Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although it does not have simple english.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Marc D'Amelio

Marc D'Amelio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pure Evil has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable Pure Evil (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Party index link

Template:Party index link (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused, broken template * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete unhelpful fr33kman 04:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Page image

Template:Page image (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused, broken template. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Format link

Template:Format link (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused, broken template. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Calcalist

Template:Calcalist (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused, broken template. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Baguio/Location map

Template:Baguio/Location map (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused, broken template. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Aired episodes

Template:Aired episodes (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Also Module:Aired episodes. Unused template whose dependencies don't exist here. Pppery (talk) 02:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC) Pppery (talk) 02:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Most Influential and Significant figures in history

Most Influential and Significant figures in history (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pure Evil has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, questionable usefullness, out dated. etc. Pure Evil (talk) 21:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• This "article" is part of a group (mostly all up for RfD) created by a sock farm. Each has various issues. This article is based on a research paper from 2015. Its data was collected a couple years before that. Any information is has is about a decade out of date. There is also the question of how this is notable and of what use old data is today. I would also wonder how valid this info is as the OP has shown a tendency to change the numbers in their other "articles" for whatever reasons and then sock multiple accounts to try and stop those RfDs. I would support the deletion of all their creations as they have an obvioius record of playing loose with the truth. Pure Evil (talk) 21:41, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete delete them all fr33kman 04:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

American Alsatian

American Alsatian (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

173.177.6.182 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable crossbreed of dog with no reliable secondary sources available. 173.177.6.182 (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Comprehensive list of the best sellers of all time

Comprehensive list of the best sellers of all time (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: NO encyclopedic reason to group these and only these products. "Estimated" stats. Questionable sources throughout such as agathachristie.com and nintendo.com. OR. Gotanda (talk) 22:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Claiming Nintendo themselves reading their own finances isn't a valid source but the media making up lies and giving vague numbers, which is all those claims are by a way "Estimates" is insane. Overall this looks far more credible than Wikipedia's NewJanny (talk) 03:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Keep<Voting to keep, disagree with nominator Never17 (talk) 17:45, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Keep— Preceding unsigned comment added by NewJanny (talk • contribs) 04:44, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Administrator note: Moved this comment under the user's previous comment so it doesn't look like two separate suggestions.

•  Keep, the page has been significantly cleaned up rather than removing it which would be pointless, citations can be changed as this page now includes Manga, Anime, Film, Movies, Music, Video Games all in one article which makes it easier to edit and adjust — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWolfAmongYou (talk • contribs) 04:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Delete. Just the kind of list not to have. Almost every item is open to challenge. Many are just estimates or claims with no general agreement, others are broad estimates.... Omits many older sources.... On and on. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete Severely doubt some of the estimates are close to being correct. It also calls itself 'Comprehensive' which is definitely questionable. Mostly the opposite of what a list article should be.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Delete Estimates are dubious Sources suspect for some items. We also don't need list in this format. fr33kman 07:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Keep, there's no logical basis to get rid of these ArmageddonAmongUS (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment: MewJenny,TheWOlfamongYou and ArmageddonAmongUs show overlapping IPs, and are likely the same user... I leave the decision on how/if their votes should be counted to the closing admin...--Eptalon (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete As with all the other articles from this sockfarm, the numbers are faked. They provide refs to support their idea of the claim but not the real numbers. Looking at the BoxOfficeMojo list of top movies of all time adjusted to 2022 ticket prices, these numbers are over 2x higher. The provided ref is also high, but these numbers are beyond even those (4.2 billion vs 3.5b) Star Wars 4 is #2 Titanic is #5 Avatar is down at # 15. Much of the rest is just copied from en. wikipedia lists and would need to have all the numbers double checked as the user has a habit of making up numbers and adding whatever entry they want at that time. The fact that all the keeps on this list are from the same sock farm... as with all their votes on the other RfD pages for their content.. Nuke it all. Keeping any of it is supporting vandalism and is a blot on our reputation Pure Evil (talk) 22:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete Delete. I see many SPAs and socks as well. Bobherry Talk My Changes 23:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:36, 3 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Daniela Tablante

Daniela Tablante (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person fr33kman 17:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Weak Keep - Looking at WP:Notability (people), and WP:GNG, this article follows both. I would say it also follows WP:ENT. This source says that she has won an award called the "National Social Media Award". I do not know if the NSMA award is real, or well-known enough. If you search "National Social Media Award", you get a company in England. And they have a branch here in LA. – Angerxiety^! 11:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete I went so far as to give her the benifit of the doubt and let her tell me why she is notable. I went to the About Me page of her website and let her own words tell me why she is notable.. and nothing. If she can not describe what she has done that is notable, how notable can she be? She told the story of her life so far and there was nothing there to set her apart for the crowd. At best, there is local intertest in South Florida with some small potential for growth . Not enough yet to warrant an article. Pure Evil (talk) 06:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rahul Bhuchar

