and change

They're just some kids messing around. Don't bother getting a block, they're only doing it on their own pages and they haven't removed the delete notices. Archer7 18:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Block them! They've moved out! Archer7 18:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

We're almost done change

That's okay, between the folks cleaning up, We're almost there now... ALl that remains is to delete the junk... Sorry I accidentally rolled back your comment, I will fix that Blockinblox 14:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Let me know if you see either Slobo or Blunkett vandalising again... Slobo continued right up to the minute I warned him, didn't even have to block, but he will probably end up being banned permanently anyway when Neto finds out!! Blockinblox 15:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks... change

...for letting me know I missed one. Freshstart 22:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Babel boxes change

The Babel boxes have been revamped to conform to a new accepted scheme. Please recreate your boxes or change the references to fit with the new standard format. The old boxes will be deleted. Ask me any questions on my talk page. Thanks! --Cromwellt|talk 01:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar change

  Congratulations: You have been awarded a Barnstar!

For your great work on fighting against vandalism I, TBC, award you this barnstar. --TBCΦtalk? 07:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

--TBCΦtalk? 07:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Subst change

Hello, M7, please subst your templates on talk pages, like vandals' ones. For example:


Thank you for your co-operation! :)-- Tdxiang @ 10:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

ciao, M7 grazie per il tuo interessamento sono dario_vet, ma dicono che non si possono tenere firme a mo' di template....--vector ^_^ (talk 19:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

politics change

Are you more interested in politics, or creating an encyclopedia in Simple English? -- Netoholic @ 19:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Users are not your employees, nor they can be treated like you are doing lately. This is just my humble opinion, you can still continue ignoring it, but I feel that a dialogue is much better than mute contrast. --M7 19:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

sysop change

Thanks for your help, but we're all set now.

Please stop asking for emergency sysop access so often. Some things -can- wait. The accounts you blocked were only editing a single page. You're also missing some finer points about the admin rights, such as leaving personal information in the deletion log and deleting one of our deletion templates, Template:Non. -- Netoholic @ 00:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Don't worry about the personal information in the logs, I've asked Tim Starling to remove the data from the database. Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nelson Mandela change

Thank you for telling me my mistake. I'm sorry, I didn't know. :). PullToOpen Talk 02:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sysop change

What would it take for me to become a sysop here?? --SunStar Net 14:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Warned? change

Why the fuck was I warned? I don't believe I did any fucking think that deserved vandalism credentials. --Railer SE10 23:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Request to Stewards change

I've posted a Request that is specifically addressed to Stewards, since I'm not sure that you can hold a veto right against sysop candidates on simple.wikipedia. Please review it and express your opinion. Thank you, M/ M7 22:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

What "veto right" are you talking about? I've been away from Simple for about a week and am just now catching up on things like admin requests. I did not promote Tdxiang because he had only 8 of 11 votes (72%) and I used my judgement also based on his recent activity which should show he is not ready for adminship. Maybe later, but not now. As for other admin requests, I am looking into them. I have contacted Vector by email, per my procedure to verify that his email access works. Eptalon's request has only ben up for about one day, so I am not ready to promote yet.
I think you need to stop trolling me and getting involved in politics. You are making a lot of assumptions about me, and getting many of them wrong. -- Netoholic @ 22:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you change

Dear M7, grazie per votare (thamk you for voting)! Even though my adminship did not pass this time, I do not hold anything against Netoholic. I would like to thank you for your support and your comments. Grazie, il mio amico (Thanks a heap, friend!)!-- Tdxiang 02:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Edit wars are bad change

Hello, M7. Vandals want attention. Therefore fighting edit wars is bad. So far, only 2 pages have been affected. It is probably wiser to let the person wear out his/her 4 warnings, and then post ot the admin board. -- Eptalon 22:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vandal change

Good... I know how to do a range block... This guy is disturbed... Okay, someone got him! Thanks so much! Blockinblox 22:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nothing change

nothing...you aren't a troll --vector ^_^ (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bureaucratship change

Hi M7, thank you for your invitation to run for bureaucratship. However, I've only been a simplewiki admin for a month or so, and I don't think it would be fair for me to run for bureaucratship at such an early stage, so I regretfully cannot accept your invitation. But thanks anyway :) Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Steward change

Congratulations on becoming a steward! PullToOpenTalk 01:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Impersonating, etc change

Hello M7. Personally, I am fine with you blocking such accounts on sight. IMO, you should be fine with doing one day blocks. To be sure, however, check with one of our Bureaucrats (esp, for infinite blocks on perceived vandal-only accounts). Also, make sure each blocked user gets informed. There is a block template you can use for that. Archer7, and Blockinblox. To my knowledge, Archer7 is the currently more active of the two. --Eptalon 17:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have infinitely blocked the offending ones. This was relatively easy as I see them as inappropriate usernames. So, go ahead, and do any further (infinite, but leave account creation open) blocks, when you see more of them. --Eptalon 17:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Opus Dei change

Hello, and sorry for bothering you. An anonymous user left a Italian-language comment on Opus Dei (which some see as a sect), on Talk:opus Dei. Could you take 5 mins to completley revise (my probably totally insufficient) Italian, os that we have an accurate translation of that comment? - Thanks --Eptalon 00:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for proofreading :) --Eptalon 00:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

re:Sysop change

Congratulations, you're now an administrator. I suggest you take a quick re-read of our policies and guidelines, and make sure you check your email regularly. If you ever need any help at all, you can always ask me or another administrator. Ma penso che non ce ne sia molto di bisogno :-) Buon Lavoro e grazie --vector ^_^ (talk) 05:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! Welcome to the admin team! · Tygartl1·talk·

{{test}} change

Just to let you know, whenever you use {{test}} or {{welcome}} or any of those kinds of templates, you should put "subst:" so it becomes {{subst:test}}. Thanks.--Werdan7T @ 00:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Age of Enlightenment change

Can you delete the page "Age of Enlightenment". Thanks, Isis 23:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Never mind Isis 03:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

RfCU change

Dear M7,

I have nominated you for checkuser access on WP:RFA. Please complete the Candidate's acceptance section.

Best of all, - Huji reply 14:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

BTW, I will also send a message on your talk page on It WP. - Huji reply 14:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I was kind of uncertain... but since you've nominated only two people, and the minimum required by the policy is two people, then I accept. --M7 15:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
You are experienced about this. You can help a lot. It won't be a problem if you don't check that regularly (for example, if you check twice a week, it would be fine, I guess). Indeed, you can help the other CU (or CUs) and check their use of the tool as well. - Huji reply 16:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
As you can image, I've several pages of some wikies on my watchlist. To add another one (Request for CU, may be) is not a great effort. But the choice is up to simple.wiki community, of course. If there is another nominee available, he is going to have my full support. --M7 16:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
You now have checkUser access. Please subscribe to checkUser-l, the private mailing list for checkUsers. If you use IRC, you can contact Dmcdevit or Jdforrester for access to the private freenode channel #wikimedia-checkuser. Thanks. —Pathoschild 18:15:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re:Trusting Users change

Hello M7,

On your RfCU, I supported you since you were already a steward, I had the 100% confidence on supporting you. For Creol, I admire him in many ways and trust him as a sysop, but not completely as a checkuser. As I stated on his RfCU, Creol has only sysop rights here; and makes several (or a few) edits in other wikis. That's my only problem on not to support him. Take user Lar for example, he's a sysop and checkuser in en wiki, commons (+bureaucrat), and meta which is enough proof that he is capable of being a CU. But Creol lacks that kind of proof (I don't really know how to express this on how I want to).

Well I hope you understand my concern (if I'm sounding very weird). Peace;) --§ Snake311 (T + C) 22:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

CU access change

Congrats for your new responsibilities! I've created Wikipedia:Request for checkuser for the same reason. Best, - Huji reply 19:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

You are around! change

I believe you appear here more than before, from when you've become a local CU. I just wanted to stop by and say "It is always good to have you around". - Huji reply 19:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Recent Block change

At the English Wikipedia, they block users for 3 days for messing around with talk pages and stuff. -Razorflame 17:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

RFA thanks change

Dear M7,

Thank you for your participation in my RFA which closed successfully with 19 supports and 1 oppose which didn't count since it was made by a sock of a banned user. If you have any comments, concerns, or any suggestions for me as an Administrator, feel free to leave a note on my talkpage. Thank you.  Lights  talk  13:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Friend change

Hello M7. I'm just wanting to tell you that I've added you to my list of friends here on Simple English Wikipedia. I hope that you will do the same for me. Cheers! Razorflame (contributions) Talk 23:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Protection of Page World War II change

Hey M7, can I request protection of the page World War II based upon the fact that it has been a very high risk page (looking at it's edit history)? Thanks Razorflame 22:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

My internet broke as I was signing my comment to Creol :) Razorflame 23:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply block change

Just wanted to point out that there seems to be an issue with this block. The last two warnings issued to the IP were actually given after reverts of not just good faith edits, but of totally correct edits. The talk page covers the edits fully. The editor reverting apparently did not fully check the edits and just assumed it was further vandalism prior to warning the user and reporting the incident. As it was only a three hour block, it is pretty much a null point now, but wanted to inform you. -- Creol(talk) 03:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

huh? change

why? Oo IamAre 21:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

???IamAre 22:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back! change

It's nice to see you back on the Simple English Wikipedia after such a long absense! Here's to you coming back! Cheers! Razorflame 16:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

User:Me: +44 01278 651 973 change

I'm not sure if you intentionally did this, but when you blocked User:Me: +44 01278 651 973, you disabled account creation and when the user requested unblock, you told him/her to register again. With the account creation disabled, the user can't create an account with an acceptable username. I'd suggest you allow account creation when you block an unacceptable username, unless its obviously a vandal or a sockpuppet. Cheers-- Lights  talk  15:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi change

Could you see this please? Thanks. SwirlBoy39 14:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

RfA/RFCU change

After seeing all of the mishaps that have been going on at the WP:RFA page involving my 7th and completely unwanted nomination, I hereby give you or any checkusers consent to do a checkuser on me if you so choose to to disprove that I am related to Benniguy. Razorflame 17:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

It wasn't benniguy who nominated you. (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the vandalism revertion of Took me a while to work out what happened when I got the new messages banner, though... :-D Nanochip08 Microchip08 onWHEELS  <font color=User:Microchip08/Randomcolor Lol! Random colour! 10:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rash of creations change

Just a question, but did you get the IP's for these users blocked? Razorflame 15:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks like you haven't gotten all of them blocked yet :P Razorflame 15:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
203.144.1xx.xxx could be range blocked, I think. Razorflame 16:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Looks like there is another impersonation account User:Cwib. Please block. Cheers, Razorflame 15:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Done! Archer7 - talk 15:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Looks like Cwib needs to be added to the regexes of username blacklist. Razorflame 16:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

Thanks for the recent blocks of those accounts. --Gwib -(talk)- 15:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again. --Gwib -(talk)- 16:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar! change

  Congratulations: You have been awarded a Barnstar!

For tirelessly and ceaselessly blocking so many vandal accounts today. TheWolf 17:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You seriously deserve this. TheWolf 17:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: (mail) change

I always read mail, but I prefer answering on relevant talk pages. --M7 (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think that i am not allowed to discuss it openly, due to privacy rules and implications. IuseRosary? (talk) 14:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Of course you can write anything on my mailbox, and I will not reveal any private letter. Please remember that I generally will not mail back, if necessary you will find a generic answer on the relevant talk page. --M7 (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I've also emailed some other admin's alerting them of my new found infomation about this incident. I will email you again when i go back on my email account. Thanks IuseRosary? (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

My RFA change

Caricatura change

ma questa è proprio una caricatura contro la mia utenza. Certo che sei immaginifico ma io neanche sono quel Pio della versione in italiano poi Tamburellista, che può avere pareri simili ai miei, tratta voci di argomenti vari: non lo puoi identificare! La fantasia è la tua rovina!--Pio (talk) 18:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Any chance of a translation? Microchip 19:13, Monday, July 7 2008 Utc
Pio was banned on it.wiki and he blames on me about his reincarnation "Tamburellista", who was also blocked. --M7 (talk) 21:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

no evidence for your assertion: I, Pio and Tamburellista are 3 persons. Your harassment is a violation.--Pio (talk) 11:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

A violation of what, exactly? --M7 (talk) 13:22, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I personally like the part where him (Pio), Pio and Tamburellista are three different people.. I always assumed Pio and Pio were Pio. That is a weird coincidence, I tell you. Pio is not Pio, who would have guessed that. And I think the violation is against the rule about looking at a Duck and calling it a duck. They are sensitive little quackers.. -- Creol(talk) 14:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Some ducks are duckier than other ducks? ;) --Eptalon (talk) 14:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

your personal attacks are funny: am I a Duck? Pio and Tamburellista are 2 users in Italian wiki and I am other Pio: M7 violation is to ban their accounts in Italian wiki stalking my changes here then no evidence! I never logged in Italian and English wiki--Pio (talk) 14:17, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Another user made me notice your changes here, my personal opinion is that his report is seriously founded, so I blocked Tamburellista and his several sockpuppets. His use of sockpuppet was also confirmed by an it.wiki Checkuser. Please note that I did not take any action here. Now, looking at your contributions list, I can just warn other sysop about your Pio's long dating habit to make several POV edits to articles and claiming to be attacked by almost everybody else. --M7 (talk) 14:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

if you are correct, tell me who is this user: is a user in which language? He is in violation of stalking against me then certainly he is POV editor!--Pio (talk) 15:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The message was in italian, of course his/her name will not be revealed. But it should'n be of any problem for you, since you have written above that you never logged on it.wiki, on en.wiki. --M7 (talk) 15:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

non sei corretto con me: quell'utente ti ha inviato un messaggio di posta elettronica e tu hai ingenuamente abboccato. Secondo me, trattasi di Fotogian o Marte 77 che probabilmente sono cloni degli amministratori Vito o Brownout. State facendo solo danni:questo utente ha IP differenti da Tamburellista e il riferimento alla mia utenza qui è in mala fede. This is a personal question between me and that lier user who canvassed you too. I think so: there are organized gangs with political pushing propaganda and canvassing for to ban accounts of different POV!--Pio (talk) 16:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

And the confusion here is realy quacking me up.. so we have PIO/Pio (en/it) and Pio (simple) who are two entirely separate people. Without ever logging into two separate wikis, Pio (simple) is complaining that M/ had (insert multiple terms bordering on breaching local law and getting realy close to legal threats: we'll just say "something to do") with the banning of specific accounts via information on stalking (of a person with the same name who an is entirely different person on two wiki's this first person has never been on). Pio (simple) coincidently has the same interest in a specific person (created article Josip Broz Tito‎ which by the way is fairly useless as written and needs either a rewrite or Rfd) as the same person with the same name on en:wp (PIO (en/it) see whatlinksto for his usename on references to him and another user dealing with said article).

A random En:wp user who has noticable issues with Pio (en) comes here and points fingers and screams "IC Ducks" but Pio (simple) comments "R not duck, quit stalking me". This is total confussion as if not duck, how is he stalking you.. If Pio (simple) is not PIO (en), then the user stalking Pio(en) (if said stalking is happening, but that is an en issue) is not stalking Pio (simple) (he is stalking Pio(en)) and yet Pio (simple) says he is stalking him. Basic logic states if A=B and A=C then A=C.. If User(a) is stalking Pio (simple)(b) and User(a) is stalking PIO (en)(c) then Pio(simple)(b) = PIO (en)(c).

Shame we do not have a steward who would be willing to compare CU data from Pio on en:wp, simple:wp, and it:wp.. Cross wiki issues with local laws could be an issue, but under US law (and "wiki-law" as it is under US law) there is no violation of law or even privacy policy to look at these accounts and compare information as to them being from the same person. Without a steward (they got much to do at times.. people like Spacebirdy and M/ can't always be bothered to with things like this even though it is well within their power to look at each and every edit the accounts have ever made on every Wikimedia Foundation wiki) Getting an en:wp checkuser and Simple: Checkuser to check the data would not be hard though, contacting the it: checkusers to compare the data should not even present a large issue. At this point, I feel there is sufficient evidence of crosswiki (en/it/simple at the very least... es and fr should probable also be informed) vandalism/POV editing/harrassment to warrant investigating the matter. -- Creol(talk) 05:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

vandalism/POV editing/harrassment by organized gangs reported by me! Certainly! My computer is used by 4 persons and one time my friend logged in Italian and English wiki using nickname Pio--Pio (talk) 12:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
"One time" your friend did this?? Pio (en) first edited in May 2006 and has almost 800 edits over nearly a 2 year period. Pio (it) started in April of 2005 and 1100+ edits before being blocked nearly three years later. That is certainly more than one time. Is he the one that logged into the 20+ other projects as well? If this is true, I would highly suggest you activate Single User Login on your account so only you can use the name Pio on wikipedias. (its in your preferences - "manage accounts" - "unify accounts") -- Creol(talk) 13:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pio is a first name popular very much in the world: in fact Saint Pio embalmed in en:San Giovanni Rotondo is a Saint revered very much in the world. I don't know others Pio logged into the 20+ other projects and is no possible for me using only Pio because other users Pio logged in before me: for example, Spanish and Portuguese wiki have others Pio and I logged in as Jxy.--Pio (talk) 14:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

My Request for Adminship change

Question change

Was that IP address that was vandalizing this Wikipedia just recently a cross-wiki vandal? I think that that might be the case as I have not seen you around here until just now. Cheers, Razorflame 20:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

There are 2 pages in need of QD. Falcon  Leave me a memo!  15:33, Sunday August 31 2008 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! change

  The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Wow, you've certainly been busy reverting vandalism for a while now by a glance of your contributions. For that, I award you The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! Keep up the good work! :) Regards, RyanCross (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

Thank you for reverting the vandalism done on my user page ;) (Yotcmdr (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC))Reply

Thank you change

      Thank you very much for supporting my successful RfA. I will do my best to fulfil my duties as an administrator and use the tools wisely. If you need any help, or have any feedback on my editing, please contact me on my talk page. Thank you again, - tholly --Talk-- 16:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply  

Genetics vandal change

O You beat me! ;).

Good job theres an admin now around, several speedys need doing.


BG7even 13:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Confused change

Why am I seeing that you deleted my user page? I hadn't put anything there yet. Did someone else edit it? Precious Roy (talk) 23:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see. May I ask if it was (talk · contribs) ? Just curious. Precious Roy (talk) 23:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Gsthae with tempo! vandal change

Hi there. Is that Gsthae with tempo vandal a crosswiki vandal? Does he hit more than one Wikipedia (this one, plus others?). Thanks, Razorflame 18:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protect Chris_G's userpage? change

Could you semi-protect his userpage? It's gotten more than 50 vandalous edits in the past week. Razorflame 18:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

my RFA change

Hi. You commented on my rfa, and I corrected a typo made in my name. A few users commented on this fact, so I think it is wise to tell you too. I'd like to apologize if it caused any problems whatsoever to you, and hope it will not cause any future problems either. Kind regards, Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 17:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Spam change

You're right... change

...however, this particular individual has been considerably less than genteel on both this site and on EN. He is a chronic sockpuppeteer the likes of which I've never seen. I twice offered to mentor him and both times he responded via a sockpuppet account with abuse hurled directly at me. As an admin at EN, I don't even give him the benefit of the doubt anymore. I simply block him on sight. Sorry if I lost my temper, but this individual is just, well, nuts. Thanks for being nice about it, though. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

A big help change

you do good work M7. -- (talk) 20:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Help!!!!! change

I noticed you put the stub template. Glad somebody's online. I need to know how to use footnotes......like how to put abcd...etc on the ref. I'm using the same website more than once because it gives a lot of info. thanks. (Please reply here or on my page) --Salixa (talk) 22:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I know a bit about articles. I've done the Namib Desert Horse on the english wikipedia which is my best article. I'm kinda in a hurry with this one because it's for the GA Cup. I'm up against really experienced editors. --Salixa (talk) 22:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Could you explain the ref thingee? Confused. (Also I'm not a little kid haha) --Salixa (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Never mind!!! :) :) Figured it out :) --Salixa (talk) 22:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sandbox change

Sorry..he was authorized to by me. I am testing out a new Xchat Perl MediaWiki API script that someone made for me. It works.. :p --Bsadowski1 21:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

block change

Why did you change my block on I thought I formatted it correctly. Griffinofwales (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

block change change

I changed the block settings on because I believe that you incorrectly blocked talk page editing. If for some reason I was in the wrong, feel free to revert. Griffinofwales (talk) 21:22, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

more change

User:The thing that likes it up the but and others to. wiooiw (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done by me. Griffinofwales (talk) 18:11, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Note change

Hey, that's actually a public place. It's not a personal address. --Bsadowski1(Talk/Changes) 20:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Anonymous user(s) change

Can you block him, but he/she/they couldn't change own talk page? Nataly8 (talk) 15:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

And.. change

  The Admin's Barnstar
For your great work as admin. Good luck! Nataly8 (talk) 15:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Flood flag change

Can I have this flag? It's for revert the changes of Hazard-SJ. Nataly8 (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Userpage change

I have fixed a typo on your userpage as a Bold move. Feel free to revert. I-20the highway 22:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

t's okay, Thanksalot
--M7 (talk) 22:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Block. change

Hey M7. I altered your block on User: and set the expiry at three years, as this IP is an open proxy. Thanks!--Gordonrox24 | Talk 17:37, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yep thanks. We have really been having a hard time with proxy vandals. Lots of them recently.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 18:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks change

Thanks for blocking the guy. The Simple English Wikipedia got hit really hard in the 11 minutes he spammed and vandalized the whole thing. Well, anyway, thanks for blocking him. Reverter (talk) 21:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Kalum0101 change

Hello M7. Just letting you know that Kalum0101 (talk · contribs) has violated the first and only warning you issued, and vandalised twice more three more times. This may warrant a block. Cheers, Orashmatash 13:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Reply change

Great job and thank you! --Crobau (talk) 23:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your block change

Hi, I was wondering why you blocked that account with no email or talk for one edit. I can understand it's a vandalism-only account but bad username? --Bsadowski1 19:46, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocked... change

I've removed this block because it appears you have placed it in error by mistake. User was in the sandbox, and the flooding, was not bad at all. Very respectfully, Jon@talk:~$ 22:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

ty change

very much for noticing this vandal. --Hyk22123 (talk) 13:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Blocco change

Grazie! :) --Mark91it's my world 22:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I think you should also delete the two articles he created. (And I actually think I should practice my Italian more than anything else... :)) --Mark91it's my world 22:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

3 hour block change

Why did you block User: as he only created a bad page twice and was never warned? Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 15:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the comment. I understand now. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 15:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Chinese man 38202 change

Thank you so much M7. You'll be the first one I' write too when he continues this. BTW be on the look for Linda Lovelace and Despicable Me. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:Anisha Abbasi change

Hi. I couldn't find the equivalent of enWP's Admin Noticeboard, so I picked you at random from the admin list. I recommend deleting the userpage of User:Anisha Abbasi then blocking them. Why? I fear it is an attempt to start the same type of thing they just got blocked for on enWP. See en:User talk:AASMOHAMMADABBASIACTOR#Multiple accounts --Geniac (talk) 05:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

See here. Eurodyne (talk) 05:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi, simple.wiki has a different policy from en.wiki in handling deletions and block. Should you see multiple accounts or other abuse on this wiki, please feel free to report again on the noticeboard. Thank you, --M7 (talk) 18:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

GoshiDoll change

Would you like to decide what is the appropriate length of time to block this user? My 3 hours was just a holding device, and in the meantime you have reverted the changes he/she made. Personally, I was thinking of indefinite as an all-vandalism account. Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015 change

  This is your only warning. If you are a member of this wiki during the holiday season again, you may be be given this holiday card without any more warnings:

Merry Christmas!!
Hello, I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!  

   –Krett12 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

VIP change

Hi, M7. When you block a user who has been reported at WP:VIP, would you please make a note there so that your fellow admins don't have to spend time investigating? Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removal Request change

Thanks for you contributions. I have removed the bit as requested. -DJSasso (talk) 18:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply