Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Creol

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.

Creol (bureaucrat) change

Creol (talk · contribs)

Closed March 12 2008 - 26/0/0 - 100% support.

I'd like to nominate User:Creol for bureaucrat status on our Wikipedia. He has been an active user for a long time, and is very well aware of policies and guidelines. I'm sure he'll be more helpful with this new responsibility given to him. - Huji ^reply 19:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates acceptance: Honored and accepting. -- Creol(talk) 22:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support change

Support - as the nominator - Huji ^reply 19:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
good --vector ^_^ (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - sure ^_^ ..--Comet styles 20:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yep, add mine to the list. Razor flame 20:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --M7 (talk) 22:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Lights talk 23:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Creol has been here a while and probabley knows more that most of use here, I trust his judgement and am condfident that he will make a great bureaucrat. Oysterguitarist 23:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm confident he'll do a good job. Anthøny 23:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Chenzw (talk ▪ changes) 09:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Werdan7^{T @} 13:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Archer7 - talk 15:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, a long-time veteran of the site, will make a fantastic 'crat. TheWolf 16:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gwib^-(talk)- 17:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cethegus (talk) 09:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and everybody--Bärl iner 13:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. - BrownE34 talk contribs 19:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Trustworthy admin.--TBC 20:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Among the best we have; could surely use the Bureaucrat tools --Eptalon (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, absolutely. · Ty grrr... 21:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I see no reason to keep him from it.-- † Christian Man 16 22:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --§ Snake311 _{(I'm Not Okay!)} 03:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Excellent admin and editor. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 08:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per the last 20 commenets. -- Da Punk '95 (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per all of the above. "Go with the multitude".--♥Amy Ames♥ (inbox) 21:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC) sock of banned user -- Creol(talk) 22:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yegoyan (talk) 23:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support for sure. :) --Isis ♠(talk) 02:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - certainly! - Alison ^❤ 06:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose change

Comment change

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.