User talk:Fehufanga/Archive 2

Stop removing my edits on Marine le Pen

She deserves to win!! I am adding the factual information and you carelessly removed it for no reason! 2A02:C7E:AEE:1200:DC91:9776:DCE1:57C5 (talk) 07:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, "deserves to win" is not an excuse to add information without any citations. In addition, I have not seen any poll results (the election starts tomorrow) as of the writing of this reply. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

They added a source, which you wrongly cited down as "not a real source". I have used some of Franceinfo's references in other articles, and as a Frenchperson I can assure you it is a real website. Thanks and have a good day. 2A02:C7E:AEE:1200:41A7:B3EA:FDBE:425D (talk) 17:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

I added a source and you removed it, that's not fair. Pohjamadesse1 (talk) 08:17, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure which edit you are referring to. I haven't reverted your contributions. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 08:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Information that i added

Umm...I understand what you are saying but the info I got was real since I visited a scientist— Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknown polygon (talk • contribs) 23:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

@Unknown polygon Hello, adding original research is generally not allowed. You need to provide actual reliable and credible sources to verify your statement. "I heard it from a scientist" is not a source. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 00:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Good work

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		For your ongoing great contributions to this wiki! Keep it up! --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

@TDKR Chicago 101 Once again, thank you for the barnstar! I saw the message you left at Kolva's talk page. I'm sad to hear that you are retiring, and I want to thank you for all you have done on this wiki! Thanks for making sure this wiki up to date. I wish you the best! — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Categories by continent

Hi, just in case you are wondering why I added Category:Categories by continent to the articles that already were in a subcategory of this, it was because this seems to be the way it's done: Category:Categories by continent includes every category that is by continent. It's probably for maintenance purposes of some kind. Thanks for adding the other category. Lights and freedom (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

@Lights and freedom ah, sorry about that! I didn't notice that. It's a non-diffusing category. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 08:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

help

Dear mister FEHUFANGA I need your help about my new page— Preceding unsigned comment added by Segawa Market (talk • contribs) 08:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Trout

Whack!

Do not take this seriously. Someone wants to let you know you did something silly!

for confusing East Java and Central Java. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Azerbaijan stubs

Hello.

I added the stubs and categories, because there are many short articles about Azerbaijanis and Azerbaijan. A United States stub exists in Simple Wikipedia.

Youes sincerely, 31.200.18.237 (talk) 06:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

A stub category is not created simply because there are many articles in a category. For example, we have numerous articles in Category:Companies that are at the stub level, but we don't have a company stub. A stub category is created when there are enough stubs for the category, there's people actively working to improve the stub, and the community approves the stub. Keep in mind, this is the Simple English Wikipedia, we try to keep things simple here. While English Wikipedia may have a stub category as detailed as "Bolivian Roman Catholic bishop stubs", we don't. Because that's not simple. You may ask for input from the community at the Simple Stub Project's talkpage. Best, — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 06:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Recorded-IP-Address

With this account, they explained their series of self-reverts with this edit summary: "I’m sorry, but what keeps happening is I kept getting logged out every time I try to edit and I couldn’t figure out how to link the English version to this version". Yes, it was a little suspicious, but now they have stopped with the self reverts. Might it be better to assume good faith for now, and to report them to VIP later if they cause disruption? Lights and freedom (talk) 06:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

@Lights and freedom I was going to say that an admin should review it first, but looks like Griff has already blocked them. They can always appeal if they think the block was unjustified. Blocks are preventative, not punitive. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 06:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

I just want to alert @Griffinofwales: to this, although maybe you've noticed and decided to block them anyway. This user did contribute significant content to the article (although maybe the topic of the article wasn't notable enough, I'm not expressing opinion on that), however now the article is nominated for quick deletion and all the content has been removed. Ok, after leaving this comment I won't bother about this topic anymore. Lights and freedom (talk) 06:39, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

L&F and Fehufanga, thanks to both of you for noticing their edits. I blocked them as the IP attached with this account was long term blocked for similar disruptive edits at enWP. As I strongly suspect this is all the same user, this user is well aware of how Wikipedia functions, and simply using this project as their playground. Griff (talk) 06:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Template changes

Would you please explain why you are removing content categories from template categories? An example is this change to Category:Baseball templates. In the past, I've emphasized that templates need to be in content categories, either individually or by being in a template category that is in one or more content categories. These changes are undoing that. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 06:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@Auntof6 Following how English Wikipedia does it, and the way I see it, mixing template categories with content categories is confusing to anyone who uses categories. They are not content by themselves. Would it be fine to remove Category:Albania from Category:Albania templates while keeping Category:Countries in Category:Country templates? — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your changes aren't following how enwiki does it. For example, en:Category:Baseball templates is in en:Category:Baseball. Category:Albania templates should be a subcategory of Category:Albania, Category:Country templates should be a subcategory of Category:Countries, and so on. Not having them there makes it harder to find the template(s) you want.

As for mixing templates in content categories, templates appear at the end of any content category they're in because they use a special sort key that puts them there. (Any that don't use the special sort key should be changed to use it.) This is documented at Wikipedia:Categories#Special sorting, under Special character sort keys; the fact that it's documented shows that templates and template categories are expected to be in content categories. That plus the fact that templates and template categories mostly have names that indicate that they are (for) templates keep things from being confusing (not that I've ever heard anyone else say they thought it was confusing).

Finally, we are not required to do things the way enwiki does. Sometimes there are reasons to and sometimes there aren't. Before continuing with this, and before making any other significant changes, please discuss to get consensus and let others know you want to change established processes. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@Auntof6 en:Category Baseball templates seems to be an odd one in this case - other sport template categories are not categorized under a content category, such as en:Category:Basketball_templates or en:Category:Table_tennis_templates. In most cases, template categories are not placed in content categories. I'm not going to remove any more content categories. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 08:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Now that I look more into it, categories in en:Sports_templates_by_sport appear to be inconsistent, more than I had thought previously. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 08:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Message from User:Mr singla112211

hi sir need to talk with you are you available Mr singla112211 (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@Mr singla112211: yes? — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Something for you

Hello Fehufanga! It's great to see you correcting punctuations in many articles on Meitei mythology and religion in this wiki! Your edits helped a lot towards a better construction of the project. And in gratitude, this barnstar is for you:

		The Kanglei Barnstar
		For the corrections of punctuations in numerous articles about Meitei culture of Manipur, you deserve THE KANGLEI BARNSTAR! Keep up the good work! :) --Haoreima (talk) 11:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

@Haoreima Thank you! I appreciate the barnstar. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello there!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Have a barnstar for your anti-vandalism efforts! --Derpdart56 (talk) 14:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Derpdart56 It's very interesting to note that you came to Fehufanga's talk page to give him an anti-vandalism barnstar and on your way, you did an anti-vandalism work! Great! :-) --Haoreima (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Derpdart56 Thank you for the barnstar, and reverting the vandalism! @Haoreima The things that we have to deal with... — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:08, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Untitled message from Neena gupta1122

hi sir can we have a quick talk are you here ? Neena gupta1122 (talk) 02:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Neena gupta1122: Don't ask to ask. If you're asking about the QD tag, there was consensus that the subject of the article is not notable, and there are no reliable sources that cover him extensively. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Untitled message from 178.197.197.173

Hello hope your doing well , I need you to check this article https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFEM it can be restored in this case the article was deleted with 9 ref one time and again with 24 references. I outlined that the artist name does not pop up on google evrytime due to similar companies with the same name, which is why the name does not show up when you search on google some times this is google id https://g.co/kgs/nV68eZ

I think this is the issue in this case he has notability178.197.197.173 (talk) 00:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

I have checked the search results again, and I have tried including terms such as "artist" and "musician", etc. There are still no indications that the subject passes the general notability guidelines. If you object, please take it to WP:Deletion review, I cannot do anything here. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 00:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

They have all been verified sources, yet I disagree. I've also tagged administrators to investigate this case, because you can't just delete just like that with 24 references. I think administrators should investigate some adminis here because those who abuse thair privileges should be taken178.197.197.173 (talk) 01:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

I have seen pages with more references get deleted. The number of references does not always dictate whether or not an article should be kept or be deleted. I don't see any administrative abuse here. Again, I cannot help you here. I have no tools to undelete the page. I suggest that you take this to WP:Deletion review, not my talk page. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Please undelete the page178.197.197.173 (talk) 01:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)"

I cannot help you then. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

I will Rapport this user who has contributed to this page for deleting abusers should not be on Wikipedia not because they think like they are always right this is wrong that article has criteria and has to restore you are wrong is not yours Wikipedia you act like is yours your privileges can be taken premnetly I think paranoia admins has to take of privileges on the wiki you agree with me talk178.197.197.173 (talk) 01:47, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

No I don't agree. Please stop discussing about admin conduct on my talk page. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:51, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Prince Sayyid Raphael Dakik

I honestly tell you It is not bad to prejudice to fast. But maybe you can improve the article and make it in Chinese language in order to gather more valuable encyclopedic information for people. Let us work on it together in a friendly and harmonic manner, respecting our works. I am looking forward to a fruitful cooperation.--Warburton123 (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@Warburton123 I am still not convinced that the subject is notable enough for an article on Wikipedia. Repeatedly accusing me of having a prejudice without evidence is casting an aspersion. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

But you honetsly made a disruptive change, which is vandalistic and in this manner you seemingly have a prejudice to say that the Hazrat Ishaan from a neutral perspective is not a worthy post. The prejudice is based on your lack of knowledge on this topic, which is no problem at all. It can happen as nobody is perfect. So please accept your mistake and let us work together by first removing the template that is discrediting the content of the article. So you consider https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Christophe,_Prince_Napol%C3%A9on more worth noting? a person who represents a dynasty that does not exist since 150 years rather than a Prince of a dynasty of the last 40 years, who simultaneosly is the current Hazrat Ishaan? The Hazrat Ishaan in Sunni Islam is similar to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aga_Khan in Shia Islam. Warburton123 (talk) 14:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

PS: I am not casting any aspersions, as I am only honest, You give the impression of prejudicing, so you should honestly for your own sake, work of your conduct. This is no problem at all as nobody is perfect. Warburton123 (talk) 14:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@Warburton123 just because a page about a similar subject exists doesn't mean that the article being discussed should be kept. And no, I don't think Jean-Christopher is notable. That doesn't change my opinion on Prince Sayyid Raphael Dakik. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Then you should stay on your principles and delete Jean-Christopher. Please go ahead. Warburton123 (talk) 14:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Lol, if "Look, if we have an article on Pokémon species, we should be able to have an article on this band" is kept, than you should for sure keep Prince Sayyid Raphael Dakik as he is the current Hazrat Ishaan and not a band that calls himself after Hazrat Ishaan. Why don´t you just accept that your arguments are not strong enough. This is not a fighting plattform where anyone just promotes his own interests, based on how many badges and edits he has, but a neutral plattform. Warburton123 (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@Warburton123 I don't see how pokemon is even relevant here. This is off topic. I'm not replying here any further. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 15:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

No it is not, it is mentioned in the link you gave me here just because a page about a similar subject exists doesn't mean that the article being discussed should be kept.. I say honestly you are a very prejudicing person, who first acts and then thinks. Sorry for being too harsh. Warburton123 (talk) 15:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@Warburton123 Well, that link links to one of the sections in en:WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, and that is one of the example that you should not argue with... Jolly1253 (talk) 15:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

About an edit

I recently made a edit on a page about fortnite and I want to apologise for vandalising and I hope you can forgive me Averagesteak877 (talk) 19:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

@Averagesteak877 well, I hope you don't do it again. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 06:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Help

I ran into a little trouble with this user on English Wikipedia MrOllie he coveted my edits called them his own I need your help can you block him? MiLanGaoPing (talk) 12:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Horror films

What do you think of horror films? MiLanGaoPing (talk) 22:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I'm not trying to abuse you I'm just asking what's your opinion? MiLanGaoPing (talk) 22:54, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Sorry if I'm bothering you. MiLanGaoPing (talk) 22:57, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Salah Eddine Saadouni

In these cases as this one (as you pointed out was a snowball) at en for deletion a QD can happen instead. The only people who keep editing it are IPs but the page is only protected for 2 days. This could just be an admin decision because as soon as it gets unprotected it will get vandalized again. I did ask an admin in private and they will get back to me later tonight if the RfD can be turned into a QD under non-notable. PotsdamLamb (talk) 23:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

@PotsdamLamb: That's fair, I see no claim of notability about the subject either. I usually prefer to see a thorough deletion discussion when one is opened. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 00:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

@Fehufanga: No worries at all! This wiki is not very large so most input is from regulars and admins. PotsdamLamb (talk) 01:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Roomball

It’s in a book kindle version only now can it be added Gardner Sports (talk) 00:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

If you search it on Amazon you can find it Gardner Sports (talk) 00:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

The kindle book

The book is called Gardners Sports collection Gardner Sports (talk) 00:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Would like kindly a reply Gardner Sports (talk) 00:16, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

@Gardner Sports I still don't see any significant indication of notability. A picture, insignificant news coverage and a book is nowhere close. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

It was on NCPR with Monica Sandreczki Under Relayball Gardner Sports (talk) 01:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

If I can rename it to Mini Basketball or at least Relayball I would Gardner Sports (talk) 01:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Can I talk to you in email instead of on here I can show you pictures of Roomball Gardner Sports (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Roomball

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mini_Basketball_3.jpg This is a picture of a kid playing Roomball Gardner Sports (talk) 00:56, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Roomball

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mini_Basketball_3.jpg Gardner Sports (talk) 01:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

please read this. disambiguation page links.

en:WP:DAB

See also: Template:Dablinks/FAQ § What's wrong with links to disambiguation pages? Links to disambiguation pages from mainspace are typically errors. In order to find and fix those errors, disambiguators generate reports of links needing to be checked and fixed. Because these reports cannot distinguish cases where an editor has made such a link with the intent to point to the disambiguation page, the community has adopted the standard of routing all intentional disambiguation links in mainspace through "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects. This makes it clear that such links are intended to point to the disambiguation page. For example: In text or in a "See also" section of an article that is not itself a disambiguation page: Incorrect: There are many places named [[Springfield]] Correct: There are many places named [[Springfield (disambiguation)|Springfield]] On a disambiguation page, an intentional link to another disambiguation page that does not contain "(disambiguation)" in the title: Incorrect: [[Springfield]] Incorrect: [[Springfield (disambiguation)|Springfield]] Incorrect: [[Springfield|Springfield (disambiguation)]] Correct: [[Springfield (disambiguation)]] In a hatnote: Incorrect: {{other uses|Springfield}} Correct: {{other uses|Springfield (disambiguation)}} Correct: {{other uses|Springfield (disambiguation){{!}}Springfield}} It may be necessary to create the redirect ("Springfield (disambiguation)" in these examples) if it does not already exist. This is described below. When to link to a disambiguation page With few exceptions, creating links to disambiguation pages is erroneous. Links should instead point to a relevant article. The purpose of a disambiguation page is to give a list of articles that is likely to include what a reader is looking for when they have typed an ambiguous term into the search box. Disambiguation pages are not articles and so should not be tagged as orphans per the Orphan criteria. The exceptions, when an intentional link to a disambiguation page is appropriate, are: Disambiguation hatnotes: Watergate redirects to Watergate scandal, which carries a hatnote linking to Watergate (disambiguation) for other uses. Links from one disambiguation page to another for further disambiguation: British has a link to Britain (disambiguation) for further disambiguation. Links from set indexes: Laing (surname) contains a link to John Laing (disambiguation). Exceptionally, in a "See also" list of interesting internal links where several different articles might be of interest to the reader and multiple ones are listed on the disambiguation page. In a redirect page (below) How to link to a disambiguation page To link to a disambiguation page (rather than to a page whose topic is a specific meaning), link to the title that includes the text "(disambiguation)", even if that is a redirect—for example, link to the redirect Springfield (disambiguation) rather than the target page at "Springfield". If the redirect does not yet exist, create it and tag it with {{R to disambiguation page}}. If you are linking within a template, such as a hatnote template, you can still use pipe syntax so that the link does not show the new qualifier. To do this, use the {{!}} character-substitution template. This helps distinguish accidental links to the disambiguation page from intentional ones. (For use in navboxes, see the {{D'}} template.) There is nothing wrong with linking to a redirect instead of linking directly to the disambiguation page; redirects are "cheap" and are basically transparent to the reader. Redirects to disambiguation pages Valid causes for redirecting to a disambiguation page include: Incomplete disambiguation (see above) Redirects from misspellings: Britian redirects to the "Britain" disambiguation page. Redirects from alternative spellings if separate disambiguation pages are not warranted: Türk redirects to the Turk disambiguation page. Redirects from variations in capitalisation, word separation, or punctuation, if separate disambiguation pages are not warranted: Bullet Proof redirects to "Bulletproof (disambiguation)". The rule about linking through a "(disambiguation)" redirect does not apply to redirects to disambiguation pages: Do not create a double redirect, but make a redirect to the disambiguation page directly (thus Bill Cox, a redirect from an alternative name, redirects to the disambiguation page and does not go through the redirect William Cox (disambiguation)). Although it is permissible for this redirect to be made, it generally should not be linked to in an article for the same reasons direct links to disambiguation pages are discouraged. See Category:Redirects to disambiguation pages. Visualizing links to disambiguation pages Links to disambiguation pages can be displayed in orange in the settings under "Gadgets" by checking "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange". 2405:8D40:B11:10F3:8AD:80BD:ABF6:C201 (talk) 05:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

That's enwiki's guidelines. This is the Simple English Wikipedia. We don't have to always follow what they're doing. Don't copy paste guidelines on my talk page without giving context, I couldn't figure out what you were trying to say. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 05:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Reverting VIP

FYI you don’t have to revert your reports on WP:VIP. The admins do it by clicking on the “clear” button you see on the screen. This way it also doesn’t add to your reversions count either. In my archives there was a post from an admin for me to not do that as well so just wanted to let you know. PotsdamLamb (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

@PotsdamLamb thanks for the heads up. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 08:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Jertaker

hey, why you nominated Jertaker article for deletion? JoseReber (talk) 22:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

@JoseReber After reading the article, it appears that the subject is not notable, and does not meet the notability requirements to be included in Wikipedia. Please read the General Notability Guideline for more information about notability. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:28, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

okay JoseReber (talk) 22:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Tags

Hey please do not undue my tags for canvassing, etc. They are there for a reason and they can be repeated as a reminder, especially when the RfA becomes as long as that one. Please reinstate the tags that you removed. I am asking you respectfully to stop reverting my changes, as this is not the first time you have undone my work. Thank you! PotsdamLamb (talk) 22:54, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

@PotsdamLamb that wasn't your tags I removed, they were added to my, your, Rubbish Computer, and IP172's comments by another IP user, which I construe as being done in bad-faith. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 22:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

 Self-whale...for when a trout just isn't enough - I am so, so sorry! PotsdamLamb (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

@PotsdamLamb That's alright :) — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 23:10, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

How to Play Golf

Did you want to expand the article? I put it up for QD and the IP who created it removed the notice and I was doing the revert and got a conflict with your version. If so, that is cool. They are making articles that are just one sentence or even just part of the sentence coming from enWP. PDL^{Talk to me!}_{OMG, What have I done?} 02:39, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

@PotsdamLamb yes, I'm still working on it. I've dealt with them before when they were making large copy and pastes from the English Wikipedia, they will persistently remove any QD tag. Looks like they're now creating low quality articles instead of copy pastes. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Disney_and_television_copy_pastes. It's a waste of our time to patrol articles like these honestly. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Here is one example of such ZooMoo. So then maybe just VIP them :) PDL^{Talk to me!}_{OMG, What have I done?} 02:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

already did. this is block evasion anyway: Special:Contributions/2603:8001:1900:2128:0:0:0:0/64. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Yeah I saw :) are you on IRC? PDL^{Talk to me!}_{OMG, What have I done?} 02:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

@PotsdamLamb I use IRC, though I don't keep it open. I can hop in IRC right now. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

No all good. I can just add an alert for if we are ever on at the same time. I have to go start making dinner. PDL^{Talk to me!}_{OMG, What have I done?} 02:51, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Publish a Wikipedia Content.

Thank you for correcting! I regret that someone from my team actually tried to manipulate the existing article for “Charles Shobraj”. We are looking forward to upload and create a new Article on “Aniket Dey” hence would be much obliged if you can assist in the same.

Regard, Mohit Rana Ranawillwin (talk) 08:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Ranawillwin Hi and welcome to Simple Wikipedia! Your statement above concerns me when you say “my team” and “we are looking forward..” So you know, we do have a guideline called Conflict of Interest that I encourage you to read. I am not accusing you of such things but I am encouraging you to read it and if it applies to you, to please follow the instructions on the page! PDL^{Talk to me!}_{OMG, What have I done?} 08:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Hey Hey

Looks like we overwrote each other. I removed the QD since they added wait and put it in RfD. Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2022/Birmal Hembram(Writer) PDL^{Talk to me!}_{OMG, What have I done?} 00:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

{{ygm}} PDL^{Talk to me!}_{OMG, What have I done?} 00:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Replied email and rfd. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 00:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)