User talk:MBlaze Lightning/Archives/2016

Red links

Hi MBlaze Lightning, recently you removed a link for William McMahon's wife, Sonia, as there was no article about her. This is not necessary as red links are quire acceptable. They show us what articles still need to be written. In this case I have not put the link back, as it is quite possible to argue that she, as an individual person, is not notable enough for her own article. But be careful about removing other links, they do serve a useful purpose.--Peterdownunder (talk) 21:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up. — MBlaze Lightning 13:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


By the way

If I am not a sock than you should NOT do a CU request. Plus I'm not a sock and I'm a smart California girl to understand not to disrupt Wikipedia. --LaurenCox600 (chat me!) 05:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@LaurenCox600 *sigh* If you're not a sock, you have nothing to worry about, and I'm not going to request CU, Cheers. — MBlaze Lightning 16:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
But Lithorien has. The SPI/RFCU seems reasonable to me. If you're not a sock, you should welcome getting cleared of such suspicions. — MBlaze Lightning 16:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ruzizi River QD

I appreciate your anti-vandalism efforts earlier but this QD is for an administrator to decide. We do not have one-word articles (which can't be called an article by any stretch of the imagination). Secondly, we could say any page should not be deleted because it can be improved. If you want to improve the article go ahead. But even then you should leave the QD for an admin to decide. If you have any questions about this just ask. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rus793 (talkcontribs)

I see you did add some improvements. In the future please don't remove another editor's QD or RfD requests even if you do make improvements. Again, that is for an administrator to decide. Thanks for understanding. Rus793 (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Rus793, the topic certainly has potential and it can be expanded and improved but as you I'll put that QD back but will try to improve the article a bit. Cheers. — MBlaze Lightning 14:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
A good number of deleted articles have some potential—if for nothing else their title. But patrollers and administrators delete quite a few of these a day here. Check the deletion log yourself to see how many are deleted daily. There simply aren't enough of us with sufficient time to improve all of them. Otherwise nothing else would get done and IP and other new users would simply keep cranking out these one-word, one sentence or blank pages with no let up. It is a practical matter. Each of us improves those we can and by your improving this one you've done something good here. Keep it up. Thanks again Rus793 (talk) 15:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
  Rus793 has given you some cookies! Now enjoy them! For improving an article marked for QD
Thanks for the cookies! :) — MBlaze Lightning 15:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcoming users

Hello, MBlaze. Thanks for your work here. I noticed that you left a welcome message for IP user 2601:283:C200:4DE0:10B0:707D:AD1A:859F. You might not have known, but here we prefer not to welcome users until we see that they are making a good number of helpful changes. None of this users changes appear to be vandalism, but none of them were really helpful, either. Before welcoming, please look over their changes to be sure that they're helpful. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ok @Auntof6 sure, before welcoming a user or IP I will do take a look over their contributions thoroughly. Cheers. — MBlaze Lightning 03:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! --Auntof6 (talk) 04:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

We seem to have a woops!

I just noticed your userpage. It has two patroller userboxes. You may not want to be displaying these until you are granted patroller rights. See Wikipedia:Patrollers. Meanwhile you might want to take them down. I'm sure you just misunderstood. The list of users with patroller status (all admins automatically have patroller rights) is at Special:ListUsers/patroller. Thanks Rus793 (talk) 02:27, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Rus793 no problem, I'll remove them but Isn't patrolling new pages and recent changes is entirely voluntary and is just a way to see that every page gets checked in a timely manner? If I'm not wrong, then Patroller user right is granted to those who regularly create good articles and their articles does not need to be patrolled or appear at Special:NewPages list. I may be wrong. Cheers. — MBlaze Lightning 03:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
(talk page stalker) The patroller right does two things. It allows the person to mark other users' new pages as patrolled, and it means that the person's own new pages are automatically patrolled (they do still appear at Special:NewPages). Patrolling could be seen as the act of marking new pages as patrolled, or the act of checking new pages as any user can do. When you have the patroller right, unpatrolled pages appear highlighted in yellow in the new pages display. I hope that sheds some light on this. Feel free to ask any questions you might have. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thanks for the information @Auntof6. — MBlaze Lightning 07:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The warning you gave to an IP

You recently gave an IP user a level-1 vandalism warning for an edit that was made to U.S. Presidential line of succession. The IP user's edit was, at a minimum, a good-faith effort, and arguably it made the article better. Either way, it was not vandalism. I have removed the vandalism warning from the IP user's talk page -- we want to encourage people to make constructive edits here, even if they are not perfect. Etamni | ✉   11:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Service award

You are qualified to display the following award. Your next level is when you hit 600 edits: Apprentice Editor (you already have more than enough time in service and you need less than 100 more edits to qualify). A belated congratulations!

 This editor is a Novice Editor and has the right to show this Service Badge.






Service award

Congratulations! You are now qualified to display the following award. Your next level is Journeyman Editor at 6 months service and 1,200 edits. BTW, you can also award yourself a service award when you have the required time and number of edits. See Wikipedia:Service awards. Also, you can pay it forward. When you see a new editor who qualifies for a service award (time and number of edits) you can give them a service award. Good luck in your editing! Rus793 (talk) 14:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

 This editor is an Apprentice Editor and has the right to show this Service Badge.





