Section I (Closed)

change

Section II (Closed)

change

Section III (Closed)

change

Section IV (Closed)

change

Section V

change

November 2015

change

  Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to "User_talk:The Blank Page Creator", without giving a good reason in the change summary. This is vandalism. If you want to practice changing Wikipedia, please use the sandbox. Thank you. While it is your talk page, you cannot blank it. Krett12 (talk) 02:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request 2

change
 

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The_Blank_Page_Creator (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I have not been blocked directly, nor have I been autoblocked. I have been affected by an IP address hardblock that has blocked logged-in editing as well. The IP is 24.63.116.248

Decline reason:

Checkuser data and behavioral evidence indicates abuse of multiple accounts. -- Chenzw  Talk  01:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request 3

change
 

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The_Blank_Page_Creator (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Wiki you now, Wiki you later! is my first account on this wiki (not my first Wikimedia account). It was blocked for sockpuppetry even though it was my first account here. I am the same person, but the only reason why I am socking is because I was blocked unfairly. I am blocked on En-Wiki for abusing multiple accounts, but I got permission to edit here while I am awaiting the standard offer over there. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! is the name of one of my sockpuppets on En-Wiki, and therefore I usee it when I registered here. However, there is nothing in the policies here that cleary states that blocks from other Wikis carry over here. Therefore, unless I get a fair explanation, I will continue to evade as there is no reason whatsoever for me to be blocked here.

Decline reason:

You blatantly admit to socking due to your perceived unfair block. Most editors feel that any block they receive is unfair. Also making this your 3rd unblock request in as many days is crossing the line of project disruption. I am removing your talk page access until further notice on both accounts. -- Enfcer (talk) 20:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Note to future reviewing administrators: I have not seen any "permission" to edit here, nor relevant ArbCom motion, not to mention that we as a separate wiki are not obliged to honour whatever permission EN grants for this editor to do over here. The English Wikipedia has no jurisdiction over wiki processes here. Relevant pages are WP:ONESTRIKE, and user contribs for all socks, with particular emphasis on the tag-bombing and RfD nominations. Chenzw  Talk  15:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Yes, these guys are right. Just because you think you were blocked wrong is not a ticket to sock at us--you could at least wash them. Krett12 (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply