I came here (on this page) almost one year ago and the admins said to come back later. Now I think I am ready as I have done a lot of reverts since then, even if I was inactive for 1 or 2 months I came back active and hopefully will still be a lot active but if not I will still come on this Wiki once or twice a week to help reverting vandalism. I have experience in reverting vandalism with Twinkle but rollback will help me do it faster and more efficiently (if I am not sure I will use TWINKLE). Reception123/Receptie123 (talk)04:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done User has done some good reverting, but is also still doing things that he/she should be leaving to admins. User also doesn't show good understanding of policies and guidelines. Although those things aren't directly related to reverting, they make me uncomfortable with the idea of giving any rights to this user. I'd like to point out that a person can be sure of something, but still be wrong: it is things the user would be incorrectly sure of that concern me. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm already a rollbacker here. I have this right in the Spanish Wikipedia, and others 3 project, and the reviewer flag in commons. This user right would be useful for patrolling new pages; I'm very familiar with the policy. Thanks Leitoxx (talk) 22:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done User has done some good reverting, but is also still doing things that he/she should be leaving to admins. User also doesn't show good understanding of policies and guidelines. Although those things aren't directly related to reverting, they make me uncomfortable with the idea of giving any rights to this user. I'd like to point out that a person can be sure of something, but still be wrong: it is things the user would be incorrectly sure of that concern me. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:31, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
