User:Fixing26/RfDs/Other

Ongoing

Past

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

QD'd -Djsasso (talk) 16:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Icem4k/Patson Daka

User:Icem4k/Patson Daka (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Icem4k has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think that this page should be attached to the main article. Chabota (talk) 15:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Comment: @Icem4k: If you want a page deleted in your userspace, you can request quick deletion of it with the reason G7 or U1. Fixing26 (talk) 16:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:54, 12 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Merge. Was merged during the request for deletion --Ferien (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

African Americans in Alabama

African Americans in Alabama (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Bangalamania has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This has no information in it that couldn't be included elsewhere Bangalamania (talk) 15:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Merge with African Americans I think the best course of action would be to merge, but definitely not delete (take this as me supporting keeping). The topic seems apparent to be notable and I see no issues with it, but provided with the little information in the article I think a merge is in order. Fixing26 15:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
This article details the circumstances of African Americans in a particular U.S. state; there are other articles (also not lsted here, e.g. African Americans in Virginia. So, it would pronably be good to group these, into bigger Articles (The conditions of African Americans in Mississippi was probably not that different from that in a neighboring state. Also note that historically, the "southern" states had (and still have?) labor-intensive agriculture, while the Northern states were more industrialized. If you find three notable African Americans form Alabama, you could make a category: African Americans from Alabama. Note that what I say here also applies to the 2-3 other (similar) RfDs. If kept, this article needs references, but RfD is not for cleanup..--Eptalon (talk) 18:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Redirect/merge: There is nothing important in this article. Instead make a table on African Americans that tells how many African Americans live in each state. Also write about the history. For example, the Mississippi Delta. 50.30.176.26 (talk) 07:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Not merging because there's too much text for the format of Separatist movements of China. Not redirecting because this movement is not mentioned at Separatist movements of China, and because nothing links here anyway. If anyone wants to work on this article in their userspace, the text can be retrieved by an admin --Auntof6 (talk) 05:13, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Guangdong Independence Movement

Guangdong Independence Movement (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Bishibitsu has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article is incomprehensible by both basic and regular English standards. The user who created this article was also globally blocked for sockpuppetry. Bishibitsu (talk) 08:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Merge and redirect into Separatist movements of China - Re-word it a bit and add the content over there. Fixing26 (talk) 20:26, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
There are two issues: the language and the merger. Merger implies that the various struggles are essentially the same, else it would be better to link those separate pages under a category. I would judge they are not so similar.

The second is the language, which is not simple, and is also far too long for what it has to say. It needs completely re-writing. It could be in essence deleted, and a simple account put in. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Redirect to Separatist movements of China seems to complex for a merge. Could use some work in that article. Darubrub (Let me know) 14:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.