Formerly known as User:Naddruf

WelcomeEdit

Hello! I am assuming you have come over from the English Wikipedia, so you are probably familiar with the way this wiki works. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few links to help you adjust:

There is much to do here. For example, there are a lot of articles that do not exist yet, which you can bring over from the English Wikipedia and simplify. Do have a look around and see what you would like to do. Thank you for joining us, and you know how to contact me if you need help. Thegooduser Let's Talk!¬†:) ūüćĀ 23:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

QDEdit

Hello. When users remove QD templates, just revert them and warn them on their talk page using {{subst:uw-qd}}. Removing QD templates is not allowed. IWI (chat) 14:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for telling me. You can remove the page from Rfd. Naddruf (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

IPEdit

Why have you mentioned Ms Mamta Banerjee as Upcoming Prime minister¬†? Kindly explain. ‚ÄĒ¬†Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:5091:d022:1:2:e2d:45e1 (talk ‚ÄĘ contribs) 17:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

@2401:4900:5091:d022:1:2:e2d:45e1: I don't remember doing that. Can you tell me what article it was on? Naddruf (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

WarningEdit

When you use a warn template, please remember to put a "subst:" at the start like this: {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}. This makes it post as a message instead of a template. Also remember to sign afterwards as normal. Thanks, IWI (chat) 18:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Naddruf (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

A1Edit

QD A1 only applies to articles with little content and no meaning. 7/30/2020 on TMZ and 7/31/2020 on TMZ do not qualify for it. Cheers and best regards, ~Prahlad balaji (t / c) 01:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC) (and modified at 01:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC))

InfoEdit

Hi, sorry for the trouble but I just noticed that when you mentioned me you did it on the administrators' noticeboard. Why did you do that? Wasn't it more logical to write on my talk or on the IP talk (or better still directly report the IP for vandalism)? Btw you talked about an edit war, like I was doing an edit war, when I was just reverting a clear vandalism... Thanks and best regards --Superpes15 (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
P.S. I don't want to make controversy. I'm just asking you so I can understand better.

Because it's a dispute, and it has to be solved. The question is whether the pictures should be removed, or placed somewhere else on the page. I don't want to make the decision on the matter, so I'm leaving it to the admins to decide what to do about it. If they choose to block the IP, that's okay with me, but they had a valid point that was worth considering (not that homosexuality should be illegal, of course).Naddruf (talk) 04:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Ah ok, you were referring only to the images, but I focused on the vandalism he added "hiddenly" (that's why I continued to rollback) :) Thanks for the clarification and have a nice day --Superpes15 (talk) 07:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
@Superpes15: I see, sorry. Thank you for telling me. They are now blocked. But I'm going to move the images down on the page. Naddruf (talk) 18:43, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I think it’s better now, have a nice day :D --Superpes15 (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

EcologyEdit

Why have you taken one subject on the biology introduction page and blown it up out of all proportion? This page is just to tell readers where to find topics. Do we not have a page on ecology? Yes, we do. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

I can move the section to ecology for now. In the long run I'm hoping to expand the biology article a lot to move it towards being a good article. Naddruf (talk) 05:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
It's only fair to remind you that added text will be examined closely to see if its construction fits our ideas on simplicity of language. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
That's fine, and you can tell me if you see anything wrong. I moved those paragraphs to ecology. I've come to the understanding that articles here don't need to be short, and they can and should cover topics in depth as long as they're simple. Because of that, I'd like to eventually expand biology so it covers all the main topics: biochemistry, cells, genetics, evolution, ecology, zoology, botany, microbiology. And if I'm wrong about this, let me know. Thanks. Naddruf (talk) 07:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Amir MahmoudiEdit

Hi, this article has nothing to do with the article you mentioned. This person is an actor.If it was related to that article, I think you are wrong. This person is another actor.‚ÄĒ¬†Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:5EC0:9013:FEC1:5CBD:2F88:B471:B8AB (talk ‚ÄĘ contribs) 07:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Myhammad Ahmad HashmiEdit

Myhammad Ahmad Hashmi son of Muhammad Nawaz live in Battian City Hujra Saha Muqeem district okara study complete Government High school hujra shah muqeem Aslam o Alaikum to All muslim Muhammad Ahmad Hashmi (talk) 09:41, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

@Muhammad Ahmad Hashmi: Why are you telling me this? Lights and freedom (talk) 17:17, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Vignesh kickboxer martialartsEdit

Hi I removed the RfD from Vignesh kickboxer martialarts; it is actually a QD and I changed it to such. Usually when you cannot find any coverage on them and the references listed are not reliable, you can pretty much QD it as non-notable. PotsdamLamb (talk) 21:41, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

@PotsdamLamb: It's okay if you think an RfD should be changed to a QD, but please do it the correct way. In this case an administrator disagreed with you and removed the QD, and then you created an unnecessary second RfD which was exactly the same as the first. Instead of doing this, it's better to add the QD template at the same time as the RfD, or just vote quick delete in the RfD. An administrator is needed to delete anyway. This would prevent this situation from happening. Lights and freedom (talk) 22:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

In case I ever get unblockedEdit

Unblock request 2021 August 7Edit

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lights_and_freedom (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I apologize for vandalism and sockpuppetry. I would like to edit Simple Wikipedia again. If unblocked, I will promise never to edit this project while logged out or with a different account, and never to cause disruption to any Wikimedia project. I can't really prove to you that I won't be disruptive, but I mean it. I understand that because this was a checkuser block, it can only be undone by a checkuser. If this request is declined, I will probably try again in about six months.

Decline reason:

Socking is too recent in my view to consider unblocking. -- Djsasso (talk) 12:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)