Wikipedia:Editor review/Razorflame4

Razorflame change

Razorflame (talk · contribs) Hi all. This is my current editor review after about a month to see what others think about how I have been editing on this site :). This is the 4th Editor Review that I have requested, and I believe that I have improved significantly since my last one :). Razorflame 22:48, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

  • You have done a most excellent job on creating so many Romanian river articles. Creating so many stubs shows a dedication that I do not posess (I only create articles when I can expand them to a non-stub status). Cassandra 17:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The articles you create with such vigour are indeed excellent, but I'd like to see more drawn-out articles. On your previous nominations, you've always had Lenzburg as a proud accomplishment. I think it would be better if you'd have more accomplishments every time you have an ER, rather than the same one each time. Nominating users for RfA at the right time also shows understanding of the RfA system. Resolved conflicts are also good, but try to keep the number of them down a tad. --Gwib -(talk)- 14:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This time, however, I also listed Romania as on of my great achievements because I expanded than article from about a 7.5 kilobyte article to an almost 30,000 kilobyte article :). I will continue to expand it further to make it acceptable for GA status :). Cheers, Razorflame 00:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I have always been pleased with the amount of work that I have been putting into my contributions here on the Simple English Wikipedia, but my 3 contributions with which I was and am the most pleased about are the 3 successful RfA nominations that I have nominated Lights, Gwib, and American Eagle for; I am also pleased about my work that I have put into the Romania article to try to get it up to Good Article status; and I am also pleased with my first and only Good Article that I have written, Lenzburg, which is currently undergoing an unsuccessful bid for demotion (it won't be demoted). I am also pleased with the amount of articles that I have written for this site as they gauge how dedicated that I am to the Simple English Wikipedia. 23,850 edits and still going :)
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I have been in too many conflicts to detail them all here, but a few of the biggest conflicts that I have been engaged in were the Benniguy fiasco of early this year and my argument with Djsasso during my 8th RfA. I dealt with both of these conflicts the same way: Someone prompted me that I should cease being active in each of these situations and that is exactly what I did in both of those situations.
    I have also been in conflicts with several other users, including: Creol, Barliner, Eptalon, Majorly, Gwib, A Link to the Past, The Rambling Man and several other users, however, each and every one of these conflicts resolved themselves and all of the previous users that I have mentioned hold no regrets for any of these situations.