Rahul Bhuchar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, not notable. Note that an {{RFD}} template was placed on the article on August 7th, but the discussion page was never created. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Kinda funny that it was tagged for over a month without a discussion page. Anyway it fails to show notability and to me feels like an attempt at promotion.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shane Hawkins

Shane Hawkins (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Son of a notable musician, but notability is not inherited. No sources I found are about the subject himself and is significant, therefore failing GNG. Note that this page was tagged with {{rfd}} since August 25th, but no discussion was ever created. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Comment: I could debate the inherited notability part as it is not always true. (Paris Hilton, the Duke of Sussex and Suri Cruise all started from the press following who they were the child of. It was not the sex tape or whatever Suri has going on and Harry was never going to see the crown (many would need to end badly for that) - those just added to the fame. In this case. it may be more important what he did than who he is. The lack of quality in this one sentence aside, there are multiple high level sources who have covered some of his performances. We are talking Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly level. All for a 17 year old.. Not saying Keep as there is little depth so far and this article is not helping its cause any. more of a "delete - not yet". But this one is very likely to need an article soon based on the press coverage and attention he is getting so far partially because of who is father is.. Notability can be inherited if the press choses it to be. Every royal will tell you they are famous because of their lineage.. That is inherited notability. Pure Evil (talk) 06:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

List of topics characterized as pseudoscience

List of topics characterized as pseudoscience (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-encyclopedic list based on NPOV. Gotanda (talk) 22:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No basis for this page. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
• this listing, which currently has two entries, is completely arbitrary. Note, that we do have a Category Pseudoscience, which currently hold 27 pages (and a few subcateghories), which likely covewrs the ideas we need just fine. So...  Delete--Eptalon (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Redirect to whatever page about this we already have most plausible option. 88.110.38.249 (talk) 15:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete Completely useless list. It seems to be arbitrary as well, why just those two? There are hundreds of examples fr33kman 21:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete per comments above. --ginaan(T/C) 08:13, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pawan Monga

Pawan Monga (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: After paid articles are removed, there's not much left that isn't a passing or brief mention. Article was created by an editor blocked on EN [1] as part of a large UPE sock farm w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Amansharma111, and created the same article over there. Ravensfire (talk) 21:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: Spam by a globally locked user. MarioGom (talk) 08:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ethnic groups in Iran by population

Ethnic groups in Iran by population (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Poorly defined, incoherent list. The low end of the population stats adds up to over 200%. Absolute numbers range too wildly to be encyclopedic. Gotanda (talk) 00:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Can't be true fr33kman 00:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
• If I look at the table above, it might be accurate (Persians/Western Persians 39%, Azerbajani/Azeri 20%, Kurds: 7%, Mazanderani 6%, Gilaks: 6%, and a few others with less than 5% each, numbers rounded up to the whole percent figure). The problem I see though, that below, we have a different set of numbers/percentages from different sources. We get no explanation at all. For me, the numbers are not that important. What is important is explaining how/why the numbers are what they are. The current article fails at that. And sorry, a listing of three different numbers, from three diffent sources, without explanation is not worth keeping. so...  Delete--Eptalon (talk) 09:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Saturday the 19th

Saturday the 19th (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Weird. We could have 200 articles like this. Do we want them? Rathfelder (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not more of these useless articles [sigh] fr33kman 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete I am having issues understanding the page (primarily due to the formatting) and if this page is kept it sets a precedent that we could have hundreds of these types of articles.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mamlakat Yusupova

Mamlakat Yusupova (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This person doesn't seem to have much written about them and thus cannot have an article about them. The first source seems to be user generated, the second source seems to be a brief mention. She seems to have won an award for teaching from the government of Uzbekistan, but it's not clear whether this is a particularly rare award, and without meeting WP:GNG, she just isn't notable. Kk.urban (talk) 18:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I cant read any of the references, but there are some. I think we should keep this, considering our sparse coverage of Uzbekistan. Notability is a relative, not absolute, concept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rathfelder (talk • contribs) 10:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Godwin Izomor

Godwin Izomor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

HushPuppie280 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: All red links nothing linked with En Wp HushPuppie280 (talk) 17:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• I already unlinked the hyperlinks on red links. I think this should be fine as hyperlinks on red links should be created for new pages to be created. Apple pellet (talk) 17:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment: Odd problem here. I put this up for QD as I didn't think it makes a claim of notability. I still don't. The problem is that the coverage of him is very good. There is ample info to support an article but I am not certain there is a reason to have one.. Reading over the sources, there is everything except why he is notable. He seems to pass the GNG so is presumed notable, but for the life of me, I can not say what that notability is based on.. Pure Evil (talk) 19:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
• Administrator note: This was not transcluded properly. I have extended the closure date to 7 days from now.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
• Keep. It's well referenced and he is clearly a significant person in Nigeria. Rathfelder (talk) 17:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
• Delete multiple sock puppets are "interested" in this perosn. See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aniflower Timtrent (talk) 12:18, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Amin Syla

Amin Syla (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

HushPuppie280 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable enough for page??? HushPuppie280 (talk) 00:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Hello,

the article has been changed and improved by references with relevance. AvalancheduCervin (talk) 21:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

• Administrator note: This was not transcluded properly. I have extended the closure date to 7 days from now.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete Can't find anything to support notability. fr33kman 21:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete not notable enough --ginaan(T/C) 02:23, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Now You See It...

Now You See It... (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2800:810:498:96AC:14A2:2877:3EB7:1839 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Very short information with one source 2800:810:498:96AC:14A2:2877:3EB7:1839 (talk) 03:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Administrator note: This was never transcluded properly. I have extended the closure date to 7 days from now.— *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 10:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The most watched broadcasts of all time

The most watched broadcasts of all time (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gotanda has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: List is not authoritative and cannot be maintained as such. Numbers are not reliable. Reference for the top-view "The Jesus Film" itself says the numbers may be inflated. Gotanda (talk) 01:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. The numbers are unreliable and look a bit odd to me.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

   Keep Disagree, it should be kept but changed to "List of broadcasts with claimed viewershp over 1 billion". Can easily be reformatted and fixed Never17 (talk) 20:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

  Checkuser blocked account. Pure Evil (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete The selection criteria is all over the place. Several single events, the full run of a tv show, the combined lifetime veiwers for a movie or music video (some anecdotal), omitting what they want to (Olympics. QE2), etc. And then there is the number padding. 1.9m for Harry/Markle? thats what those refs say as well but CNBC reported mid 20M US with 24m in the UK. That leaves 1.85 billion sets of eyes.. 1.4b total people in india.. 400M to go.. seems more than a stretch. Pure Evil (talk) 01:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

  Agree with pure evil. Scrap the page, The best solution is one page for movies and television shows based on what the estimated viewership they've accumulated. And then live events held on a single day such as sports, memorials, weddings and concerts. For numbers up for contention it should be starred with Astericks ArmageddonAmongUS (talk) 04:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Keep per nom. Disagree with nominator.— Preceding unsigned comment added by NewJanny (talk • contribs)

  Checkuser blocked account. Plus "per nom. disagree with nom".. really? They agree and disagree with the same thing. Pure Evil (talk)

•  Delete per nom. Agree with nominator.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobherry (talk • contribs)

This request is due to close on 01:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Snitch

Snitch (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is not the main meaning of snitch, and the redirect will make it harder for non-native speakers/children to find what they want. I wanted it to soft redirect to Wiktionary so it could actually be useful, but Fr33kman said I couldn't do that. I also couldn't make a disambiguation page because there isn't something to disambiguate. Kk.urban (talk) 19:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep Pure Evil seems to have fixed the situation. fr33kman 19:36, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

  I do have my uses.. Pure Evil (talk) 20:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

• I'm okay with keeping it now. But I read that disambiguation pages could be deleted if they didn't disambiguate anything. Whether the current page gets deleted or not, it's better than what existed before. Kk.urban (talk) 19:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Keep per fr33kman. Bobherry Talk My Changes 20:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Keep It has been turned into an acceptable disambiguation page. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Keep The page has been turned into an acceptable disambiguation page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Kashipur Hashemia High School

Kashipur Hashemia High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pure Evil has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable Pure Evil (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• keep It is a school established in 1971 located in Comilla district of Bangladesh. মোহাম্মদ জনি হোসেন (talk)

  Why? discuss. Pure Evil (talk) 23:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Delete not notable.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:11, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete Not notable fr33kman 23:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nom: not notable --ginaan(T/C) 01:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete Adding to the list: not notable – Angerxiety^! 12:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Delete. Why discuss this at all? It clearly falls into a standing agreement that schools must prove their notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 00:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests