Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback/Archives/2009/April/Done


I've been here for quite awhile now, and I come on pretty often. It's getting kind of annoying reverting with just the "undo" button (I miss my Twinkle! :() So, I've changed my mind because I come here everyday now. Thanks! :) Papercutbiology♫ (talk)) 12:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Done - Enjoy...--Eptalon (talk) 12:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
After the discussion last time, I have decided to wait out the full week. It has now been a week. Thanks in advance! Razorflame 16:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please wait the two more days. There are seven days in a week, not five. Majorly talk 16:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I could have sworn that it's been a week already....if it hasn't then I am sorry for requesting this early! I could have sworn that it has been the full week. Sorry one again, Razorflame 16:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested too early. Sorry! Razorflame 16:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Done I have regranted both you and The Obento Musubi rollback, Please do not use rollback abusively again. Just so you know, if it is removed again for abuse; you will have to wait longer to get it back. Good luck! fr33kman talk 00:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am a rollbacker on English Wikipedia (See my userpage here) and want to contribute more on Simple.  Mm40(talk | contribs)  18:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  DoneJuliancolton | Talk 18:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have rollbacker on en.wikipedia, see here Arctic Fox 18:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Not done I'd like to see more time and experience here on Simple English Wikpedia. Things are, well, a little different here and you need to assure others that you aren't too trigger-happy. Definitely a good sign that you're a rollbacker on en.wiki, but here we have one change every three minutes, there it's three changes every second. Right now you can easily use Undo... Hope you understand. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment: I'm sorry to budge in, but it seems to me the guidelines say that if you have rollback somwhere else you get it automaticly. Anyway, Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 17:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Done Indeed. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, (well I'm not the one who should be thanking you), but thanks for doing it fast =). Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 18:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I looked in the page history, and found this comment by User:Yotcmdr. Since I have rollback on en.wikipedia... (verify) Dylan620 (Sign this plz) 23:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Done, since you're already trusted with the tool elsewhere. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 21:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Done PeterSymonds (talk) 21:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment: Err, what happened to my reason? I typed in "*{{subst:rfp|Inferno, Lord of Penguins|Already a rollbacker at en-wiki, and the tool may be useful to me here as well.}} ~~~~ "... is that normal, or do I have reason to believe the world is coming to a sudden death by lorem ipsum? Inferno, Lord of Penguins 21:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You probably hit = instead of - in your reasoning. That's my best guess. If the reasoning is left blank (or you have an equals sign) it defaults to {{lorem}}. EhJJTALK 22:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would seem right...except, I copied the text (with Ctrl-C) before I saved, and the text above is the same text I typed in. Quite a mystery this is. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 22:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... either gremlins or the lorem ipsum cabal, but I've probably said too much... EhJJTALK 23:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]