User talk:Pmlineditor/Archive 13
This page is an archive. Do not change this page. Make new comments on the current talk page. |
Idiot.
Whack!
For this and not putting it in the queue. Idiot. ;) Goblin 12:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC) I ♥ Yottie!
- Oops. Sorry for that. :( Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
ANI
I had already stated that my attempts to discuss with the user had failed. Normandie Talk! 14:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi Pmlineditor, thanks for fixing Crab spider! :)
Dewflower has given you some cookies! Now enjoy them! |
Warmly, Dewflower 08:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for the cookies, I'm eating them at the moment. :P Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
Just wanted to say thanks for granting me rollback! :) --- cymru.lass (talk)⁄(changes) 20:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Idiot. (Again)
Whack!
AWB does weird things when you have the flood flag enabled, you normally need to logout and log back in, because you've flooded RC. Idiot. :P Goblin 19:25, 4 February 2011 (UTC) I ♥ PeterSymonds!
- I did logout and log back, and my edits were hidden. :/ Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 09:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, strange... they weren't for me (Yes, I have bots hidden...) :/. Nonetheless, you're still an idiot ;-) That you cannot dispute! :P Goblin 09:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC) I ♥ The Rambling Man!
Out of scope user page
User:Llibertatcom, cross-spam user page--Musamies (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Deleted. Thanks for notifying me. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Note
67.23.242.32 (talk · contribs) is a proxy; please block. Thanks, Goodvac (talk) 09:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 09:14, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Another one: 69.175.118.122 (talk · contribs). Goodvac (talk) 09:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Goodvac (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
My recent reversion
Hello, Pmlineditor. I have reverted your undoing the IP editor in Pakistan-administered Kashmir this morning; I don't see any problem in the edit, other than it does perhaps need sourcing. People have told me I should have used "undo", to be able to specify a reason. Feel free to contact me, if you think my action was worng though. --Eptalon (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- I reverted the edit because it was basically an unsourced addition as well as a direct copy-paste from Enwiki. I personally don't have a problem with rollbacking my edit, seeing you clarified here. There's a useful script which allows different edit summaries for rollback, which you can use, btw. Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 17:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
NASCAR
Thanks for fixing that... Cheers. Mìthrandir 13:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, :) Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
VIP
How much would you say is sufficient? I think that if the user doesn't get the picture after three warnings, then they should be reported... that's just my view... Cheers. Mìthrandir 14:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with you that three warnings in sufficient, but these warnings should be recent. In this case, the warnings date back to 2008, which certainly isn't recent. Regards, Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, I should have paid attention to that... my bad, I'll look harder next time... Cheers. Mìthrandir 14:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
RFA
And, last but not least, I want to thank you, Pmlineditor, for the nomination and support. I'll ask any questions should they come up. Best, Albacore (talk · changes) 02:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Congratulations! I am certain you will do well as an admin. :) Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 08:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)