WikiWikingerX

RfD nomination of David Fefolt

An editor has requested deletion of David Fefolt, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/David Fefolt and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. BRP ^ever 14:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

This David Fefolt page page needs to be restored. I'm seeing literally 100s of Wiki pages that consist of barely more than a paragraph and have not a single reference link. My DF entry was well researched and had plenty of sources. This deletion was/is just unnecessary. WikiWikingerX (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

RfDs discuss the notability of the article's subject, not the quality of the article. If you believe the discussion was improperly closed, you can bring that up at WP:Deletion review. Best regards, Vermont (talk) 20:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)