Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Imdad Imam

Imdad Imam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 07:22, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Relayball (Game)

Relayball (Game) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 02:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• https://www.topendsports.com/sport/new/relay-ball.htm It’s a sport locally EliG233 (talk) 02:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:03, 26 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Tengenapatam

Capture of Tengenapatam (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Did a search on Google found nothing connected to page. BigKrow (talk) 19:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Comment maybe you should check the sources rather than doing Google Searches [1] this and other two sources have significant coverage about this battle, so i suggest you to stop your stupidity and go through sources rather than putting articles to deletion with your baseless reasons like "Can't find on Google" Mr.Hanes Talk 19:44, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

  @Mr.Hanes: don't you dare call me stupid for one and two I been editing on here for awhile now I see you have a temper should I report you to the mods??? BigKrow (talk) 19:48, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

  Atleast give a proper deletion reason while going through your deletion history your reasons are "Seems Hoax", "Can't find on Google" etc they are not proper reasons for deletion. "You don't dare call me stupid" Seems to be a threat which means you are violating WP:Personalattack in that case i should be the one reporting you to the Mods. Mr.Hanes Talk 19:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

  I didn't threaten you with bodily harm bro so relax Islam scares me.... @Mr.Hanes: BigKrow (talk) 19:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

  Don't cyberbully me... BigKrow (talk) 19:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

  You can't even threaten someone verbally on Wikipedia and what is the connection of Islam with this ? Mr.Hanes Talk 20:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

  I would recommend you both stop this and don't continue with any further personal attacks. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

  Agreed BigKrow (talk) 21:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Y3IIO

Y3IIO (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not very encyclopedic or notable. Personally, I don't see how adding a person's social media sites makes the subject notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 15:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agree with Nominator--Ksy 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Nabhan family

Nabhan family (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No trustworthy sources have confirmed that this family has been covered collectively. A website that appears to be user-generated yet lacks identified authors and sourcing information on family names is one of several untrustworthy sources. Other Please If I am not wrong Ksy 14:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Snee-Oosh, Inc.

Snee-Oosh, Inc. (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 14:52, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:52, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Behera (Koli title)

Behera (Koli title) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Where Found Behera (Koli title) as the content mention And other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 14:48, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:48, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kyaw Myo Min

Kyaw Myo Min (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject do not show significant coverage Other please check If I am not wrong Ksy 14:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  QD'd as copyright violation. Tuscan Ant (talk) 07:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Basel Al-Haroon

Basel Al-Haroon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Draft is made with Copy paste from the subject CV Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 14:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as the article's subject is not notable. There is only one source in that page. Codename Noreste (talk) 16:38, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete As written, this isn't enough to show WP:NBIO is met. The sole source is a bio page of a connected organization, never a reliable source. This needs sources that are independent from the subject with significant coverage to show notability. Ravensfire (talk) 18:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Rasha Thadani

Rasha Thadani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability found other check if I am not wrong Ksy 14:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete It's w:WP:TOOSOON for an article right now. WP:NACTOR looks for multiple significant roles or winning a major award. Neither are true here. Ravensfire (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete complex headings such as "External links" which is confusing for those who non-navite english, learning disability and children. Raayaan9911 18:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:32, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fahd Al Hemeiri

Fahd Al Hemeiri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Just a Promotional content. Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 14:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:27, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Antony Manyara

Antony Manyara (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Adolf Lu Hitler Marak

Adolf Lu Hitler Marak (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tuscan Ant has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article contains false information and is written in a non-neutral way because it was generated by ChatGPT. Tuscan Ant (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete BigKrow (talk) 12:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:30, 25 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Minecraft mobs

Minecraft mobs (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS and fails WP:GNG. I think a redirect or merge to Minecraft could be a good idea. AVG555^(talk) 20:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Merge I think merging the two would be a good idea too. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 20:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2035

2035 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS, fails WP:GNG, and WP is WP:NOTCRYSTAL AVG555^(talk) 19:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep There are many kinds of things that can be included in articles about future years without being WP:CRYSTAL. Some of the entries here could be reworded, but the article itself is fine. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2034

2034 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS, fails WP:GNG, and WP is WP:NOTCRYSTAL AVG555^(talk) 19:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep There are many kinds of things that can be included in articles about future years without being WP:CRYSTAL. Some of the entries here could be reworded, but the article itself is fine. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2033

2033 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS, fails WP:GNG, and WP is WP:NOTCRYSTAL AVG555^(talk) 19:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep There are many kinds of things that can be included in articles about future years without being WP:CRYSTAL. Some of the entries here could be reworded, but the article itself is fine. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2032

2032 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS, fails WP:GNG, and WP is WP:NOTCRYSTAL AVG555^(talk) 19:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep There are many kinds of things that can be included in articles about future years without being WP:CRYSTAL. Some of the entries here could be reworded, but the article itself is fine. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2031

2031 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS, fails WP:GNG, and most importantly, WP is WP:NOTCRYSTAL. AVG555^(talk) 19:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep There are many kinds of things that can be included in articles about future years without being WP:CRYSTAL. This article is fine. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:13, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2030

2030 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS, fails WP:GNG, and most importantly WP is WP:NOTCRYSTAL AVG555^(talk) 19:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep no need a deletion, it just Wikipedia calendar. Raayaan9911 22:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep I think some of the entries could be reworded to say that the thing described is expected or planned, rather than a sure thing. Other than that, though, we have articles like this about future years without any problem, as do other Wikipedias. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Eren Niazi

Eren Niazi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zjui3r has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet the notability requirements. Zjui3r (talk) 18:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Audiophile terminology

Audiophile terminology (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Cactusisme has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: notable? Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 08:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete complex, LLM generated article. Ternera (talk) 15:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete AI-generated content, complex article, which is makes difficult to understand for those who non-navite english, learners and learning disability. Raayaan9911 15:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete per Raayan, AI-generated content and complex article. –Davey2010^Talk 19:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Joacim Cans

Joacim Cans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I found many interviews with him, but no WP:RS to show he meets WP:BIO AVG555 (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Wibbly Pig

Wibbly Pig (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS and does not meet WP:GNG. The article on the normal English Wikipedia should probably be nominated for deletion too. AVG555 (talk) 03:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Zombilation – The Greatest Cuts

Zombilation – The Greatest Cuts (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No WP:RS and does not meet WP:MUSIC AVG555 (talk) 03:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marko Meko

Marko Meko (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Jaypung has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines due to a lack of significant, independent, and reliable secondary sources. The majority of the sources cited are promotional, local, or primary in nature and do not provide the in-depth or critical analysis necessary to establish the subject's notability. Additionally, the article is written in a promotional tone, resembling an advertisement rather than an objective, encyclopedic entry. While the subject may have some local recognition, there is no evidence of significant achievements such as chart-topping hits, major awards, or critical acclaim from reputable sources. Without substantial independent coverage, the article does not meet the standards required for inclusion on Wikipedia and should be considered for deletion. Jaypung (talk) 01:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kaveri (2024 movie)

Kaveri (2024 movie) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wikipedia is reliable so I made a search on this but found nothing. BigKrow (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• BigKrow FYI Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/Kaveri (2024 movie), Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 21:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kaisi Ye Dor (movie)

Kaisi Ye Dor (movie) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails notability BigKrow (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:53, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ayaz Syed

Ayaz Syed (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem notable enough for no Wikipedia page also not much in article... BigKrow (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Nothing to support this as a notable person, sources are single-line mentions at the end. Nothing to show that WP:NBIO is met after article was pruned of sources that didn't mention Syed and pure promotional fluff. Ravensfire (talk) 20:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  This is person is base on reality biography Karachibhai21 (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  I believe you that this is a real person. But most people are not notable and to have an article on Wikipedia, the person must be notable. And from what's in the article and a web search, they aren't notable. Ravensfire (talk) 20:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Could not find any WP:RS whatsoever. Fails WP:BIO. AVG555 (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  Block this person ip @Ravensfire@AVG555 Karachibhai21 (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  I would recommend you read WP:CIVIL. Thank you. AVG555 (talk) 21:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  Are you the real editor of this wikipedia you needed to review this person who really appeared in Pakistani entertainment industry Karachibhai21 (talk) 21:26, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  I did review this person. They are not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. People have to have WP:RS about them and meet the guidelines at WP:BIO. AVG555 (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete I agree with BigKrow and Ravensfire, sorry, maybe in the future, but for now he is one of millions of MUAs and influencers. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 21:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you @Dream Indigo: BigKrow (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 21:41, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete According to this WP:RS→TypeInfo (talk) 09:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nominatior. Raayaan9911 21:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sunita Dholakia

Sunita Dholakia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Found Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 19:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No WP:RS, does not meet WP:BIO, and most of the sources are minor coverage that barely mentions the subject at all. AVG555 (talk) 19:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Joanna Modes

Joanna Modes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tuscan Ant has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I'm not sure if she counts as notable per Wikipedia standards. There are a number of sources, but they all seem to be from "gossip websites". Tuscan Ant (talk) 19:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - I would agree with your assessment of the sourcing, I'm down for a delete, unless reliable sources can be found. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
• Keep: I just double check each link and there are very much legit, even those from gossip websites are based on facts sources. If we will not keep it, otherwise that way we will have to delete all celebrities Contributor Eli (talk) 10:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Keep- I do not agree, I am pro keep it, all sources are reliable, legit and base on facts. Contributor Eli (talk) 10:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: Struck out duplicate "keep" from this user. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: All of this user's edits here have been to this RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

• Keep: I have checked sources and sources are legitimate despite some might look like gossip, they are Wikipedia standards. 212.14.47.11 (talk) 11:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: This IP's only edits here have been to this RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

• Keep:He revisado todas las fuentes y son legítimas y confiables, y Joanna Modes es una persona muy conocida en España y el Reino Unido. Esta página cumple con los estándares de Wikipedia PaulaMaurizio (talk) 11:36, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: This user's only edits here have been to this RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

