Talk:Hurricane Vince

As of 12 April 2010, this article is a very good article. (compare to current). This means the community feels this article is written very well. You may see the vote that promoted the article here.

Untitled

I have polished the language a bit. Made shorter sentences and such. --Eptalon 20:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

To do

• Create the two redlinks.

Aren't there three redlinks? (Including the one in the references, I mean.) Classical Esther^♣ 12:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Those are not counted, it seems. Now, there are two of those. Pmlineditor ∞ 15:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

• Fix the accessdates, all refs and extlinks are okay.

  Not done. TRM said it's not needed in another article/

• Try to simplify a bit more. Pmlineditor ∞ 11:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

  Basically done. Pmlineditor ∞ 12:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

VGA review

Do the following:

• If you copied it from en, then why is there 18 refs here and 20 on en? Copy them over.

  The other two are dead links. I'm looking for sources. Pmlineditor ∞ 12:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

• All sections could use simplifying. I'll help.

  Yeah, I know. I will look into it tomorrow. It'd be great if you helped. :) Pmlineditor ∞ 12:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

That is all I can find really. I might find something later though. I-on|^{I-Гalk |I-PrФjecГ} 12:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Simplification

I overhauled most of the article to make it simpler and more accurate (the first paragraph of the MH was confusing and not correct). I'd appreciate a quick proofread if anybody gets a chance, but it should be getting closer to VGA now. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:05, 26 March 2010 (UTC)