation to hand over everything it publishes, whether digital or physical, to the national libraries. It is also necessary to clarify which category a label falls under. It's a music company, but the charts can no longer be used as a reference as they have been proven to be manipulated. As a company, it should definitely be enough that Battl Victory Records is named and listed in the National Library in Germany and also in the Sigel-Staatsbibliothek. Likewise in MusicBrainz. Likewise, the amount of releases I could find is also sufficient in my opinion.
I'm not very experienced when it comes to deletion requests and where do I have to insert this {{wait}} or make a non-deletion request? DayforDay (talk) 06:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
@DayforDay As Ferien has opened a deletion request, you can no longer use {{wait}} to hold off the deletion process. It was meant to be placed on the article below the quick deletion template. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 07:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi @Fehufanga,
oh ok but thank you for your help and the information. DayforDay (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - The general notability guidelines require independent, significant and reliable references to establish notability. I do not see a lot of that in the article. Most of them are primary sources, which are not independent of the subject, or are database listings, which are not significant enough to establish notability.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 07:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


El PolimataEdit

El Polimata (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Musician BLP with unsourced discography, missing attribution from everybody wiki. Web search by real name or stage name leads to social media or wiki mirrors, cannot reach to reliable independent sources. Previous deletion records suggest the possibility of xwiki spamming, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Polimata for full log. MathXplore (talk) 14:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 14:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Republic of Western Armenia (2nd nomination)Edit

Republic of Western Armenia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The overall tone of the article seems negative, enwiki doesn't have an article on this. I'm not an expert on this subject, but the page seems out of place. It also talks about a newscaster for seemingly no reason. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 23:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Comment: Article has been deleted before, so it may be eligible for QD G4. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 05:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
    @Hockeycatcat: No, it is not. See the page history: I declined QD/G4 because the current article has more content and references than the one that was deleted before. Remember that G4 is for when the content is the same, not just the title. -- Auntof6 (talk) 06:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


SimodmartEdit

Simodmart (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Poorly sourced musician BLP. Web search results by stage name (nickname) are mostly primary sources. Using real name as query leads to many social media accounts including others with same name. Cannot find reliable independent sources about the discography. MathXplore (talk) 08:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete per nominator. I actually wanted to nominate this earlier, but it was not long after the article was created, so I wanted to give the creator more time on expanding the article. Jolly1253 (talk) 12:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Murder of Barbara WaiteEdit

Murder of Barbara Waite (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced murder incident article. Web search results are limited to local news etc. that may not be significant coverages. People mentioned in the article do not seem to be notable without this event. MathXplore (talk) 08:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 08:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The end justifies the meansEdit

The end justifies the means (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SoyokoAnis has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: One unreliable source and the page is about a phrase that necessarily does/should not apply as an article. SoyokoAnis - talk 16:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Alright SoyokoAnis, for your information, this is to tell you that this page was created on 2016 by User:Macdonald-ross. It went a bit revision. To me, the article doesn't have any defect except for the improper source that was added. It can be removed. So I go for   Keep-ing the article. Everything is according to the guidelines of simple wiki.--DMK-C5 (talk) 17:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
    @DMK-C5: I have put back the reference that you removed. Things can be used as references that are not reliable. It's just that they can't be used to establish notability. Whether the site is a reliable source might be up for discussion, though. Please explain why you called it an "improper" source. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:11, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Personally, I have no investment in this article, and won't mind whether it stays or goes. But I think the phrase is notable and interesting enough to be explained. The ends justifies the means is an important political idea. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep - this concept has significant historical notability, which is asserted within the article. Kansan (talk) 22:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


AkteruzzamanEdit

Akteruzzaman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cricket umpire BLP that may not meet WP:GNG. Most of the given references are just passing mentions, not focused on the subject in concern. Web search results by page title or full name include too many others with same name, cannot reach to reliable sources focused on this subject. MathXplore (talk) 08:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 08:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mizanur RahmanEdit

Mizanur Rahman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cricket umpire BLP that may not meet WP:GNG. Most of the given references are just passing mentions, not focused on the subject in concern. Web search results include too many others with same name. Using "Mizanur Rahman cricket umpire" just shows sources about a cricketer with same name. Relevant discussion took place at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizanur Rahman (cricket umpire). MathXplore (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 08:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Md RaselEdit

Md Rasel (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Yahya has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable actor. Sources are about one of his controversies. —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 21:11, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 21:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


HiveonEdit

Hiveon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails en:WP:NCORP Lights and freedom (talk) 17:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Non-notable crypto company. --Derpdart56 (talk) 13:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Amaro coffee academyEdit

Amaro coffee academy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: QD was declined, so I'm taking this here. Doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG, in Persian or English. Not a notable educational institution. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 09:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete per nom, as I request for QD.DMK-C5 (talk) 10:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
    Ah, by the way, thanks @Fehufanga for RfD. I saw Eptalon's message and told me if I wish to go for RfD. DMK-C5 (talk) 10:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Fahed Al-FankEdit

Fahed Al-Fank (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Journalist/writer article without references. Cannot find reliable sources about his writings or literature. MathXplore (talk) 08:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 08:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


InnosiliconEdit

Innosilicon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Company article that may not meet WP:GNG. Given references are about the products rather than the company itself. Web search results shows Amazon.com, primary sources and their translations etc. MathXplore (talk) 08:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

The company is mentioned in well established tech news outlets like Tom's Hardware and TechSpot, I provided the references in the article. Barecode (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:Pp-extendedEdit

Template:Pp-extended (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Currently, our project does not have extended protection/confirmation. I think this template does not match our user access level system. MathXplore (talk) 04:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete per non, for now. When the community thinks of this new user level access (hope that won't be coming), we will see about it. --DMK-C5 (talk) 05:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - Per nominator. NytharT.C 08:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:24, 27 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Master of Computer ApplicationEdit

Master of Computer Application (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: QD A4 declined, but non-notable product. "Is about people, groups, companies, products, services or websites that do not claim to be notable. This includes any article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, product, service or web content that does not say why the subject is important." Gotanda (talk) 22:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete Fails WP:GNG by the looks of it, although I agree that it was appropriate to decline A4 here. A postgraduate degree is not a product and it is important that quick deletion criteria is strictly followed - any unclear cases should go to RfD. --Ferien (talk) 19:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment Universities offer products, courses which people pay for, at the end of buying and using enough of those products the consumer requests, and often pays separately for, a degree. They are products. We have enough traffic on RfD. Can't these non-controversial deletes go to QD? --Gotanda (talk) 06:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


IGA Supermarket shootingEdit

IGA Supermarket shooting (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possible hoax, this needs more sources especially for an incident like this. Derpdart56 (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Speedy delete - likely hoax, article provides no context (including the location of the alleged incident). Kansan (talk) 22:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Power supply unit (computer)Edit

Power supply unit (computer) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tumthe3 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article already exists here: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_supply_unit Tumthe3 (talk) 16:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 16:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:1617 BCEdit

Category:1617 BC (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A large number of year categories in BC which are unnecessary. Each of these categories contains either 1 article, or 1 subcategory that contains 1 article. That is not always bad, but at this level, the articles can just be moved into the corresponding DECADE categories. The whole point of categories is to group things together, and the decade categories could do this more effectively. It would make it easier for readers and there would be less steps to click through.

Note: On enwiki, year categories (en:Category:Years) end at 699 BC, while decade categories end at 790s BC. The year deaths/births categories go back further. Simplewiki is supposed to be simpler, so I propose the year, year births, year deaths, and year establishment categories end at 499 BC, but this can be discussed.

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - Unnecessary NytharT.C 08:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
  • I have mixed opinions:
  • Keep categories for years, births, and deaths. We have always considered these to be exceptions to the 3-item rule. When we know the exact year of something, especially the year someone was born or died, it's good to have it in the exact category.
  • Delete categories for establishments, and recategorize contents. These categories have not usually been considered to be exceptions to the 3-item rule. Also, establishments of some things are sometimes not in just one specific year.
Those are my thoughts. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
@Auntof6 The only items contained in the year establishment categories are Roman Republic and Medes. So are you proposing these be moved into the "decade establishments" categories? Lights and freedom (talk) 02:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
@Lights and freedom: I suppose I am. By the way, I just removed the category for the Roman Republic from the establishment category; usually the (dis)establishment categories contain articles for the things that were established, not categories for them. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussionsEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 22:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Amir ZobdehEdit

Amir Zobdeh (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SoyokoAnis has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This page is non-existent in the English Wikipedia. No sources(a source I found was IMDB which isn't reliable, please tell if there are more). SoyokoAnis - talk 03:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 03:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   DeletePeterdownunder (talk) 22:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Deep Water (video game)Edit

Deep Water (video game) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This video game seems to be made by notable developers, released in Japan, Europe etc. but cannot find reliable sources by searching with English title. Web search with Japanese title goes to Amazon.com, video game wikis, blog posts etc. MathXplore (talk) 15:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete Sources do not cover the topic enough! The article has no copies in other projects and languages--Englandes (talk) 06:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   DeletePeterdownunder (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Template:La Union RadioEdit

Template:La Union Radio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Template:Isabela Radio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Template:Tuguegarao Radio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Template:Baguio Radio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Template:Vigan Radio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:

These radio-related navigational boxes do not have any relevant blue links to articles in the main namespace. Similar situation as Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Category:New Jersey radio market navigational boxes. The templates are just used by others as links between them, but that isn't helpful if the template itself has no navigable links. Some of the red links were previously deleted per QD A4, fails WP:GNG, so these templates may not have usage in future. MathXplore (talk) 15:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete Per nom. In some cases, the entries in the body aren't linked at all, neither red nor blue. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   DeletePeterdownunder (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Satellite Broadcasting Inc.Edit

Satellite Broadcasting Inc. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced radio network article. Includes a list of affiliated stations and looks like well-known across the nation, but web search results just show American companies with similar name instead of the article's subject. MathXplore (talk) 14:17, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

I did minor changes to the above comment, as the template was not typed in properly and was unsigned. Jolly1253 (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Yoshie AkibaEdit

Yoshie Akiba (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to be a case of WP:BLP1E --Ferien (talk) 10:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Comment: I wrote about the kanji description in the article's edit summary, but I'll also leave notes at here for record. The kanji description seems to be 秋葉好江 (per https://globe.asahi.com/article/14354054, Asahi Shinbun article). Although search results by kanji form shows many blog posts rather than reliable sources. MathXplore (talk) 15:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Thank you for bringing this article to my attention (and MathXplore (talk, thank you for the Kanji for her name and the Asahi Shinbun mention, which further demonstrates again her international stature). It looks like MathXlpore and I tried commenting at the same time and so I'll try again:

Ferien (talk), thank you for bringing this page to my attention. It looks like the Pandemic interrupted my checing on this students' work and refocused my own teaching efforts. I spent this morning updating the article and hope it better demonstrates notability for Akiba.

The year this article was started we had students focusing on notable women in the San Francisco Bay Area, where we live. Although our school is located more than an hour from Yoshi's, it is an iconic and notable institution throughout our greater region, as Akiba is an iconic and notable person. (As is also demonstarted, I believe, by the local but geographically diverse set of sources that focus on her and her work in education, advocacy, and promotion of jazz and Japanese culture.) Furthermore, as several sources that I used to start building out her page this morning indicate, her work has been influential in bringing and maintainting interest in jazz to the West Coast of the United States.

I spent some time contemplating whether the article really should have been about Yoshi's (as it is on ENG), but Akiba is recognized for work that goes beyond just her club, both in the world of jazz and the world of Japanese cultural outreach. The fact that so many jazz legends show up for her (whether it is Oscar Peterson describing Yoshi's as "the best club that I've played," Shiela E partnering with her on the mission of Elevate Oakland, or Stevie Wonder and George Lopez stepping up during the Pandemic to help keep Elevate Oakland's work going) is one demonstration of how the broad span of her life's works have been important to many artists -- not to mention the countless children and other individuals impacted by the community centers, educational programs, and performance venues she has created.

The focus of our annual Wikipedia project with students is for them to have a hands-on demonstration of the importance of participation to get notable stories told. We work on the idea that "authority is constructed" and (as WomeninRed notes over on ENG) that the structures and gatekeepers of information creation can make it hard to prove the notability of non-male and/or non-White individuals. Akiba is an excellent example of this issue -- as an older, Japanese-born woman, she is less likely to be celebrated and documented in the way that people of other identities (especially men) might be for her work in Jazz circles. That is specifically why we take the precious classroom time and make the concerted effort to pull together the documentation exists and that proves the case. Hopefully, the source materials I added this morning will clarify her notability.

I look forward to watching her page grow over time.

Thank you, Castilibrary2 (talk) 16:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Keep Not a single event, but a long and influential career. Article needs a lot of work, but that is not reason for RfD. --Gotanda (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:16, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Sheikh Muhammad IbraheemEdit

Sheikh Muhammad Ibraheem (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DMK-C5 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:AUTHOR, not notable DMK-C5 (talk) 10:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit


This request is due to close on 10:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Mr BulletEdit

Mr Bullet (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - Not able to find reliable sources for this one. Possibly a random video game. NytharT.C 09:09, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:09, 24 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Modern history of AzerbaijanEdit

Category:Modern history of Azerbaijan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Do we need modern history categories? Can we define "modern history" in the range of simple English? I think the meaning of modern history could be affected by the passing of time, and that is why I think it's beyond simple English. In this case, Category:History_of_Azerbaijan should be enough. MathXplore (talk) 07:17, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep The term "modern history" has a specific meaning. en:Category:Modern history says "The modern era began approximately in the 16th century." So the beginning point won't change, although theoretically someone could declare an end to it and the beginning of a new period.
If this were the only category for a period in history of Azerbaijan, I might think the plain history category would be enough. But since we also have categories for the ancient and medieval periods, I think we should keep the set. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:44, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Not notable. Peterdownunder (talk) 12:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Family of Gavin NewsomEdit

