3 of Diamonds
| This is 3 of Diamonds's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to 3 of Diamonds. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||
Rollback change
I have granted your rollback request. Please remember to only use the rollback function for true vandalism. Any other need to revert edits must be done with other methods. -- Enfcer (talk) 02:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Requests for rights change
Please do not reply to requests for rights, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Patroller. It is one thing to give possibly relevant information, but if you do so, be respectful and do not say the requestor can or can't have rights. That is for the admins to say. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Just a couple of tips. When tagging an article for improvements, one or two (of the most needed improvements) is usually sufficient. If you can fix the problem yourself, that it always the best approach. Ten tags on the same page is far too many (and that particular page would not have been an easy fix). Secondly, the article (which may be deleted by the time you read this) appears to be a copyright violation. The user apparently copied and pasted information directly from a copyrighted (©) source without putting it into the editor's own words or getting permission from the author. An administrator will decide. Copyright violations can often be spotted by copying sentences from the new article, then searching for a match using your search engine. The matching pages can then be examined to see if this was the source. Sometimes, the original source is another Wikipedia article on another project, which the page or pages you find may have copied from. Often these will list Wikipedia as a source. Then it is not a copyright violation for the purposes of using QD:G12 (Copyright infringement). You were right in spotting that it was not laid out as an encyclopedic article and had several other problems. If you have questions or would like any help just ask here or post to Wikipedia:Simple talk. Thanks User:Rus793 (talk) 17:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, it looked like a copyvio, but I couldn't find the source. Thanks for the tip!
Quick deletion of Savings account change
The page you wrote, Savings account, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Really,if there is w:Savings account, then what makes you think this page will be deleted?--3 of ♦ I go first 14:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Please do not edit, blank, or strikeout other users' comments on RfD pages, as you did with this one. The closing admin will see that these editors were not acting properly and take that into account. They will also see that those editors did not give meaningful arguments for keeping the article, and will likely not consider their "votes". Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)