It is thought that this user has used more than one account to abuse Wikipedia.
The use of more than one account to harm Wikipedia is banned in the rules. If a new account is made to get around a block or ban, the block or ban will be made longer.
See block log, WP:SOCK, and lists of suspected and confirmed accounts for more information.

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Shakinglord (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

Please, it was my freind, I swear! The school IP is sared! I know I've made some bad decisions in the past, but don't let this mistake ruin my useful contributions to Simple! you know of my countless articles created. I've expanded Simple to great heights! Ask anyone, and they can agree I am a good editor! Don't let my past transgressions ruin my life here on Simple. I really don't want to leave! Your friend Shakinglord (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sure, it was always either a friend or the brother. The whole socking in the past wasn't you, I'm sure. I bet it was also one of your friends or your brother. -- Barras talk 11:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Then it seems I have no choice. I officially secede from Wikipedia. I am forming an anti-wikipedia society: WAAW (Wikia Alliance Against Wikipedia), a collective effort to improve Wikipedias for individual topics and ensure the complete and utter destruction of Wikipedia. I am truly sorry that I must resort to such action, but administrative failure was ultimately to blame. Farewell, we will meet again, perhaps now not on such friendly terms. Your friend Shakinglord (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of User:Shakinglord/WikiProject Gemology change

 

An editor has requested deletion of User:Shakinglord/WikiProject Gemology, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/User:Shakinglord/WikiProject Gemology and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 07:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply