User talk:Razorflame/Archive 5

Kung Fu Panda

Just a reminder. Don't issue a warning to the user after tagging an article as QD. I know Kung Fu Panda was an obvous case for deleting, but other times it is not so. Best to leave the warning to the admin who actually deletes. It also means there will be no confusion about why a userpage already has a warning. -- Was it for a different piece of vandalism or the one that was just QD'd for example. Thanks -- Barliner  talk  20:09, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Will remember in the future. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Year pages

This is a small point, really, but when you create year pages, could you please place them in categories in this manner:

• For example, the category on page 1266 should be written as [[Category:1266| ]]

This just keeps things clean and follows the standard I have set up for a large number of year pages and their categories. Thank you. · Tygrrr... 17:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure, will do in the future. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Stubs

Will do. adit 17:03, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! This is just to help us editors to help you better! -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 17:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Yup, I'm familiar with categories. If I've missed any it's simply an oversight. Is there a page about categorization?

Not that I know of. Just make sure you put them into the appropriate categories. If you still need help, I would contact Barliner or Creol for more assistance. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 17:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

And thanks for fixing the typo. Guess I saw what I'd intended to write. adit 17:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 17:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Categories

Do you really understand categorization? The other entries under Category:Numbers are not all numbers either. Such as prime numbers. Any type of number or article about number belongs in the numbers category. adit 20:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I have brought this to an administrator's attention. He will decide this matter. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Out of line

I think what you are doing in out of line. You are stalking my changes and reverting them in order to harass me. If you disagree, get an admin. adit 21:08, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Have, and you, as another editor, are supposed to wait until the admin resolves the dispute. Instead, you are adding fuel to the fire. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Here's the deal, you are not waiting either. adit 21:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I am waiting; I am trying to revert your edits because you are the one that isn't waiting. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Understanding

I'd rather you take the time and interest to try to understand what my point is. adit 21:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I've looked at the English wikipedia, and they have them categorized serparately, just as I've done here. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

As a matter of fact, they don't. On Wikipedia Integers is a subcategory of Rational numbers which is a subcategory of Numbers. For now, we don't need the intermediate category, do we? adit 21:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I've already done such. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I will change my own pages myself. I do not require assistance in the matter. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

That's called "ownership". Nobody owns pages on Wikipedia. Any editor may edit them. I find your attitude about this offensive. adit 21:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Overcategorization

Another problem that arises with category systems is that if you put numbers in both Numbers and Integers, the Numbers category gets overfull and hard to use. adit 21:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Last request

I've asked you several times to stop undoing my work. I am asking you again. You are simply going to get yourself blocked as your changes have now become malicious. adit 21:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Block

I will be asking for you to be blocked. adit 21:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

For what? I have already asked you to stop editing while we wait for this problem to be resolved, and what have you done? You've continued to change pages. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

For repeatly reverting me when I have asked you not to. adit 21:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I am reverting your changes because you keep on making changes while waiting for resolution. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

You know, the proper form of dispute resolution is discussion. You are instead fighting. adit 21:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

No response. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Trying again

I request that you please wait and see what I am trying to do. Okay? adit 21:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Integers

I have changed the tag on Category:Integers from qd to rfd. I will not quick delete a category with so many articles in it, even if it is requested by the original creator of the cat. I would suggest discussing the situation on the category's talk page or post it on the RfD page and suggest an alternate method for categorization for the numbers currently in this category. I am going to suggest the same to A Ramanujan. Thank you. · Tygrrr... 21:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I have posted a proposal at Category talk:Integers. I hope you (Razorflame), will come discuss there. adit 21:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Categories

I have written a brief proposed guideline on how to use categories at Wikipedia:Categorization. The basic idea of categories is simple. However, to use them in the best way for all users can be more complex. When I said that you did not appear to understand categorization, I meant the more complex part. I did not in any way mean to imply that you were stupid. I am sorry that you took it that way and apologize for my part in the misunderstanding.