Family of Gavin Newsom (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Family of Ron DeSantis (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This request includes the following articles:

We don't usually have articles (or even categories) about the families of individual politicians, unless the family as a whole is notable. (Examples of cases where the family as a whole is notable include the Kennedys and the Roosevelts.) These articles are just lists of the parents, partners/spouses, and children of each person. This information would be better merged into the articles about the politicians. Auntof6 (talk) 08:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Relatives are not notable by one of the family having notability. That's elementary. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 08:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   DeletePeterdownunder (talk) 11:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

First Family of CaliforniaEdit

First Family of California (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
First Family of Florida (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This request is for the following two articles:

One doesn't usually refer to the "first family" of a US state. In any case, these articles consist of 1) a general description of what a first family consists of (with no references for the definition) and 2) a generic statement about whose family is the current "first family" of the state. Neither of those seems encyclopedic. Auntof6 (talk) 07:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 07:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Notability not established. Peterdownunder (talk) 11:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Shadi Rifaat AshiEdit

Shadi Rifaat Ashi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested quick deletion; Palestinian movie-maker/youtuber, 30 years old. Seems to have made some TV productions. Big question though: is he notable? Eptalon (talk) 19:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

Keep

Hello all ...

  • The character achieves notability and meets the standards of the biography, as it is a person working in the field of acting, directing and television production.

The character is very popular in the Arab world, as it is the first character to create a television program that simulates the reality of young people in the Arab world.

  • The character is the owner of the real beginning of content creation in the Arab world.

The character has won several awards in the fields of acting and directing.

  • The character is the first Palestinian YouTuber, and he is the first person to enter the world of YouTube in the Levant region.

The character has sufficient reference coverage. --Osps7 (talk) 06:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Is this subject related to Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Shadi Ashi ? MathXplore (talk) 06:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
    If those sources are real, I think he would be notable. The Guardian and Al Jazeera are pretty well known sources. But I clicked on the link to the Guardian article and didn't see any information about him ... I don't know about the Al Jazeera article because I can't read Arabic. Lights and freedom (talk) 06:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
    @Lights and freedom The Guardian article talks about his program (Watan A Watar), where he was arrested by the Palestinian Authority after publishing the program's episodes, and he was the main producer and one of the program's representatives. Osps7 (talk) 07:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
    @Osps7 Ok, but the article doesn't even mention him. Therefore it is no evidence of his notability. Lights and freedom (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
    But the article mainly talked about his most prominent artwork, and his first acting and production work.
    There are many people who have found fame because of their artwork, and because of their ideas.
    There are also many references that covered all the article.
    Al Jazeera also talked about it, and there are many articles.
    And when you compare it with any foreign content creator, we see that it achieves the standards of notability. Osps7 (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
    @Lights and freedom, we also must keep that in our mind about WP:1E (enwiki). DMK-C5 (talk) 15:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
    There must be an explanation.
    The character is not famous because of one work, the character is famous for several reasons, he is the creator of international Arabic content, and the owner of the real beginning of the entry of YouTube to the Levant region, and he is a producer and director and directed important series, which were mentioned in the Guardian newspaper.
    The character has his entire series, and he is the series' producer and lead actor.
    The character has a strong media presence, and has many sources within the article, and the article has been covered with sufficient sources. Osps7 (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Keep I see that the character has achievements, especially that there are enough sources to cover the topic, and the character is an actor and content maker at the same time.--Englandes (talk) 07:00, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - A person working in the field of acting or television production is not automatically notable. Many articles about non-notable actors have been deleted in the past. Being the first Palestinian YouTuber is a claim of notability, but the subject himself must also have significant coverage. Looking at the sources, none of them are significant.
  1. Ref. 1 is not significant, consisting only of several short paragraphs.
  2. Ref. 2 is a resume, which is not a reliable nor independent source.
  3. Ref. 3 is famousbirthdays.com, a website which has been blacklisted on the English Wikipedia for persistent abuse and spamming. Not a reliable source.
  4. I cannot judge refs. 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 13 because I cannot read Arabic. Ref. 12, however, appears to be short enough that I think it would fail as significant coverage.
  5. Ref. 6 is a passing mention in the title and a single paragraph. Not a significant coverage of the subject.
  6. Ref. 7 is not significant.
  7. I do not see any coverage of the subject in ref. 10
  8. Ref. 14 is a youtube video, which is generally unreliable.
Elsewhere, I cannot find significant coverage from reliable sources.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 10:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Notability not established. Peterdownunder (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

RaelEdit

Rael (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Repeatedly created BLP with poorly sourced discography, possibly an non-simplified copy of ptwiki. No sign of recent works. Using stage name as query just show YouTube, social media, IMDB and ticket websites. Searching by birth name leads to another person with similar name. MathXplore (talk) 01:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • English to Portuguese research is totally different I will leave here some examples that the artist is notorious with the following sources from Rolling Stone Magazine, Jornal G1, O Globo all sources linked to TV Globo the most famous press in Brazil. All interviews and news from major Brazilian media.
  1. [https://gshow.globo.com/tudo-mais/rock-in-rio/noticia/rock-in-rio-thiaguinho-jorge-aragao-priscilla-alcantara-e-rael-sao-anunciados-no-festival.ghtml Rock in Rio: Thiaguinho, Jorge Aragão, Priscilla Alcântara e Rael são anunciados no festival]
  2. [https://g1.globo.com/pop-arte/musica/rock-in-rio/2022/noticia/2022/08/19/emicida-vai-receber-drik-barbosa-rael-priscilla-alcantara-e-pastor-henrique-vieira-no-rock-in-rio.ghtml Emicida vai receber Drik Barbosa, Rael, Priscilla Alcântara e Pastor Henrique Vieira no Rock in Rio]
  3. [https://g1.globo.com/sp/sao-paulo/sp1/video/rael-se-apresenta-no-festival-percurso-8165643.ghtml Rael se apresenta no Festival Percurso - Festival no Campo Limpo tem shows gratuitos. Fica perto do Terminal Campo Limpo. Rael se apresenta no domingo]
  4. [https://canaisglobo.globo.com/assistir/c/p/v/6927739/ Assistir Rael, Coisas Do Meu Imaginário - Canais Globo]
  5. [https://rollingstone.uol.com.br/rock-in-rio/com-disco-indicado-contra-bad-vibes-rael-lanca-clipe-de-musica-com-trio-melim-so-ficou-o-cheiro-assista/ Com disco indicado contra bad vibes, Rael lança clipe de música com trio Melim; assista 'Só Ficou o Cheiro']
  6. [https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/saopaulo/2014/12/1565042-e-preciso-se-manter-fiel-a-verdade-mas-livre-para-experimentar-diz-rael.shtml 'É preciso se manter fiel à verdade, mas livre para experimentar', diz Rael]
  7. [https://guia.folha.uol.com.br/shows/1216612-cada-vez-mais-mpb-rapper-rael-da-rima-se-apresenta-em-sp.shtml Cada vez mais MPB, rapper Rael da Rima se apresenta em SP]. --Leonaardog (talk) 02:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete Assesing the sources given above:
  1. Only a passing mention of the subject, would not count towards GNG.
  2. Same as #1
  3. Doesn't explain why the subject is notable.
  4. This is not independent of the subject, would not count towards GNG
  5. Not in-depth, essentially a press release, would not count towards GNG
  6. Interviews are not independent of the subject, would not count towards GNG.
  7. Not in-depth, would not count towards GNG.
In conclusion, not notable. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 08:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
@Fehufanga:   Keep The artist has high coverage by sources from major newspapers in Brazil such as Folha de São Paulo, G1, and in addition he participated as an actor in a TV Globo series. The source I added speaks of his US tour with the group he formed in 2001. -- Leonaardog (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
  •   Keep I think the Portugese page demonstrates notability from the sources. Also, he was nominated for a Latin Grammy Award, which meets en:WP:MUSICBIO if this wiki goes by that. Lights and freedom (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
    Isn't this discussion already closed? Midknight of the Abyss (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
    @Midknight1342: No. If it were closed, it would say it was closed and the result would be indicated. RFDs are not closed just because they are past the close date. -- Auntof6 (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   DeletePeterdownunder (talk) 11:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ukrainian AmericansEdit

Category:Ukrainian Americans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: According to Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Categories showing mixes of national ancestry, it was decided that our project would not have descent categories. I think this category is equivalent to the previous discussion target. MathXplore (talk) 03:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • I don't really see this as over categorization, especially since Category:African-American people and Category:American Jews exist. SEWP isn't like it once was eight years ago(there were probably only 5 or so pages in the cat back then compared to the much more significant count now) and there tends to be specific cultures surrounding any of these groups of peoples. That being said, however, I don't really care seeing as I don't edit much anymore. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk
Thank you for the comment. Just for reference, some editors think that Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Categories showing mixes of national ancestry is still valid. Recently, Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Category:Hispanic and Latino American people has been finished per the consensus above. Although, a different category may lead to a different conclusion, so that is why I started another RFD. MathXplore (talk) 02:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Also would like to mention a valid argument pointed out here in that this can pertain to Native Americans and Asian Americans even though it is a very defining feature of many cultures. There are many Asian American protests, types of Native Americans, etc that all deserve their own category.
Just because one specific RfD has made a case, it also doesn't mean it's a good idea to uphold that case and at the moment, it would make more sense to delete & add cats based on the thoroughness of the category. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 17:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
The issues with African-American people and American Jews have been seen as different from most categories similar to these. I'm not 100% sure why that is, but it might be because they are ethnic groups, not just groups with certain national origins, and because being Jewish is also a religion. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Excluding categories like "American Jews","African-American people"; "Hispanic Americans" or similar (which also describe either an ethnicity, or a religious group), we still have about 190 countries in the world, so about 36.000 possible combinations of two countries. And cases, where someone grew up in one country, but his/her family ultimately came from another country are probably common. Bob Dylan was born in Minnesota, and probably has liuved all his live in the US. His family emigrated from the USSR (what now seems to be Ukraine), so we find a category "Ukrainian Americans". Does he have an Ukrainian passport? - I highly doubt it. A categiory ti say: Look my (Grand)(Father/Mother) was from the Ukraine, but I grew up in the US, and spent all my life there? - Don't forget, unless your parents were part of the "First Nations", almost everyone in the U.S has parents who either immigrated (likely from Europe) or were brought there, likely from Africa. And for each of the 15 people currently in category "Ukrainian Americans", we'd likely need a reference to substantiate the claim. In short: I see a very limited use for such a category (outside the one's pointed out above: either denoting an ethnicity or group with a common set of religious beliefs).--Eptalon (talk) 07:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
    This relates to one of the problems with these categories: at times, they have included people for different reasons. It can be people with ancestry from the named country, people who were born there but were never citizens (the "Fooian-born Americans" whose parents may have only been vacationing or working there, for example), people with dual citizenship (US and the other country), and people who were originally citizens of the other country but who became naturalized citizens of the US. (And there are or have been similar categories for countries other than the US as well.) That makes these categories less meaningful. Even if we carefully define who qualifies to be in each category, not everyone would pay attention to the definition. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
    It's a kind of industry without end. Unless a person has arrived and taken new citizenship, there is little sense in the entire concept. It borders on crackpot to go on generation after generation saying "I'm Portugese-Australian" (or whatever). And few people do. It is more of a WP industry than a real-world reality. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 03:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Quick deleted by User:Macdonald-ross. ShadowBallX (talk) 15:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC).

Bill nye the Russian spyEdit

Bill nye the Russian spy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable sources or significant coverages found for this term. Almost all web search results seem to be social media or YouTube videos. MathXplore (talk) 03:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 03:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:31, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Sam AjdaniEdit

Sam Ajdani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: While the subject is claimed to have won several contests, I don't see any significant and reliable coverage. The second contest doesn't seem to be a notable contest either. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 22:55, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - I found a few sources but I think they're just regular coverage and don't appear to be significant. NytharT.C 09:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. Redirected to Rattlesnake --Auntof6 (talk) 08:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Rattle SnakeEdit

Rattle Snake (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 06:14, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit


This request is due to close on 06:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:20th-century prime ministers of EgyptEdit

Category:20th-century prime ministers of Egypt (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Do we need to categorize prime ministers by century ? I think Category:Prime Ministers of Egypt is enough for now. MathXplore (talk) 04:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 04:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Template:Swift XiEdit

Template:Swift Xi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Japanese company template that may not be useful, possibly related to Nick Barua xwiki spamming. The company that is the subject of this template does not exist at here yet and notability disputed at jawiki. Most company templates at our project are used to list up affiliates or company product names, but this template is just a brief company profile (company type, product abstract, related industry). The blue links at this navbox are going to Unmanned aerial vehicle, Robotics, Aerospace engineering, Aviation, but these are indirectly related topics with the company so I don't think this navbox will hold position at these pages. In addition, if you want to describe company type or relevant industries in template format, using Template:Infobox organization is enough, no need to make another navbox. MathXplore (talk) 04:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete per nom. Chenzw  Talk  17:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Template:T-ICUEdit

Template:T-ICU (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Japanese company template with only one blue link, possibly related to Nick Barua xwiki spamming. Most company templates at our project are used to list up affiliates or company products, but this template is just a brief company profile. If you want to summarize a company profile in template format, using Template:Infobox organization is enough, no need to make another navbox. MathXplore (talk) 04:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 04:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Jasim UddinEdit

Jasim Uddin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DMK-C5 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable artist and fails WP:MUSIC. No reliable source found. DMK-C5 (talk) 02:55, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 02:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Bavarian Elite-AcademyEdit

