Agrave Banks

This user is, of his own desire, no longer active on Simple English Wikipedia.

Archive 1 - do not edit this area!
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Only warning The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. My warning was more than appropriate to the IP address. Why? Because that IP address is clearly the same user as the named user who's already received multiple warnings. They don't get a "clean start" just because they logged out. Only (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Well, heh, there's no obvious evidence of that to a standard recent changes patroller like me. You could've at least mentioned "possible block evasion" or "registered user evading account sanctions" in your edit summary reverts. Mind telling me which account, or is that private data? Agrave Banks --- (talk - contribs - email) 02:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC) They're clearly the same user as User:Silimarlonvincent. Only (talk) 02:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC) ...who is not even blocked. Agrave Banks --- (talk - contribs - email) 02:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC) I never said they were. They received many warnings on the named account, so including an only warning (after two other warnings) on the IP account is more than acceptable. Please don't revert me when I warn users again. Only (talk) 02:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Another "snarky" comment. You seem to think that what I am doing is inappropriate and that my point is not valid. Of course, now I can believe you because you've provided evidence and clearly justified your actions. However, admins need to do both of these things consistently (ideally, everyone should, not just admins), and therefore previously when you had not done so, I had every right to revert you because I disagreed. Notice that I did use AGF rollback. Agrave Banks --- (talk - contribs - email) 02:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Again, no snark behind my statement. Only (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion. Your warning to IP user 129.67.119.4 The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. You left an "only" warning (level 4im) for this user. That was not appropriate, because the user's edits were not severe. When warning users, please start with lower-level warnings and go through all the levels. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)  Acknowledged Agrave Banks --- (talk - contribs - email) 20:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Archive 2 - do not edit this area!
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
February 2017 The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in line with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Sockpuppeting - Wiki You now, Wiki You Later. If you think this block is unfair, you may ask to be unblocked by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private, please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked. Enfcer (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC) This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Agrave_Banks (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs) Request reason: The words that the blocking admin used are not entirely accurate. I Love Bridges is not a sock of WYN WYL - it's the other way around. Also, WYN WYL was indef blocked here for socking, and yet that was my first account on this project, although it was like my 6th account on EN Wikipedia. I never locally created the CentralAuth global accounts of I Love Bridges and the first five socks on this project, and therefore when I was editing here under WYN WYL I was not evading any blocks, unless the block from EN is allowed to be carried over here. Agrave Banks --- (talk - contribs - email) 00:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC) Decline reason: Even if it wasn't socking before. It is now. I should have looked closer when I was looking this morning or I would have probably made the block myself. -- DJSasso (talk) 02:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC) This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Agrave_Banks (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs) Request reason: You mention "even if it wasn't socking before". Does that mean that User:Wiki you now, Wiki you later! can be unblocked, since it was incorrectly blocked for abusing multiple accounts when that wasn't true? Agrave Banks --- (talk - contribs - email) 02:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC) Decline reason: No my point was it was irrelevant. And now that you have edited with this account they are both socks of each other. I should point out that WYN WYL was socking at the time as TheReviewingOfficial654321 so it was socking then as well. -- DJSasso (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.