I hope you will read what I wrote about categories and give me feedback if my writing is hard to understand. adit 22:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I already understand categories, so there is no reason for me to read that. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:33, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Integers

There is no reason for any integer to be in both the integer subcat and integer cat. This situation is the same as the "fossils and dinosaurs" problem we came across recently. I intend moving all integers into that subcat. Your QD has been cancelled and replaced by an RfD as a courtesy, but you have not furthered this.-- Barliner  talk  17:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I will post my suggestion for this whole mess at either the RfD or the Category talk:Integers right now. Please stay tuned for my suggestion at either of those two locations. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:32, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

barnstars

Barnstars moved into barnstar section of my userpage. Thanks both for your barnstars! I am happy :) -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Rubbish

What rubbish you write sometimes "Now I think I've ruined my chances of becoming an admin" :)

Everybody makes mistakes. The fact that you have accepted my explanation of the integers and numbers problem shows that you also learn. Keep up the good work, you have not ruined your chances of becoming an admin at all. Check out "The Resilient Barnstar" at WP:BARN. I just gave you that, even before you wrote about ruined chances. -- Barliner  talk  22:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I didn't know that that was what the barnstar was called. Thanks for helping me! -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Integers

If you are happy with my idea, do you still want to leave the RfD template on the category page. There is nothing on the WP:RFD -- Barliner  talk  23:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

No, you can take it off. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 23:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar! Cheers,  Lights  talk  23:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem! -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 23:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Apology

I agree and apologize as well. I hope we can work together in the future. Let's make sure we start to discuss right away if we disagree about something. adit 01:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 01:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

External links

Yes, I figured that out. But I still forget to change it sometimes. Please feel free to fix it when I forget. adit 01:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 01:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Thanks for adding me as a friend. I don't have much of a userpage, but I still consider you a friend. --Werdan7^{T @} 02:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

That's good to hear. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 03:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

re: RfA

I do think that one month is too short, but if you keep editing like you are now, you won't have a problem in Febuaury.--Werdan7^{T @} 05:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

February is too long away....I was hoping that maybe at 2 months, people might think that I might be one of those exceptions listed under the RfA requirements :) -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 05:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

The beginning of February is only 6 weeks away. That's not too long. :)--Werdan7^{T @} 05:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

By that time, I'll have 13,000-14,000 edits anyways.... (if the number of edits that I've been doing are at the same pace that they have been happening over the past 4 weeks. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 05:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

New pages

I don't know about the other admins, but I look at most of the new articles that are created, even though I don't mark it as patrolled.--Werdan7^{T @} 05:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

A lot of the 371 unpatrolled pages are your year pages. As I trust you not to be a vandal it is a waste of time to open up a new section and mark them patrolled. Like Werdan, I don't mark as patrolled all the pages I check because I tend to check pages as they are created rather than going through the log. When there is a quiet period some could go through the list, but patrolling only marks a page as having been checked and shown not to be vandalism so another admin doesn't need to check it again.-- Barliner  talk  12:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the clarification! Razorflame (contributions) Talk 16:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

RFA thanks

Dear Razorflame,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA which closed successfully with 19 supports and 1 oppose which didn't count since it was made by a sock of a banned user. If you have any comments, concerns, or any suggestions for me as an Administrator, feel free to leave a note on my talkpage. Thank you.  Lights  talk  13:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

RE:Nomination for Adminship

I can't because, I don't meet the criteria cause I don't have e-mail, but thanks for offering :) Oysterguitarist 14:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, not a problem Razorflame (contributions) Talk 16:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Friends

Sure. You know, I'd never looked at your user page because your sig is a redlink! I figured that meant you didn't have a user page! adit 16:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

My userpage is there, you just have to get over the fact that it looks red. :)

Razorflame (contributions) Talk 16:43, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:Bureaucrat

At this time, Simple does not need any more bureaucrats. Three is more than adaquate to deal with the few tasks they are needed for. -- Creol(talk) 16:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

You are more active than any of those 3 though. I think that you will be a good 'crat. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 16:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Simplification

It's easy to simplify an article. Look at this edit for a reference. It's just a simple re-wording of certain sentences to make them easier to understand. This is actually very good for your vocabulary. When you "dumb down" a sentence it actually means you're finding synonyms for complex words and sentences and rearranging the grammar of the sentence.
It's very good for your brain, to make links between words and adapting a sentence to fit with different context.
Gwib^-(talk)- 17:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I'll give it a try. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 17:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

barnstars

moved to userpage

Thanks Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:04, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

revert

No. I reverted the message to the one I issued under my signature. Not a forgery given by somebody else but with my sig attached

 Barliner  talk  20:20, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

...Thanks for clearing that up.Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Semiprotection

Hi. I don't think that protecting your talk page would be necessary as of now, although I believe it would be ok if there's more vandalism from different IP ranges. FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 23:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks anyways. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 23:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Municipalities of the district of Zurzach

Do you think this template should be made? Oysterguitarist 00:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I haven't created any other templates for any of the other districts, so, no, I don't think so, but someone else may prove me wrong. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 00:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you very much! And yes, your new signature is very neat. Happy holidays! JetLover ^Bam! 02:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

6,000 edits

Sorry to burst your bubble, but you haven't actually made over 6,000 edits. I checked two edit counters to be sure:

• Interiot's count
• Misza13's count

Gwib^-(talk)- 10:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Both of them haven't been updated yet. I checked my settings tab on the upper part of the screen and it says I've made 6,000 edits. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

My mistake, didn't know that they needed to be updated.

Gwib^-(talk)- 21:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, they were updated. The 6,000 figure includes my deleted edits. :) Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Well you deserve every edit, even the deleted ones. Merry Christmas as well! It's half past 11 in Switzerland so it's almost time! Otherwise Happy Holidays if you don't celebrate it.

Gwib^-(talk)- 22:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstars! In case you want to include your sig inside the barnstar template, you're going to have to add 1= before your message. ({{BS|1=blablabla ~~~~}}) Cheers,  Lights  talk  23:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I will remember to put in the 1= before them from now on. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 23:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the nice things you has said about my changes:) I am not sure if this is not a good place for me to say this XD..but I don't know where to put a thing like this..so sorry ;)..and thanks again to the nice words :) bye from Italy90.

It belongs here as much as it belongs in a new section! There are no problems with your English, so it isn't a problem! Have fun editing here on Simple English Wikipedia! Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:Municipality help

Your welcome, and I had skipped around on a few that I am going to go back to since the articles on en have more information, so I'm going to spend more time on those. Oysterguitarist 19:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I've already created the ones that you skipped on. You are welcome to add simplified information to them, though. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Would the Jura canton be okay to start on? Oysterguitarist 19:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

You don't need to ask me if it's alright to fix up articles that I've started. Go ahead and make the changes! I trust you fully to make good edits! Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Cantons

This should help, but a reworking of existign info will be needed

{{Infobox Canton
|official_name      = <!-- MANDATORY -->
|native_name        = <!-- Its German name -->
|image              = 
|image_size         =
|image_caption      =
|map                = 
|map_size           =
|map_caption        =
|flag               =
|coat_of_arms       =
|capital            = <!-- MANDATORY -->
|area               = <!-- in square kilometers -->
|population         = 
|population_density = 
|population_as_of   = 
|website            = 
|party              = <!-- If abbreviating name, use party_link for article name -->
|party_link         =
|party2             = <!-- For states with two ruling parties -->
|party_link2        =
|leader_title       =<!-- eg Minister President or Mayor) -->
|leader_name        =
|leader_title2      = <!-- If more than one leader (ie. Minister President and Mayor) -->
|leader_name2       =
}}

--Bärliner 21:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

That does help. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Moved to userpage Thank you, Razorflame for all of your contributions. And please note that I'm not giving you this in response to my barnstar, you're just doing a great job. :)

Thanks a bunch! I have just been trying to make this site a better informative place, and my contributions have reflected that so far. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 18:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Canton

I thought you meant some stuff inside that's why I chopped it right down.. Glad you've got it working.--Bärliner 11:26, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I thought it was some stuff inside as well, but it just turned out to be the stuff at the end of the template. That was what I suspected, but I wasn't sure. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 18:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Year categories

Is there a reason you created categories for years that don't have any pages in them? (Category:99, 79, 70, 66, etc.) If there isn't a good reason, I am going to delete them because even though they'll probably get used eventually, there isn't much sense in having empty categories. · Tygrrr... 19:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I was categorizing them because the pages just said, for example, 99 said 90s as a category, instead of the correct category of 99. I was just categorizing them like the rest of the year pages. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 18:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Claudine Monteil

Good catch. I missed the punctuattion--Bärliner 19:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I noticed the puncuation marks before and after the article name almost immediately. I was surprised that no one else moved the page before I did. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay

Okay. Ingnore the Family guy article then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandlerjoeyross (talk • contribs)

I've already undone your change to the Family Guy article as I could tell that it was a direct copypaste from the English Wikipedia. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 19:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:Cantons

Sure. Oysterguitarist 20:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

You've already been working on Jura, so I will give you Jura. I've been working on Aargau, so I take Aargau.

Oysterguitarist

1. Jura
2. Vaud
3. Valais

Razorflame

1. Aargau
2. St. Gallen
3. Ticino

This is how I've divvied up the cantons for now. I've decided that since Bern is such a huge canton (430 some municipalities), we can both do Bern. Same goes for Graubueden.

You like this plan? Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good. Oysterguitarist 20:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Help

Hi thanks for the barnstar prize,its very appreciated. As you might have noticed i am a good editor, and i am asking you if you could unblock me on english wikipedia as i have been unfairly blocked their. My name on english wikipedia is Zingostar,my spelling isnt always the best but i contribute to wikipedia in a good way.And not being best friend with an administrator shouldnt be punished with a long block. I have also been blocked for quite some time their so i think its time to unblock me anyway. Happy editing and thanks again!,--Sinbad 21:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you, seeing as I am not an administrator on that site. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok. i just feel that my knowledge could come to more use as an editor and not the opposit. If you can do anything do it,otherwise thanks anyway. --Sinbad 21:07, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Seeing as I actually don't have very much influence on the English Wikipedia, I doubt that I could do anything to help you on there. Otherwise, I might've already done it. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

What you could do is to write to one of the administrators on "Category:Wikipedia administrators" and just ask them to look into this "case". And write your opinion. But you do what you like. Thanks--Sinbad 21:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure, I will do that right now for you, however, I am not sure what the result will be. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes.Thanks,but its better to try then not to try. I think wikipedia would lose a good editor if they dont let me in again.--Sinbad 21:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Do mention the barnstar prize. and my wikipedia name zingostar. thanks.--Sinbad 21:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok saw the message. thanks my friend!--Sinbad 21:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

This was only because of your editing here. If you do continue to edit like you used to in the past, I will have no option but to endorse the indef block given to you on the English Wikipedia. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Of course. But as you have noticed i have "matured" in my editing since, and you have to agree that indefinite block was a bit over the top.--Sinbad 21:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

You have matured a bit on here, but will that equate to a good change over on the English Wikipedia? I've read your block log over on the English Wikipedia, and have noticed that you've been blocked 3 other times in the past for some actual hardcore stuff, like stalking of UpDown and stuff like that, as well as the sockpuppetry that Kimberly Ashton was accused of here. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:25, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

This was in the past. And 2 out of three blocks where not really in good faith(in my opinion). and as you have noticed their hasnt been any diserruptive behaviour here.--Sinbad 21:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

But there has been an issue that some of your edits have needed grammar fix-up, which has actually created more work for some of the other editors here on Simple English Wikipedia. Other than that, I have seen no noteworthy abuse or bad behavior here on Simple English Wikipedia. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 21:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I must go. See ya--Sinbad 21:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help!

Thanks! I just made a page on Dr. Pepper, right before you gave me this message, and I'm wondering if you think it's good. I can make it longer, I really want to help out here. Mabey sometime in the future I'll join English Wikipedia, but they've got alot of people there. Cypher

P.S. do you call it en wikipedia? I saw those links that say en:articlename.

The Dr. Pepper article is fine. Barliner (a trusted editor here on Simple English Wikipedia) has already fixed it up for you.

As to your P.S. : Some people call it en Wikipedia, but I prefer to call it the English Wikipedia. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

ENWP and SEWP :) saves typing --Bärliner 22:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I switch between them. If I am using it informally, I will most likely use SE:WP and en:WP. If I am using them formally, then I will spell out the entire name. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

disambig

If there are only two uses, as is anthrax, the {{otheruses}} fills the need without creating another page --Bärliner 22:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I didn't know that the otheruses template was created on the Simple English Wikipedia. But, there are actually three uses of this name. I was in the process of adding the third. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

In which case move the disease to anthrax (disease) and the disambig page can be anthrax. Its much easier for a new searcher that way I think. --Bärliner 22:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Will do. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Why QD Antrax, just right the disambiguations on it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barliner (talk • contribs)

To make room for the moving of the disambig page already created. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 22:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

 Done and moved --Bärliner 22:55, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

My bad...

Sorry, I didn't know but I do now. Thanks! I'll make sure to use other changes next time. Cypher 00:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem! I was just looking out for you is all :) Razorflame (contributions) Talk 00:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Note on edit count

But looking at 1bookfan's en contribs (en:Special:Contributions/1bookfan), he only edited his userpage and treated Wikipedia like Myspace. JetLover ^Bam! 00:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

All I've been doing is making minor grammar changes and welcoming users. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 00:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I do vandal-fighting to contribute on en. JetLover ^Bam! 23:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I've tried doing that, but everyone always seems to beat me to it :) Razorflame (contributions) Talk 23:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

AH-64 Apache

Are you sure it is a stub? It seems long enough to me. JetLover ^Bam! 23:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

:I'm never sure if an article is a stub. I just put a stub on it and other editors can remove it or help it as they like. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 23:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Why. That makes it sound as if you are just collecting edits --Bärliner 00:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, scratch that last comment that I made. I usually put a stub template on an article when I know for sure if it is too short and is in need of the stub template. Sometimes, I make mistakes and place the stub template on an article that is already long enough, I just think it is too short still (this is very few times). Hope this helps! Razorflame (contributions) Talk 00:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Hey

I think so. JetLover ^Bam! 23:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)