Bavarian Elite-Academy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 16:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Weak  Keep I don't know it's got articles in 2 other languages and they're both trustable wikis if it was one sure, but 2 makes it seem more notable. I think it just about passes GNG plus it causes no harm to keep it. N1TH Music (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
    N1TH Music, could you show me sources that show it passes GNG? If so I can just withdraw this RfD. --Ferien (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
    @Ferien The corresponding article in german has 6 sources, are none of them reliable? N1TH Music (talk) 05:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
    N1TH Music, two of the references there are from the academy itself so they do not show notability. One is from Süddeutsche Zeitung but again doesn't seem to show notability, just seems to be there to promote the academy, as it is just explaining how the school works. The two sources from universities simply explain about scholarship and the only remaining source is an interview that just mentions the school twice. --Ferien (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - I don't see any reliable or significant sources in German or English. Just because it exists on another Wikipedia, doesn't mean that it necessarily passes GNG here.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 09:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:13, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ColourblocksEdit

Colourblocks (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

N1TH Music has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This topic was QD'd for being nonsense but after conducting a quick google search it appears Colourblocks is the name of a TV series. That may not be the authors' intention however I thought it was worthy of a discussion. I still doubt however that this TV series is notable which is why I've brought it to Rfd N1TH Music (talk) 15:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete This article is nonsense and has no value or significance--Englandes (talk) 06:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:11, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Ek Anokhi Rakshak - NaagkanyaEdit

Ek Anokhi Rakshak - Naagkanya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 21:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:10, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Roger: The Last HumanEdit

Roger: The Last Human (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. --Ferien (talk) 21:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 21:27, 20 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

TraxWeeklyEdit

TraxWeekly (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 21:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 21:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:08, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Abdul Qayoom Mangrio/Computer E LearningEdit

User:Abdul Qayoom Mangrio/Computer E Learning (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Old user draft for a non-notable subject, this appears to be promotion --Ferien (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep I don't think we should delete anything on somebody's user page unless it's got copyvios. There's the place to test and experiment with things.N1TH Music (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
    N1TH Music, I agree that pages in userspace should generally not be touched but this doesn't seem to just be a test or experiment. In my opinion, it is a violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST and is the kind of thing that would be deleted under enwiki's U5. Yes, it isn't a priority to delete this as it's in userspace but currently it is just sitting there as free promotion for this company. --Ferien (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
    @Ferien I disagree, there's nothing promotional there it's one sentence and it's in the User space. I think we should follow WP:BITE here, we should the creator a warning about creating this kind of stuff, he may be an up and coming editor so we should just inform him about the guidelines and tell him to try to edit existing articles. N1TH Music (talk) 05:04, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
    N1TH Music, their last edits were in 2018 and all their edits apart from the ones to this page have been deleted. They also created a very similar page to this one but in mainspace this time, which was deleted and they were warned for it, but then it was created again just a few minutes after. It's reasonable to assume they are just using userspace so their promotion doesn't get deleted as easily. It's a similar story on enwiki where they went to userspace to promote and both the user pages they created ended up being deleted. --Ferien (talk) 06:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - We don't have a U5 deletion policy here, though user pages are deletable under G11 if they are advertisements/promotional in nature. In this case, the username of the sandbox's creator imply a conflict of interest. User pages are not indefinite drafts for promotional content. Delete. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Federick HallEdit

Federick Hall (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to satisfy the requirements of Wikipedia:POLITICIAN. Gordonrox24 | Talk 03:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 03:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Ice Cream GradeEdit

Ice Cream Grade (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Cannot see anything that makes this particular road notable. Gordonrox24 | Talk 03:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Weak  Keep as per WP:GEOROAD, roads are generally presumed to be notable just so long as there is something to say about them which can be sourced properly. I think this just barely passes but needs to be copy-edited and expanded. N1TH Music (talk) 20:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete. Does not make the case for the road to be important. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - Subject-specific notability guidelines do not override the GNG, which this road fails. Few reliable or significant sources.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 09:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:28, 20 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

John Lister MouldEdit

John Lister Mould (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not satisfy the requirements of Wikipedia:POLITICIAN. The mayor of a borough, not even of a municipality proper. Gordonrox24 | Talk 03:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 03:26, 20 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Nadezhda Gavrilovna PetinaEdit

Nadezhda Gavrilovna Petina (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Being an honored artist/citizen is a claim of notability, but I cannot find sources about how they were obtained. Most of the web search results are just wiki mirrors, details about works and artist career remains to be unexplained. MathXplore (talk) 01:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 01:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Wong Chi-KeungEdit

Wong Chi-Keung (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable, possibly even a hoax, created by a globally locked LTA. --Ferien (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - Hoax, not notable. No coverage of this Wong Chi-Keung. If anyone's a "representative" of Johnny, it's Keanu Reeves. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 00:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:06, 19 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. I did not redirect because there are multiple possibilities for a redirect target. Others are welcome to recreate as a redirect or dab if they wish. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Emotional damageEdit

