I have read and I understand what rollback is. Rollback is a tool that allows users to revert vandalism easier and faster. I know that with rollback, I could play a significant part in the fight against vandalism. I also understand that rollback is not and right but a privilege. I understand that if I misuse rollback, I can get it removed and I can also be blocked from editing. Amanda Call Me 18:46, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done You're very new here and still learning how we do things. You also reported a user at WP:VIP who had not vandalized, which shows that you don't always recognize what's vandalism and what isn't. Take some time to learn how we operate: some kinds of changes here could look like they're vandalism when they're really OK and in line with our policies and practices. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Autoconfirmed and rollbacker on the English Wikipedia. I want to become more involved in the Simple English Wikipedia. I get very frustrated sometimes when I see vandalism and I have to revert it the slow way. I also understand how rollback works and when to use it. Thanks, TheQ Editor (talk) 22:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done While having the permission on other wikis, does qualify you to have it here, we do like seeing a little more then just a few days of activity, and a handfull of reverts here on simple before we grant the right. Give it a little bit, and more good reverts, and there should be no reason not to get it, it is just too soon for most admins. --Enfcer (talk) 14:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done You're very new here and still learning how we do things. You also reported a user at WP:VIP who had not vandalized, which shows that you don't always recognize what's vandalism and what isn't. Take some time to learn how we operate: some kinds of changes here could look like they're vandalism when they're really OK and in line with our policies and practices. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
