User:Lolcats20/Archive/Archive 1 Sep 2016

Service Award

You have just hit your 200th edit and are qualified to display the following award. Your next level is when you hit the 600 edit mark (you already have more than enough time in service). Congratulations User:Rus793 (talk) 14:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

 This editor is a Novice Editor and has the right to show this Service Badge.





Thanks

I had forgotten the page version ID for the blue wren! Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your warnings at User talk:105.56.152.202

Hi, Lolcats20. I noticed that you issued several "last warnings" and a "final warning" to this user within a short period of time. Please do not do that. Once you issue a final warning, the only other action needed is a report at WP:VIP, even if there is more vandalism. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

@Auntof6:Thank you for telling me , I noted a few others doing this, and thought that was how it was meant to be, Sorry for any trouble it caused. Lolcats20 (talk) 07:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Estimates and facts

Hello. It came to my notice that you have reverted the removal of estimates from the infobox, in spite of lack of official population census sources about the ethnicity of the population. In the cases where a country does not collect data on ethnicity in its population censuses, this section in the infobox is left just empty. A such example is Turkey, where a note and a redirect to the Demographics section is in place instead. Estimates by various international or foreign national agencies can not be represented as facts or official data. Thank you and have a good day. --SilentResident (talk) 10:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

@SilentResident: My apologies, I had not noticed it was an estimate, and therefore thought you were intent to vandalize Greece, Once again I am sorry, and will make sure that this does not happen again. Lolcats20 (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
@Lolcats20: There is no problem. Have a good day. --SilentResident (talk) 10:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Appreciation in joining in Wikiproject India

Thank you and I appreciate you for joining your name in User:Wiki tamil 100/Wikiproject India. the first person to join in this project.--Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 12:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Take a deep breath....

Chenzw has blocked the IP for 48 hours. Etamni | ✉   15:35, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@Etamni: Yeah, thanks for helping with that user. Lolcats20 (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

RE:Use of template

It's not my template, anyone can display it. J991 17:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Episode

 

An editor has requested deletion of Episode, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/Episode and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. User:Rus793 (talk) 13:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

To explain further, the reason for nominating this article for deletion is that it seems to be a dicdef (a dictionary definition). Terms such as this belong in the Simple English Wiktionary (which already has this term). Wikipedia is for articles on notable subjects. Many articles, however, begin with a definition. But, an article goes well beyond being just a dictionary type definition. If you can research the subject into a larger article with several reliable source citations showing it to be notable, that may save the article. Keep in mind we are a separate project from Enwiki. Because they do or do not do something does not mean we have to follow suit. User:Rus793 (talk) 17:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Lolcats20. Thanks for creating this category. You might not have known, but when you create a category, that category itself needs to be categorized. I have categorized this one, but please try to do it yourself when you create categories. If you have trouble figuring out what categories should be added, feel free to ask. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:35, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

@Auntof6: – Thank you for telling me, I was not aware that I had to do that. In the future I will start to do that when creating categories. Lolcats20 (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Service award

You have passed your 600th edit and are qualified to display the following award. Your next level is when you hit the 1200 edit mark, Journeyman editor (you already have more than enough time in service and you are halfway there already). Congratulations again. User:Rus793 (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

 This editor is an Apprentice Editor and has the right to show this Service Badge.





Your new pages and patroller right

Hello, Lolcats20. Part of having the patroller right means that pages you create do not need patrolling. When you are given this right, we are trusting that articles you create are in good shape and appropriate for this Wikipedia. I just had to make some substantive changes to Papers, Please, an article you created.

  • I removed a lot of redlinked categories.
  • The article didn't have code for a references section.
  • It was not wikified.
  • It needed copy editing.
  • It needed simplifying, mostly for compound sentences.

We expect these things to be done when a patroller creates an article. Please be sure that articles you create are in good shape. If your articles continue to need cleanup, your patroller right can be taken away. --Auntof6 (talk) 04:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Patrolling

Hello, Lolcats20. I happened to notice some issues with the article Kevin Downes, and I saw thst you patrolled it. The issues I saw were:

  • The article doesn't show notability.
  • It uses an incorrect heading, "External links" instead of "Other websites".
  • It has an authority control template with no parameters, which puts a narrow empty rectangle on the page.

These things, especially the last two, could have been fixed easily. When you patrol, you need to do more than just look at the article. If there is an issue that you aren't going to fix, you can either tag the article so that someone else can find and fix it, or just leave it unpatrolled. You don't have to patrol things just because you have the ability.

Looking at some of the other pages you've patrolled, I also noticed other issues.

  • Saheed Osupa needs simplifying and copy editing for grammar.
  • Otto Lilienthal needs simplifying, more categories, and a stub tag.
  • Francesco Filippini needs simplifying. It also needs some cleanup: at the bottom, there is a misplaced Commons template, as well as a template that we don't have.

When you patrol, please make sure that the page being patrolled either doesn't have issues like this, that you fix the issues, or that you tag it so that others can find and fix the issues. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:30, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Sbs882y stuff

Hello, sir, I would like to ask why was my pages deleted. The page Volvo B10BLE was the same type of method I did so why was it deleted? If possible can you undelete it? Thanks. Yours Sincerely, Sbs882y Sbs882y (talk) 22:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

If you don't mind can I 'copy' the Volvo B10BLE for the Volvo B10M and Mercedes 0405? Thank you. Sbs882y Sbs882y (talk) 23:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@Sbs882y: The reason I put your articles up to be deleted is that the articles had no claim to being notable and that they had little information, of little meaning. If you are to make this articles again, you need to add more information on them, things like History, origin, uses etc. And use References to meaningful articles or websites relating to them. Lolcats20 (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
You can also check Article wizard for more information on how to create articles. Lolcats20 (talk) 09:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

But for the Volvo B10BLE, the page was the same format as my pages. So why must my pages be deleted? Sbs882y

And also, I use my phone to edit stuff so I cannot see why it was deleted. Please leave why on my talk page. Sbs882y

Journeyman service award

Congratulations! You have now passed your 1,200th edit and are qualified to display the following award. The next level, Yeoman Editor, requires 1 year (which you already have) and 2,500 edits. BTW, you may use any form of the award you like and you may award it to yourself (although it always seems better if someone else awards it to you). Now if you notice an editor is due a service award (time and edits), pay it forward and award it to them! Nice going. User:Rus793 (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

 This editor is a Journeyman Editor and has the right to show this Service Badge.





18:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

9+10=21

I don't think 9+10=21 on Template:Addition table is vandalism. If you'd like to know more, please search "9+10=21" on Google. 83.31.148.122 (talk) 15:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

@83.31.148.122:This was vandalism, which is not allowed 9+10=21 is incorrect and is infact 9+10=19, please do not do this again. Lolcats20 (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Lolcats20. You gave out a level one warning on the user's talk page, which was appropriate in this case. Level 1 "assumes good faith." Generally the message begins with the words "Welcome to Wikipedia" (not the same as a welcome message) or something similar. Your discussion and or guidance to this user needs to also assume good faith and should match the warning level. People do make mistakes and level 1 gives the benefit of the doubt. Level 2 does not assume anything. It is just the normal progression of warning levels. Frequently this is as far as it goes and the user "gets the message" this isn't a place to play or make careless edits. Level 3 assumes vandalism. But you should not go directly to level 3. Just be helpful to others, you cannot know their intent unless you have more to go on. Admins here are on top of things. At some point one will step in and take the necessary measures. Just trust the system. Thanks User:Rus793 (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi, I think there might have been a misunderstanding here. This IP has persisted in their "9+10=21" agenda on both this wiki and EN. The editor was previously warned (along the levels) and (thereafter) blocked, but continued with their edits to {{Addition table}} without discussion with others. This editor has since blanked their talk page, though previous warnings are available in the revision history. Considering the user's unblock requests on EN, I think their intentions (on not contributing constructively) are quite clear. While administrators do possess the technical tools for enforcing policy, other editors are also an important part of the community, and their opinions and judgment should be valued as well. Chenzw  Talk  16:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

15:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

[m:Special:MyLanguage/Tech/News/2016/29|Tech News: 2016-29]]

12:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

21:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

15:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

21:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

15:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

18:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

22:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)