Archived requests
- Administrator / Bureaucrat / Checkuser / Oversighter
- Rollbacker
- Patroller
- Transwiki Importer
Successful
User
|
Date
|
Tally
|
Comment
|
Lights
|
23 December 2007
|
19/0
|
successful adminship
|
Cometstyles
|
26 November 2007
|
25/0
|
successful adminship
|
Barliner
|
14 November 2007
|
12/0
|
successful adminship
|
Yegoyan
|
4 November 2007
|
12/0
|
successful adminship
|
Werdan7
|
16 October 2007
|
19/0
|
successful adminship
|
Eptalon (checkuser)
|
6 October 2007
|
25/0
|
successful checkusership
|
Creol (checkuser)
|
26 September 2007
|
29/0
|
successful checkusership
|
M7 (checkuser)
|
26 September 2007
|
27/1
|
successful checkusership
|
Huji 2
|
9 September 2007
|
14/0
|
successful adminship
|
Phaedriel
|
9 September 2007
|
17/1
|
successful adminship
|
Isis
|
29 July 2007
|
19/0
|
successful adminship
|
Majorly
|
21 May 2007
|
12/0
|
successful adminship
|
Browne34
|
8 May 2007
|
9/0
|
successful adminship
|
M7
|
7 May 2007
|
7/0
|
successful adminship
|
Vector (bureaucrat) 2
|
31 April 2007
|
9/0
|
successful bureaucratship
|
Tygartl1
|
30 April 2007
|
10/0
|
successful adminship
|
FrancoGG
|
24 April 2007
|
14/0
|
successful adminship
|
J Di
|
7 March 2007
|
7/2
|
successful adminship
|
Creol
|
3 January 2007
|
15/0
|
successful adminship
|
Voting for removal of sysop rights due to inactivity. Note that these would be instantly reinstated upon their request. Archer7 - talk 20:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Requested removal of access on Meta. Archer7 - talk 20:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Access is removed. - Huji reply 16:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Archer7 - talk 20:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support removal of both. Majorly (talk) 20:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. yeah, go ahead, remove them both. --Isis§(talk) 20:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. - BrownE34 talk contribs 21:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Never seen either, so go ahead --Eptalon 21:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Billz (Talk) 21:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support for User:SimonMayer and Oppose for User:Brion VIBBER. Is futile, Brion can gets sysop when he wants
:P
. ^Zeta^/query 22:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can Brion actually do that? I always thought that developers were a completely seperate level, and that the developer groups were granted access to the code of MediaWiki and in some cases, access to the servers. If I'm correct, it would be pretty difficult I think to add himself on the live copy. I've never heard that developers have bureaucrat/admin access. Does anyone actually know what rights developers have? Archer7 - talk 12:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support · Tygartl1·talk· 23:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- support for that--vector ^_^ (talk) 09:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Why? --Choosnink TALK 21:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The reason is because they will most likely never use the tools again. Therefore, it's misleading in the statistics to say that we have that number of administrators. It's also a security issue, as if we have greater number of people with extra powers, there's potentially more people for hackers to target. We'd reinstate them if they ever came back. Archer7 - talk 08:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, I have decided to remove the vote of a banned user, Choosnink. This is due to the fact that "she" is the sockpuppet of a troll.-- Tdxiang 09:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Simon hasn't been around for a really long time, and Brion can just give it to himself if he needs to. Sean William 21:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I have not seen either of them around since I have joined wikipedia simple english. They are not really much of a help if they are not here.--†Sir James Paul† 03:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support removal of both. --§ Alastor Moody (T + C) 17:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Brion VIBBER can just give himself sysop status if he needs to work here. Simon hasn't been here in a while, so he can be removed. Nishkid64 (talk) 18:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Werdan7T @ 07:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support.-- Tdxiang 09:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Huji reply 18:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support removal of both I have never seen either of these make one good edit since I have been here. -- j. rand|talk| contribs|email 02:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Based on your contributions, your oldest edits are no older than two weeks. - Huji reply 11:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: for security purposes. RaNdOm26 11:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: getting nearer the true number of sysops. ONaNcle 17:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]