Hello, Лъчезар, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia!

You may want to begin by reading these pages :

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen immediately. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on Talk pages, please sign your name by typing "~~~~" (four tildes)

Good luck and happy editing! Griffinofwales (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Talk in Russian with Mr. Pustynski archived here (please do not edit further). --Лъчезар (talk) 15:30, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is NOT a political blog and most, if not all, of your texts as seen in the New changes are POV and could be deleted at sight. If you feel unable to neutralize them, let me suggest you to contribute instead inside http://en.mmetapedia.org ONaNcle (talk) 08:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint. I was effectively expelled from the Complex English Wikipedia in September 2009. Now it's time to expel me from the Simple English one. What else to do with someone who simply refuses to obey the rules? You're right – the place of such people's isn't here. I wonder how the bosses still bear with me :) --Лъчезар (talk) 13:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Your text is inside your User Page and is somehow soft POV; if you're only for trolling you'll be obviously be expelled; but if you work on things you know, you'll probably be welcomed; Good luck! ONaNcle (talk) 14:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Black listEdit

Thanks. They may feel that I'm trolling but in fact I'm just warning. Anyway, I see that "metapedia" is a forbidden word here because it triggers the spam filter (that's why you've used a double "m"), I wonder why? Their impact is negligible compared to the mighty Wikipedia, what they're fearing of? --Лъчезар (talk) 14:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry ;-))) I've myself been expelled from French metapedia doing too much (trying looking Trotskist as they are). Here, the Black list including metapedia is NOT established by people on Simple; it comes from the Foundation; very few politic links on it such as metapedia but a lot of commercial links banned from spamming. ONaNcle (talk) 14:23, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, link-spam is big trouble, but to ban the word "metapedia.org" is too much. By the way, I'm glad you're not Trotskyite; Trotskyism has plagued the West. --Лъчезар (talk) 18:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

The previously blacklisted word went through now! Glad the Foundation removed it. --Лъчезар (talk) 18:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
"Metapedia"'s still blacklisted, but they made an exemption for the actual Wikipedia articles that talk about Metapedia. In almost all cases, there's no reason to link to Metapedia from an article. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Change summariesEdit

When you make a change, could you please be more specific? On many of your changes, you will say something like "added Kubik", but you are making dozens of other changes in the same edit too. Please try to use change summaries that more accurately reflect what you are doing. Thanks! Either way (talk) 18:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

I thought that the other changes are too minor to be worth mentioning. But thanks for your note, I'll try to not omit any significant changes I do. --Лъчезар (talk) 12:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

conspiracy theory articleEdit

There is currently a discussion occurring here about the neutrality of the article. You are invited to participate. Griffinofwales (talk) 21:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Quick deletionEdit

I have declined your request for a quick deletion at moon landing conspiracy theory. An author may only request deletion on an article if he or she is the sole person who has changed the article. Many people have changed it since you first created it. You are welcome to discuss your issues with the article on the talk page of the article. Either way (talk) 10:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)