Thank you, Rus793 :) — MBlaze Lightning 14:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Iceland

You recently reverted an IP editor after the IP made changes to Iceland and failed to cite sources. The changes were valid so I am putting them back. I will add citations shortly. Etamni | ✉   07:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Okay, no problem. — MBlaze Lightning 17:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

New categories

Please don't make a new category until there are three or more pages to put in it. That's how we do it here. Otherwise they get deleted when Aunt does a sweep through the categories! Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

And in addition to that, please categorize the categories you create. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 4 August 2016

Managing user pages of sockpuppet accounts

I noticed that you left a sock notice on one user page, and blanked the user page of another sock. These are normally done by the person who confirms that the user is a sock. Please don't do these things yourself. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Roger that. — MBlaze Lightning 05:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Battle rap

I deleted the material because it was added by a user who was blocked on en Wikipedia for self-promotion. None of the material I removed is back by anything resembling a reliable source.

See:

Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 20:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

15:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

QD log

Hi MBlaze Lightning, thanks for you work on fighting vandalism. If you find pages with "attack names", please request a QD, but do not add them to your QD log. I have recently been asked to suppress an attack page, but I also had to suppress a version of your QD log page where the attack page name was also listed. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me, --Peterdownunder (talk) 01:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

change conflict

I'm guessing you've already realized the change to Wikipedia:Introduction was acceptable, and that this is why you blanked the warning you applied. :) Etamni | ✉   13:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

yep :) — MBlaze Lightning T 📧 13:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

15:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

18:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Update to wiki page https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_Telugu_movies required

Hi MBlaze Lightning, Please update Janathe Garage collections in wiki page https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_Telugu_movies I have given reliable sources for editing.

Thanks, Coolbabucoolcool (talk) 19:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)CoolbabucoolcoolReply

  Done MBlaze Lightning T 08:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Impersonator

Someone is trying to impersonate you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bbb23_and_Royer2356

I am sure it's to disrupt your STANDARD OFFER.

22:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

User talk:2602:FFE8:102:306:0:0:3504:6B90

@MBlaze Lightning: What's going on at User talk:2602:FFE8:102:306:0:0:3504:6B90? It appeared your original level warning was level 1 and was changed to Level 4. As I'm sure you know we start with level 1 or 2 and do not go directly to 4. While I was changing back to your original warning it appears you changed back to the level 4 warning—inadvertently, I'm sure. Did you want to change it back to level 1? I just added a level 2 warning and if the user continues to vandalize, it will go through the rest of the levels. Otherwise, if there was some reason let me know. I'll leave it to you to take care of. Thanks Rus793 (talk) 18:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blaze. The user is actively vandalizing right now so maybe this is a moot point. Rus793 (talk) 18:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Rus793, please see the IP's talk page history correctly. My original user warning was level II [67], ChenzwBot gave a level I warning [68] before me. I appropriately warned the IP [69] before reporting to Vandalism in progress. The vandal quickly removed all the warnings, I understand, how you might have overlooked and decided to give the vandal a warning again [70]. That is why, I decided to restore last stable version [71] but it seems I restored the wrong version. This might be a error on my part (I was on a mobile that time). Anyway, the vandal is globally blocked now. Cheers, — MBlaze Lightning T 07:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar

  The Original Barnstar
For MBlaze Lightning for keeping the Simple English Wikipedia up to date and accurate. Peterdownunder (talk) 22:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Peterdownunder.   MBlaze Lightning T 06:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

21:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Journeyman Service award

Congratulations! You are now qualified to display the following award. BTW, you may use any form of the award you like and you may also give yourself a service award (although it always seems better if someone else awards it to you). Now if you notice an editor is due a service award (has both the time and edits required), pay it forward and award it to them. Nice going! Rus793 (talk) 15:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

 This editor is a Journeyman Editor and has the right to show this Service Badge.





Update for Janatha Garage Movie collections

Hi,

Could you please update Janatha Garage movie collections in https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_Telugu_movies based on below source

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/janatha-garage-5th-weekend-box-office-collection-jr-ntrs-film-crosses-rs-135-crore-mark-32-days-696348

Thanks, Coolbabucoolcool (talk) 19:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)coolbabucoolcoolReply

  Done MBlaze Lightning T 08:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

20:29, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Reverting

Hi MBlaze Lightning, please be careful with revert. This should only be used for vandalism. If the edit, like the recent one to Enrico Fermi for example, has been a genuine attempt to add content, then it is not vandalism, and revert should not be used. In this case, if you feel that the new edit does not improve the article, makes major assertions that are not referenced, or other things, then use the "undo" feature. I always try to show good faith by carefully separating the vandals from the inexperienced. Of course, even better for an unsourced claim, would be to find a relevant source and cite it. --Peterdownunder (talk) 06:14, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: September 2016

 




Headlines



Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

 
News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

16:42, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

17:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

16:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2016

 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Hastings

I saw that you caught the vandalism at this page and that the user had been warned three times previously. I almost added it to Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress when I noticed you already had. But you placed it at the bottom of the list where it may not get attended to right away or another editor might not notice it and add a new entry. New instances of vandalism should be placed at the top of the list. I don't know when you'll see this but if the user has not already been dealt with, could you move your entry to the top? Thanks. Rus793 (talk) 18:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Done. cheers, — MBlaze Lightning T 18:58, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For all your efforts in reverting vandalism. Rus793 (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Rus793! — MBlaze Lightning T 18:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

15:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2016

21:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

18:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2016

 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

20:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

Return to the user page of "MBlaze Lightning/Archives/2016".