Emotional damage (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The current definition ("situations where a person suffers physiological harm...") makes no attempt at connecting the term with anything related to emotions. Google is completely unreliable as it's completely flooded with the meme. Either redirect this to Psychological trauma, or delete it. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 11:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Comment: I used "Emotional damage" at Google Scholar as query. The articles that appeared as result does not include this term. At this moment, I cannot believe that "Emotional damage" exists as an academic terminology. MathXplore (talk) 11:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
    On the other hand, Google Scholar shows many articles with "Emotional damages" in their title. MathXplore (talk) 11:07, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Keep EMOTIONAL DAMAGE Keep but either Redirect to a more fitting term, such as Mental illness or related articles. --Derpdart56 (talk) 16:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 07:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Gay HitlerEdit

Gay Hitler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Having roads named after himself could be a claim of notability. In addition, the article tells stories about his name, early life, and obituary. Although this page does not explain his works as dentist, and how he served to the community. Historical procedures about how he made roads named after him is also missing. Using "Gay Hitler" as query just leads to sources about Adolf Hitler. Including middle name in the query shows few obituary articles and the others are about Adolf Hitler, very hard to find reliable sources for this biography. MathXplore (talk) 06:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Comment: What in the....--Derpdart56 (talk) 16:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - Mere onomastical coincidence and/or curiosity that doesn't lend any significant notability.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 03:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 06:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 07:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Raúl AldanaEdit

Raúl Aldana (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Voice actor BLP with an unsourced filmography copied from enwiki. The references at the enwiki version seems to be passing mentions, duplicate references, primary sources and may not support the notability of this subject. Most of the web search results are fandom, IMDB, social media accounts and cannot reach out to reliable sources to verify the filmography. MathXplore (talk) 06:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 06:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 07:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

DasqEdit

Dasq (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks reliable sources. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria. BRP ever 02:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - None of the sources presented in the article are reliable and/or significant. Not notable. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 04:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - Not notable, doesn't have an article on enWP. NytharT.C 05:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete Yes, he is a DJ, and he has many works.. but he is not considered distinguished or well-known, and he is not considered a beginning in this field--Englandes (talk) 07:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:44, 19 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 07:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Make A Wish BDEdit

Make A Wish BD (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DMK-C5 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, mostly created for advertising. And doesn't have enough sources to verify this. More over I see this is more like a travel and tour office and have some branches in Bangladesh. But it is not exactly a industry at all. DMK-C5 (talk) 09:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Striked off some reason because it might be possible a company.
DMK-C5 (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - Not notable and no reliable or significant coverage from independent sources. Sources that are in the article don't qualify to pass GNG.— *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 22:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:33, 18 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 07:55, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Bratko Bohdan MartynovychEdit

Bratko Bohdan Martynovych (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Possiby notable Ukraian actor, wh recentrly died, at age 81. Might not be well-known in the English-speaking world. Not sure there are enough sources, so taking this to RfD, instead of doing a quick-deletion request. Thoughts? Eptalon (talk) 07:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 07:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 07:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Vyshegorodtsev, Vladimir I.Edit

Vyshegorodtsev, Vladimir I. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DMK-C5 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, even have possible notability claims. But I feel there is need for improvement here. Comments? DMK-C5 (talk) 03:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - I don't see any significant coverage in Russian or English. If this were to be kept however, it should be renamed "Vladimir Vyshegorodtsev", as the current name uses the reversed order (as in ruwiki). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fehufanga (talkcontribs)

This request is due to close on 03:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 07:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Born GroupEdit

Born Group (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

MathXplore has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Company article based on a declined enwiki draft, as mentioned in article talk page. Cannot see attempts to resolve the issues pointed out by the enwiki reviewer(s). Job description is too ambiguate, and the client list does not give any further details of corporate connections. Relevant web search results are primary sources, LinkedIn/Wantedly, or other companies with similar name, cannot reach to significant coverages. MathXplore (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • The sources given for the article are secondary, reliable news outlets. Will work on expanding job description and corporate connection. Will that resolve the issue? Shaivikshetty (talk) 09:07, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
    I'm not sure about that until I see the changes. MathXplore (talk) 09:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
    Have added section "services" to expand on the job description.
    Have added another reference:
    ETbrandequity
    And two case studies to show corporate connection
    Ford
    Tata
    Please have a look. Thanks Shaivikshetty (talk) 13:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
    In this case borngroup.com pages cannot be counted as WP:RS. I'm asking independent coverages about this topic. MathXplore (talk) 13:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
    The clients are referenced in the mint article - an independent and reliable verified news source. I can remove the clients if you think that is not sufficient. I have addressed the issues in the rest of the stub to qualify retaining the article. Shaivikshetty (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
  •   Delete - Not a notable company. No significant coverage that would help establish its notability. All of the sources above are not reliable. — *Fehufangą✉ Talk page 03:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:24, 15 September 2022 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Related pagesEdit