Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfD)
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives Edit

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletionEdit

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletionEdit

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the userEdit

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

DiscussionsEdit

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussionsEdit

Suresh PritamEdit

Suresh Pritam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Desertborn has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Musical artist, appears to lack notability at this time. No reliable sources linked, just bios and own songs. Google search does not reveal news articles. Desertborn (talk) 12:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Delete - fails notability guidelines for music. Milo, Talk, Contribs 12:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment Also, appears that the subject wrote this article. The username creating it is the same as the name of the subject. Further there is a heading "listen to my music" which clearly indicates that as well. Of course that in itself is not a reason for deletion but is highly questionable. The whole thing seems very promotional to me. Desertborn (talk) 12:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 12:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Asif JeriyaEdit

Asif Jeriya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SpaceGuy32 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail guidelines for music notability. Milo, Talk, Contribs 13:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 13:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Rijvi RajEdit

Rijvi Raj (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable --IWI (talk) 11:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit


This request is due to close on 11:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dur KhanEdit

Dur Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't believe this subject to be notable. Can't find much to source the article, and the award he won doesn't appear to be notable either. Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 22:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Aladdin MeierEdit

Aladdin Meier (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Belwine has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable or pass the general notability guideline. --Belwine (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 20:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


CA1Edit

CA1 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Belwine has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to exist --Belwine (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 09:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Stanley KavetuEdit

Stanley Kavetu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG. Work is typical of a lawyer in this field. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 01:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Nebojša KavarićEdit

Nebojša Kavarić (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I believe this subject fails the standards set out at WP:CREATIVE. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:23, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Not notable. All routine for an artist. What it lacks is notable professional critic who is independent of the person, not fan-cruft. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 01:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


David John Henry Ingham Roper-CurzonEdit

David John Henry Ingham Roper-Curzon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable --IWI (talk) 23:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit


This request is due to close on 23:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Afro-GypsyEdit

Afro-Gypsy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability/verifiability concerns. I only found one good source that even used the term "Afro-Gypsy," an interview with exactly one musician who owns that it is his own personal term. I found no sources showing that the term is in general use. I know we are WP:NOTCENSORED, but given that "gypsy" is a slur, we should take extra care to be accurate. Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit


This request is due to close on 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Jashon CuylerEdit

Jashon Cuyler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Belwine has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Belwine (talk) 12:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Not notable. YouTube and Facebook are not suitable as evidence because they are not independent of the person. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 12:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Pran G BasakEdit

Pran G Basak (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Belwine has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG --Belwine (talk) 10:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Not notable. Reads like a c.v. Support for claims of notability must be independent of the person, such as by disinterested expert critics. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment - I have not been able to find third party reliable sources covering the subject. --85.255.232.68 (talk) 14:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Artur KasperekEdit

Artur Kasperek (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't believe this subject passes WP:NMUSIC. Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.


DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 00:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


CinemablindEdit

Cinemablind (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Belwine has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: does not appear to pass WP:GNG --Belwine (talk) 17:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 17:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


DellorEdit

Dellor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Is this notable? I don't know, and the controversy part doesn't seem true... Derpdart56 (talk) 15:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Well it's true, there are clips of the incident where he said the n word 64 times and the sexist incident where he told a female gamer to go cook a sandwich, those 2 clips are on YouTube. And there's an article on the YouTube fandom wiki called wikitubia where the source is from, and the other 2 sources are the clips I mentioned earlier in this reply, have an awesome day. Kamen rider saber (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
    Wikitubia isn't a valid source...--Derpdart56 (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Well, both sources are self published and are editable by strangers, so I guess it is. So,   Delete Darubrub (talk) 13:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  • His YouTube channel (here) has about 800,000 subscribers, but I cannot find any reliable sources about him.   Delete --Belwine (talk) 13:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

I added some reliable sources.Kamen rider saber (talk) 17:14, 13 April 2021 (UTC) This request is due to close on 15:40, 13 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Atto AbbasEdit

Atto Abbas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

つがる has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't get much from the typical Google lookup. Also Tagged as 'Cross Wiki Spam" in which the IP is constantly removing the QD Tags on this Wiki. Send to RFD for people's thoughts... Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:58, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Doesn't seem anything notable or of value in what has been presented to this point. Billinghurst (talk) 02:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Football definitely isn't my area of expertise, but just looking around I did find a hit at Yahoo news, which leans me to a weak keep. From what I understand of NFOOTY, the threshold for notability is having had played in a professional league. With this subject being so young, I'm unsure if they meet that requirement. However the source reads as if they are at the very least about to be playing professionally soon, pending Covid restrictions.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:06, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  • https://www.kasimpasasporkulubu.com/kasimpasadan-son-gelismeler/ official team blog stop deleting verified articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nezashema (talkcontribs)
    • Ridiculous... you even resort to creating hoax websites. This is the official team website. Nehme1499 (talk) 03:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Strong delete and SALT the article has been deleted multiple times on en.wiki, and SALTed. Nezashema and 45.156.29.58 also need to be blocked (same person). This cross-wiki spam is becoming difficult to control, so SALTing here would already be a good start. Nehme1499 (talk) 02:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete looks like a complete hoax. No evidence of the player playing for Kasımpaşa. ShadowBallX (talk) 03:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Changing my vote to   Quick Delete per the other pages. ShadowBallX (talk) 03:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

https://www.posta.com.tr/arsenal-atto-abbasi-transfer-etmek-istiyor-2288041

https://www.asistanaliz.com/futbol/son-dakika-kasimpasali-atto-abbasa-arsenal-kancasi-a77456

https://t24.com.tr/haber/arsenal-kasimpasa-li-atto-abbas-in-pesinde,915531

https://www.cnnturk.com/spor/futbol/kasimpasali-abbas-arsenalin-radarinda

https://www.milliyet.com.tr/skorer/son-dakika-arsenal-kasimpasali-abbasin-pesinde-6357625sock strike. Praxidicae (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep

The Fact that alot turkish media talk mention this player shown much notable for the page to be * Keep and player was mentioned on live transfer move to arsenal on the sun newspaper UK in January seems the deal didn't go throughsock strike. Praxidicae (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)


  • KEEP

did my research and i suggest this page should be * Keepsock strike. Praxidicae (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

  • delete this is a hoax and contrary to the assertion that this is a reliable source, it is not. It's a press release and Yahoo will publish them for pay regardless of the accuracy of content. Praxidicae (talk) 14:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete No apparent evidence of claims. Anyone can make claims that would meet NFOOTY, but these have to be verified for us to keep. --IWI (talk) 14:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment I decided to look deeper into the player. While it looks like he might exist, he heavily fails GNG. And while it seems like Fabrizio Romano (a very credible person in soccer transfer rumors) had discussed the player being linked with a move to Arsenal, it actually is false (see this for the story). ShadowBallX (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
    He probably exists, but this doesn't mean he plays for the teams/in the leagues that are claimed. --IWI (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
    After a bit more deep searching, it seems that the player has been training with Kasımpaşa, which is why he probably doesn't appear on the website. He also did seem to be linked with a transfer to RB Leipzig back in November 2020. I also found an Instagram account. (Here is the link if you want to see it) ShadowBallX (talk) 21:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
    The person obviously exists. However, all claims to notability are false/hoaxes. Neither Arsenal nor RB Leipzig even know who the player is, and I actually wouldn't be surprised at all if the player's agent paid Kasımpaşa for Abbas to train with them (but not actually be part of the team). Nehme1499 (talk) 21:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment if anyone wants to have a bit of fun, read this userpage in Spanish about Atto Abbas. Nehme1499 (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete The article has been speedy deleted via AfD in eswiki (per hoax and promotional) and enwiki (per notability concerns). El Rolo Ueeqee (talk) 22:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment We are not voting here it look like Nehme1499 is bringing all his friends Wikipedia editors to say delete this is blind argument let’s forget about Wikipedia or all Wikipedia families let’s talk about outside sources this page have so many outside sources reference that identify the page Turkish sport newspapers talk about this page and administrators let’s look at this let’s not forget the methodology of Wikipedia is powered by outside sources so Wikipedia editors saying previously page was deleted on wikieng doesn’t signify anything other than editor’s opinion.
    Hi there, the page still fails notability guidelines on this Wikipedia and others. Whilst I see you have good intentions, the page just isn't notable to stay on the wiki. See and WP:GNG for more information. Fixing26 (talk) 11:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
    I don't see the good intentions in creating 10 accounts to avoid blocks, and creating this hoax footballer on every Wikipedia project possible so that there might be a chance that one stays up. Nehme1499 (talk) 13:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
    That's probably true in regards to intentions, I have a tendency to give people the benefit of the doubt. Fixing26 (talk) 13:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
    Please continue to do so; assuming good faith is an important principle on Wikipedia. --IWI (talk) 14:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
    "Actions that are not consistent with good faith include vandalism, sockpuppetry, and lying." Nehme1499 (talk) 14:33, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
    Yes, this was a general comment as he said he tended to give the benefit of doubt. --IWI (talk) 16:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
    Yes yes of course, AGF is paramount. But after a year of this, I think good faith can be thrown out of the window with this specific user(s). Nehme1499 (talk) 16:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Quick Delete deleted mutliple times cross wiki and not notable. Darubrub (talk) 14:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Comment - In one of the articles, he was referred to as 'starlet', so could be a case of TOOSOON? Therefore, my vote would be towards delete. --185.69.144.102 (talk) 15:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
    Hello. If an article calls a player a "starlet", that does not actually matters. What mainly maters is the content in the article. ShadowBallX (talk) 21:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The World's Major Belief SystemsEdit

The World's Major Belief Systems (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Original research, lacks reliable sources and doesn't seem to be notable, I can't find it anywhere else either Fixing26 (talk) 22:00, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete per above. ShadowBallX (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
  • probably an attempt to get en:Major religious groups to this Wiki. Yes, there are 7-8 "large religious groups" (Christianity,Islam,Judaism, Hiduism, Buddhism,"Folk Religions" (Chinese folk religion, Japanese Folk religion, Korean folk religion)). So: In its current form, the article needs improving, and we can talk about the title/where to put it, but the subject is clearly notable. en:Religious studies are also about comparing these different belief systems. Since dleetion isn't cleanup, I suggest we rework this into a viable stub..- clear keep--Eptalon (talk) 22:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
    Yes, there's the problem of having no sources, and the text probably being copied form an unattributed source. I have started World religions (which is a partial translation of the EnWp article). One option would be a redirect, to get rid of the unattributed content...--Eptalon (talk) 09:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
    A redirect would work too. Fixing26 (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Unsourced spiel put up in a single edit and almost certainly copied from an unacknowledged source. It's a case where the lack of credits is critical, and notability is not a defence because it is POV and probably a coyvio. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


S. J. BerchmansEdit

S. J. Berchmans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lights and freedom has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looks like advertising. I can't find any coverage in reliable sources so he seems to fail WP:GNG. Lights and freedom (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • S. J. Berchmans is Christian evangelist. He is widely known in South India. He is notable. Page should not be deleted. Underpants90 (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Underpants90: To show that he is notable, you must find reliable, independent sources that talk about him. Independent means they were written by somebody who is not connected with him. Reliable means they can be things like news articles, or major music awards, but they cannot be blogs. Anybody can write a blog, so this does not make somebody notable. All the sources I see on the article were either written by him, or by an organization which he runs. Lights and freedom (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Underpants90 (talk) 16:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC) okay, if you believe it can be deleted. I'm not connected to the subject at any case.

  • Delete Cannot find anything to show notability. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:38, 10 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Jaisalmer NewsEdit

Jaisalmer News (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable --IWI (talk) 12:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

  •   Delete Doesn't appear to be notable, can't find anything in other media publications and isn't on other front pages of search engines that've I've tried Fixing26 (talk) 23:58, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 12:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Arpana SharonEdit

Arpana Sharon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail en:WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 12:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

  •   Delete Not notable. I can't find her in any news, the only items on the web I can find mentioning her are her own YouTube channel, with 7,000 subscribers. Fixing26 (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete - per nom, a non-notable individual.-KH-1 (talk) 01:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 12:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Underpants90 (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Arpana Sharon was featured in the multiple online sources.


Vedax MusixEdit

Vedax Musix (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail GNG. --IWI (talk) 13:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 13:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mike Smith (animator)Edit

Mike Smith (animator) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I originally thought the page was a hoax (as has been the case in the past), but there is an indication that this person exists. In any case, there doesn’t appear to be any independent coverage of him. Thus, I believe they fail GNG. --IWI (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete as not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 16:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Khushi BhardwajEdit

Khushi Bhardwaj (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails NACTOR as they have only starred in one notable tv series. Fails the other points also. --IWI (talk) 08:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Delete There are some references like, which is not listed in article. Though appeared in one movie only. Hosaimol (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bijan GanjaliEdit

Bijan Ganjali (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail NACTOR and GNG. --IWI (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Keep dose pass GNG and he is old Iranian actor who has acted in many movies and series and continues to do so... "37.255.154.18 (talk) 22:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)"
  •   Delete Article does not seem to cite Reliable Sources, and neither does Google return me much. --Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Siavosh TahmouresEdit

Siavosh Tahmoures (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail NACTOR and GNG. --IWI (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • The text offers no discussion of notability. The manner illustrates how little the concept is understood. It says "He is one of the oldest actors in Iran". In the absence of knowing what he has done, and what the critical responses were to it, we have no alternative but to delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep He is one of the famous and old Iranian actors who has acted in many movies and series and continues to do so. "37.255.154.18 (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)"
  • Keep dose pass GNG and NACTOR "109.125.174.232 (talk) 16:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)"
  • Delete per nom. Doesn't appear to pass WP:ENT.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Audu Bako Zoological GardenEdit

Audu Bako Zoological Garden (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, but weakly. Derpdart56 (talk) 14:51, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • en:Tierpark Hagenbeck and en:Tiergarten Schönbrunn are examples of two zoos that are notable; both have existed for centuries. Another one is perhaps fr:Réserve ornithologique du Teich. I haven't had an in-depth look at the sources, but I think the article might have potential. Note also: AFAIK, they speak English in Nigeria, so sources should be easy to find. The question I cannot answer is the following: Among all the zoos in Nigeria, what is it that makes this one special? - In its current state, the article might be either a delete, or a keep, but with a little work I think it can be turned into a keep. --Eptalon (talk) 21:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
  • If it had proper content, no doubt it would be fine. But it doesn't have any real content. So delete as it is. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete seems to fail GNG looking at a google search. Only passing mentions. --IWI (talk) 22:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
  • I believe it is more commonly known as the Kano zoo and also Gidan zoo. That would make it one of the first (the first?) zoo opened in Nigeria, which would certainly be notable. And I believe the one with the most animal species. But as it stands I agree the article has not enough real content. Desertborn (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
    Notability is established by independent coverage from reliable sources, just to clarify. Unless subject-specific guidelines say so, it being the first zoo doesn't make it automatically notable. --IWI (talk) 17:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Jody StevensEdit

Jody Stevens (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I think this article is worth some discussion. The subject's personal work really doesn't turn up much. Looks like some minor success with one song. Outside of that, his other accomplishments appear to be having worked alongside his father writing songs for other artists. I'm not sure I am convinced the subject is notable enough for their own standalone article. Possibly we could have an article for their band Fast Ryde, however even that seems questionable. Gordonrox24 | Talk 02:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete fails all points of en:WP:MUSICBIO. Also, insufficient in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 01:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep not sure about en:WP:MUSICBIO, but the person has coverages including from Billboard, Music row, The West News. The article may be curtailed in great extent but should not be deleted. Hosaimol (talk) 15:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
    Those sources don’t seem to cover this person at all. --IWI (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Those sources do mention this subject very briefly, however they do also seem to confirm what I've thought. This subject is only known through their father's work. This subject's collaboration with their father may warrant a mention on a Jeff Stevens page, should we get one. But only as part of a full history of their work.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes, sorry. I should have said they don't cover the subject in depth at all. --IWI (talk) 11:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.



Recently closed deletion discussionsEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep.--Eptalon (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Jennifer PenaEdit

Jennifer Pena (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darubrub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems like there are no sources for this article, which makes me doubt about the notability of this subject. Darubrub (talk) 18:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Keep Grammy award nominations. Clearly notable. -Djsasso (talk) 20:08, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep has been nominated for a Grammy multiple times, which passes WP:ANYBIO.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Grammy nominations + numerous other awards, so definitely notable. Milo, Talk, Contribs 10:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. No objections raised. --IWI (talk) 02:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Julie CondliffeEdit

Julie Condliffe (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject doesn't appear to be notable. Run of the mill lawyer, no noteworthy contributions to the field. Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 00:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. No objections raised. --IWI (talk) 02:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Josh BogertEdit

Josh Bogert (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Believe this subject fails NACTOR. Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:10, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 22:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. No objections raised.. --IWI (talk) 02:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Jonha RichmanEdit

Jonha Richman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't see how this subject passes GNG. Some references seem to mention a Jonha Revesencio, not a Jonha Richman, so it is unclear if we're talking about the same person. In any case, doesn't appear to be notable. Gordonrox24 | Talk 22:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 22:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Quickly deleted as copyright violation and spam. Operator873talkconnect 02:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC).

Saša MilivojevEdit

Saša Milivojev (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

GhostDestroyer100 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of notability. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • This is a shameless cross-wiki spam. The article was uploaded by an IP who hadn't edited anything else, and this is the case in all of the articles. Even Saša himself has contributed to some of the articles, like the Hungarian one. The sources do not establish notability. All of the interwiki links cite similarly unreliable sources. Also, both the IPs and Saša are vandals as well, since (in the case of the Hungarian article, at least) they keep deleting the deletion template. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete, not notable. --Derpdart56 (talk) 13:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Related pagesEdit