Amy~simplewiki

I TEND TO REPLY HERE. IF YOU ARE ONLINE AND DON'T REPLY AFTER I REPLY I WILL NOTIFY YOU I'VE REPLIED ON MY TALK PAGE.

Welcome to Wikipedia! Hello, Amy, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! I hope you will be happy helping here. You should begin by reading these pages: Wikipedia:Useful, Help:Contents, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines, and how to write Simple English articles. If you want some ideas of which pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles or the list of wanted pages.

Even though it is a good idea to research an article (like looking at the discussion page) before making large changes, please be bold and try! Any changes you make that are not perfect can be fixed later. We are also working most on core articles and the most common topics until this Wikipedia grows.

If you want to ask a question or talk with other members, you can visit our version of the "village pump" at Wikipedia:Simple talk. Administrators on Wikipedia can also help you with more difficult problems. You can also ask me for help. The best way to do that is to leave a message on my talk page. You should always sign your messages on Talk pages by typing "~~~~" (four tildes) at the end of your words.

If you would like to test Wikipedia, please use the sandbox. Please do not test Wikipedia by editing its articles. Good luck and happy editing! Lights talk 02:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Checkuser RfA change

Latest comment: 16 years ago9 comments5 people in discussion

Thanks for voting, but your comments make it seem as if you have misunderstood what a checkuser's functions are.--Bärl iner 21:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Maybe my message was confusing, because I tend to overcomplicate explanations and reasons. I opposed because firstly, User:Vector, I've only seen revert and vote inside the new changes bar that's in the left margin. Other than those he, in my views, is inactive most of the time. Secondly, Vector, not that I've seen based on his contribs, had asked or done anything to give him the rights of checkuser. Lastly, I just plainly and simply think he is not qualified yet. I don't have anything personally against him, but, Razorflame is an active and simple user, (this is just an e.g) and he deserves to be admin more than Vector deserves to be a CU. This is just my views. Please show me anything you can testify against. Svidanyay,--♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

There are still some issues before I can become an administrator. I would suggest that you view this page so that you can understand the dynamics of this currently. Thanks, Razor flame 21:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am not asking you to change you vote, I opposed too, but "What can a checkuser do other than rename and give other people tools?" is plain wrong. Those are a 'crat's functions, not a checkuser's--Bärl iner 21:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Still, you're active, you help and you still edit articles often enough. I'm not saying you deserve it, but you deserve it MORE than Vector deserves CU in my point of view. --♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, whoops. I know what they're supposed to do but I should have proofread my reason. Svidanyay, --♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's not about 'deserving' the tools. Oysterguitarist 21:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hm. Then I am completely eligible to run right now, and I could get so many supports but I don't deserve the tools. Should we go with the mulitude or the guidlines?--♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You could run, Bianca.. Amy.. Kimberly.. but under which of your socks would you use? And I don't doubt you could find enough accounts out there to get as much support as you could need.. -- Creol(talk) 22:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed change

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Amy. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Amy~simplewiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

08:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed change

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

10:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Add topic