Raymondnivet
I have nominated Ophelia Bretnacher disappearance and Ophélie Bretnacher disappearance, both articles you created, for deletion. The two articles are almost exactly the same, and I question the notability and relevance of both Purplebackpack89 (talk) 02:53, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Multiple edits to the same RfD
changePlease remember to use the "Show preview" button and think out your replies before hitting the "Save page" button to cut down on edit clusters by you to one page, This makes Special:RecentChanges easier to read. Thanks.-- † CR90 01:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
changeOphélie Bretnacher 2
changeTo Jamesofur
changeHello, I redid the paper on Ophelia Bretnacher shortening. By removing the references to Eva Rhodes, demonstrating sociologicalimpact in France in adding 2 secondary sources television and the great story on France 2 television 13-15 the mag, and a summary article. Thank you kindly tell me what you think and thank you for your kind assistance Best regards --Raymondnivet (talk)21:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Ophélie Bretnacher 3
changeTo Katerenka
changeHello, And now what do you think of this shortened version yet? http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Raymondnivet/Oph%C3%A9lie_Bretnacher%27s_case
Other pages have survived at the deletion discussion, and even speedy deletion!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oph%C3%A9lie_Bretnacher_disappearance http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oph%C3%A9lie_Bretnacher
Best regards --Raymondnivet (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Ophélie Bretnacher last
changeTo Jamesofur :
changeWhy do ou never answer? --Raymondnivet (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
You wrote that:
- Thank you both for your comments. Raymond: I restored and moved the article to your user space at User:Raymondnivet/Ophélie_Bretnacher_disappearance If you think you can improve it please feel free and me or another admin can move it back out. I would encourage you to specifically focus on trying to explain why its important beyond the actual case itself, to bring it out of the 1 event issue. I would also guess that if it survives in fr others there will have ideas as well on good things to add. Kate: don't worry I noticed it and thought it was worth noting, more about how complicated it was then anything. I should also note for the record (which I forgot as another point on my close) that I did think a bit about BLP. While obviously it isn't strictly a BLP there has been a long standing tradition of recently dead being treated, at least partly, as such because of the connections to the living. This does not mean that it can't be an article, just that you should be careful when you talk about other people etc. James (T|C) 23:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
And then no answer !
I redid and redid again the Ophélie Bretnacher page.... And it'was always deleted.
SO I give up Ophélie Bretnacher, and I give up simple to !
Bye --Raymondnivet (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A big thank you for your own, but very effective answer. Sincerely--Raymondnivet (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Heads up
changeFYI: Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2010/Ophélie Bretnacher disappearance. Comments are welcome. Lauryn Ashby (d) 22:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
One month and half of persecution
changeby Katerenka (alias Lauryn Ashby)who has deleted this page 5 times
changeIt's not possible . Katerenka asks for the 5 th (yes !!!) time the deletion of Ophélie Bretnacher disappearance. It will be without me. It's great, great persecution. So I give up...--Raymondnivet (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's not persecution, I just do not think that this article meets the guidelines for inclusion. Please don't take it personally. Lauryn Ashby (d) 22:59, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Great great persecution (2 month)
changeby Purplebackpack89 who asks the page deletion for december 8th 2009 on all WP (french and simple)
changeWhy do you persist persecuting me ? Ophélie Bretnacher disappearance O.B. has been kept on the others WP : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oph%C3%A9lie_Bretnacher_disappearance http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oph%C3%A9lie_Bretnacher
maybe you can change your vote ????
TWO MONTH OF PERSECUTION, IT'S NOT ENOUGH ????
--Raymondnivet (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Lauryn said it and I'll say it too...it ain't persecution. And even if the article was kept on English wikipedia, you still recreated deleted content, which you really shouldn't do Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 23:48, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
No it's not the same content. It's has been improved by WP Community !!! But you did'nt read it ??? You are abble to ask the deletion of something you hav'nt read ?? --Raymondnivet (talk) 23:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- I voted delete this (and last) time because of notability, not quality. It's perfectly acceptable to delete a non-notable article of any quality. Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 00:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Non notable with primary and secondary sources ? --Raymondnivet (talk) 00:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think its time that you all step back from this heated discussion. And let the Afd finish..--Sinbad (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK
changeLauryn (u • t • c) 07:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)