• Keep: Joanna Modes definitely counts as notable per Wikipedia standards and definitely sources are reliable, page is well writen per Wikipedia standards and there are direrect links to other notable Wikipedia pages that aacept links to her. There are a number of sources that all meets Wikipedia standards and are proper reliable press articles from popular press magazines that relying on curent and historical events sources supported even by history books. Moever relying on the press as sources is not against Wikipedia standards, so I am voting fo keeping this page and I am startled you requested for deletion. Hall Gelashvili (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: This editor's only edits here have been to this RFD. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Keep: All sources are reliable press articles from popular press magazines that relying on curent and historical events sources supported even by history books. Moever relying on the press as sources is not against Wikipedia standards, so I am voting fo keeping this page and I am startled you support this request for deletion. This request is more of against standards Hall Gelashvili (talk) 13:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: Struck out duplicate "keep" from this user. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is more of against standards No, it's not. Requests like this made in good faith are a part of Wikipedia's process and suggesting otherwise is not helpful and shows a lack of understanding of Wikipedia. You are correct that using articles from good media sources is allowed, and is quite common. Just having a website doesn't mean something is a reliable source though. Tabloidish scraper sites (which were a lot of sources in the article) aren't good sources. They scrape content from anywhere with minimal, if any, validation and cover themselves with a disclaimer that they aren't responsible. That shows the lack of editorial oversight, key for being a good source. Also, please only !vote once (keep / delete), use "comment" for further remarks so it doesn't look like you're trying to stack votes. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Keep: Hold on! We have received information that editors who have requested the removal of this article were writing from Poland using the same IP address from Kielce and have been reported to the police as well as to the Wikipedia Noticeboard for deliberately removing 30 sources. I am waiting for this to be verified. Hall Gelashvili (talk) 23:58, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: Struck out duplicate "keep" from this user. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete There are many sources, but none are WP:RS. Gossip is not included in Wikipedia. AVG555 (talk) 19:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
• Keep:I vote in favor of keeping this article on Wikipedia. Joanna Modes is a significant figure in contemporary history, hailing from a Georgian royal family, with her original surname Bagration-Mukhraneli. This lineage is referenced in historical literature, including works of Lambert M. Surhone. In addition to her mother, Joanna Modes is connected to the Tiele-Winckler family, and she has been mentioned not only in contemporary books publications, German press but also in Polish media. I have read that there has been a recent withdrawal from public events due to medical reasons in Poland. It is important to recognise her as a historically significant figure, as she has made an impact as notable individual. It is concerning that her public life may be curtailed, which raises the issue of safeguarding her page, as it may be at risk of deletion. Deleting this article is not beneficial for Wikipedia, we should let editors supplement and expand it. 2A02:A317:4AC0:F700:24C8:500A:685C:8192 (talk) 02:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Keep: Yes, I agree, we shoud keep this page. SHe is a natable person, sources are reliable, and meet Wikipedia Standards 212.14.47.11 (talk) 11:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: Struck out duplicate "keep" from this IP. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Keep: I fully agree, and the most important is that the sources are reliable and are not against Wikipedia standards Hall Gelashvili (talk) 13:18, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: Struck out duplicate "keep" from this user. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete I've done some pruning of the sources, removing the obvious scraper sites. There's a lot of junk sources still left in the article though n(Who's dated who? Really?). The way the article is written, Modes's notability is seemingly driven by her family and who she's dating? Notability doesn't transfer, so just dating someone that is notable doesn't really help notability. All of those sources related to the dating are very tabloidish, not strong sources at all. The Pantheon.world source for "Greatest Polish Models of All Time" seems limited to just that site, if it was from a strong mainstream media source, maybe. As it is, not a good source. There are database driven sources, primary sources, and more junk sources. I'm struggling to find a single really good source - significant, independent coverage. There's isn't enough quality sources here to show Modes as meeting WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. Ravensfire (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Keep : Hold on! We have received information that the editors who have requested the removal of this article were writing from Poland using the same IP address from Kielce and have been reported to the police as well as to the Wikipedia Noticeboard for deliberately removing 30 sources. I am waiting for this to be verified. Hall Gelashvili (talk) 23:59, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: Struck out this text that is already entered above. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jimmy Crystal

Jimmy Crystal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lee Vilenski has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject is a character from an animated movie. Nothing in a before search. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Could not find any WP:RS to show this character is notable outside of the movie. AVG555 (talk) 19:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete The only other mentions of this I see online are from other wiki sites. Don't think the subject is notable enough for an article. Ternera (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:18, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jerry Abramov

Jerry Abramov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tuscan Ant has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails Wikipedia's Notability guideline. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Tuscan Ant (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Could not find any WP:RS to show this person meets WP:BIO. AVG555 (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Coco Berlin

Coco Berlin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Reads like a promotion, poor sources, not notable. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Could not find any WP:RS for this person and this article is very, very promotional. AVG555 (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

BLOCK FM 103.2

BLOCK FM 103.2 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG; no reliable or secondary sources, written like an advert. I also have doubts about the award, as the two sources don't show if they actually got awarded it. RiggedMint 12:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I also found that this now deleted page relates to it, and so the IP making this article could be related to the IP who made that article. Overall, I think this is one big promotion scheme. RiggedMint 12:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

hlo, Mr, the award is real just because am using a pc now but i will send the photo and screenshot that shows that they have an award and still this is not promotion sir. The secondary website source you need as an advert explain it to me so that i get it as i get your screenshot for the award. 41.210.147.69 (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

i have now the screenshot for the for company message showing that they have an award Sir@RiggedMint where should i send it 41.210.147.69 (talk) 14:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

THAT DELETED PAGE LOOKS SIMILAR BECAUSE THE Same person is the founder but pages have different information, this page claims notability that page i think didn't claim it, this page/article is not for promotions because you would have seen editors or persons in charge of it starting to post promotional content but there is a reason why its on wikipedia not for promotions but because it follows all wikipedia guidelines to be here, so even the award id real and the post is on the radio station facebook page and email you can contact them for the award reference or go to social media because its world wide and easier to see on facebook.

stay safe@RiggedMint @RiggedMint Kasoloug (talk) 14:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

A lot of people go onto Wikipedia for promoting their stuff, and clearly there is some promotional tones here. And also, it fails WP:RS and WP:GNG (listed in the nomination), both are wikipedia guidelines. RiggedMint 14:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

use this also https://blockfmuganda.websites.co.in/update/welcome-to-block-fm-1032-uganda/2922943 Kasoloug (talk) 15:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

BUT THIS IS NOT PROMOTION 41.210.147.69 (talk) 16:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

BUT OKAY YOU CAN DELETE THE PAGE IF YOU WANT BUT WE ARE NOT HAPPY , ITS NOT FOR PROMOTION PLEZ 41.210.147.69 (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

BY THE WAY SIR, HOW DO YOU WRITE AN ARTICLE NOT PAGE AN ARTICLE 41.210.147.69 (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

• as me, i think this article should be left on Wikipedia because all information on it is real, any one denying search using your search engine. it has an award because on Facebook i saw the message from their post when it shows GRA Team needs money to send it in Uganda since GRA is not in Uganda, its an international Award, so they have the message sent by GRA Team to them for winning an award thats why it was included. any query 41.210.147.69 (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
• Administrator note: This page was nominated for A4 before being sent to RfD (see history).- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:45, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete Written like an ad, and by per nominator. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 14:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  It cannot be QD'd as said by the revision made by FusionSub, it has a claim to nobility, but it fails GNG. RiggedMint 14:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  what is GNG 41.210.147.69 (talk) 14:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  General Notability Guidelines. RiggedMint 14:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  bro, make it simple, what do you want to be added in the article 41.210.147.69 (talk) 15:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  hlo what do you want https://blockfm.websites.co.in/ check tell more you need 41.210.147.69 (talk) 15:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  another site is here https://blockfmuganda.websites.co.in/ Kasoloug (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  @RiggedMint @RiggedMint what do you want exactly because the page has no problem, instead of asking for deletion, you would have corrected the mistake because its set public for everyone to edit but you or you would have removed the data that you think is not correct because the page is even now on search engines people are getting information about it so bro not that every article needs to be deleted, an article needs to be deleted if it is still under quick deletion requests but not deletion as now, it has already passed through that step. Thank you Mr@FusionSub for your help in making this article stay on wikipedia.

