April 2021

change

  Welcome to Wikipedia. You might not have done it on purpose, but your recent change removed helpful information from Wikipedia. We ask that you do not remove things from pages, as you did to "Deri Lorus", without giving a good reason in the change summary. If it was a mistake, do not worry. The part of the article you removed has been put back. If you want to try things out, please use the sandbox. If you would like to learn how to help Wikipedia, please see the welcome page. Thank you. Please don't remove RfD templates. Dingothegorg 14:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay. But I did a research about the Deri Lorus it seems he is notable and he is featured on multiple articles. You can check too. Underpants90 (talk) 14:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

But still, you shouldn't remove any RfD templates unless they're kept as an article. Dingothegorg 14:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Okay sure. Underpants90 (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Editing

change

I can see you’re already doing well here. Keep going and happy editing! --EVHOfficial (talk) 11:36, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Underpants90 (talk) 11:37, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Underpants90: You’re welcome. --EVHOfficial (talk) 11:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Arpana Sharon

change

An editor has requested deletion of Arpana Sharon, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Arpana Sharon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --IWI (talk) 12:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm not going to remove the template for requests for deletion just do some research and nominate for RfD hereafter. Thanks Underpants90 (talk) 12:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Jaisalmer News

change

An editor has requested deletion of Jaisalmer News, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Jaisalmer News and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --IWI (talk) 12:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notability

change

In future, please try to make sure what you are making an article about has enough sources to pass WP:GNG to avoid more deletion nominations. --IWI (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm working on the editing. Before I'm adding citation and sources, you had nominated for deletion. Please do some research and nominate for RfD. Without knowing anything please don't do. You're kinda rude. Underpants90 (talk) 12:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of S. J. Berchmans

change

An editor has requested deletion of S. J. Berchmans, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/S. J. Berchmans and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Lights and freedom (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

S. J. Berchmans is notable. The article exist on English Wikipedia. Underpants90 (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, the article still exists on enwiki, but that alone is not a reason to keep the article.
Please go to the rfd to voice your opinion instead of just responding on your user talk page. Thanks. --Belwine (talk) 16:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply