Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Current requests for rollbackEdit


I know I have said before that rollback is not needed to revert vandalism, but when a user makes lots of bad edits, it takes quite a long time when reverting all of them using Twinkle and it would be quicker to rollback. Also, there are situations when a diff isn't needed to see that the last user who edited the page was vandalising (see my talk page history today..), it would be quicker to use rollback instead of going to history, clicking on the diff and pressing vandalism. Rollback would assist me in my anti-vandalism activities. I have read through WP:Rollback feature and I am aware that rollback should not ever be used for good-faith edits - Twinkle or normal undo can be used for those. Thank you for your consideration, and, obviously, feel free to ask any questions. --Belwine💬📜 20:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Strong support as per his performance.DJRC (talk) 07:43, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, but just a reminder that requests for rollback are not votes --Belwine💬📜 09:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
I know just think this is an (Non-administrator observation) and suggestion.DJRC (talk) 13:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Ah ok, just mark comments using {{nao}} in the future :) Belwine💬📜 13:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
  Comment I would request any admin to check this since no comments has been made earlier.DJRC (talk) 10:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  Done. Everything looks fine to me. My apologies for the wait. Hiàn (talk) 01:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


I would like to become a rollbacker because I want to revert vandalism quickly. Twinkle can sometimes take a long time, but with rollback, vandalism can be undone in a jiffy. In addition to that, it takes a while to revert vandalism by clicking a bunch of links if you use Twinkle. Also, I have a low tolerance when it comes to vandalism, and the job can get done faster and more efficient with Rollback. I've read through the Rollback guidelines and should not use it for edit-wars or use it to revert good-faith edits, as I can use Twinkle for that. Thank's for your consideration. --Cuddles9999💬📜 16:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  Not done You've been here less than a month, and have
  • Been cautioned about warning people for edits that were not vandalism.
  • Told a user (Latie .vet) that their user page might be against user page guidelines, when it appears that said user didn't even have a user page.
Take some more time to learn how things are different here before taking on any additional rights. Some things (not the ones mentioned above) are different enough here that they could seem like vandalism if you're not aware of them. I have this list that shows some of them. (That list is not policy or a guideline, but it references some relevant policies and guidelines.) --Auntof6 (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

@Auntof6: I'll come back in a month or so when I'll feel and know that I'm ready. --Cuddles9999💬📜 14:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)