  be well

  Kasolo Ug Kasoloug (talk) 15:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  Pages can still be deleted through this, the QD was declined because it had a claim of notability. I nominated this page for deletion because it is simply not notable, it doesn't use reliable sources, and the sources aren't verifiable, it also doesn't have a neutral POV tone, it feels much promotional. I would improve it if it wasn't for the fact that it just isn't notable, as stated. RiggedMint 15:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  BUT I PROVIDED YOU ALL SITES AND THE PAGE ALSO HAS REFERENCES ON EVERY POINT, SO AM NOT SEEING ANY PROMOTION AS I SAID BECAUSE I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY UPDATES ABOUT MUSICIANS ON IT, SO CAN YOU BE A GOOD EDITOR AND IMPROVE ON IT, OR TELL ME THE WEBSITES THAT YOU THINK ARE VERIFIABLE TO BE USED AS REFERENCES, RADIO.NET FOR APPLE OR Kasoloug (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  The radio website that is listed the most does not give much info at all, and facebook is not a reliable source, I will look at the other sources later when I have the time to. RiggedMint 16:03, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  BUT DO NOT DELETE MAYBE WRITE ON THE TALK PAGE WHAT IS SHOULD BE DONE WRITE SIR Kasoloug (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  you add that tone and even all information about this radio station is on Internet help this page as an editor not a deleter of pages 41.210.146.244 (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

  it has notability, what else do you need 41.210.147.69 (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  @RiggedMint (Non-administrator observation) What do you mean it cannot be QD? 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 18:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  (Non-administrator observation) Right it cannot be QD because it has notability but fails GNG, what shall we do here? 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 18:33, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  @Adelaideslement8723 I’m not logged in currently, but instead of quick deleting you should use {{vd}} instead. 206.124.220.60 (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  I think so also we should not delete because it has notability and a page to be on Wikipedia notability should be on 41.210.146.40 (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

  hko,good morning, how can we improve the page instead of deleting it can we help. Its not all about promotion as we see no content for promotion 41.210.146.40 (talk) 06:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

  how, written on a website as an advertisement for block fm 41.210.147.69 (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  me i think its notable and this radio deserves an article, who is with me? 41.210.147.69 (talk) 15:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  what are you meaning 41.210.147.69 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  https://blockfmuganda.websites.co.in/#business-section Kasoloug (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete No WP:RS at all and most of the sources this article uses are primary. This article is also promotional. AVG555 (talk) 19:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  that's your thought but fake okay add secondary sources 41.210.159.172 (talk) 06:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

  me I think you all need to see the award reference source, tell me where to send the imgae showing the award. Plz 41.210.159.172 (talk) 06:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - this isn't a notable subject. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  at your mind but it's notable just because for you you're not notable 41.210.159.172 (talk) 06:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Not a notable subject and it is written like a ad, and fails GNG. 𝓐𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓭𝓮 ^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴 ♡ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓼)} 19:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

  {{wait}} it's not an ad what are you on. All things needed are there preferences and what ever what do you want 41.210.159.172 (talk) 06:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:28, 23 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ishaan Khatter

Ishaan Khatter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Ok BigKrow (talk) 22:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• @BigKrow: You didn't give a reason why it should be deleted. Tuscan Ant (talk) 22:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

No little meaning fails notability? BigKrow (talk) 22:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

• Keep Found Notability on news section of google Other Please check If I am not wrong --Ksy 20:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kurdish Genocide (1915-1918)

Kurdish Genocide (1915-1918) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Simple Wikipedia is suspiciouly seen as a link/source, brought to RFD, revert if im wrong thnx. BigKrow (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The Kurdish Genocide of 1915-1918 refers to the mass murder and deportation of Kurds in the Ottoman Empire during World War I, Perpetrated by the Assyrian and Armenian forces [1][2]. It is estimated that more than 600,000-700,000 Kurds lost their lives by these massacres [3][4][5][6][7] ↑ 2017, p.

Ok i found this. BigKrow (talk) 22:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdish_recognition_of_the_Armenian_genocide BigKrow (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

This article should be deleted. There is a clear edit war occurring between what appears to be Kurds and Assyrians, as can be seen in the edit history. This is also impacting the article for the Assyrian genocide.

Additionally, this article doesn't appear to exist on any other Wikipedia as well, so there's no verifiable discussion of a Kurdish genocide having occurred by Assyrians and Armenians from the early 20th century. Surayeproject3 (talk) 03:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of chios 1790

Battle of chios 1790 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Griffinofwales has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No sources, no indication that this battle occurred, reads as OR. Griff (talk) 20:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

I gave U sources I just didn’t know where to put them.I put them in the end.Also I used AI to help. Napolitana32 (talk) 18:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete per Griff BigKrow (talk) 20:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete There have been many battles in Chios, but I have found no WP:RS for this particular one. It could be a WP:HOAX. The source used in the article seems reliable, but I doubt it is talking about a battle in Chios in 1790. AVG555 (talk) 19:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Flag of Alcalá de Henares

Flag of Alcalá de Henares (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet WP:GNG and has no WP:RS showing anything significant, notable, or encyclopedic AVG555 (talk) 15:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Merge into Alcalá de Henares. RiggedMint 15:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Black ambient

Black ambient (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Absolutely no WP:RS to show that this is a thing. The article of this on the main English wiki is a redirect to dark ambient, but there is no article on the Simple English wiki for that and no sources that "black ambient" is a synonym for it. AVG555 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete or maybe redirect to a dark ambient article? Google does not show any search results showing that this is a real thing. Ternera (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Flag of Seville

Flag of Seville (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet WP:GNG and has no WP:RS showing anything significant, notable, or encyclopedic AVG555 (talk) 15:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Merge into Seville. RiggedMint 15:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• I also would support a  Merge. Ternera (talk) 16:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Flag of Mérida, Venezuela

Flag of Mérida, Venezuela (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not meet WP:GNG and has no WP:RS showing anything significant, notable, or encylopedic AVG555 (talk) 15:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Merge into Mérida, Venezuela. RiggedMint 15:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• I also would support a  Merge. Ternera (talk) 16:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Edward J. Crawford

Edward J. Crawford (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Jaypung has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article does not meet notability guidelines for biographies (WP:NBIO). The references are primarily local or niche business sources and do not provide significant independent coverage to establish notability. Many references are primary sources or dead links, failing WP:RS. Jaypung (talk) 16:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• keep He is a fellow and some source exists aswel102.89.23.72 (talk)

• Keep Plenty of coverage exists. Here are the good sources:

Forthworth Inc - This article has significant coverage on him.

Travel Talk - Long article on him and his family

Hawkins Crawford - Article about his wedding and has a bio about him and his wife.

Forthworth Business - A good long paragraph of bio on him

tulane.edu - Article about his Tedx Talk. It is short, but the fact that he did a Ted talk should help with notability.

Book: In the Warlords' Shadow - This book contains a few paragraphs of info on him.

Voyage Dallas: This is an interview, but there are 3 paragraphs of intro about him that is not an interview, hence it should count towards notability.

texas.gov - A long paragraph of bio on him

Peace Corps Connect - Click on his image and you will see a long bio on him.

Based on all the above, significant coverage exists and he meets notability guidelines.Lionsonny (talk) 08:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Administrator note: Since the request was listed late, the closure date has been extended.--BRP ^ever 14:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC) 08:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Giuseppe Campano

Giuseppe Campano (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tuscan Ant has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have no idea what makes this man notable. Tuscan Ant (talk) 00:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not notable Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 09:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete could not find any WP:RS whatsoever. I don't believe the sources the article uses even talk about him. AVG555 (talk) 18:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

  I know from personal experience that you can find this information about people, such as their birth and death dates and places, home addresses, family members, occupations, and military service, in census records. But these are primary sources, which Wikipedia generally does not use and which don't count for notability. Tuscan Ant (talk) 18:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Flowing Wells Junior High School

Flowing Wells Junior High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG (not sure if A4 technically applies to schools so just sending here) –Davey2010^Talk 18:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Agreed with Davey. BigKrow (talk) 18:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Don't take this down we worked hard on this.

its pretty famous inside of Tucson. 68.107.182.234 (talk) 19:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@68.107.182.234, Please read en:WP:Notability, en:WP:NSCHOOL and en:WP:GNG to gain a better understanding of why it was nominated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't agree 68.107.182.234 (talk) 19:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

This is TS Rubber main by the way I'm just not signed in 68.107.182.234 (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

We are planning to add more sources and it is notable 68.107.182.234 (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

No idea who Rubber Man is, You have 7 days to adequately source it, Thanks –Davey2010^Talk 19:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Self proclaimed moderator of this page 68.107.182.234 (talk) 20:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Delete - not notable, I'd also suggest Flowing Wells Unified School District isn't notable either. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:55, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  no we willll make it better. 68.107.182.234 (talk) 19:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  honestly i dont know how to feel.

  ill see what i can do the high school is also in english wikipedia and

  i found some sources to prove its notable 68.107.182.234 (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  Flowing Wells Unified School District is also on en (en:Flowing Wells Unified School District) and tbh I'm not clued up on school districts so I don't really know if this is notable or not, There's plenty of coverage although it all appears to be LOCAL only but meh I'll leave it for now, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  How is it non-notable 68.107.182.234 (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  seems like ROUTINE and PRIMARY sources to me. That's a different discussion, but I don't think it's notable. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  Please don't delete this me and my friend worked really hard on it 68.107.182.234 (talk) 20:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  Just because you worked hard on an article doesn't mean it is kept if it meets the criteria for deletion. That is not how Wikipedia works. AVG555 (talk) 17:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete, non-notable middle school, though I would keep the district as it is notable enough, it just needs cleaning up. RiggedMint 20:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  Just to clear up any confusion the school district isn't part of this discussion and will be kept regardless of this discussion. –Davey2010^Talk 20:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  lets just see how it goes.

  if proof gets added the article can stay.

  if it doesn't take it down

  give us 2 months to add proof or it gets deleted. 68.107.182.234 (talk) 21:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

  There isn't a choice for it to be longer. I suspect it's quite unlikely that this subject is notable, but if it is, then sources to that effect need to happen whilst an RfD is in progress. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:09, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Non-Notable School Articles. Raayaan9911 09:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete No WP:RS whatsover and does not meet any WP:GNG. I would argue that the article is mostly WP:OR too. AVG555 (talk) 16:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

• Hi AwesomeGuy1223, Thank you for adding your sources to the article however none of these can be used for the following reasons;

Source	Reason
https://www.facebook.com/FlowingWellsJuniorHighSchool/	This is a Facebook page and cannot be used per en:WP:FACEBOOK
https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/arizona/flowing-wells-junior-high-school-255192	This is a directory listing and again cannot be used
https://www.greatschools.org/arizona/tucson/1642-Flowing-Wells-Junior-High-School/	This is a directory listing and again cannot be used
https://www.pima.gov/1361/Flowing-Wells-Junior-High-School-Pool	This is a about an outdoor pool which doesn't prove it's notable (unless notable people were using the pool or the pool itself was notable for some reason which is another story for another day = still not usable)
https://www.donorschoose.org/schools/arizona/flowing-wells-unified-school-district/flowing-wells-junior-high-school/62273	This is a directory listing and again cannot be used
https://www.instagram.com/explore/locations/244702422/flowing-wells-junior-high-school/	This is a Instagram page and cannot be used per en:WP:INSTAGRAM
https://www.niche.com/k12/flowing-wells-junior-high-school-tucson-az/	This is a directory listing and again cannot be used
https://www.azed.gov/flowing-wells-junior-high	Now deleted, Previously a business directory (see https://web.archive.org/web/20220627171304/https://www.azed.gov/flowing-wells-junior-high-0)
https://www.kold.com/story/20119324/threat-results-in-lockdown-at-flowing-wells-junior-high-school/	This is great however it's local coverage, See en:WP:LOCALCOVERAGE - Imho this isn't enough to establish notability
https://www.kgun9.com/tucson-schools-managing-threats-to-start-school-year	This is great however again Local Coverage and Imho doesn't establish notability
https://www.nogalesinternational.com/sports/rio-rico-wrestlers-end-on-high-note/article_6be57292-2883-11e8-9816-a7b5e4214544.html	Nogales International can be used however this news piece is about the school hosting a non notable wrestling event, this cannot be used as it isn't en:WP:INDEPTH or en:WP:SUBSTANTIAL - It's just a trivial mention of the school hosting the event

In short, with the exception of the LOCAL ones - the rest of the sources you've provided cannot be used and none of these prove the school is notable in any way, shape or form,

Please remember sources need to be national/global news coverage (BBC, Telegraph, CNN, The New York Times, Washington Post etc) and that they must be en:WP:INDEPTH, en:WP:SUBSTANTIAL and have NATIONAL/GLOBAL coverage, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 23:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Attic conversion

Attic conversion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

AVG555 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Any article about an attic conversion is just advice or ideas for a conversion. No actual encyclopedic or notable information/ AVG555 (talk) 23:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agreed with nominator. No actual encyclopedic or notable information. No page on English Wiki either. Lionsonny (talk) 09:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Administrator note: Extended closure date, discussion wasn't listed at WP:RfD.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete per above Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 09:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC) 15:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jimmy Here

Jimmy Here (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No notability. Majority of the sources are primary to his YouTube videos and websites announcing events. Other please check If I am not wrong Ksy 04:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non-notable. BZPN (talk) 11:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete not notable Cactus🌵 ^{spiky ツ} 09:37, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• Delete- per normMunachichloe (talk) 15:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete looks like non-notable. Raayaan9911 09:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Allamah Sayyid Badiuddin Shah Rashdi

Allamah Sayyid Badiuddin Shah Rashdi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Griffinofwales has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject does not meet GNG or AUTHOR. Created by a global sockpuppet network. Griff (talk) 02:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nominator. BZPN (talk) 11:02, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep. We should keep genuine subjects on Wikipedia simple to make it better place for everyone

This article seems to be misunderstood, as most sources / ref are in Arabic, Urdu, and Sindi, which makes it difficult for English speakers to understand and read. Sheikh Badiuddin Al Rashdi Al Sindi was a highly respected Islamic jurist of the 20th century, known mainly in the Middle East and South Asia. Misunderstandings happens, but this should be reconsidered. There are also articles about him in Arabic, Urdu, and Sindhi on Wikipedia. HowDareYouu (talk) 16:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi HowDareYouu, I did quite a bit of research before creating this RFD, and after your comments, I did as you asked. The Urdu and Sindhi articles only have one reference, which would not meet our SIGCOV requirements. Reading our article, although there are many sources, none of what the article describes meet the requirements of SCHOLAR. Simply founding a religious school does not qualify for notability. Griff (talk) 00:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Administrator note: This user's only edits here have been to their user page, this RFD, and the article the RFD is for. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:22, 21 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Asterian Language

Asterian Language (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

205.154.244.130 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable invented language 205.154.244.130 (talk) 23:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• It’s a constructed language, and no, it is notable, just not very much so information-wise on the web, hence why I am creating this article. Kejgą (talk) 00:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles have to have citations, please add some or this page will probably be deleted NS1729 (talk) 04:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

We aren't a place to advertise your made up languages. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

• Quick Delete it's a hoax (A6). BZPN (talk) 11:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete hoax article, A6. Raayaan9911 10:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• Quick Delete Hoax article without any sources. Very possible the article creator made it up. AVG555 (talk) 19:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete I will say this is a hoax page becuase it is might be a made-up language and it has no sources too. thetree284 (talk) 23:43, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Dienoycus

Dienoycus (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

205.154.244.130 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be a misspelled version of Deinonychus, but the spelling is too different to be plausible. 205.154.244.130 (talk) 23:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Merge to Deinonychus We need merge. Raayaan9911 10:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Merge per above. Redirect not necessary as this is a very unlikely redirect (no Google results). Griff (talk) 23:37, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Devan Leos

Devan Leos (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

205.154.244.130 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person per WP:GNG. The coverage is either not significant or not from independent sources 205.154.244.130 (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Comment- There seems to be some coverage of him to pass Notability, most likely throw my weight on keep Munachichloe (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep According to this and this and also this, and even earning recognition from Elon Musk[2], subject clearly meets GNG, and nominator appears to not have actually reviewed the page. Not only is the subject a former television star, he's also launched (multiple?) companies and achieved recognition for them. --2603:8001:1DF0:94E0:BCE7:C8F5:A84C:3C2A (talk) 01:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
• Keep The subject has a verifiable and sustained record of coverage in reliable sources, including recognized media outlets (TheWrap, The Hollywood Reporter, RadarOnline, OK! Magazine, etc.), which sufficiently demonstrate his notability as both an actor and entrepreneur. Fits WP:actor. --TheTakoDread (talk) 03:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Zubayr Ali Zai

Zubayr Ali Zai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Other Please check If I am not wrong Ksy 16:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Has English Wikipedia Article so notable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zubair_Ali_Zai 165.155.163.135 (talk) 17:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

  Having an article on another Wikipedia does not make the subject notable. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete - While there is a claim to notability, none of the sources I have found on enWP or urWP meet our RS requirement, and without that, this article does not show that Zubair is notable enough for an article. Griff (talk) 23:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

What a Horrible Night to Have a Curse

What a Horrible Night to Have a Curse (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zjui3r has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable Zjui3r (talk) 15:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep - This band are notable. The English language Wikipedia have had an entry about this particular album since 2008, and if it (or the band which created it) were not notable, it would have been removed a long time ago. I am happy to expand this and simplify it from the English Wikipedia's version. If this can't be kept, please move it to my userspace and I will work on it to make it easier and more complete. DaneGeld (talk) 15:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Could not find any RS whatsoever. The normal English article should probably be deleted too. AVG555 (talk) 15:48, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Keep Notable Band --Ksy 15:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Notability is not inherited. Just because the band is notable doesn't mean every song or release they have is. The song/demo is being nominated for deletion, not the band. AVG555 (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Unable to find RS relating to this album.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 17:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

 Delete per comments by AVG. Dane, I am unable to find enough sources to show that the song meets NMUSIC, but if you are able to make a version in your userspace, I will be happy to review it. Griff (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Patrick Treacy

Patrick Treacy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Brammarb has nominated this page for deletion for the reasons:

1. This page appears to have been created and maintained only by SPAs/paid editors, The evidence of paid editing appears incontrovertible (see here).
2. Questionable notability: a professional does not become notable simply because he or she (in the course of his or her professional duties) happens to see a single famous patient on a small number of occasions. It's the patient who is notable not the doctor
3. Lack of reliable sources everything seems to be based on a small number of interviews with the articles subject

--Brammarb (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non-notable, fails GNG. BZPN (talk) 11:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

I created this page by my own. So, why you are requesiting to delete it? 103.121.10.117 (talk) 09:01, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Three things - 1. Your IP address didn't create the page, unless you are also 39.50.156.131, in which case I would suggest that you would sign up as a Wikipedia editor. 2. Second, the recent edits have been specifically advertised (by you or some one else) as the editing of a page for payment. You did not declare this as you are required to do. 3. The page does not meet notability guidelines, even before considering the paid editing and that the creation of this page on Simple English wiki is arguably an attempt to bypass the problems that have arisen and the blocks that are in place on the main Wikipedia entry for this subject. Brammarb (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete Does not meet WP:BIO. People are usually not given articles if they are only known for WP:ONEEVENT, especially something like being a doctor to a celebrity decades ago. AVG555 (talk) 19:47, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Abbas Raza Nayyar

Abbas Raza Nayyar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Just a Promotion of subject Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 14:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No WP:RS whatsoever and this article reads very promotional. Some of the sources the article uses don't even mention the subject, so could be WP:OR. AVG555 (talk) 16:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete promotional article, person is non-notable. BZPN (talk) 11:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Clearly promotional article, sources are questionable with several that have passing mentions at best and/or are press releases. There's not enough to show that WP:NBIO or WP:NPROF is met. Ravensfire (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Love Connection articles

Love Connection (IMVU series) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This show is about virtual people dating each other. There are no sources, no claim to notability, and does not meet any of the criteria in WEB.

This RFD is for these articles: These pages are:

• Love Connection (IMVU series)
  • Love Connection (IMVU Series) (redirect)
• All Stars In Paradise
• All Stars In Paradise (season 1)
• All Stars In Paradise (season 4)
• Paradise Hotel (IMVU Series)
• Tabatha Cavalli (IMVU Star)
• Angie Lavigne (IMVU Star)
• House of Villains (IMVU series)
• Bachelor Party
• Bachelor Party (season 1)
• The Simple Life: With Angie and Dakota
• Love Connection (season 1)
• Love Connection (season 2)
• Love Connection (season 3)
• Love Connection (season 4)
• Love Connection (season 5)
• Love Connection (season 6)
• Love Connection (season 7)
• Love Connection (season 8)
• Love Connection (season 9)
• Love Connection: Charm School
• Love Connection: Charm School (season 1)
• Love Connection: Charm school (season 2)

Ravensfire (talk) 04:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Per nom. Griff (talk) 23:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jawonism

Jawonism (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

RiggedMint has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG; could not find any sources other than the homepage referenced. RiggedMint 02:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I apologise for the article failing to meet the requirements and Standards. I am not an expert editor, so if you can, please help me to edit it so it can meet the standards. Although Jawonism is not known, It is a very small religion. 2401:D002:C00B:E00:7CD1:1D9F:4EB1:B775 (talk) 02:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Your standards are honestly fine, but the problem is that this religion doesn't really meet WP:GNG. There is (quite literally) only one source i've found about this religion, and that's the homepage listed in the article. RiggedMint 15:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

I understand. 2401:D002:C00B:E00:F1D2:4FFC:3CB8:D46A (talk) 22:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

This is my religion, a one that is not well known. 2401:D002:C00B:E00:F1D2:4FFC:3CB8:D46A (talk) 22:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• delete Clearly non-notable. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
• delete Non-Notable.--Ksy 05:29, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete non-notable. BZPN (talk) 11:08, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yazidi Rebellion

Yazidi Rebellion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Kurdish–Turkish conflict - Wikipedia BigKrow (talk) 22:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete the reason for reporting to RfD given above is not correct (sounds like nonsense - it does not explain why), but I can confirm that this is another hoax. BZPN (talk) 11:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete - While the nominator's reason for deletion is not appropriate, after review, this article appears to be about several battles in Lalish between 1904 and 1906. The sources provided are not reliable, and there is not any other SIGCOV I can find that covers the taking of the city. Griff (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Raid on Ottoman trading routes

Raid on Ottoman trading routes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The Yazidis controlled all trade routes in Shingal and the surrounding area and were feared among the Muslims. They also refused to pay the taxes levied by the Ottomans and to submit to them completely. The Yazidis also attacked Ottoman columns of goods without fear and plundered them. BigKrow (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete the reason for reporting to RfD given above is not correct (it does not explain why), but I can confirm that this is another hoax. BZPN (talk) 11:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete - Nomination reason is unclear (or does not exist), however so is the scope of this article. Griff (talk) 19:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:33, 19 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ottoman-Yazidi Conflict (1891-1893)

Ottoman-Yazidi Conflict (1891-1893) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Between 1891 and 1893, a bloody conflict erupted, POV. BigKrow (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Merge useful content into a history section on Yazidis. This was quite a significant event for them, but the sourcing does not support having its own article. Griff (talk) 19:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Attack on Bashiqa and Bahzan

Attack on Bashiqa and Bahzan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Attack, no evidence on web. BigKrow (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - No SIGCOV in RS for this battle. Griff (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Berwarî

Battle of Berwarî (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It relates a battle that took place between the Kurdish/Muslim Zebari and the Nastorian/Christian Tiyari tribes in the Qumri village of Berwarî region (Amedi in Iraqi Kurdistan) around the end of BigKrow (talk) 21:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - The nominator did not provide a reason for requesting deletion, but upon review, it does not appear this article meets our criteria. The only source is a blog and notability is not established. Griff (talk) 17:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:42, 19 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Incubateur HEC Paris

Incubateur HEC Paris (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Griffinofwales has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Declined QD G11. Notability in question. Griff (talk) 16:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete No Notability found--Ksy 20:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bambu Lab

Bambu Lab (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zjui3r has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is written like an advertisement. Given detailed about all products but not seem notable. Zjui3r (talk) 12:26, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Article as written does not meet notability standard. There are not enough sources that meet SIRS. Griff (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Category:Roller coasters by name

Category:Roller coasters by name (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: this is nonsensical category that was previously was deleted on enwiki for not being defining or absurd. What exactly do you mean by "By name". I checked through all the articles (i actually didn't lol) to see wither or not they were another subcategory of roller coasters and I believe we don't to merge or whatever. Anyway this category make no sense and most categories having "___ by name" usually are meant to only contain subcategories, while this is just the other way around (contains only pages). QuantumFoam66 (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Please note that the fact that one person doesn't understand the reason for a category does not make it nonsensical. We have three "by name" categories, and none of them are meant to contain only categories. "By name" is one of those criteria that can mean either 1) things grouped by shared name (we don't have any like that) or 2) things referred to by individual names rather than by some other characteristic. In the case of roller coasters, examples of other characteristics include the year they were introduced, the country they are in, and their manufacturer.

The purpose of this category was to declutter the parent category so that the coaster articles weren't mixed in with other articles on the page. It also allows people to find a coaster by name when they don't know any of the other characteristics. I have no particular objection to merging this category back to its parent (or doing the same with the other two "by name" categories). However, if we do that, I would want to see something done to group them in the main category so that they are visually separated. That might take the form of using a special sort key either for the named coasters or for the other things in the parent category. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep - Maybe you should've looked at the Enwiki articles first because had you done so you would've seen the categories there for rides are much more complex,

"I checked through all the articles (i actually didn't lol) to see wither or not they were another subcategory of roller coasters" how old are you 5?, Everyone checks things thoroughly before nominating that's literally Rule 101 of editing Wikipedia!.

Anyway keep as the category name is fine and because no valid reason has been presented for deletion other than "I don't understand it and I didn't bother going through the category thoroughly. –Davey2010^Talk 21:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep per Davey, but what does nonsensical mean for this category, other than the Euthanasia Coaster, the category seems alright enough. RiggedMint 15:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Merge to parent category - Ignoring the very poor nomination reason, I still do not really understand the purpose of this category or how we would apply it. The reasoning stated by Auntof6 is reasonable, but not what we should use categories for. I recommend applying the sortkey and merging back. Otherwise, we should clearly define what this category is meant for. Griff (talk) 02:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Naveed Gill

Naveed Gill (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable polo player, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 18:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominatior Raayaan9911 16:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete - No SIGCOV in RS. Griff (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Top Talent

Top Talent (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable talent show, The Enwiki article is a completely different talent show, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG

Should also point out it was created by a globally locked LTA so no idea if it's a hoax or not, Either way non notable show, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:09, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

As Griff notes below this is indeed on the Albania Wikipedia (https://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Talent) and the sourcing there isn't much better either although it does debunk my hoax theory so struck that part, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete seems like non-notable articles, However, Sources are not good. Raayaan9911 18:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete - This appears to be a machine translated version of the sqWP version. No objections to re-creation in the future, provided a version showing notability is created. Griff (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:34, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Battle of the Levant

Battle of the Levant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article states "There are no Safavid sources to indicate that this battle took place. " so basically it's a WP:OR article, Cannot find any evidence of notability, en:Battle of the Levant redirects to a completely different battle, Fails SIGCOV and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 16:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No Notability--Ksy 18:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete - Everything Davey said. Griff (talk) 02:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:33, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Nautiyal (caste)

Nautiyal (caste) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable caste, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 16:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - As said by the nominator, this article does not meet GNG. Griff (talk) 02:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Ottoman Safavid Clashes (1507)

Ottoman Safavid Clashes (1507) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reliable source for verification. Not sure if the clash happened and the significance of it. BRP ^ever 15:24, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - There is no real information in this article to show it meets EVENT. Griff (talk) 01:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete No Notability as per Nominator --Ksy 18:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:24, 18 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Ottoman Safavid Clashes

Ottoman Safavid Clashes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Barely anything on the web about this. Hard to verify the content. BRP ^ever 15:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Merge - There seem to be a few articles on this subject or related subjects that might benefit from being combined into a single entry. This Ottoman-Safavid dispute is historically significant. Brammarb (talk) 12:25, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@Brammarb I am happy with Ottoman–Safavid relations being created by anyone. However, this page barely makes any sense and doesn't seem to have any reliable information to contribute towards that. Can you please suggest how to proceed with merging here? BRP ^ever 13:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

It feels more like a piece of history tale with majority of the information missing. I am struggling to find anything meaningful to merge. BRP ^ever 14:01, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete - These clashes are not notable enough for an article, with no lasting impacts (EVENT). If there was any useful information to merge, I would recommend that, but this is not a useful redirect nor is there any information to merge. Griff (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:21, 18 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Alqosh Massacre (1832)

Alqosh Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: An event such as the "Alqosh Massacre" in 1832 may have actually occurred, according to several sources and enwiki (en:Alqosh). However, the article provides false information regarding the details, and such a battle itself is most likely not independent, unimportant event. BZPN (talk) 14:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Well researched nomination. There is not enough SIGCOV on this massacre to have its own article. Griff (talk) 01:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
•  Delete Agree with Nominator --Ksy 18:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:02, 18 January 2025 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests