User talk:TTP1233/Archives/2021/January

Latest comment: 3 years ago by TTP1233 in topic Welcoming users

NB

Try not to jump on a page while the editor is still working on it! Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Macdonald-ross: Can you please explain it.KP (talk) 09:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Barnstar for You!

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for your recent anti-vandalism efforts. Please keep up the good work! :) Belwine💬📜 14:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks KP (talk) 17:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your edits on Joe Biden

Hello! I undid the picture you added to Joe Biden because it is not usually used on Wikipedia + the 2013 one is more up to date.
Many thanks, Belwine💬📜 19:15, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

When adding stub templates

Hi. Please don't add stub templates yourself. New stub templates are discussed at the Simple Stub Project here. Many thanks, Belwine💬📜 09:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Photo on 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries

Hi, I managed to revert to the original photo that was there before the vandlaism. If you ever can't seem to get the original picture back, just let me know. See if you can use the undo feature. Many thanks, Belwine💬📜 15:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I tried in my mobile version but it is not working. KP (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok. I don't usually use the mobile version so I am not sure how to undo on there. Apologies. Belwine💬📜 16:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's ok man. It happens. KP (talk) 16:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Joan of Arc edits

I did not make unhelpful changes to this page. Simple English Wikipedia is designed for people whose first language is not English, and it should be easy to read. The grammar in the original article was wrong and certain sentences were ambiguous or difficult to read. Correcting English is not vandalism. I did not change the contents of the page or delete anything, I only improved the language. That is why, after checking why the bot had changed it, I reverted it back. Please read the changes before blindly accusing people of vandalism. Vaulties (talk) 17:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) For some parts of it, I think your language was simpler and for others, I think the previous language was simpler. I don't think anyone appears to be 100% in the right here. Belwine💬📜 17:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Belwine:, are you saying this to me or to Vaulties? KP (talk) 18:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Both. There are some areas where I think the language Vaulties used was simpler, and areas where I think the language that was there before was simpler. Belwine💬📜 18:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I'm but confusing on this. KP (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I apologise for my edits. This mobile version is too problematic for me to control on it. Both languages was simple I checked twice. But again making it simplier is .... ok. Let what it has done. Please don't mind on this. KP (talk) 03:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I might change it so there's some of your language in there adn some of Vaulties'. Some of the language was more simple in certain parts, so I'll just pick which ones are most simple in certain areas. Belwine💬📜 08:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

  Welcome to Wikipedia. You might not have done it on purpose, but your recent change removed helpful information from Wikipedia. We ask that you do not remove things from pages, as you did to "Mizanur Rahman Azhari", without giving a good reason in the change summary. If it was a mistake, do not worry. The part of the article you removed has been put back. If you want to try things out, please use the sandbox. If you would like to learn how to help Wikipedia, please see the welcome page. Thank you.  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 08:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Listen, the article you have created is just an advertisement, and there is no WP:NPOV, so it was tagged, but you removed intentionally during its nomination for deletion. So, I can't help for it.KP (talk) 08:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Are you mad? The article still RfD continued.  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 08:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
However, you did remove the "Advertisement" template, and you also added external links to Facebook and Twitter that made it like an advertisement... Belwine💬📜 08:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Masum Ibn Musa and TTP1233: you could get into an edit war. Please discuss your changes instead of reverting.
@Masum Ibn Musa: you have removed the advertisement template that shouldn't have been removed, and add external links to Facebook and YouTube that have made it like an advertisement.
@TTP1233: you removed a few of the references that Masum added.
Please co-operate with each other and try and compromise on this article.
Don't spend too much time though, as the article will probably be getting deleted soon anyway. Remember that RfDs use consensus and not the general vote.
Many thanks, Belwine💬📜 08:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
       My friend, you see I restored the version again of removed references which masum added. I then re-add the tag. I want to explain it and I'm not in mood in edit war.KP (talk) 08:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I have readded the ad tag and removed external links inside article already. I don't think there is much need to worry about it. The article would need a pretty major rewrite to become encyclopedic in my opinion. At the moment it sounds like it's being written from a fan's point of view. Many thanks, Belwine💬📜 08:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
User:Belwine Thanks its better now but previous version was poor because data and reference was removed.  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 09:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Ah ok. I'm going to check the references that are there now, if there's a wide range of reliable sources then I'll happily change my vote to keep :) Belwine💬📜 09:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Belwine Thanks a lot. Hope that so....  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 06:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Help me

I know all guidelines of Wikipedia including articles creation but how will I create a article any options are there.TTP1233 (talk) 07:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi TTP1233. To create an article, I usually go to the page where it would be (e.g. simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/????) and then I press Start this page. Then, you can use the visual editor to type out your article. Remember to read the below so you can create a good article. Good luck! Belwine💬📜 10:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
is there a grading scheme of articles as in English Wikipedia like stub class, b class, c class, etc. KP (talk) 11:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi, apologies I didn't see this earlier. I believe there is not at the moment. I think (not 100% sure but I think) that articles are put into these classes for WikiProjects, and we don't have many active WikiProjects here. Many thanks, Belwine💬📜 19:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Also, WikiProjects here are unofficial and we don't tag pages with anything related to them even with active projects. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thank you gentlemen.KP (talk) 04:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can you help me how will I preserve these notices as an archive and stored it like I saw in some wiki users.KP (talk) 09:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you mean talk page archiving, that can be done by using User:MiszaBot/config. That page is set up to be used as a template, even though it is in user space. The doc page attached to it explains how to use it. You can see an example of it at the top of my user page, but please do not make an exact copy of what I have because it has my userid hardcoded! (I should look into making that a variable.) If you have any questions about it, feel free to ask.
By the way, when you ask for help on a new topic, it's good to ask in a separate section instead of adding it to an old section. Cheers! --Auntof6 (talk) 10:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thnx KP (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


Block notices

Just a quick note that generally, only administrators should post block notices on user's talk pages. --IWI (talk) 15:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for that, I didn't know that. KP (talk) 17:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

No problem at all. Just please also note that we keep all red links on this wiki so we know what to create. Please don't remove them; thanks :) --IWI (talk) 08:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thnx-KP (talk) 08:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Creating talk pages for articles

Hello! Just so you know, you don't need to make talk pages for new articles, unless you are adding attribution. Thanks, Belwine💬📜 10:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok.KP (talk) 10:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Closing RFDs...

Hello, and welcome to our Wikipedia, as to closing RfDs, don't worry too much about an RfD running past the end date. An admin will eventually look at them. It won't necessarily be me closing. As to the given RfD discussion was still taking place. Don't worry, we'll handle them. All those Miss Universe candidates will likely be closed together (possibly with the same result for most of them). --Eptalon (talk) 09:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, ok thanks. KP (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Users removing comments from their talk page

...they are allowed to do this as it shows they have read it. Please do not revert them. --IWI (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes I agree but if they do any wrong and got notices on their talk pages and to save themselves,they are blanking it. Then how do we have understand this. Even that I will accept your advice. Thnx.KP (talk) 09:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
They are allowed to do this. There is no obligation for them to display their warnings once they have been read, that's not what they are intended to do; they are simply there to warn. --IWI (talk) 09:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The only time they can't remove notices on their talk page is if they are block notices and they are currently blocked. However, once they are no longer blocked they can be removed. Warnings are not badges of shame. -Djsasso (talk) 12:49, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

Hi, just so you know, no editing should be taking place on the Mizanur Rahman Azhari article from now on. We're just going to let the RfD happen. Also, I added an archive box to your talk page so archives are easily accessible. Thanks   Belwine💬📜 12:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thnx KP (talk) 15:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Andromeda (TV series)

Hello, and thanks for nominating Andromeda (TV series) for quick-deletion. It was indeed rather similar to the EnWp article. I have now rewritten the text, to be a little simpler. If you still think it should be deleted, please do a regular RfD. Thank you. --Eptalon (talk) 12:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for simplifying it.--DJRC (talk) 12:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Help me (24.01.2021)

can you pls help me that whether the User:TTP1233/talk page header is approvd or not? Best,--DJRC (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it needs approval. Is there something on it that you think might be a problem? You might want to put includeonly tags on it if you plan to transclude it to your talk page. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
No Sir, no problem on it.DJRC (talk) 08:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
(Closed helpme request. If you still need help, just change it back) --Belwine💬📜 19:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks DJRC (talk) 06:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Performance

Hello everyone, since I had a month here on this wiki, I want all of you to tell me that whether I'm doing my duty or not. Anything you are allowed to do comments except one that is ignoring this question and answering useless question and all. Not compulsory. You may take your time to comment.DJRC (talk) 11:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

You've been a good user so far, reverting vandalism and writing articles - keep it up!   Belwine💬📜 11:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sandbox

Hello! Just so you know, you can put pretty much anything in the sandbox unless it is advertising, or violates copyright, or swearing. Even if it contains something bad, Hazard-Bot will just reset it an hour after the edit. Thanks   --Belwine💬📜 09:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh I thought it is a only guidelines. Nothing more is allowed. Anyways! THANKS!!DJRC (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
No problem  
you can reset the sandbox if you want, that is fine. Hazard-Bot (talk · contribs) automatically resets the sandbox every hour though --Belwine💬📜 12:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for advice. DJRC (talk) 13:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcoming users

Hello! I know you're on mobile right now, so it may be harder to edit, but remember to subst welcome templates by putting subst: in front of them, like this:
{{subst:Welcome}}
Thanks,   --Belwine💬📜 13:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thnx buddy.DJRC (talk) 13:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Return to the user page of "TTP1233/Archives/2021/January".