User talk:Ferien/Archives/2024/March

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Ferien in topic redirect

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-10

Tech News: 2024-10

MediaWiki message delivery 19:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-11

Tech News: 2024-11

MediaWiki message delivery 23:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-12

Tech News: 2024-12

MediaWiki message delivery 17:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Questions to create articles/page

I can create a page called: 'Rusrdanbis Alliance'?. Rusrdanbis Alliance (talk) 17:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rusrdanbis Alliance, creating articles on topics you have conflicts of interest with is strongly discouraged, and therefore I am unable to help you with creating this article. --Ferien (talk) 22:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Peanut stew

Could you have a look at User:Rathfelder/Sandbox/Peanut stew when you have a moment and tell me whether you think it is simple enough to be published? Or if not advice would be welcome. Rathfelder (talk) 17:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rathfelder, yup, that's great, I have no issues with that being published. There are a few little things I'd change like It has been described as one of the national dishes of The Gambia. to It is one of the national dishes of The Gambia. (or even the national dish of the Gambia), per w:National dish#G and maybe trying to use a different word other than commercially at the start but those are just minor issues. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 17:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much. Rathfelder (talk) 17:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Rathfelder If I may, it actually sounds really good. Have you had it before? One thing I did notice is you bolded the second using of Peanut Stew. It should only be bolded when it’s first used per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#First sentence. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 23:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
That was an accident! Rathfelder (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 13:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

All done

Hey Ferien - on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Protection request for multiple pages I was able to get them all back in order and corrected. They obviously are stubs but the bones are back to the way they should be and all of the CAPS have been removed from fire engine. Thanks for your help even though there is still some subtle vandalism (exact same thing from before) but on a different range (of which I emailed you). Thanks - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 23:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia translation of the week: 2024-13

Tech News: 2024-13

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deleted article

Hi Ferien, I think there were one or two articles that may have been wrongly tagged for QD around 03:00-07:00 UTC, 26 March. They may have been tagged as test pages with an explanation which didn't seem to qualify. They may have been among the articles deleted by Macdonald-ross from 07:08-07:34. Could you please review these deleted pages? Sorry, I have forgot the specifics. Kk.urban (talk) 15:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kk.urban, thanks for the message. I've just restored US Airways Group, as it's definitely not a test page and has the potential to become an acceptable article. Invasion of the Waikato also technically isn't eligible, but I'm not sure what I'll be able to get from that. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 15:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also, was X-Men '97 a test page? Kk.urban (talk) 15:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Kk.urban: No, it was not. Restored, thanks. --Ferien (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Kk.urban (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA closures

Hi! I just wanted to check that I hadn't misunderstood how the PGA closures work. I couldn't find any info pages on what the rules are. Did I do something wrong for this? Happy to do it differently in future if it's wrong. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lee Vilenski, hey, usually admins do the PGA closures, so I did revert that edit, but then noticed this hasn't happened as much lately, and we don't have any rules that say it needs to be an admin who closes it. There's nothing wrong with your closure beyond that. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
ah, that makes sense. I did have a check to see if it was a requirement and couldn't find much, and the two before that one was non-admin so didn't realise it was a sysop item. Have a great day. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Lee Vilenski, you too, sorry for the confusion! --Ferien (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
For clarification, are non-admins allowed to close these, or is it admin-only? I ask as a non-admin who has closed a few before. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Ferien: It looks like you missed my question. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I hadn't looked at my talk page at all from when you sent that first message until now, and that's my bad. There's no rule against non-admins closing PGAs. They are usually done by admins though. I don't know whether it'd be worth a discussion. --Ferien (talk) 21:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

redirect

Hi, about this, apart from the hoax insertion, the content was mostly a copy paste from this page: [27] so that page history is filled with copyright violations, both copyvio and BLP issues would be good reasons to "first delete and then redirect" imo. And it was eligible for a G5 QD in the first place anyway. Tehonk (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tehonk, ok, I've deleted those revisions from the history. G5 is still relatively new here, so we occasionally don't use it, especially when an article is already at RfD. If the copyright violations had been pointed out prior to/during the RfD, the article would already have been deleted per G12, but no-one pointed it out until now. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 21:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Return to the user page of "Ferien/Archives/2024/March".