My name is the master of all of the 6's is currently:
Withdrawn (see below for more information)

Hello, My name is the master of all of the 6s, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia!

You may begin by reading these:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles or the list of wanted pages.

You can edit any pages you want! Anything you write can be changed immediately. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on Talk pages, please sign your name by typing "~~~~" (four tildes)

Good luck and happy editing! Gwib -(talk)- 00:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Adminship

change

You may want to read to the criteria for adminship before applying. You don't meet them yet. --Gwib -(talk)- 00:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well when will I meet them? My name is the master of all of the 6's (talk) 02:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
When you've proven your trust to our community. So far, this was not the best way to start off your career here. Cheers, Razorflame 04:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm trusting wikipedia. Hope I get administrator privileges. My name is the master of all of the 6's (talk) 19:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
You should wait a few months and learn the policies before applying. Although there is no mandatory edit count, a count have 500+ edits is preferred. No offense, but if you applied you would probably fail (and I would too). Griffinofwales (talk) 20:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
I can always recreate my request...MNITMOAOT6 (talk) 20:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Read WP:CFA. Also, the account you created (MNITMOAOT6) is not a doppelganger account, it is an alternative account. Please read the template you placed on the account (it explains what a doppelganger is). Griffinofwales (talk) 20:16, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Holy grackamoly, my talk pages is getting alot of repies! Well, not really alternative. When shall it turn into a dopperganger account? MNITMOAOT6 (talk) 20:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please do not undo the edit that I just undid & Do not change other people's comments (even if they spelled something wrong). Griffinofwales (talk) 21:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC) Please change your password immediately. Griffinofwales (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I mean no offence, but this wiki needs other work, particularly in the article space. If you're only editing here for adminship, please leave. I'm afraid that's a long way off at the moment. Thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unblocked

change

Hello, I am one of the CheckUsers here, and I ran a test against the user you were accused of incarnating (known here as A1A2s). I found no link between you and that user. I therefore unblocked you. Have fun editing here. --Eptalon (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank ya Eptalon. Unfortunately, my autoblock is still in effect. It would be best if you remove the autoblock, then I'll be back to editing. My name is the master of all of the 6's (talk) 18:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Majorly is conducting a proper checkuser investigation. The autoblock will be removed if you're cleared. Thanks for your patience. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009

change
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of changing privileges. If you believe this block is unfair you may request to be unblocked by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked.EhJJTALK 21:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
 

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My_name_is_the_master_of_all_of_the_6%27s (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

No, you've been using sockpuppets to evade this block, so it will say as it is.-- Either way (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply