Kremlinerr

Hello, Kremlinerr, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia!

You may begin by reading these:

• Help
• Rules
• Links to useful pages
• How to write Simple English articles
• How to copy from another Wikipedia

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles or the list of wanted pages.

You can edit any pages you want! Anything you write can be changed immediately. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on Talk pages, please sign your name by typing "~~~~" (four tildes)

Good luck and happy editing!  GARDEN  21:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

First radio

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio as is my edit —This unsigned comment was added by Kremlinerr (talk • changes) 14:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Your edits in Nikola Tesla

Hello, you did some edits in Nikola Tesla; there were some changes you edit warred over with User:MKil. Rather than edit-warring (which does not lead to a better article), why don't you use the talk page of the article to solve the issues you have and make the article better, once you agreed on the text to use? - Thanks --Eptalon (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

i made well known edits, but some people have priority here, so no matter what one says even if correct they either get blocked or have correct edits reverted! —This unsigned comment was added by Kremlinerr (talk • changes) 14:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I am not interested in I am right, and you were wrong-scenarios; all I am saying is that if there is a problematic passage (which there seems to be), that these facts are backed up by a third party opinion, for example references. No matter what happened, is it really too much to ask to use the talk page of the article to discuss changes, especially since they seem to be contested? --Eptalon (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

sure, but with certain individuals common sense never prevails no matter what you do or say, besides i pointed out to radio link as ref, read first b4 saying otherwise, i followed rules!

I am leaving town for conference, im glad you protected page- im sure the other party will reply with all sorts of non-sense, he's been doing it for 3 years, reverting without evidence 1000s of articles, trust me, if i had to revert what he does, it would become my full time job[1] here mkil proven wrong yet again, but who knows if i dont get blocked in meantime, but if i do, than that proves my point so no need for me to explain my edits or follow ups mkil ll make and he's master at it, believable unfortunately for those who take one sides, my edits they are correct, as always.

My college project was on ac/dc concepts, i know a lot when it comes dealing with electromagnetism!

—These unsigned comments were added by Kremlinerr (talk • changes) 14:30, 14:32, 14:40, 14:42, 14:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of changing privileges. If you believe this block is unfair you may request to be unblocked by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked.

Goblin 14:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

thank you, i prefer to remain blocked, if you read what i wrote above, i did nothing wrong, my edits are correct and i knew i will be blocked, such actions do not bring any good to wikipedia with wikidiots as one who blocked me, but im glad, i always use such actions to my advantages!

I love all the blocks, the more the better! —This unsigned comment was added by Kremlinerr (talk • changes) 15:43, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for edits

Well, you know how it is, where you are not liked, things go back, i love your edits on big wiki on classical composers. I do agree with you, even if suspended they should thank you for edits, kremliner gets an A. So, keep it up, if you have to go thru hell, go until you see the light at the end of the tunnel, so if you are freddy or not, rock on with fine edits :)!