Vumury
Quick deletion of Nancy Pelosi Taiwan visit change
The page you wrote, Nancy Pelosi Taiwan visit, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Gotanda (talk) 00:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
August 2022 change
Hello, Vumury! Here at Simple English Wikipedia we use the section heading "Related Pages" instead of English Wikipedia's "See also", which you used in "Nancy Pelosi Taiwan visit". This makes it simpler and easier to read. Please remember to use "Related Pages" in articles that you create in the future. Thank you for your help! MathXplore (talk) 01:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Removing QD templates change
Hello, Vumury. Please do not remove quick deletion templates from articles that you created, as you did on Nancy Pelosi Taiwan visit. This is mentioned on the QD template text. I have put the QD and wait templates back on the page, so please do not remove them again. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Repeating the notice above, please do not remove QD templates from pages you have created. An admin will review it and decide whether to delete the page or not. Thank you. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:40, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- You should ask the nominator (Gotanda), as they believe that the article you created was not simplified from the English Wikipedia. Please do not remove the notice again. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- but if I have been doing that, and it does not respond, rather there is a chain of arbitrary decisions against my article see the relevance I do not think it is a reason for deletion or at least there is some query here to say what is done with the article--Vumury (talk) 05:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Our admins are not as active at this time of the day, and not all of them monitor the quick deletions. It's best that you leave a reason on why the article shouldn't be deleted on the article's talk page for now. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:54, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- Never mind, looks like you already removed it. I won't put it back, but I need to reiterate that you shouldn't have removed it. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- but if I have been doing that, and it does not respond, rather there is a chain of arbitrary decisions against my article see the relevance I do not think it is a reason for deletion or at least there is some query here to say what is done with the article--Vumury (talk) 05:49, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
- You should ask the nominator (Gotanda), as they believe that the article you created was not simplified from the English Wikipedia. Please do not remove the notice again. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC)