I need rollback so I can revert vandalism faster and in case there's too many vandalism revision. There is no even need to leave an edit summary. Kaseng55 (talk) 05:06, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaseng55 Twinkle works even with rollback rights it still puts in the edit summary. I use it as well. Again it’s just my opinion, the final decision is up to an admin. But I believe we do have certain criteria to meet which should be on the main page for permissions. Da LambTalk to me!OMG, What have I done?05:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I don't see much history of vandalism fighting yet, but I do see evidence of edit warring on Twinkie. You're welcome to ask again when you've done more of that. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:53, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Auntof6 That was a lot of us. GRC was around and I was on IRC with admins so as he triggered filters I let them know so he could be blocked. He settled for a bit then came back. Jiniffer is back too. I know it’s not a yay or nay from us but I just wanted to point out to the editor about the requirements to become one. Da LambTalk to me!OMG, What have I done?06:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000 and PotsdamLamb: Still edit warring to some extent. It is technically allowed in m:WMFBAN but it is a huge waste of your own time and gives him more attention by flooding the page history. If you want, best thing to do is ignore him. Follow block, revert, ignore, because he edit wars. Don't want to discourage you from vandal fighting but my advice with GRP for the most part is just let an admin get to it. They will be able to bot rollback it which will hide it from recent changes and waiting for an admin to come around will stop making messes like this. Reverting him alone is literally no use and does more harm than good. If you want any more detail then feel free to email me but I don't think any more detail is necessary here. --Ferien2 (talk) 21:49, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]