Talk:Pest killer
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Belinda in topic QD
QD change
I don't see why this should be so immediately nominated for Quick Deletion, especially with the reason of having "little or no meaning". Some references would help, yes, but let's not rush into deletions. :) Bella tête-à-tête 09:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- To me, it's just a dictionary definition, without enough content for an encyclopedia article. I'm OK with leaving it if others disagree. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps it should be Requested for Deletion. I'm not sure if it should be kept (there is no such article on en), but if it isn't blatantly wrong, QDing should be used sparingly. Bella tête-à-tête 09:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- We have the page pesticide, which is probably very similar in content and scope, can we redirect there? --Eptalon (talk) 12:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Redirected to pesticide.--Peterdownunder (talk) 12:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- This is strange. The redirect doesn't work... Bella tête-à-tête 12:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Redirected to pesticide.--Peterdownunder (talk) 12:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- We have the page pesticide, which is probably very similar in content and scope, can we redirect there? --Eptalon (talk) 12:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- Perhaps it should be Requested for Deletion. I'm not sure if it should be kept (there is no such article on en), but if it isn't blatantly wrong, QDing should be used sparingly. Bella tête-à-tête 09:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)