NulledLeak
Welcome
change| Welcome, NulledLeak! | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Caution concerning your use of Huggle
changeHi NulledLeak, my name is Chris (DaneGeld) and I'm a regular editor here. I'd like to draw your attention to your edits using the Huggle anti-vandalism tool. I noticed earlier today, you undid edits by one of our administrators, Oshwah, when they reported vandalism at Vandalism in Progress. Not only that, but you then left a templated message on their userpage.
I would like to caution you that you as a user are responsible for every single edit you perform with Huggle. It's not intended for new users, and requires some degree of getting used to. Misuse of the tool can get you banned. While I would not wish to discourage you from your anti-vandalism and reversion work, I would suggest you hold off on using Huggle for now, and get some experience under your belt before you carry on. If you want to start with anything, wait a few more days and try Twinkle. It's a bit easier, but you still need to read our policies and rules to make sure what you're doing is right.
I would also like to make you aware that leaving template messages on the pages of regular users is strongly discouraged - a general rule of Wikipedia is Don't template the regulars. If you see something you think is wrong with an edit made by one of our users or administrators, visit their talk page and talk to them directly. Template warnings are very impersonal and come across sometimes as rude, especially when the user has actually done nothing wrong!
If you have any questions, please ask them here. I will mark your page on my watchlist, so I'll be notified when you edit it.
Regards, DaneGeld (talk) 20:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- For the record: I'm not an administrator on simple-wiki ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- I apologise, @Oshwah:. I had seen comments on your talk page, saying you'd banned people, and assumed that was the case! Sorry :) DaneGeld (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- No apologies are needed, DaneGeld :-). I adding a note here just so the user wouldn't mistakenly believe me to be one. No big deal ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
- I apologise, @Oshwah:. I had seen comments on your talk page, saying you'd banned people, and assumed that was the case! Sorry :) DaneGeld (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
??? Clubs of football world champions
changeI'm the creator of this page.--188.153.146.111 (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Use of Huggle
changeAs a followup to DaneGeld's post above, it's vital not to press any wrong buttons when using Huggle. I'd advise you not to use Huggle here until you have gained enough experience with reverting vandalism. You have reverted several perfectly fine edits already. Please remember continual bad edits such as this can lead to you being blocked. Regards, hiàn 22:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
(machine translated/máquina traducida) Como seguimiento de la publicación anterior de DaneGeld, es vital no presionar ningún botón incorrecto al usar Huggle. Te aconsejo que no uses a Huggle aquí hasta que hayas adquirido suficiente experiencia para revertir el vandalismo. Ya ha revertido varias ediciones perfectamente finas. Por favor, recuerda las malas ediciones continuas como esta pueden llevarte a ser bloqueado. Saludos, hiàn 22:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Temporary ban on using Huggle
changeYour use of Huggle here has been very disruptive. In many cases, you have used it to revert edits that were good. Therefore, I am issuing you a temporary ban on using Huggle. I am going to delete and salt your Huggle configuration page. If you demonstrate by other means that you can be a constructive editor and revert only bad edits, then in three months you can ask for Huggle ability to be given back and the configuration page to be restored. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Quick deletion of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NulledLeak
change
The page you wrote, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NulledLeak, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page Cannot become an administrator because you are 1 month of activity.. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here.
Unblock request
change
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
NulledLeak (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)
Request reason:
Im interested administrator.
Decline reason:
User is not currently blocked. -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
An editor has requested deletion of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NulledLeak, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2018/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NulledLeak and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. DaneGeld (talk) 17:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Your request for adminship
changeIf this is a serious request, you need to list it on the requests page. I'll let you figure out how to do that, because a prospective admin should be able to figure it out.
If it's not a serious request, then please let us know so that we can close it, and please don't create this kind of test page.. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
quick deletion
changeI noticed that you've nominated {{Newoe}} for deletion due to it being vandalism. As a note, such pages are eligible for quick deletion. You can mark such pages with the tag {{qd}}. --Ixfd64 (talk) 20:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Your recent undo
changeBoth RfAs have already been closed by a bureaucrat. Do not attempt to restore them again. Chenzw Talk 13:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Your changes are causing disruption to the project and this is not acceptable. Please stop. If your disruption continues, you will be blocked from changing Wikipedia. Chenzw Talk 13:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
NulledLeak (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)
Request reason:
Please, unblock and see this message block. Sorry about that. --NulledLeak (talk) 13:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Too many disruptive changes with no sign that user wants to contribute constructively. Besides being indefinitely blocked on other Wikipedias, user is also globally locked (as a vandalism-only account), so unblocking here would have no effect. Besides all that, user hasn't given a meaningful reason to unblock. -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:40, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Why are you impersonating me? I didn't leave the blocked message on your user talk. Chenzw Talk 13:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)