Blissyu2

It is about 2:02 PM where this user lives.[Purge]

Hello, Blissyu2, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! I hope you will be happy helping here. You should begin by reading these pages: Wikipedia:Useful, Help:Contents, Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines, and how to write Simple English articles. If you want some ideas of which pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles or the list of wanted pages.

Even though it is a good idea to research an article (like looking at the discussion page) before making large changes, please be bold and try! Any changes you make that are not perfect can be fixed later. We are also working most on core articles and the most common topics until this Wikipedia grows.

If you want to ask a question or talk with other members, you can visit our version of the "village pump" at Wikipedia:Simple talk. Administrators on Wikipedia can also help you with more difficult problems. You can also ask me for help. The best way to do that is to leave a message on my talk page. You should always sign your messages on Talk pages by typing "~~~~" (four tildes) at the end of your words.

If you would like to test Wikipedia, please use the sandbox. Please do not test Wikipedia by editing its articles.

Good luck and happy editing! · Tygrrr^·talk· 23:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

About thames infotech article

Hi, I was just checking about Thames Infotech and thr outcome was that it's not notable but we are a media agency based in I found the following notable result for the same company and for the owner of company google news [ https://sheikhasif.com/in-news/] I dont know much about it but I can say this guy and his company must have a wikipedia page.

--StartupPk (talk) 18:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I don't think this is appropriate for Wikipedia. This is not a place to advertise anything. Blissyu2 (talk) 12:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

starting RfDs

You can enable Twinkle in your gadgets preferences, then when Twinkle starts working again, you can nominate articles for deletion easily, by hovering over Twinkle in the top right corner of the page and pressing RfD :) --Ferien (talk) 21:15, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I was trying to nominate Emerie Agunwah. Didn't seem to work :(. Blissyu2 (talk) 14:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Ah okay. I think I worked it out thanks. It seems like it is a multi-step process. Let me see if I can find any others. I don't want to add too many at once to overburden the process though. Blissyu2 (talk) 14:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, Twinkle isn't working at the moment, unfortunately. It's making everything a little slower... --Ferien (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Contradiction?

"Keep No claims of notability. Blissyu2 (talk) 04:38, 21 November 2021". 89.8.153.72 (talk) 05:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Oops I might have hit the wrong button. Where did I do that? Blissyu2 (talk) 12:21, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

I believe

I believe this. Start an investigation! Haoreima (talk) 09:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

When someone mention this page Ethoi Oinam, I got to remember it. Now, I blanked the page so that an admin may delete it without any further conversation. Previously, it was nominated and closed. And I had decided to request an admin to delete it. But I forgot about that, due to other works. Well, it's good you nominated it and remind me. The article needs to be discarded. :) Haoreima (talk) 11:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy Holiday

Hello Blissyu2: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Haoreima (talk) 18:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

GA VGA has changed

Hi, you commented on or edited one or more articles that are up for GA VGA review. The system now requires !votes within a shorter period of time, which has already elapsed, but seems there is a bit of a grace period. Without at least five editors voting (up or down), no articles can be promoted. Please have a look here [1]. Thank you, Gotanda (talk) 00:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

The User:Cintrocity RFD

About your latest comment: These are all things the closing admin would know to look at. Sometimes RFDs aren't closed as soon as they could be, but that's not necessarily a problem.

By the way, if you comment on an RFD and then change your mind, as you did on this one, please make sure you don't leave two different comments. The instructions for discussions say this:

Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".

Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

I checked and I did not change my mind. I made comments before committing to a keep. Blissyu2 (talk) 00:23, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Behavior

In regards to your statement here, it's common on this project for RfD's to run longer than the minimum amount of time. This is due to many reasons like low participation or, in this case, an unclear consensus. The sysops of the project decide when it's appropriate to close RfDs, not the date at the bottom. Further, this comment is unkind at best and more likely a personal attack by casting aspersions. Sysops on any project are charged by their community when they are elected to protect the project, enforce policy, and correct mistakes made by editors. Auntof6 is not Wikistalking you, they are doing their job as a sysop. I came across this statement as I was processing the items on RfD ready for closure. Since you've already had behavior issues on this project, you should be aware that you will now be on Final Warning. Any further incidents of any type will result in an immediate block.

This message must remain on your talk page for not less than 1 year. Removing the message will violate your final warning and result in a block. Operator873 ^connect 19:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that that is not a personal attack. Blissyu2 (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

I will quote it here for future reference:

•  Comment: - This is more than a month overdue for closure. I note that I voted delete above and perhaps that is holding this up. I am happy for this to be kept if it helps, though I don't want to change my vote. It looks like a non-consensus to me.

Blissyu2 (talk) 11:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

I will note that I have been here for 17 years without incident, until you decided to harass me. I will ask for another administrator to review your decision that that was a personal attack. Blissyu2 (talk) 11:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Blissyu2, by accusing another editor of misbehaviour without evidence, which is quite blatantly what you did on the RfD page in this comment (that Operator873 already linked correctly), that is casting aspersions. Instead of deciding to address the comment in a more constructive, civil manner, you have made the decision to say he has decided to harass you and that Operator's decision was a personal attack, that was again unfounded. Making unfounded accusations towards editors who make comments you disagree with is not acceptable, as noted in Wikipedia:Casting aspersions (enwiki) and your comment above indicates to me that you are going to continue doing that. Therefore I've blocked your account indefinitely. I would strongly advise reviewing w:Wikipedia:Casting aspersions before appealing this block.

Reviewing both Auntof6 and Operator873's actions, per your request: they were both acceptable. Auntof6's comment was a notice that you should only be making one decision in an RfD per Wikipedia:Requests for deletion#Discussions and Operator873 was warning you and in fact, arguably was lenient by giving you another final warning following a previous final warning in Special:Diff/8750208. Neither Auntof6's nor Operator873's comments were personal towards you in any way. --Ferien (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

For the record, I will quote the two problematic comments below, as there seems to have been some misunderstanding with diffs.

"I agree that your Wikistalking of me is not helpful. Please stop." – Special:Diff/8860203

"I will note that I have been here for 17 years without incident, until you decided to harass me. I will ask for another administrator to review your decision that that was a personal attack." – Special:Diff/8890155 --Ferien (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Auntof6 followed me across multiple RfDs and had been deleting my comments. I was merely trying to be helpful. I would argue that she was quite nasty and very personal in doing so. I was asking her to stop doing that as it was quite upsetting. Now I am in trouble for that! Seems quite unfair! Am I not allowed to help admins with RfD decisions? Very unfair. Blissyu2 (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

The issue is that you accused Auntof6 of misbehaviour and didn't provide any evidence for her doing so.

My main focus with the block was your second comment, saying that the final warning was a personal attack. Again, no evidence was given for this and it seemed you were accusing multiple editors you happened to disagree with of misbehaviour. Now any editor is welcome to accuse any other editor of misbehaviour if there is the evidence for it. But if you don't give evidence, that can be equivalent to a personal attack, per what is said in the casting aspersions page I have linked above. --Ferien (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Ferien. Thank you for reviewing the decision. I hereby apologise unreservedly to Auntof6 for making that statement. I am happy to provide diffs to prove it, but, as you say, it is not about whether I was right or not, so much as I said it in public. I am happy for that statement to be deleted. I was not aware that I was offending anyone. I was merely asking, politely I thought, for Auntof6 to stop following me around, as I found it to be quite unnerving. After 17 years on this wiki with no issues, I am alarmed that you gave me an indefinite block over such a minor thing, and I hope that you will reconsider your position. Thank you. Blissyu2 (talk) 14:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Blissyu2. I should probably clarify my position slightly – you are welcome to accuse editors of misbehaviour, if they have misbehaved but if you are going to accuse an editor of misbehaviour, that needs evidence/diffs. I also gave you the block, as you accused Operator873 of harassing you, again without evidence, after he points out your comment at RfD. To be clear, I blocked you indefinitely because I was seeing this as a bit of a pattern, accusing editors who disagree with you of misbehaviour without evidence. That being said, you are welcome to make an unblock request, for another admin to review and they do not need to check with me before unblocking. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

I have mostly been staying out of this discussion, but for the record I was not wikistalking or following you around in any way. I regularly look at the RFDs and make comments when people give what I believe are invalid reasons for keeping or deleting a page. If it looked like I was following you around, that was coincidence -- I happened to see several of your comments at the time, but I said similar things in response to other people's comments. -- Auntof6 (talk) 00:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

┌───────────────────────┘
Point of order... 17 years? CentralAuth says this account attached to SimpleWiki as Home in 2015. I'm aware of you've had several accounts over the course of your tenure at Wikipedia. However, in this particular case, claiming you've been a Wikipedian for 17 years only works against you since a Wikipedian of 17 years would know this behavior is absolutely not tolerated on any project. Operator873 ^connect 20:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Operator873, for what it's worth, the oldest edit on the Blissyu2 account is from 12 September 2007, almost 16 years ago. --Ferien (talk) 20:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Ferien I stand corrected. I've struck the comment about CentralAuth, but left the remaining since it's still applicable that an editor of 17 years should know better. Thanks for that... and weird CA is borked. Operator873 ^connect 20:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Please can you consider an unblock. I think that my behaviour here was generally quite good over my 17 years on this wiki and a misunderstanding in which from my perspective someone did appear to be stalking me I think does seem reasonable. I do not believe that this classifies as bad behaviour on my part as there was no kind of investigation into the alleged bad behaviour on the part of the other party. At worst, I am guilty of making a claim that appeared to me to be true but was not. An apology, which I have given, should suffice. Thank you. Blissyu2 (talk) 22:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

[unblock|please consider an unblock for the reasons listed above. thank you] Blissyu2 (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Blissyu2, as the blocking admin, I would quite like to unblock you, however I should note I made the block after reviewing the situation – not quite the investigation you seem to expect, but a review from an uninvolved admin nonetheless, so please do not try to act as though you have not been listened to.

You can reread my original blocking message again, however to recap as this is a year on, and I'm quite tired of sugarcoating this to benefit you: You accused Auntof6 of wiki-stalking you because she made comments on requests for deletion towards you (which she has also addressed above). Operator873 then also in reviewing RfD noticed your comment and gave you the notice at the top of this page addressing a couple of comments you made on that page. You then accused him of harassment, but this was unfounded too and quite blatantly untrue. In reviewing RfD myself, I noticed your call for an uninvolved administrator and came to review the situation. I've tried to assume good faith above and say how these accusations just needed to have evidence, but realistically, you have simply been making false accusations against sysops because they noticed your comments. Notice how all three administrators involved in this situation noticed this all because it was on Wikipedia:Requests for deletion, a venue admins monitor regularly, as all RfDs are closed and addressed by administrators, because your comment was problematic and instead of just addressing it, you have deflected at every last opportunity, making out that admins are out to get you. That is highly disruptive to admin workflow and the project in general. For you to call this reasonable and claim you haven't had the chance to a fair hearing shows you are clearly not ready to be unblocked even now.

To all potentially reviewing admins, I entirely redact my message above saying other admins do not need to check with me before unblocking. I do not support an unblock at this stage at all. --Ferien (talk) 23:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

If you want to request an unblock, please use the standard method for doing so, so that admins will see the request. That method is to use the {{unblock}} template and include the reasons you think you should be unblocked. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)