Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2013/July/Notdone
- Aaqib (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)
- I have reverted vandalism with Twinkle, and if I have the rollback feature. I can do more
- Sorry, but no. Your edits don't show that you are competent enough to have this right. The fact that you were recently blocked also shows that you need more experience before you get more rights. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:20, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- Wait! How does being rude have to go with rollback feature?????????? --Aaqib 21:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not done. --M7 (talk) 21:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- Wait! How does being rude have to go with rollback feature?????????? --Aaqib 21:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
- I am a large vandal fighter on various WMF sites and would like to help at Simple English Wikipedia. For a short time, I was a rollbacker at English Wikipedia and had a self-requested removal, as I did not think I was ready to use it, but that was one month ago and I'd like to help various WMF sites fight the vandals. Thanks. WT101 (Chat • Count) 17:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not done Since you are not currently a rollbacker anywhere we will need to see some evidence of that sort of work on this wiki first before we give you the flag. Come back when you have atleast hundred or so vandalism reverts. -DJSasso (talk) 17:37, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Razorflame (talk · contribs · count) (assign permissions)
- To defend this project against vandalism if I see it. Even though I won't be editing, I still see no reason why I should not have this permission as I've had it for a long time, and see no reason as to why it was removed. Razorflame 01:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not done If you will not be editing, there is no point in you having the right. There are other, equally effective ways of reverting vandalism. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- It was removed because you asked for it to be removed. -DJSasso (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for that link :) Razorflame 22:25, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- It was removed because you asked for it to be removed. -DJSasso (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)