Hi, I'm MPD (Talk to me!). I've just noticed that your username may not meet our username policy.
This is not anything against you, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our guidelines - we hope to see you editing again soon!

Our username policy says how you should choose your username. Put simply, you should not have a username that people find offensive, advertises a real world group or company, or is confusing (for instance, if it impersonates another user).

If you have already made changes and wish to keep your changes under a new name you may ask for us to rename your account. If you want to, please go here and ask for a new name. It will be changed by someone once they receive the request.

If you think that User000name fits inside the guidelines, feel free to tell me why on this page, and I'm sure we can come to some conclusion.

However, please be aware that the username you currently have, User000name may be blocked from editing without warning — if your name is listed here, you may want to tell people why you should not be blocked on that page.

Thanks again,

MPD (Talk to me!) 16:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Matthew Peter-Davis: Hello, can you explain how this username is offensive/confusing? I don't see any part of this username which violates the username policy. Also, seeing your account was just created 11 days ago, I advise you to limit your warnings and read the Simple English Wikipedia's policies and guidelines carefully. Thanks, Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
The username appears to be a username which a retired or vanished user would be renamed to (user000name seems to be a procedural name). MPD (Talk to me!) 12:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Matthew Peter-Davis: Your reason is not mentioned in the username policy, so your reason doesn't makes some sense. Also, the username doesn't even look like a retired/vanished user from my own POV, stewards and global renamers commonly rename vanished users to names containing nonsense and random characters, like "kawhduegfyeyuesfuijedciugdyuafydgr", which violates username policy because of being confusing. Thanks, Pokéfan95 (talk) 11:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
User000name, I see no problem with your user name. @Matthew Peter-Davis: If you see any other users whose names you think are bad, I suggest you report them at WP:AN to get a second opinion before leaving a notice on the user's page. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply