Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2009/February/Done

User:Barras

Barras (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

It is easier for my to fight against vandalism. bar ras 19:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Synergy 19:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChristianMan16

ChristianMan16 (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

Well I had rollback feature but I was warned for incorrect use and I committed another edit with out knowing a policy where an IP removed warning's from his user talk which I didn't know was aloud cause I didn't know the policy. So I thought it was vandalism and undid it with rollback, Razorflame set me straight, and since in the rules it doesn't state you have to know policy on that sort of thing, I figure I should get it back for another chance since I now know the policy, I will also read up on other policies to not make the same mistake again. † CM16 ^{t _c r} 09:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: - See User talk:Kennedy#One last chance, please and User talk:ChristianMan16#Incorrect use of rollback Kennedy ^(talk) 09:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want them to know this fine, I've added more direct links.-- † CM16 ^{t _c r} 09:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would really like to have it back it's making it harder for me to revert vandalism quickly, by the time I find it and get it done with the undo button, it already been undone by someone with rollback.-- † CM16 ^{t _c r} 22:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It was removed just today. Please give it more time before further requesting. Thank you. Synergy 22:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, I learned my lesson, and after all it was just a mistake. How long do you want me to wait?-- † CM16 ^{t _c r} 22:45, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much longer than 16 minutes. Until you show good judgment while using the undo button. Synergy 22:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, please pay attention!!! --vector ^_^ (talk) 22:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Reversed. No U pay attention. Synergy 22:48, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Face it, you messed up. You can't expect to get a right back 16 minutes after it was removed. Show us that you deserve rollback Simon^KSK 22:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I messed up and I filed at 16 minutes after but it's now been about 14 hours....I can be trusted with it.-- † CM16 ^{t _c r} 22:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

14 hours? That's not even close. You have been warned before. Again, show us that you deserve the rollback tool and that you can use it properly. Simon^KSK 22:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:SimonKSK

SimonKSK (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I don't have that much edits here, but I would like rollback to fight vandalism. Simon^KSK 21:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have experience elsewhere of reverting? Majorly ^talk 21:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

w:User:SimonKSK. Yes. I have rollback on enwiki. Simon^KSK 22:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done --vector ^_^ (talk) 22:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Obento Musubi

The Obento Musubi (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

Rollbacking is a helpful feature of undoing edits. I already have rollback privileges on the English Wikipedia, and would like them here. I have not undone any vandalism here due to the fact that I am a new user at the Simple English Wikipedia, but when I find vandalism here, I promise I will use it to the fullest, and I will not abuse my privileges. obento musubi 05:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done --vector ^_^ (talk) 06:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! obento musubi 08:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:WaterGlass

WaterGlass (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I have made 70 edits according to my preferences and I have done vandal-fighting and contributed to many articles. WaterGlass (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Kennedy ^(talk) 09:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've read Wikipedia:Rollback feature, but please do tell me if I'm not using it correctly. WaterGlass (talk) 22:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kalajan

Kalajan (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

vandal fighting ←Kala jan→ 20:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Recent sock puppet activity on en and very little editing history here. Try back in a few months when you have some better history to judge upon. -Djsasso (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, quite frankly my history is irrelevant for this. My intentions are clear. ←Kala jan→ 20:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree with Djsasso. We need something to base our decision on, and frankly, your history is not good. Kennedy ^(talk) 21:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is here. ←Kala jan→ 21:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Djsasso and Kennedy. Majorly ^talk 21:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, never mind. When I have more trust I'll request again. ←Kala jan→ 21:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. Kennedy ^(talk) 21:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChristianMan16

ChristianMan16 (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I've had some time in"time out" to think over my wrong doing with my last bad rollback doing, and ever since then, I've felt "benched" and out of vandal fighting. Now I realized my wrong and am ready to do right, may I have Rollback back? † CM16 ^{t _c r} 20:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Yes, but please don't do it again. Chenzw Talk 07:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you do it again, your rollback may be removed for a much longer period of time. — RyanCross (talk) 08:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I promise to try harder.-- † CM16 ^{t _c r} 20:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Versus22

Versus22 (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)

I was granted rollback on the English Wikipedia two months ago. I will remember to use rollback only in clear cases of vandalism and in my user spaces, not for any other situations. Versus22 (talk) 07:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Please note that your request is broken (not using the template) and will probably not be archived by the bot. However, what is weird is that the template refuses to accept URLs in its parameters. Chenzw Talk 08:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]