Welcome change

Hello, Aelahmann3333360, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will show your username and the date.

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.

Good luck and happy changing! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 change

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Your changes to the page Nigger worked, but because it had things in it which did not help improve the page, it was reverted or removed. If you would like to do more tests on Wikipedia, please use the sandbox. You may also want to read the welcome page to learn about helping the Simple English Wikipedia. Thank you. BRP ever 05:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for undoing your recent test with the page "User talk:BRPever". Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about changing our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not make tests on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. Auntof6 (talk) 06:54, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Template:Block request change

 

An editor has requested deletion of Template:Block request, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2018/Template:Block request and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 07:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Template:Protection request change

 

An editor has requested deletion of Template:Protection request, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Hey! But I usually request pages to be protected if they have excessive vandalism. I don't want it to be deleted!

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2018/Template:Protection request and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notice change

Please read WP:ONESTRIKE. This applies to you. Vermont (talk) 04:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 change

Do not remove RfD tags from pages being discussed for deletion. Thank you, Vermont (talk) 04:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make test edits, use the sandbox. Vermont (talk) 04:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  This user is asking to become an administrator on Wikipedia:

Reason: I was very good on Wikipedia. I did not disrupt Wikipedia at any point. I was reverting vandalism on Wikipedia.

Quick deletion of User:Farfegnugen change

 

The page you wrote, User:Farfegnugen, has been selected for quick deletion for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the specific reasons. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Hiàn (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test changes to Wikipedia articles. This is seen as vandalism. If you continue to make tests on articles, you can be blocked from changing pages on Wikipedia. If you would like to do more tests, please use the sandbox. Unless in your userspace or in the sandbox, please stop with the testing edits. They are not needed in any way. Hiàn (talk) 05:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey! But I want to become an administrator, which means I create a bot that does good edits; like creating userpages. Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in line with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating WP:ONESTRIKE after being warned to stop vandalizing. If you think this block is unfair, you may ask to be unblocked by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private, please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked. Auntof6 (talk) 08:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
 

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aelahmann3333360 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely by Auntof6 for violating WP:ONESTRIKE. I promise I won't vandalize Wikipedia anymore and I promise I won't violate WP:ONESTRIKE again. I will have useful contributions, which will be better than reverting vandalism. For example, I will add good information in pages. And if I am accidentally blocked because my IP address was used by a blocked user, I will not panic. Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 21:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No compelling or substantial reason to expect different behavior to justify unblock at this time. Operator873talkconnect 21:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Aelahmann3333360, I received the email you sent me asking to be unblocked, and I'm answering here. I also decline to unblock you, for the same reasons given above. If you make any further unblock requests, please make them on your talk page instead of emailing, unless you lose access to your talk page. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

How do I make a working unblock request? Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 22:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aelahmann3333360 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)


Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely by Auntof6 for violation of WP:ONESTRIKE. The block is no longer necessary because I no longer violate policies. I will have useful contributions, which will be much better than reverting large-scale vandalism. Aelahmann3333360 (talk) 23:04, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You no longer violate policies because you can't: you're blocked. I'll also note that you're currently blocked on two wikis, and warned on a third. Thus, it does not seem that you will make constructive changes if unblocked. -- Vermont (talk) 23:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

I received the second email you sent me. I still decline to unblock you. If you want to make any further unblock requests, you need to use the process described in the block notice above: make the request on your talk page if you can, otherwise send email to the email address listed in the block notice. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply