User talk:ONaNcle/failed 2007 AND 2008 RfA

Active discussions

Good luck and happy editing! -  BrownE34  talk  contribs  20:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

fr Cet utilisateur a pour langue maternelle le français.
en-2 This user is able to contribute with an intermediate level of English.


Please do not blank pages. This is seen as vandalism. If you feel that an article should be deleted, you can list it at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion. 23rd Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Kama has been listed there already. You can vote on it if you like at the RfD page. Directions on how to list an article for deletion can also be found at that page. Thank you. · Tygartl1·talk· 17:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Why are you repeatedly blanking pages? Sean William 16:28, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
I gave my reasons in the Edit summary Sean... I guess you had your own reasons to restore it... but you forgot to tell the communauty about them. Let me suggest you to follow User:Tygartl1 advice above and both vote and explain why keep this nazi creation. ONaNcle 18:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Just because no pages link to it doesn't mean that it should be blanked. If you feel it should be deleted, you can mark it for deletion using the directions on Wikipedia:Requests for deletion. Do not blank any more pages. Thank you. · Tygartl1·talk· 19:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Repetitive changesEdit

Some users operate Bots that will go through and make repetitive changes like what you are doing with the "Other Websites" sections. You are of course free to continue making those changes, but, if you wanted, you could hold off and let the bots make those changes. If you wanted to ask a bot owner to make the changes or wanted more info on bots, see Wikipedia:Bots. Didn't know if you would be interested or not. Thanks -  BrownE34  talk  contribs  19:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

The articles you have recently created are vandalism and this is not acceptable on any Wikipedia. Please stop. If you continue creating inappropriate pages like Ringworm, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thanks.-- Creol(talk) 06:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Now that you saw I was careful to follow sysops advices ...
13:09, 25 May 2007 Browne34 (Talk | contribs) deleted
"25 november 1993" (blanking doesn't get rid of the page though and
gives the admin more steps to see the content to see if it really doesn't make sense) 
... may I blank in my own User Page all the texts related to the specific policy of your wiki ? ONaNcle 14:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of AdviceEdit

I am restoring TygartL1’s advice to you. It was in good faith, did not demand you restore your talk page, and was civil in the fact that deleting such content could cause others to believe you have something to hide. Further, your edit summary borderlines on a civility violation. Advice from Administrators may be unwelcome in your book, but I advise you to not be reckless in your actions or you may become “persona non grata” on this wiki. Consider this a warning. It is not subject to your deletion. Thank you. -  BrownE34  talk  contribs  21:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The two warnings, one from me and one from Creol cannot be deleted. As far as removing the rest, I wouldn’t recommend it. It makes it look as if you are trying to hide things. The best thing you could do would be to continue to make good edits and after time the problems would be thought as a learning time and a thing of the past. I guess you could also archive your talk page as well, making sure there was a link to the archived material. -  BrownE34  talk  contribs  15:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Most of the controversial texts inside my own page were mine ;-))) and you'll soon notice that I've just been removing most of them. The Creol warning has been moved just below yours. I agree with you about learning time not to stay any longer as far as it can be archived in the page history. ONaNcle 11:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

External linksEdit

By the way, ONaNcle, proper Wikipedia term for the links is "external links", so if you're changing them in the future, please write "external links" instead of "other websites". Nishkid64 (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

It's actually Other websites here... :) Majorly (hot!) 20:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


Hello ONaNcle, I have quite undemocratically decided to keep the article, so it can be renamed, and be a basis for work. This looks very much like prefix notation to me. As a side-note, I think prefix- and postfix-notation are probably more widely used than Polish notation and Reverse Polish Notation (therefore redirect from one to the other). I have also created a page Mathematical notation which tries to give the full picture; it would therefore be good to perhaps use the same category. Do not fear to ask, if you need help with it. --Eptalon 21:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


I've now closed your RfA as unsuccessful. Please feel free to apply again when you feel you are ready. Thanks, Archer7 - talk 17:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

a bit late :-) --vector ^_^ (talk) 19:22, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


Do not nominate me for adminship. I am not ready yet. Maybe in a couple of months. Also, why is Jessicagirl blocked and why did Tdxiang leave? j. rand|talk| ε contribs|email 03:15, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

At User_talk:Ionas68224#Your_message_to_Tdxiang a sysop has answered you also about Jessycagirl much better than I could have it myself. ONaNcle 07:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Username pronounciationEdit

How is your user name pronounced? (In IPA, please). j. rand|talk| ε contribs|email 17:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

First time I wonder about it ;-))) When I'm speaking to myself, I say it the French way (with an nasalized) but I'd appreciate someone suggests the best British way. ONaNcle 08:28, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for undeletionEdit

Dear ONaNcle,

You didn't make a well formatted reuqest here. I reverted it, and ask you to make the request again, but following the format of the Request for undeletion page. Thanks, - Huji reply 12:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for voting on my 2nd RfAEdit

Template Link FAEdit

I have checked three article from which you removed this template. They all seem to qualify for the FA template status. -- Barliner  talk  12:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Page blankingEdit

Instead of just blanking the pages of nonsense articles please mark them with the Template {{QD}}. This will put them in a special category and and a bot will draw attention to them on IRC. Thanks-- Barliner  talk  13:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

In that sense Simple is very peculiar against most other wikis. That's why, as soon as in my first RfA, I've declined using both deleting and blocking options. Anyway, to become much more useful here, I need other tools such as the UWP one. ONaNcle 13:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

The UWP tool? what do you mean-- Barliner  talk  13:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

You removed Barliner's question above (about UWP) and I reverted it back. This is my question too. What do you mean by UWP tool exactly? - Huji reply 14:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
By the way, it is not a good practice to remove other's comments from your talk page. Read more here to see why archiving is preferd. - Huji reply 14:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Looking back, he means UnWatched Pages. I've never actually seen that abbreviation before and it looks like no-one else has either, so it might be a good idea just to call it "unwatched pages". Archer7 - talk 19:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


I write a message for you here, please, read it :)! good work on, --vector ^_^ (talk) 17:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Already done   ... It shows that at least one sysop had read all my stuff about UWP... ONaNcle 17:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Reply to your message left on my talk pageEdit

On you can check I'm rated #18 (only #43 here on Simple) on another wikipedia wiki where I never applied as admin. Therefore, you made a wrong guess saying in Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ONaNcle that I "have shown no need for the tools" especially the UWP one. BTW, could you manage to protect my talk page since I'm taking a long wikibreak because exhausted after fighting all those people against me. ONaNcle (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Razor was saying that you have not demonstrated a need for the tools here. That is something you have not fully rebutted. Also, Razor is not an admin; ask AE to protect the page. Cassandra 07:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
My previous queries were told nonsense :-))) by AE. ONaNcle (talk) 13:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
I just said to ask Creol, for he was the one that deleted it. Here was what was in the page I deleted, "04:28, 19 May 2007 Creol (Talk | changes) deleted "Planets in discovery order" ‎ (Merged to solar system)" - that was it. If you would like to have your previous work restored, ask Creol. Cheers -- AmericanEagle (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
In response to your message that you left on my talk page, I do not take into account any actions or what you have done on any other Wikipedia other than this one when I am considering someone for adminship. I only take into consideration what you have done for the Simple English Wikipedia and what you haven't done and how active you have been. That is the basis for my vote in your request for adminship. Cheers, Razorflame 20:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Not only Creol but any other sysop could have resumed not the restoration work but the fusion one on my own text on planets removed from the "history". About the need for the tools, I've been trying to be more explicit this morning here ONaNcle (talk) 08:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


(The anonymized paste-copy below is included in a global QD and will soon disappear ; if you are referring to those texts, please don't mention who is YYYYYY because even if it is obvious this week it won't be in several months ; I keep those two texts as a reference thinking about my Summer 2009 RfA) ONaNcle (talk) 06:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
  1. Even if this serious user is slightly below the 1000 edits mark, he must not feel the need to leave or, such as Razorflame or me, work on another sister project but, considering we do have enough stewards and bureaucrats, be given at least a One-Month-Trial period as a sysop. ONaNcle (talk) 08:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
    Post-scriptum: YYYYYY is now slightly above this one thousand edits mark, as well as User:Runningblader and myself. His edits are more complete than my average ones but, even before the sock-puppet controversy below, he was already below the 50% vote ratio and I can't then hope soon become an admin. Trust me : it's too hard to work without not especially the destructive ones (protect/del/block) but the informative sysops tools. That's why I'll end browsing alphabetically (ten letters already done) my watchlist before my next long wikibreak. ONaNcle (talk) 20:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
About sockpuppetsEdit

Is the lesson here simply to not disclose who you are when editing other projects and to hide it, removing all traces of accountablility? Cassandra 07:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

YYYYYY did not hide his sockpuppetry and XXXXXX has easily found him. Myself, many months from now, I told a Simple bureaucrat about my ancient aliases (about 50,000 edits). If I don't unveil it to everybody, it is not because I'm afraid about Simple Users' reactions, but just to avoid the risk to attract outsiders who could perturb our nice Simple way of life. ONaNcle (talk) 08:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
I withdraw this RfA. YYYYYY 20:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


Apologies if I am not following etiquette by posting this here, but on your RFA you posted:

Futhermore, CheckUser over here proved I did not use muplital accounts to oppose a RfA, as accussed here by XXXXXX. -- YYYYYY 20:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

However, I just want to point out that the link you provided actually neither proved or disproved your innocence or guilt - the other account was created using an open proxy, so there was no way of knowing whether it was you controlling the account or not. ZZZZZZ 22:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Unless I made about 50,000 edits on different wikis, the same stupid argument was done when I was banned from an important wiki. Someone using proxies was doing vandalism on the entries I was the most proud of and the CU said it was obviously me. When it happened, I was of course very angry (my talk page was blocked at the same time) but the YYYYYY story, months after my own story, now makes me laugh remembering me the Einstein aphorism (I know only the French version) about the depth of human stupidity. ONaNcle (talk) 05:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent editEdit

I have just reverted the edit you made here. It is still a stub as it is calculated based on the amount of readable text in the article. Although there is the infobox code, that does not remove it from stub status. Thanks, Chenzw  Talk  11:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Answered here. ONaNcle (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

QD taggingEdit

Hello, you have been tagging pages for quick deletion with the reason "dazibao". Can you give an explanation? Thanks. Chenzw  Talk  12:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

It's an old story from 2007. I used then to do QD:sandbox that were not understood but the dazibao one worked better : in French (my native language) dazibao has not the Chinese meaning and is used only when a vandal is tagging walls. ONaNcle (talk) 12:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA planningEdit

Hi ONaNcle. I noticed above you said something about having a summer 2009 RfA? Well, just for you to keep in mind, it is frowned for users to plan RfAs, like saying I'll try an RfA in March or something. If you are going to try an RfA, you have to try when your ready to try one. If you plan an RfA, it will most likely be opposes and snowed on. And by the way, if users want to become an administrator, they have to show they would be a good one, like tagging articles for quick deletion correctly and reporting users to vandalism in process. If you have any questions, you can always ask. Thanks! -- RyanCross (talk) 07:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

My reply here. -- Ryan†Cross (talk) 10:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "ONaNcle/failed 2007 AND 2008 RfA".