Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2015/February/Notdone

Im active in cross-wiki countervandalism and anti-spam activities as active members of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team. I don't have admin rights here or in Big wiki but I think I could benefit from the Rollback tools so I can revert spam and vandalism faster. For example, I have reverted some spam links and vandalism here with TW. Regards--Grind24 (talk) 12:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator observation) User has been hat collecting across multiple wikis. See cswiki, laws, ptwiki, and a few others. User claims to be an "experienced" member of SWMT, however, I don't see many reverts or deletion taggings xwiki. User seems to have more interest in getting a certain number of rights rather than contributing to the project. User only has rollback on testwiki which really means nothing. Although they have done some work here, I suggest waiting some months before requesting this flag or any other right. Eurodyne (talk) 18:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done The users amount of work here is able to be handled under other revering methods, which the user already seems to be using. Please continue to revert the vandalism you see, as any help is appreciated. I just do not see enough of the work yet to feel it necessary to grant the right at this time. With continued contribution and more time, it will be possible. -- Enfcer (talk) 20:18, 1 February
Just created my new account, Bigwill91. If I see vandalism on a page, I can use this tool to revert it to the last revision. I was doing this while not logged in. Bigwill91 (talk) 03:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done This is your first and only edit to Simple Wikipedia. Need a lot more experience here before the tool will be granted. Only (talk) 03:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This would be usefull while patrolling the recent changes. Abigor (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done Except for some edits almost 5 years ago, you've only been here a day. I looked at some of your edits and saw some things that concern me. Specifically:
  • You reverted an edit on Ku Klux Klan with an edit summary "Reverted good faith edits by 62.49.127.26", then issued a final warning to the user for it. It's probably appropriate to leave some kind of message when a good faith edit is undone, but not a final warning.
  • On a couple of your changes that I spot-checked, those to Beppu and Power Rangers Ninja Storm, you used the edit summary "wikify". However, the changes you made resulted in overlinking.
Because of these things, I don't believe it would be appropriate for you to be a patroller at this time. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]