Talk:Aaron Ehasz
Latest comment: 3 years ago by TDKR Chicago 101 in topic QD
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aaron Ehasz article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| This article is about a person who is alive, and so it must follow our rules for biographies of living persons. Controversial content about living persons that does not have any sources or is poorly sourced must be removed straight away from the article and its talk page, especially if it harms their reputation. If such content is repeatedly added to the page or if there are other concerns related to this rule, report it on the Administrators' noticeboard. |
QD
changeThe RfD was closed nearly 11 years ago. He appears to be more notable now. Pinging @PotsdamLamb and TDKR Chicago 101: for further discussion (user who tagged + user who created the article) --Ferien (talk) 10:05, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- @PotsdamLamb: I was going to mention this, thank you @Ferien:. Deleted articles can be recreated as long as they are notable, well sourced and at least in better shape then they were. I also noted PotsdamLamb briefly nominated Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen for deletion. Maybe look into examples of articles that merit deletion or the deletion policies. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- You’ll also notice less than a minute later I reversed my own QD on that. I’ll watch the other articles to see if they go up based on criteria. PotsdamLamb (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- But its the fact you are nominating multiple articles for deletion, some of which do not merit such action such as this, Island of stability (which was flat out denied deletion), Block size (cryptography) (flat out denied deletion) or general relativity. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 10:11, 31 May 2021 (UTC)