Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2013/June/Done

User:Glaisher change

Glaisher (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

Please grant me the rollback flag as it will help me revert vandalism much faster and easily. Thanks --Glaisher (talk) 10:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator observation) I do support him/her. curtaintoad | chat me! 10:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Based on what, CT? This user has been here less than a month. --Auntof6 (talk) 11:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This changer has been here for more than a month, changing for roughly half-month, and has made around 50 reverts with good-faith and vandalism reverting in that period. So I can support h-im/er. curtaintoad | chat me! 11:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, a month and a few days -- I was going by the first edit date. However, that's still very little time. Not that we get a say anyway. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per CT.Rights should be granted.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Auntof6 Well, don't you think 50 reverts is already much? When i was granted the right (now i am currently not rollback) i know i had almost the same amount of reverts as Glaisher.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 12:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean Auntof6? curtaintoad | chat me! 12:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry for spelling the name wrong.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 12:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! --Auntof6 (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't think that's very much. It's not just the number of reverts specifically, though, it's the overall amount of experience here. However, it's not up to me. We'll see what an admin says. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your right! We can't decide what is really an admins decision.Reception123 / Receptie123 (talk) 12:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
(wondering why we have such a long discussion here over rollback) Edits and reverts look alright, member of SWMT - crosswiki anti-vandalism activity looks fine. Rollback granted. Editors are reminded that support/oppose !votes are non-binding - administrators may or may not take them into consideration. This is not an RfA. Chenzw Talk 13:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:TCN7JM change

TCN7JM (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

Hey. I would like to request rollback here because I feel I can be trusted with the privilege. I have rollback on two other wikis (English Wikipedia, Wikidata), and I know what is and is not vandalism. As I become more active in vandal fighting on this wiki, I think I will need to use this privilege to assist me. Thanks for consideration. T C N7JM 03:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Chenzw Talk 04:31, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]