Mirandatalks
Quick deletion of Stankevicius MGM
change
The page you wrote, Stankevicius MGM, has been selected for quick deletion for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the specific reasons. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Quick deletion of Chalet Lizette Brannan
change The page you wrote, Chalet Lizette Brannan, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Gotanda (talk) 22:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Chalet Lizette Brannan, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Chalet Lizette Brannan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Gotanda (talk) 23:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
Hello. I responded to the email you sent me. Thanks --Ferien (talk) 17:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal attacks such as this are not welcome here
changeThis comment you left on Auntof6's Talk page "the nominator is notorious for acting out of regards for process, he is concern more about edits number and not due process." is a personal attack and is not welcome here on this wiki. If you offer a clear and sincere apology, I will accept that in good faith. I look forward to your response and your constructive contributions to this wiki. --Gotanda (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
I’m sorry, if you misquoted that out of lines. I made a clear explanation to you on your page about the article, it was decline on En not because of notability, it was for additional citations, my intention was of cause making it available on both the En and Simple, so rather i corrected the mistakes, simplify it and make it readily available on simple and in order of conflict of interest I took it down personally on En with the intention of making it more better readily when I have its time on En. But your comments when I reach out to you looks obvious disturbing to me, when you mentioned “frustrated editors”. We’ve all been here for many years on Wikis and we know the right from wrong, why do i deserve such regards from you on the basis I asked you to take down your nomination that your earlier errors has been amended and you should have calmly make a due diligence before you took an action. Nevertheless, like you said, we are all here to contribute and this shouldn’t be an issue in respect. I’m sorry on my reaction, and I hope you take it heartily for pardon. Thanks. Mirandatalks (talk) 06:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)