Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfD)
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives Edit

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletionEdit

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletionEdit

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the userEdit

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

DiscussionsEdit

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussionsEdit

Yuki HeEdit

Yuki He (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Didn't get any votes at Rfd last time so it was only a soft delete so can't be speedy deleted as a recreation. So going to put this up again because I don't see any notability. Djsasso (talk) 19:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete. Clearly written as an ad for the person. Ignores the need for notability, and even if the person were notable (I think she's not) the article would need complete revision. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 19:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Uday BiswasEdit

Uday Biswas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not seeing anything indicating meeting WP:GNG. Djsasso (talk) 18:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • {  Delete Can't seem to find anything that shows he's notable. Photograph used on article seems to be taken by someone closely affiliated or friends with the person in article. Fixing26 (talk) 19:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:29, 18 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Danushka KumarathungaEdit

Danushka Kumarathunga (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Declined speedy that doesn't seem to meet notability. Djsasso (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete I even checked the English Wikipedia for this article and I found nothing. --IAmSwiz (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete The article does not mention anything notable. 89.8.101.210 (talk) 21:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Killing of Zohra ShahEdit

Killing of Zohra Shah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article about a child-abuse victim (sexual assault on children, victim vas 8 years old, and also subject to sexual violence). What we have is the 1:1 copy of EnWp, which was flagged as "complex article from another Wikipedia", 2 minutes or so after it was created; whoeber brought it over didn't have time ot sipmlify; for this reason, I cannot approve a quick deletion. Other problem: The article talks about a domestic slave. To my knowledge, slavery was abolished; child labor should be outlawed. Documents such as this PDF seem to tell a different story. So, the big question: supposing there's some truth in the article (seems to have English-llanguage refs), should we keep or delete the article? Eptalon (talk) 22:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Keep I believe this to be valid. I believe we had this conversation on IRC earlier this week about categories for these types of things amongst others. So it may seem that slavery has been abolished, but in actuality it isn’t. Here in the US criminals in prison, prison camps, etc., are still considered slaves under the law as that section was never removed. It is currently being reviewed and may be amended to eliminate that which eliminates slavery in the US completely. I also came across this post from a popular and recognized organization. org here}/countries-that-still-have-slavery/ The Borgen Project. There are still 167 countries that have slaves with Pakistan being #3 on the list. The article is from 2017 but there are more recent articles out there. This can also fall under human rights abuse as well. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Indeed, this is an awful event, reported here in a slovenly fashion. It's a copy of some very bad journalism about a significant event. It shocks me that events like this are so badly reported that we can't really tell where the truth lies. The problem having this in the wiki is that it says in effect, "if it's sensational enough, we'll print it, whatever". Personally, I'd never print anything on this kind of emotional hype. I would want a quote from the judge's summing-up at least. Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Marc Dutroux is a Belgian criminal, who tortured at least 6 girls (aged 8-18, IIRC). Four died, two starved locked up while he was in prison. This is not about the person, or the crimes he committed: Despite these crimes, we do have a more-or-less-balanced article about him. Same case with Josef Fritzl (who locked up his daughter, and I think she has at least one child from him). Again, we managed to have a balanced article. Even if the case got a lot of media attention in Pakistan, we need to wait until there's a judgement for the couple (at least for domestic violence, possibly for sexual assault of a minor). The authorities are under pressure to deliver a verdict (several years in prison, don't know Pakistani law). Ideally, we wait until at least the first instance published the verdict. Given, that English is an official language in Pakistan, we will be able to use that as a source. --Eptalon (talk) 20:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


CalmerryEdit

Calmerry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only sources in article are quite opinionated articles in a list format. Fixing26 (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete The article seems more of an advertisement for the service. Not worth keeping, in my opinion. Etoza (?) 16:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  Delete: The refs just list the various articles that have this specific platform mentioned. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Radhesh AriaEdit

Radhesh Aria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Praxidicae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: completely non-notable vanity spam with dubious unsupported claims to fame. hasn't ever had a major role and has no coverage Praxidicae (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete None of the sources are reliable at all. --Ferien (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep I found lots of sources on bing with a quick search and the sources on the wikipedia page are still conected to websites and are a little notable. Should we keep it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:444:201:9e70:ac9f:9625:7a50:b191 (talkcontribs) 14:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete The sources are mostly from wikis (Wikipedia and a FANDOM wiki). The sources are not reliable and I can't seem to find any mainstream reliable coverage regarding him, other than a Radio Times article that briefly mentions his role in a movie. Definite delete. Fixing26 (talk) 23:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


EnosEdit

Enos (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:444:201:9E70:E1FB:40F8:97F3:924F has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Trying to be a notable article 2601:444:201:9E70:E1FB:40F8:97F3:924F (talk) 15:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Delete 50.30.176.23 (talk) 15:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. A minor figure in the Hebrew bible with little or no independent evidence. Not even listed in En List of minor Old Testament figures, A–K. Honesty compels me to admit it is accepted as a C-class article on En wiki (but move discussions in progress). It may end up in their List of minor biblical figures. In general, we should try and avoid the wiki being used for or against any religion. Major figures in a religion are OK, but marginal figures are not OK, IMO. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. The arguments above, work for me. 89.8.101.210 (talk) 21:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 15:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Seth the HonorableEdit

Seth the Honorable (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

50.30.176.23 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looks like nonsense. 50.30.176.23 (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 15:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Daniel FordEdit

Daniel Ford (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

PotsdamLamb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable very short page PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 04:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete: Not notable. Animalguy7 (Message me! · What have I done?) 16:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC). Sock strike. Darubrub (Let me know) 19:37, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Weak delete. It also seemed to not have any sources. 89.8.101.210 (talk) 21:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 04:18, 16 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


VerdisEdit

Verdis (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darubrub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article was originally QDed for A6, but it is now restored for this process. This article still lacks secondary soruces and significant coverage to pass WP:GNG as I noticed in the en-wiki afd. This could also possibly be created by a locked user sockpuppet. Darubrub (Let me know) 12:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This account was only created to vote here. Etoza (?) 09:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Abstain - shows to be attracting more and more attention. i suggest keeping it for a few months and reviewing it again later if it continues to gain more secondary sources. so far I think it has enough to stay. 67.183.124.12 (talk) 09:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Sock strike. Darubrub (Let me know) 22:32, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
This account was only created to vote here. Etoza (?) 09:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
you cant be serious. wikipedia is banned in my part of the country I live in so I have to use a VPN sorry. besides, you cant call an IP an account. 67.183.124.12 (talk) 10:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
I wonder... Etoza (?) 13:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
IP Addresses change all the time, it's how the internet works. That person isn't an account, so you can't accuse them of that. 49.183.35.159 (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Not all the time, very slowly unless you use some methods. Does not address w:WP:NOTTHERE. Darubrub (Let me know) 14:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
It's so nice of these random IPs to suddenly care about this one RFD thread when most discussions have only a couple (trustable) editors voting, and they haven't made a single edit yet!   Etoza (?) 14:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete The most of the article's sources aren't reliable. I saw news aggregators and self-published sources. The decent sources are local, which means that the micronation isn't popular outside those countries (and I'm assuming that they even popular there). The other micronations on this Wiki have a history and culture behind them and international coverage, which Verdis doesn't have. I also suspect COI. Etoza (?) 14:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
RTL is a large source, especially in Croatia. TELEX is a very known Hungarian news site. 49.183.35.159 (talk) 14:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
I smell a case of w:WP:BLUDGEONING. Darubrub (Let me know)
In the Telex source, Verdis takes up less than a paragraph, only a couple of sentences. Also, the existence of the microstate doesn't mean it should have an article. It just exists, only covered by local news, without history or culture behind it. This seems more like an attempt to popularise it. The suspicious accounts (probably sockpuppets, but I can't make careless statements) don't make this any better. Etoza (?) 14:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete - Lacks reliable sources and continuous mainstream coverage. The few articles that do mention either do not dive in deep about it or only mention it once on their entire news website. :Wikipedia's not the news and shouldn't mention minor fads unless they have some sort of lasting effect, which this doesn't. Fixing26 (talk) 19:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Clearly a hoax, set up by a 14 years Australian boy. No reliable sources. Article was set up by an account that proved to be a sockpuppet after a sockpuppet investigation on the English Wikipedia. The Banner (talk) 11:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep like he said Like Plenty of secondary sources. Not hoax. And 3 dlete 6 keep keep wins! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C40:1700:610:FD20:965C:54AF:BC4D (talkcontribs) 16:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    Wikipedia is not a vote. Fixing26 (talk) 23:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ilbe StorehouseEdit

Ilbe Storehouse (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article has been sitting in this state, since 2015, and consists of one sentence, two related pages, (one of which is a red-link), and two categories, one of which is a mystery. There's an article en:Ilbe Storehouse, whichgives some background (we don't have). If this was a newly-created article, I would delete as "A4- doubtful notability". Since this has been sitting aound for 6 years, I'll give it the grace of a discussed deletion. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 21:54, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Weak delete If no one will expand this article, then it will fall under "Little or no content", which is ground for deletion. Etoza (?) 16:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:54, 13 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Josh fightEdit

Josh fight (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Didn't last WP:LASTING. All media coverage I can find from reliable sources were from the days prior and the few days after it took place, nothing much since. Fixing26 (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete This page seems to be notable and it has notability but not a lot of references so maybe delete. so we should do a regular deletion discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:444:201:9e70:ac9f:9625:7a50:b191 (talkcontribs) 14:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    If it's notable enough for Wikipedia then it shouldn't be deleted. Deletion is not for clearing up pages with a few references. --Ferien (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    I don't believe the event is notable. I'd suggest you read into WP:DP for further information on deletion discussions, rules and more to help you begin. Fixing26 (talk) 19:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep - Really, again? --IAmSwiz (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
    There's been no reliable coverage of it since, the media coverage I can find is all from about the timing of the event - it was a passing fad with some initial coverage which ended quickly and thus not notable. Fixing26 (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Alhaji Abdulrahman Musa BasharEdit

Alhaji Abdulrahman Musa Bashar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested Quick-deletion ('A4-Notability'). A quick google search for the name didn't turn up anything useful. Therefore, I propose deletion.. Eptalon (talk) 15:56, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete - searched on several search engines, couldn't find anything verifying claims made in the article or of significant media coverage Fixing26 (talk) 16:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. Lacks verification of notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mahmood Ul HassanEdit

Mahmood Ul Hassan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

PotsdamLamb has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable; I cannot find anything that states he was in the government; All I see on a search is nothing; I followed all of the links and they are all about a steel mill where this person's name is not mentioned. I wanted to bring it to discussion to see what others think. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 15:58, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • en:Rana Mahmood-ul-Hassan seems to be a politician. The problem though, birth dates don't match (The one we have is born in 1961, the one EnWP has is born in 1970). I haven't cross-checked the sources yet, but if the claim "Pakistani politician" is halfway credible, we can't simply delete the article. So if the birthday problem clears up (and we are indeed talking about the same person as EnWP), then it's a keep; in the other cases (more likely) it's a delete. Let's see what others think.--Eptalon (talk) 20:50, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
    Also note that the QD was contested, so we should do a regular deletion discussion.--Eptalon (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment I did post to the talk page asking the editor who just created their why this should not be QDd and they did not respond. It clearly states that if they post wait, they need to post on the talk page why. There is this article en:Mahmood-ul_Hassan from the ENG wiki. I did find this article him being a politician by searching for his name and adding politician to it, however, that is the only thing I can find, as the rest all have different first names. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 21:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment: The editor of the article responded on the talk page about why they think it should not be deleted

Thanks you so much that you have understand my problem that there are Biographical Article on Wikipedia with like no Reference seriously i am not lying there is a long Biographical Article with no Reference but it was probably written by a bug wikipedia editor so i couldn't you know ask him that how is that Notable with no Reference because obviously i am scared that he is gonna block me. Logogresta (talk) 04:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 05:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

  Delete Very common type of name, so since the birth dates don't match it is almost certainly a difference person. In which case notability is not proven. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)


  •   Comment Sorry My Bad i haven't checked that deeply but birthday could be a mistake.

User: Logogresta (talk) 6 June 2021 (UTC)

@Logogresta: Are you able to find any other sources for this person that proves he was a politician? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 07:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@PotsdamLamb: Ok let me find any if i can find before the case is closed. 07:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@PotsdamLamb: hi, i have did alot of research and i found out that he was not a politician but the good thing is, Mahmood Ul Hassan is an 18th Scale Government officer it mean in his country Pakistan. 18th Rank in Government is a big thing matter of Fact the Person who becomes the President of Pakistan is 22nd Scale Officer. Thank You User: Logogresta (talk) 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@PotsdamLamb: So what's the decision? Thank you User: Logogresta (talk) 7 June 2021 (UTC)
@Logogresta: The decision is not final until the date and time below. If you expect the article to stay it needs to have reliable and verifiable sources.PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 07:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep So what's the decision we have to take a decision now because we are over the deadline this case should be solved yesterday my personal thoughts on this we should just the article on WP. SPSPSPWhatsup have any question! —Preceding undated comment added 18:26, 13 June 2021‎ (UTC)
    @Stark Pablos: Lots of deletion discussions get closed after the closing date at the bottom of the page. If needed the discussion can be extended and that has been done quite a few times in the past. --Ferien (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Keep I Don't Know much about Simple Wikiepdia Notability Guidelines as an Encyclopedia as per on a Stub but seems good to me but keep in mind in am not a Professional in This. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airrack (talkcontribs) 18:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
    @Airrack: The issue is that the subject of the article doesn't seem to be notable, not the amount of content in the article or quality of it. --Ferien (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  • @Ferien: But taking about the amount of content i think enough because because let me finish as our dear editor User:PotsdamLamb have said and I have confirmed that there is also a Article on the Main English Wikiepdia named "Mahmood-ul Hassan" is 3 lines long so i don't think that the content is less in the article Mahmood Ul Hassan as per keeping it in the Bio-Stub Category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airrack (talkcontribs) 18:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
    @Airrack: w:Mahmood-ul Hassan is a totally different person from what I can see. w:Mahmood Ul Hassan has been deleted multiple times on enwiki. Also: I have struck your extra keep !vote, please do not !vote more than once. Remember to sign with ~~~~ too. Regards, --Ferien (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
    @Ferien: Sorry my Bad i didn't know. Airrack (talk) 18:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete - not notable. Being Deputy Manager in Pakistan's biggest Steel Company, is not enough for a wiki-article about him. 89.8.101.210 (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Engjëll BerishaEdit

Engjëll Berisha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Animalguy7 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject does not seem to be notable. There are no references (just notes) and there is no list of artworks he or she made. Animalguy7 (talk) 22:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Keep  Delete Changing opinion based on Macs comments - Found this on en wiki en:Engjëll Berisha. Not a major artist but seems to have local notability and was published in a history book (see refs). PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 23:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

  Delete. No evidence of notability at all. It is just a copy of En, but it doesn't meet their requirements and will get axed. To be notable as an art painter is simple, and this person does not have any chance. No established critics have written assessing his work and his work is not listed in any first-rate museums. These "historical dictionaries" list everyone there is. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:35, 10 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Waberer's International NyrtEdit

Waberer's International Nyrt (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Feels promotional. Darkfrog24 (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Even the title is nonsense. Notability not proven. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete Pretty big company but I'm not seeing the news sources required. Also the name of the company is "WABERER'S INTERNATIONAL Nyrt.". Like we have Ltd in the UK, Hungary have Nyrt. If this was kept it should be renamed Waberer's, per WP:COMMONNAME. --Ferien (talk) 08:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
      Comment dewiki and huwiki have pages on this company. --Ferien (talk) 08:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Theres an article about the company on the Hungarian wikipedia . IAmSwiz (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
    That's not an open-and-shut argument here, because we are a derivative of English WP. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    Actually even saying enwiki has a page is not a good reason for keeping as the page -- the key criteria is WP:GNG. --Ferien (talk) 11:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Valeri LilovEdit

Valeri Lilov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is an interesting case, however all in all I think I'm leaning delete here. The subject is an International master, not a grand master. So they aren't a top rated player, and they don't appear to have actually won any major tournaments. They've written a few chess related books, but I'm not seeing the critical acclaim or coverage we'd require of any other author. So I think, as both a chess player and as an author, they fall short of our notability requirements. Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:06, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • As a note, the one claim I was really interested in, "In 2005, Valeri received the Presidential Award from Bulgarian President Georgi Parvanov" I can't seem to find anything to back that up. On their profile at Lichess where they offer training for a fee, I did find this "In 2007, the former President of the Republic of Bulgaria, Georgi Parvanov, officially awarded Valeri Lilov with a one-year scholarship in recognition of his achievements in chess through the years." However that isn't the same as winning an award from the President.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 23:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete. The IM title is not worth much these days because FIDE has allowed the GM title to inflate. There are now several thousand GMs. Therefore the IM title is not notable. This person would not be considered for the national team in Olympiads, or any other top tournament. It is a rung on the ladder. In effect, the article is a self-ad. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 23:06, 8 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Babo FingoEdit

Babo Fingo (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: After a short search, I could not find any sources. I can't confirm that the subject of this article exists. Darkfrog24 (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Delete. Same reason as nom. All I found was a Facebook page in another language and doesn’t look like a ‘man of the cloth’ to me. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 19:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

oh ok, hm it was my fault then, No of course it is a mystic legendy person Maybe one can improve it? thanky.

  • I found the problem! Nalanidil showed me a source, which I've added. It's BabA Fingo, with an A! That's why the source search didn't work. I change my vote to keep and withdraw my request for removal. I am satisfied that this is a real figure from folklore. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
@Before withdrawing I recommend making sure the article states its folklore and haveNalanidil add more to what’s there including sources. We can help with spelling, grammar, etc. @Darkfrog24@Nalanidil PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 21:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
The "it's folklore" is already done. More sources would be good, though. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)


Thanky you all, oh it was my fault, i see, instead of a, I wrote mistankenly O :) , sorry Nalanidil (talk) 21:52, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm glad we could fix the article up, Nalanidil. Do you want to learn more about how to write good articles? Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, is the page Baba Fingo still for delation? Nalanidil (talk) 23:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

People can still !vote for its deletion if they want and comment and give reasons why it should be deleted if they want. Improving the article with more sources makes it more likely to be kept. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

It was you who nominate the page for deletion, but now we have 2 sources. Actually, i don't want the article to be deleted, can't understand why should be then yet deleted ???

I have an Idea, maybe we can changed the title in the name of the Kakava festival, and include the symbol figur baba fingo? There are more sources in english with about the festival Kakava. https://www.dailysabah.com/turkey/2018/05/07/a-night-and-day-of-feasts-as-roma-festival-kakava-takes-over-edirne


Nalanidil (talk) 11:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Nalanidil This discussion has to run the full length of 7 days. At the bottom it tells you when it will be closed. An administrator will make the final decision based on the comments made in this discussion. The best way to keep it from being deleted, as @Darkfrog24 stated above is you need to really expand the article with numerous sources. As it stands right now, it is about a 50/50 (that is 50% chance of being kept and 50% chance of it being deleted). You can do what you want with the article and here is a good guide (WP:HOW) to help get you started. You have five days to get this article out of danger. I am also going to ask you to keep your thoughts into one paragraph and to use the reply button so it formats the way it should be and makes it easier to read for everyone. If you need any help in how to write the article, please reach out to me, DarkFrog24, or post on Simple Talk. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 15:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)


How many more sources should i bring for an article so that it will be believed by others? Especially since there are hardly any sources about it in English. if two sources in English are not enough, then I don't know either. But, no matter delete it if you want, the roma people who celebrate kakava also know the figure baba fingo, and that's enough.

Nalanidil (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Nalanidil The sources can be in other languages, however, they must be reliable sources. It cannot be an individual users blog, but it can be an established and well known authors blog. We have many articles with references in other languages, the only requirement is that the article is written in simple english and follows all other policies. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 17:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

one think surprised me, why are in this article is no source given? why is there no suggestion to delete it?

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baba_Yaga

Nalanidil (talk) 17:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

1. If you check the English Wikipedia, you can see that Baba Yaga is a notable and popular topic. Baba Fingo does not have a Wikipedia article.
2. Whataboutism is not a good argument. Etoza (?) 21:23, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

eee? so what`? baba yaga is here on simple english wikipedia, without sources since many years and are not deleted...

But please i havent the time to talk longer about deletion, yet another user Etoza involved it. As i said before delete it and is ok. My sources are not good enough so ok. Roma people who celebrate Kakava, knows about Baba Fingo and all is ok...No problem, delete the Article. By by ...I didnt made a comment anymore on this topic. Delete Baba Fingo Page and all is ok.

sincerely Nalanidil (talk) 22:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

It's nice to see you can be a good sport about Simple's deletion rules. We all write stuff that gets deleted sometimes. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete If the article gets deleted, there is still a chance that new faces will find new references, on another [1] talk page. 89.8.101.210 (talk) 21:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 19:05, 8 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Tapan ShethEdit

Tapan Sheth (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article about a nature photographer from India, who won a number of prizes (but without reference). Has references to newspapers (such as the Irish Sun, or Mail Online (presumably: Daily Mail). I do want to say however, that the article reads pretty generic. Question to the community: keep or delete? Eptalon (talk) 19:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Quick Delete @User:Eptalon You just deleted this on the 17th. It is a hoax. Even if you look at the nat geo link they provided it goes to a photo contest entry form. I cannot remember who created it, but I remember putting the tag on it. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 19:58, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    A4 doesn't apply because they claim to have won an award, which is a claim to notability. It also doesn't appear to be an obvious hoax, pretty sure he's a real person and maybe he's done some of the things claimed. An obvious hoax would be telling us he landed on Mars in 1981, not that he has awards for photography. Also QD G4 doesn't apply to an article that was previously Quickly deleted, it only applies to pages deleted after an RfD. So, I don't see how this can be QD again.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  • This feels like a bit of an interesting one. The guy definitely exists. His work has been used by news organizations in their stories. I tried and cannot verify that he won the Nature’s Best Photography Asia 2016 award, their website only goes back to 2017. The subject doesn't appear to be widely cited by their peers, doesn't appear to have innovated a method, no verified significant work or critical acclaim. I think we must delete.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Delete From my understanding, Daily Mail and The Sun aren't reliable sources for establishing notability. If there's not any sources beyond those 2, I'd suggest deletion. Fixing26 (talk) 00:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:57, 6 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Gwen Shamblin LaraEdit

Gwen Shamblin Lara (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Person combining the ideas of weight-loss programs, with those of Christianity. An IP put up over 30k text (which was basically a copy paste of the EnWP article. I cut it down to a three or four sentence stub, but looking at it now it still looks very "promotional". The EnWP version is longer. To me the very basic question is: There are many movements out there that "re-interpret" a religious work and add contemporary elements. Some of them are called prosperity churches. Question to the ocmmunity: keep or delete? Eptalon (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Comment I certainly see where you are coming from. I always like to fix up articles to prevent them from being deleted, but this one is a tossup. I'll see what I can do. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 10:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Her ideas, as far as they go, are not original or notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 04:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 18:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


W. Yao LiangEdit

W. Yao Liang (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Gordonrox24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsure if this subject meets our notability requirements. When trying to search him up, there is a little bit of difficulty due to another unrelated university professor with a similar name. I don't believe I'm seeing the widespread coverage I'd expect, on topics such as research breakthroughs or special achievements. Gordonrox24 | Talk 16:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Keep Here is what I found with a quick search UoC - Gonville & Caius, ResearchGate, and An AI site that pulls in his information from around the internet. To me he fits Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Academics PotsdamLamb (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
    Which sections of Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Academics do you think those links support? Those links appear to be a collection of papers written by the subject. You should expect to find the same thing for just about anybody in the sciences who is or has actively published works. What our requirements say is that those published works have had significant impact as shown by reliable sources. If any of those works had received major coverage outside of just being listed, then he would be considered notable. Alas, they just appear to be lists. In fact, on the AI site you can browse a seemingly endless supply of people with the same sort of content. The only criteria he appears to come close to is "The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.", however the subject even falls short there. Not a distinguished professor, but a professor emeritus. Often a title given to respected retired professors, but not necessarily a sign of notability.--Gordonrox24 | Talk —Preceding undated comment added 20:04, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
      Delete. Does not meet criteria for notability. 89.8.101.210 (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.



Recently closed deletion discussionsEdit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Unable to establih notability.--Eptalon (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Andrii OstapchukEdit

Andrii Ostapchuk (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to pass WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 18:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  •   Quick Delete   Delete. I have qd’d some of these pages. Eptalon and I had a discussion about these no name people who only have a YouTube channel and maybe something irrational tied to them. None of them meet notability. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 18:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    However, Ostapchuk claims to be notable, he has won an award so the article can not be deleted quickly. --Ferien (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    And debunked - never won an award - https://www.imdb.com/event/ev0004502/2018/1/ PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 18:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    Still though, they have claimed to have won an award and therefore the page cannot be deleted under the A4 criteria. --Ferien (talk) 18:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    @Ferien The issue I have with this particular policy is that it says it can be QD'd for non-notable people. But on the other hand if they claim notability we have to go through 7 days (possibly less or more) even though the notability factor was just thrown out of the window with valid written proof. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 19:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    @Ferien So I was just speaking with User:Vermont and this would actually be considered a hoax since the award was never awarded to the person. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 19:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    @PotsdamLamb: Sure, but not all of the article is a hoax. For example, Ostapchuk has won a Silver Creator Award as the channel has over 100,000 subscribers. I think this is just a case of not notable. --Ferien (talk) 19:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
  •   Comment People, the article has beeen nominated for deletion, so we discuss for the week. There's no reason to quick-delete this now...--Eptalon (talk) 19:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    @Ferien: What other parts do you think make a claim to notability? For one, the title of the page and such is not even spelled correctly, it should be Andrey, not Andrii. Zima is not recognized as a reliable source, he does own Focus and some things under it, so yes they will publish articles about him. Supposedly he did start the club stated with the comment of The conversation takes place during a private party at the Young Business Club. This is a club of young, moderately rich and rather ambitious entrepreneurs. It includes 312 Ukrainian businessmen under the age of 35 with a minimum income of $ 4,000 per month. The total turnover of their companies is over UAH 7 billion.[1] Basically it looks like he is only known for running and having this club, which is associated with his youtube channel which does have 174k subscribers, but no awards.[2] PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 20:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
    Doesn't really matter. Clearly Ferien agrees the page should be deleted, otherwise they wouldn't have nominated it for deletion. The folks above are just pointing out that the QD rationale you gave doesn't stand up to current policy. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 05:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
    I have no clue what you are talking about @Gordonrox24 as I said I agree with his reason for the deletion. I was trying to understand what he saw as notable that would make it an RfD. See my very first statement at the top where it says they are not notable. We have seen quite a few of these types of pages lately and they have been QDd without question or argument. If the QD got challenged then I brought it over to RfD for discussion. I QDd one today that someone linked to on Feriens page as it was non-notable and was deleted via RfD four different times on EN. This is the place for debate so I would appreciate you not condescending me (again) and trying to shut me down. Thanks, PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
    They explained that in their very first reply. "Ostapchuk claims to be notable, he has won an award so the article can not be deleted quickly That immediately shuts down the QD debate, and that is what makes it an RfD. You only struck your QD comment in your most recent change, so my assumption was you still believed it to be a QD, which it clearly isn't based on the very first reply. I'm not being condescending, I'm just stating what I think should be obvious based on the clear policy facts. If an article makes a claim to notability it cannot be quickly deleted under A4 even if that claim doesn't stand up to a real test.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 06:31, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
    @Gordonrox24 I understand that, however, if there is proof that they never won the stated award then it can be qd as a hoax. Which is what I did, I looked it up, they were never even nominated. But I feel this is pretty much over as all are deletes and the creator hasn’t contested or made any other edits then creating this article. ;) PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
    No. Simply no. If you think somebody didn't win an award they claim to have won, that is what RfD is for. A6 is for clear hoaxes. Indisputable hoaxes. If he claimed to have walked on the surface of the sun, that would be an A6 hoax. If we have to research and look into whether or not he might have or didn't win an award, that isn't an A6. QD is only for the most clear cut cases. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 06:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
    @Gordonrox24 Then take it up with Vermont as that is what they said. It is pretty simple to look it up. IMDb lists awards. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
    I have faith that Vermont knows the criteria. It is quite clear. What is not a QD is posted, and it shows what is a valid RfD argument. Such as,"Uncertain hoaxes or articles that are false". If you have had to research it to find out it is a hoax, that makes it an uncertain hoax.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 06:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete There really isn't a single thing I can find that makes me think the subject is notable.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 05:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Me neither. Delete. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:08, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 20:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Intense XEdit

Intense X (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find much in the way of sources on this. Sat with no sources on en.wiki for well over a decade before being deleted. Don't think there is any notability here. Djsasso (talk) 03:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  • Delete Yeah, there just isn't anything there. --Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:56, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 03:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Was a two sentence stub, without much context, or references.--Eptalon (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Naomi GamboaEdit

Naomi Gamboa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to pass WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 10:58, 7 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. Article was quick deleted and therefore the deletion was not as a result of the discussion PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC).

Michael CondryEdit

Michael Condry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

50.30.176.23 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Advertising 50.30.176.23 (talk) 05:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

This request is due to close on 05:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete. One sentence-stub-with-infobox, sorry; no cotent....--Eptalon (talk) 23:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Mashudo mitsudu Season 2Edit

Mashudo mitsudu Season 2 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Darkfrog24 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I am not confident this is notable by itself. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:48, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

DiscussionEdit

  Delete No notability and no content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:444:201:9e70:ac9f:9625:7a50:b191 (talkcontribs) 14:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pagesEdit

  1. Tarasova, Daria (30 May 2018). "In pursuit of success. Why entrepreneurs and politicians are swapping patent leather shoes for running shoes". ФОКУС (in Russian). Retrieved 1 June 2021.
  2. "100 богатейших украинцев - YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 1 June 2021.