Cotevertu
Quick deletion of Canadas links to the world change
The page you wrote, Canadas links to the world, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Pending(tell me I screwed up and where) 16:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Canadas Links to the World... change
Hello Cotevertu. I noticed you recreated the page Canadas links to the world. As you know, this page was previously requested for deletion and then furthermore deleted. You can see the discussion here. It was deleted to do the fact that the article was written with original research. To increase the amount of reliability, Wikipedia has a No Original Research policy. This means that articles cannot be based on ones own research or thought. The second reason the article was deleted was because the article has been covered elsewhere. For this case, the article is covered through ought most of the all articles that involve Canada. If you still think that the article should not have been deleted you can contact an administrator. If you wish to create a new article, you can use your sandbox to allow you to continue to come back to your article without "publishing" it. Also, you may want to read this page. It will aid you with your editing here on Wikipedia.If you have further questions please feel free to ask here or on my talk page Thank you for your time. -Pending(tell me I screwed up and where) 17:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
The sandbox. change
Hello. I reverted your edit on the sandbox because it was unconstructive. I dont know why you tried to delete the sandbox but, unless it was a test, please dont do it again.--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- Also please sign your posts with four ~~~~. Thank you.--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 17:40, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- It was a test. Forgive my error. Cotevertu (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
January 2014 change
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make helpful changes to Wikipedia. However, some of your changes, like those to "Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/Scarlett O' Hara (band)", did not seem to be helpful and have been reverted or removed. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Auntof6 (talk) 04:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not make unhelpful changes to Wikipedia, like you did to Syria. The changes you made seem to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you want to try changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Osiris (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Last warning change
Cotevertu, you need to stop making non-constructive edits. You've been blocked on the English Wikipedia for similar disruption, and then you go and make this edit here. Your most recent edits were not constructive either. I'm giving you one final chance. Please don't disappoint me. If you need any help, let me know. Osiris (talk) 02:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Your recent changes, like those to Mourning Dove, are vandalism and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue vandalizing, you will be blocked from changing pages on Wikipedia. Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
This really is your Last warning. I dont want to report you, but if it happens again I will--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 17:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Bots. change
I am very concerned about you asking me to tell you how to create a vandal bot. I am not going to tell you how and if you do find out how to create one I recomend you dont. People who create vandal bots often end up banned for ever. And even if you want to create a constructive, usefull bot its not going to happen. Only trusted users are allowed to create bots and considering the fact you have been vandalising wikipedia as recently as today, No one will aprove your request.--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 20:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Duccio change
Kindly stop changing that sentence in the Duccio article from the plural to the singular. When ESLs learn a new noun, they learn the singular and the plural. In English, this is particularly simple as the noun gets an "s" or an "es" on the end (in almost all cases), as in "owner, owners" and "church, churches". This is learnt in the very first lesson on nouns. Amandajm (talk) 01:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)