Cleanup? change

Hi, I saw your recent edits were observed of sort of removing information (possible ref-info). If you are cleaning up the mess of the page, please acknowledge here (and in your edit summary for future edits).--Dibyojyotilet's chat 15:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Dibyojyoti: if you are referring to edits such as this, nothing was "removed" I used WP:NAMEDREFS to cleanup both the reference section and combine duplicated references. That took the previous 38 references and condensed them down to the actual 6 references that are being used. Nunabas (talk) 15:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
@DRC-B5: I am going to ping you again because I pinged the wrong name. Nunabas (talk) 15:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the clarification. Dibyojyotilet's chat 15:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Pointless Edit change

Could you tell me what rules these edits are based on? [1] I don't think putting the stub template at the bottom, under two spaces, is just your favorite and not according to any rules. Please stop making meaningless edits.--Ayuta Tonomura (talk) 12:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please see w:Wikipedia:Stub#How to mark an article as a stub. MathXplore (talk) 12:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Ayuta Tonomura: See MathXplore's link above, and that edit isn't "pointless" as I am adding/refining categories. When I am doing that I am also cleaning up the article a little bit. Nunabas (talk) 12:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply