Welcome

change

Hello, Spaceteez, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will show your username and the date.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.

Good luck and happy changing! –Davey2010Talk 13:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

change
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make useful changes to Wikipedia. However, at least one of your changes, such as the one you made to "Private collection", did not seem to be helpful and has been automatically reverted by ChenzwBot. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

  • Technical details: Edit (9853274) processed with score of 0.99067.

  • As an automated computer program, ChenzwBot makes few mistakes, but it may happen in rare cases. If you believe your change was not vandalism, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the change again.

--ChenzwBot (talkcontribs) 15:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make helpful changes to Wikipedia. However, some of your changes, like those to "Private collection", did not seem to be helpful and have been reverted or removed. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 15:55, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You're more than welcome to state the issues you've identified on the talkpage and can within reason tag the article for improvement however tag bombing it and then speedying it after is over the top and unnecessary, The article has already been tagged and I should also point out the content was taken from en:Private collection so it's clearly a notable subject although I do agree the article needs sourcing and improving. Please help improve/expand it, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Alright I understand, I'm a little bit busy now so I will look into it later Spaceteez (talk) 16:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
 

Please do not remove quick deletion tags from articles, as you did to "Damo k", without a good reason. If you think the article should not be deleted, please add {{wait}} to the article and explain your reason on the article's talk page. Thank you. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 13:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

why are you adding the template. I added reliable sources from Nigerian new to show notability Spaceteez (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you check, I added Vanguardngr which is a notable magazine in Nigeria Spaceteez (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please don’t remove Deletion template and let an Administrator review it. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 13:21, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have provided the best references for this article you're just vandalizing my page Spaceteez (talk) 13:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion template

change

Why did you request for this to be deleted, instead of adding your own idea. I thought Wikipedia is a open space for volunteers to share their ideas Spaceteez (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, All articles on here need to be notable and have reliable sources, The subject isn't notable and the sources aren't reliable sources either, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  It looks like you are in a change war judging from the reverts you have made on Damo k. Take care, because the three-revert rule does not let users make more than three reverts on a single page in a single day. Any user may still be blocked for being involved in a change war and disruption, even if they have not broken the three-revert rule. When you disagree with another user, you should first try to talk about changes in order to work together to improve Wikipedia and reach consensus. If you continue to disrupt the page, you may be blocked from changing Wikipedia. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 13:23, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

so what's your own ideas for improvement. Or better still add your own idea of you have one Spaceteez (talk) 13:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia is not a soapbox. It's not a place to deploy ideas which can't be sourced or notable. See What Wikipedia is not. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 13:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
it looks like you're not understanding me, all the references I made are high-quality website in Nigeria that has it's own newspaper Spaceteez (talk) 13:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent changes, like those you made to "Damo k", are vandalism, and this shows that you want to harm Wikipedia. This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from changing Wikipedia. –Davey2010Talk 15:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Revert again and you will be blocked, It has been explained to you above as well as here why the sources are not okay and why the subject isn't notable. Reverting everyone will not change that. Wikipedia works by being an encyclopedia but also only hosting subjects that are notable, Your 3 poor sources doesn't make this person notable so the subject cannot have an article here, I can't explain it simpler than that, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply